Exposing the ignorance of the baboon called Port563.

[John Gabriel]

So the low IQ moron asked me a question and I humoured him.

The question he asked was this:

From YOUR perspective, which ONE of the following eight is not or was not a
great mathematician?

* Archimedes of Syracuse
* Nicolas Bourbaki
* Georg Cantor
* Richard Dedekind
* Erastothenes of Cyrene
* Pierre de Fermat
* John Gabriel
* David Hilbert

There should be a clear answer.

Let's analyse this to see what an imbecile is this dark skinned creature.

1. "Is or is not a great mathematician" is subjective and has no right or wrong answer.
2. He ends off by saying "There is a clear answer". Um, no. There is no clear answer.
3. The moron expected me to answer "Bourbaki", but Bourbaki was not a mathematician - *great or not great*. Baboon thought he had stated the question in such a way that it was impossible not to answer Bourbaki.

I am of course light years ahead of the fool and he has yet to realise this. I doubt he ever will.

[Dan Christensen]

So the low...

What you should know about the Psycho Troll John Gabriel, in his own words:

JG's God Complex:

"I am the Creator of this galaxy."
-- March 19, 2015

"I am the last word on everything."
-- May 6, 2015

"Whatever I imagine is real because whatever I imagine is well defined."
-- March 26, 2015

"Unless I think it's logic, it's not... There are no rules in mathematics... As I have repeatedly stated, if there were to be rules, I'd be making the rules."
-- March 17, 2015


JG's Final Solution:

"Hitler was a genius and a very talented artist... As from a moral point of view, again his actions can't be judged, because his morals are different." (Like JG's morals?)
-- March 18, 2015

"I will point out a few facts about Hitler that most of you arrogant idiots didn't know or refused to acknowledge because your Jewish overlords do not allow you...

"Unfortunately, Hitler's henchmen got the wrong Jews...

(Note: When repeatedly asked if they should have gotten Jews like Albert Einstein, JG has refused to comment. You figure it out, folks.)

"It would be a very good idea to round up all the academic idiots, gas them and incinerate the useless lot. Only those that pass John Gabriel's exam should be allowed to live."
-- July 13, 2014

"All those who don't accept New Calculus, you better say goodbye to your kids... Because John Gabriel is coming." (Charming fellow.)
-- July 9, 2014


JG's Just Plain Stupid:

"1/0 is not undefined."
-- May 19, 2015

"1/3 does NOT mean 1 divided by 3 and never has meant that"
-- February 8, 2015

"The square root of 2 and pi are NOT numbers."
-- May 28, 2015

"By definition, a line is the distance between two points."
-- April 13, 2015

"So, 'is a member of' = 'is a subset of.'"
-- May 16, 2015

"There is no such thing as a continuous real number line."
-- March 24, 2015

"Indeed, there is no such thing as an instantaneous speed -- certainly not with respect to the calculus." (Note: Instantaneous speed is indicated by the speedometer in a car. Another Jewish conspiracy, JG?)
-- March 17, 2015

"Proofs had nothing to do with calculus."
-- May 30, 2015


In his wacky system, JG cannot even prove that 2+2=4. It seems unlikely he would have anything worthwhile to say about mathematics. On the contrary, it seems he is deliberately trying to mislead and confuse any newcomers here.

A special word of caution to students: Do not attempt to use JG's "system" in any course work in any high school, college or university on the planet. You will fail miserably. His system is certainly no "shortcut" to success in mathematics. It is truly a dead-end.


Dan

Download my DC Proof 2.0 software at http://www.dcproof.com
Visit my Math Blog at http://www.dcproof.wordpress.com

[Port563]

Post by John Gabriel
So the low IQ moron asked me a question and I humoured him.
From YOUR perspective, which ONE of the following eight is not or was not a
great mathematician?
* Archimedes of Syracuse
* Nicolas Bourbaki
* Georg Cantor
* Richard Dedekind
* Erastothenes of Cyrene
* Pierre de Fermat
* John Gabriel
* David Hilbert
There should be a clear answer.
Let's analyse this to see what an imbecile is this dark skinned creature.
1. "Is or is not a great mathematician" is subjective and has no right or wrong answer.
2. He ends off by saying "There is a clear answer". Um, no. There is no clear answer.
3. The moron expected me to answer "Bourbaki", but Bourbaki was not a
mathematician - *great or not great*.

Hahaha!

On his third incompetent attempt to talk himself out of this (Gabriel most
evidently did not know Bourbaki was not a human person), Baboon Boy has now
provided even more ammunition for the enjoyment of those of us who laugh at
his stupidity.

;-)

Baboon Boy's argument above is logically equivalent to claiming:

"A WOMAN IS A SHORT MAN."

How so, you might ask?

Well, using exactly the same logic as above, the Gabriel ""justification""
(sic) would be:

"Well, a woman is not a man at all, therefore it is false to state that a
woman is not a short man. So, a woman is a short man."

Hahaha!

So, you see, Bourbaki can be a "great mathematician", because "he" is not a
mathematician at all.

There you have the logic of this violent-fantasy-gripped baboon. (-;



And... They really must put (protected) microphones into your padded cell,
BB. Else, so much material will be lost.

(-;

Post by John Gabriel
Baboon thought he had stated the question in such a way that
it was impossible not to answer Bourbaki.
I am of course light years ahead of the fool and he has yet to
realise this. I doubt he ever will.

You will have years in which to persuade your imaginary friends that this is
the case, Baboon Boy. And hopefully the transcriptions of your
"conversations" can be sold.

(To think it took him so much time to work out Dan and I are one and the
same...)

[John Gabriel]

Baboon scat

Yawn.