What is the difference to the mathematical science

Post by bassam king karzeddin
Dear All
What is the difference to the mathematical science If
any mathematician publishes a correct results or
correct theorems here or in a very reputable journal
or in any site say for example (kitchen food stuff)
as long as it has suitable title and is true science
and have correct URL and can be easily found by the
searchers on the internet
I think there is no difference at all
I'M I RIGHT
Thanking you
Bassam Karzeddin

I can think of several differences:
1. Professional mathematicians are far more likely to read journals than look at websites like thise one.

2. Since papers in journals are not surrounded by non-sense, it is much easier to find them.

3. Since papers in journals are "peer refereed", they mathematicians can have more confidence in their results.

bassam king karzeddin

2018-02-13 17:57:33 UTC

1. Professional mathematicians are far more likely to read journals than look at websites like thise one.
2. Since papers in journals are not surrounded by non-sense, it is much easier to find them.
3. Since papers in journals are "peer refereed", they mathematicians can have more confidence in their results.

Is it really that different? it seems almost not at all, for sure

BKK

Simon Roberts

2018-02-13 18:17:34 UTC

1. Professional mathematicians are far more likely to read journals than look at websites like thise one.
2. Since papers in journals are not surrounded by non-sense, it is much easier to find them.

I think they may many time be surrounded and be nonsense, don't you?

Post by G.E. Ivey
3. Since papers in journals are "peer refereed", they mathematicians can have more confidence in their results.

The premise is that true math is sometimes here and not in journals. peer reviewed, PROPER or not. A truth is a truth. Forget exposure, right? I've tried and have been flat out rejected, think about THAT.

Simon Roberts

2018-02-13 18:25:53 UTC

1. Professional mathematicians are far more likely to read journals than look at websites like thise one.
2. Since papers in journals are not surrounded by non-sense, it is much easier to find them.

I think they may many time be surrounded and be nonsense, don't you?

Post by G.E. Ivey
3. Since papers in journals are "peer refereed", they mathematicians can have more confidence in their results.

AND do you think only MATH (bullshit math or not) is without sense, douche?

Simon Roberts

2018-02-13 18:27:24 UTC

1. Professional mathematicians are far more likely to read journals than look at websites like thise one.
2. Since papers in journals are not surrounded by non-sense, it is much easier to find them.

I think they may many time be surrounded and be nonsense, don't you?

Post by G.E. Ivey
3. Since papers in journals are "peer refereed", they mathematicians can have more confidence in their results.

AND do you think only MATH (bullshit math or not) is without NON-sense, douche?

Simon Roberts

2018-02-13 18:29:53 UTC

1. Professional mathematicians are far more likely to read journals than look at websites like thise one.

So?

Post by G.E. Ivey
2. Since papers in journals are not surrounded by non-sense, it is much easier to find them.
3. Since papers in journals are "peer refereed", they mathematicians can have more confidence in their results.

They should have much less confidence. No?

Simon Roberts

bassam king karzeddin

2018-02-20 15:46:10 UTC

1. Professional mathematicians are far more likely to read journals than look at websites like thise one.

So?

They should have much less confidence. No?
Simon Roberts

I don't think that they have any confidence nowadays, for sure

Their confidence was solely based on beliefs, and they mostly got it now, sure

BKK

Zelos Malum

2018-02-21 08:44:47 UTC

1. Professional mathematicians are far more likely to read journals than look at websites like thise one.

So?

They should have much less confidence. No?
Simon Roberts

I don't think that they have any confidence nowadays, for sure
Their confidence was solely based on beliefs, and they mostly got it now, sure
BKK

Considering there is nothing that shows a contradiction in mathematics, the confidence is very high.

It is believed that ZFC is consistent and strongly so as we have tried finding a single contradiction for a hundred years and all attempts ahve failed.

bassam king karzeddin

2019-04-30 15:36:40 UTC

Post by Zelos Malum

1. Professional mathematicians are far more likely to read journals than look at websites like thise one.

So?

They should have much less confidence. No?
Simon Roberts

I don't think that they have any confidence nowadays, for sure
Their confidence was solely based on beliefs, and they mostly got it now, sure
BKK

Considering there is nothing that shows a contradiction in mathematics, the confidence is very high.
It is believed that ZFC is consistent and strongly

So you only are saying it clearly, say it again and loudly, please

Post by Zelos Malum
It is believed that ZFC is consistent and strongly

Yes, it is believed..., you are right this time

Post by Zelos Malum
so as we have tried finding a single contradiction for a hundred years and all attempts ahve failed.

Really, did you try? wonder! who else did try? no wonder!

Of course, there is not only single contradictions but so many you are too blind to see, and more precisely closing your eyes and mind and refusing to see, FOR SURE

Dumbo
BKK

FredJeffries

2019-04-30 15:54:46 UTC

Post by Zelos Malum
It is believed that ZFC is consistent and strongly

Yes, it is believed..., you are right this time

Post by Zelos Malum
so as we have tried finding a single contradiction for a hundred years and all attempts ahve failed.

Really, did you try? wonder! who else did try? no wonder!

The efforts of late Edward Nelson were the most well-known:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edward_Nelson
https://web.math.princeton.edu/~nelson/

bassam king karzeddin

2019-04-30 16:04:36 UTC

Post by FredJeffries

Post by Zelos Malum
It is believed that ZFC is consistent and strongly

Yes, it is believed..., you are right this time

Post by Zelos Malum
so as we have tried finding a single contradiction for a hundred years and all attempts ahve failed.

Really, did you try? wonder! who else did try? no wonder!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edward_Nelson
https://web.math.princeton.edu/~nelson/

So, did they succeed?
BKK

bassam king karzeddin

2019-04-28 12:38:23 UTC

Post by bassam king karzeddin
Dear All
What is the difference to the mathematical science If any mathematician publishes a correct results or correct theorems here or in a very reputable journal or in any site say for example (kitchen food stuff) as long as it has suitable title and is true science and have correct URL and can be easily found by the searchers on the internet
I think there is no difference at all
I'M I RIGHT
Thanking you
Bassam Karzeddin

bassam karzeddin

2023-08-10 02:06:32 UTC