Post by John GabrielPost by bassam king karzeddinPost by Dan ChristensenPost by bassam king karzeddinPost by Dan ChristensenPost by bassam king karzeddinThey are still away from public attention and higher authorities concern, for many crimes they committed against the human mind
I really hate the word murder, never supporting any kind of violence or hatred issues among people, but I do believe that they do deserve a good treatment, since they are innocent humans after all, and I am quite sure once they are completely cured and get completely healed, then they would do something useful for the societies they belong to, and finally to the whole world, instead of expanding the well formed ignorance to be faster than expansion of the big ban explosion
So, not necessarily death camps, but re-education camps to be "cured?" Not sure that JG will agree with you on that.
Not at all for death camps, but yes for true enlightenment and good education, and never mind who agrees or not,
John Gabriel represent a rare case where his talent is widely denied, which drives him to say many mad things,
I never said anything about death camps. That was a forged post. Please don't believe ANYTHING this lying troll DC tells you. Almost everything on his libel list is a lie or distortion.
Forged posts happened to me also long ago (around 10 years ) in sci.math – Drexel, (with someone fabricating many posts in my name, by making new profile with my name, where Quasi immediately could recognize him as a thief, and also recently few posts were forged in my name, but I did notify them
Link: http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?threadID=1732934&messageID=6190543#6190543
Post by John GabrielPost by bassam king karzeddinhe still can not recognize that accepting some of his views would certainly ruin so many top mathematicians in this field,
But of course I realise this Bassam. I have been saying this long before I ever met you!
Yes you did, even I did long ago and realized how huge the problem is,
Post by John GabrielPost by bassam king karzeddinand the whole issue would turn to be political issue among nations, since some nations claim falsely and unofficially that they are more cleverer than others by their peculiar race,
Today's modern Greeks are not particularly smart. However, the Ancient Greeks were intelligent beyond belief. This is a fact, not a myth.
I do not think that the Ancient Greeks were intelligent beyond belief, they indeed missed many things (for sure), at least (for me) , where my theorems stated here in sci.math and elsewhere in Quora, or MSE, were not recognized by them, where there was not any objection to be recognized so easily from their era only
And still, many other theorems are certainly there (unknown), where I feel lazy to teach them, since I know for sure that true knowledge seekers are few or very rare and they are scattered over centuries, but self seekers are so plenty and many are secretly working
Post by John GabrielPost by bassam king karzeddinand imagine someone proves them so stupid and so inferior to others, so this is really a big issue that would take long time to be settled by the truly the wise people from all the planet, since it is commonly now a global education, and the basis of this sensitivity is actually so silly, because the whole knowledge is exceptionally from the all human on this planet which was accumulated from very old history up to our date
Rather than admit error and correct themselves, they would rather live a lie. They have no values or morals.
Yes, the vast majority of the modern professional academics are truly, selfish, greedy, enviers and so shameless beyond imaginations with no self respect, adding the BIG unlimited stupidity to their inherited traits, then obviously no values or any morals remains
They do believe only in authorized mathematics (even if they cannot comprehend it), (Example: FLT proof)
That is why I wrote many times that, the magnitude of a skilled football player young boy now a days is much more worth than all their accumulative magnitude including their brain masters ancestors, not to compare with singers or famous actors or many other categories
Post by John GabrielPost by bassam king karzeddinPost by Dan ChristensenWhat happens if, even after 20 years imprisonment -- ooops... I mean "re-education" -- they still claim that 0.9999... = 1? Then, will it be off to the "showers?" Only as a last resort, right?
I do not think that would take this long time to be considered true as many people might think today, especially in our open word today, ideas can immediately fly from anyone to anyone else on this planet within a seconds, but still if some people would still think so, then it is up to them to live and die ignorants, and who says ignorance is only in mathematics?
or ignorance would ever seas?
Post by Dan ChristensenEspecially, that vast global ignorance was mostly inherited and never was their guilts basically, so they are actually victims and not criminals whom they indeed need everybody's help to be saved from all well established fictions
Post by bassam king karzeddinPost by Dan Christensen"It would be a very good idea to round up all the academic idiots, gas them and incinerate the useless lot. Only those that pass John Gabriel's exam should be allowed to live."
-- John Gabriel, July 13, 2014
No, no, the gassing idea is too horrible, nobody ever likes to be gassed so brutally, even this still happening up to our days, unfortunately under all attention of wise people on earth (see the wars in Syria - so unbelievable)
So, it would only be as a last resort?
It should not be
Post by Dan ChristensenPost by bassam king karzeddinPost by Dan Christensen“Hitler was a genius... As from a moral point of view, again his actions can't be judged, because his morals are different.” (Like JG's morals?)
-- John Gabriel March 18, 2015
Hitler was recognised globally as a war criminal against humanity
Don't look now, but JG must certainly be adding YOU to his list of enemies to be "re-educated"... or whatever.
It does not matter and you may had noticed that I still disagree with him so openly about the (irrational constructible numbers), where I do not mind losing if I truly can learn something new
I have explained this to you several times Bassam. It is not my idea but >that of my ancestors and sorry to tell you, but you are not even close to >them in intelligence.
Yes, but sorry to tell you that was not at all convincing, and not because you were wrong, but because the mathematics was foraged, once they started considering the cube root of two as a real existing number, despite so easy and rigorous proof by Euclidean of impossibility of such number
The Pythagoreans were cleverer than them, (Even this theorem originally realized by Babe lions),
Post by John GabrielTHERE IS NO SUCH THING AS A CONSTRUCTIBLE NUMBER.
http://youtu.be/B3AlAil5Crc
But we can so simply draw geometrically a triangle with (3, 4, 5), then is (5) a symptom of a number (5) only, or is it number (5) actually?
And sqrt(2) is not any number in RATIONAL numbers only, since it is indeed greater or smaller than any possible (rational or fractional or decimal representation), (smaller or greater would certainly never imply any equality)
Post by John GabrielA number is not constructed. It is a MEASURE.
There are indeed existing, not only by geometry but also in theory and in front of anybody eyes where one cannot deny, (visibly, physically, sensibly existing), but in their SURD form, and never in their infinite decimal representation (with integer proofs from my stated INEQUALITY), (That was the biggest foraged in the history of mathematics), which makes you right in your claims
And what does that suggest to you, a definition of a number you adopt from the Greeks is obviously wrong, since it cannot define something visibly and physically existing before eyes.
and a super definition must be adopted to contain all the existing numbers, and such definition I shall state it as the following:
“A number is an existing exact length on a straight line created from defined unity”
and not created in the current paradise of mathematicians (infinity)
Anybody is welcomed to refute it or modify it
Post by John GabrielPost by bassam king karzeddinWonder why did he choose well established numbers to refute despite so many other sets of well established numbers are so easily refutable as the set of complex numbers (including imaginary numbers), the set of transcendental numbers, the set of algebraic numbers, (I mean he can concentrate more on them and safely escape from so many traps), where the defence then is so weak to unbelievable degree, and later he can then attack those (Pythagoreans numbers), (the most difficult task),
since at least they have real existence as any rational numbers, (they are living amongst the rationals, side by side, and face to face, and shoulders to shoulder, even though, they can never be measured with rationals (or even infinite rationals) and that is why they were called (irrationals)
And rationals are not continuous (as he confessed), then what is connecting them?
I am forming an unexpected answer for this dilemma
Post by Dan ChristensenPost by bassam king karzeddinPost by Dan ChristensenYou two make a great team!
Dan
I really have no intention to make any team, but to rescue the new generations from the mind fictions that is waiting them definitely
But frankly, there are many mind criminals (at least in the unnoticible small world of mathematics) whom they did recognise the truth but insist to hide it and ignore it, for the sake of narrow purposes or self esteem or dignity
Salvation through re-education! Arbeit macht frei! Catchy slogans.
Dan
I really do not like any kind of salvation, and it is not clear enough to me what did you mean exactly!
You cannot discuss truth with a liar (DC). This troll is an immoral, dirty pedophile. He will lie and libel over and over again. Whenever you respond to his comments, you are an accomplice. Don't you understand this?
Please John, do not dictate me whom to reply and whom not to reply (this is basically my choice)
Because, I assume good faith in all people I reply, and my replies are not only directed only to people whom they discuss, but also the wise readers whom they can recognize who was a liar or who was honest, or who was wrong or right!, (so the purpose is educationally oriented)
Post by John GabrielNOTHING this troll says is true. NOTHING.
He reminds me of the lying FYRs (former Yugoslav republic) who think they are connected to the Macedonians.
It is a fact that NEVER in the history of man has the conqueror ever spoken the language of the conquered. Yet the lying Slavs, now claim that they forgot how to speak Greek.
The corrupt USA supports these sub-human liars.
There must be also honest people in USA and everywhere else, but they need to realize facts and require the courage to break their absolute silence
Post by John GabrielI hate the bastard DC. The lies and libel he spread about me I have had to explain to my previous employers is not true. Even just recently, there have been posts on sci.math that are forged. I did not post these.
How can I know so much truth if I am an immoral person? Ask yourself this.
Immorality increases with the magnitude of ignorance gained, and vanish with the magnitude knowledge acquired
I wish to make you and DC as good friends, and this would happen only if both of you really seek true knowledge and facts
I appreciate your tireless efforts to point out the well established errors and forged mathematics, where this would facilitate repairing the mathematics and free the Queen
Post by John GabrielI value truth and justice above everything else.
Yes, this must be the motto adopted by all the honest mathematicians on earth if they really want to be with considerable magnitudes like many other human categories
Post by John GabrielI hate this bastard queer Dan Christensen. To be honest, I would beat him within inches of his miserable worthless life if I could. I would do the same to Gilbert Strange. Both Christensen and Strang are confirmed pedophiles.
It is my opinion that ALL pedophiles should be shot. They do not deserve to live. If I had children and a pedophile touched any of them, I would end their lives - law or no law. How can you even discuss things with this pedophile Dan Christensen? Would you talk to a pedophile in normal circumstances? By talking to him, you consent that what he is doing cannot be bad.
Constructive general Critiques might be accepted as well, but hearted issues are really disturbing and useless,
He might be as well struggling so hard to convey his mathematics as you as you or anybody else,
Let us hope you both forgive each other's and make a new start new generations
Regards
Bassam King Karzeddin
25/02/17