On Wednesday, September 27, 2017 at 11:27:53 PM

tirsdag 26. september 2017 11.14.18 UTC+2 skrev

On Sunday, September 24, 2017 at 7:17:00 PM

On Thursday, November 24, 2016 at 5:50:05 PM

*Post by bassam king karzeddin*Why it is impossible to find a single

primitive Pythagorean triplet (in positive integers)

being with all terms as powerful numbers?

Just imagine how little and how so tiny and

how unnoticeable is the world of mathematicians for

sure

A new theorem had been stated since a long

time, not a single professional historian could claim

older sources nor a single genius mathematician could

also refute it, but still, doesn't count to be

adopted by any mathematical establishment, especially

that it is published in a Usenet as sci.math

As if the word publish means only in a

Journals, (not learning any lesson from

the history)

But just imagine if this (half line theorem

without a single mathematical notation) was announced

by a top known genius mathematician or an alleged top

(Journal or University), then how the mathematical

press would immediately act with so much music and so

many analysis with especially those many so

professional talents that acquire very long tongues

and deepest throats (that are good for something

else)

So where are they hiding now from this

simplest challenge? wonder!

Don't we live in an era of supercomputers

also? wonder!

I also announced a modest prize for you genius

mathematicians

Is it your so negligible and so unnoticeable

dignity that make you pretend to be deaf and so

blind? wonder!

Or is it the inherited dishonesty that the

vast majority of the professional mathematicians

acquire? no wonder!

Aren't you so shameful of your little

self-being as real traitors to the science that

feeds, drinks, and cloths you? wonder!

Or is it that your inferiority complex that

makes you have hated a lot of real challenges for the

sake of making easy baseless maths based on

non-existing concepts as many as here (infinities,

epsilon, delta, Approximations, famous meaningless

cut, Average, endless sequences, ...etc), wonder!

So, if this is the case then you really don't

need to worry at all, because you are dancing alone

in the dark

And just imagine the football world where a

little boy only scores a goal of a win in a

competitive football match, then see how the whole

world first-page coloured photos in newspapers, in

the world press, in every TV station, ... etc

Just compare yourself and certainly, you would

find yourself facing a mirror mathematicians, but

wait and don't break the mirror...

And I was only comparing you with a class of

another little category, and there are much higher

categories for sure

But why all this is happening with a class of

people who generally think that they were born genius

and very distinct from others, but the fact is really

shocking, but why?

It is because mathematicians had been deceived

and upset-minded for so many centuries by now for the

sake of worshipping some few devils that mislead them

globally, otherwise, if true mathematicians are

sufficient number, then they would never accept to be

less than the top leaders of this mad world that are

generally governed by mad people who can't even

comprehend a simplest theorem like the Pythagorean

even you assign the best teachers for them for all

their lives, and they will destroy the world over

your heads for sure

Just look and listen carefully around, but

those helpless wouldn't change their inevitable

destiny unless they learn the biggest unforgottable

lesson for sure

BKK

And observe carefully here the complete absence

in this thread of few well-known TROLLS (at least in

sci.math – Google) as (Dan, Jan, Markus, Zelos, … and

other so strange forgotten creatures), where at the

same time they, they usually do appear very often in

my other threads in many much less talkative topics

than real challenging mathematics as number theory

where generally any mathematician can say repeatedly

anything that he learnt blindly from books

I really wonder about those incomprehensible

characters

And I know that they would run away and hide

immediately once they read the first line, and not

because they don’t understand any big issue in

mathematics, but certainly because they have no word

to add here, and they would be so glad if anyone

could prove me wrong, and they would immediately

appear in this case

But here in such area, there isn’t any hope for

anyone to turn it down (for sure)

And not because that I can’t prove it, of

course, I can and (so easily), but my real intention

is to make my Theorems (which seem only as

Conjectures for you all) as a suitable and permanent

curse and real punishment for such common typo

mathematicians in the era of free word internet

publishing, which will soon invade and throw away the

official traditional publishing as peer-reviewed

Noting that, if the well-known Euler’s (sum of

powers wrong conjecture) was only announced today

then most likely it will be refuted in the same day

mainly due to computer engineers and mathematicians

programmers, but that actually took few centuries to

be refuted

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euler%27s_sum_of_powers_

conjecture

I also challenge all those (themselves) called

world Peer-reviewed (Top Journals and Universities)

to prove me wrong in any of my PUBLISHED theorems

In fact, I want to make a great fun of them

mainly for school students and another

non-professional-mathematicians, especially for

footballers and in the best area they feel so proud

(for sure)

Regards

Bassam King Karzeddin

Sep. 26, 2017

The answer is so easy that non here has thought you

were serious. It is not solved. If you have a

solution; give it.

KON

So, it is unsolved problem, and I don't know truly

y why one shouldn't be serious here

And if it isn't a truly unsolvable problem, then why

y the mathematical establishments announce it so as

an unsolvable problem in number theory? wonder!

Or is it that they consider sci.math as a SH*T

T source or a reference for mathematical problems?

wonder!

Then, they should have to get ready for a stage

e where a reference or a source may be also

considered from any SH*TY reference or any rubbish

source as here for example as long as it contains

challenging problems (with documented dates that no

one on earth could solve it yet)

Or maybe they would think about it once they

y deliberately conclude it from any future fabricated

old references from an alleged reputable source, as

usual, especially if they truly could solve it,

wonder!

Isn't so strange that people came to know about so

o many others who wrote only notes for themselves in

much older centuries, whereas something PUBLISHED

REPEATEDLY to the whole WOLRD and so freely nowadays

goes unnoticeable? wonder!

Also, I wouldn't be stingy with you mathematicians

s by not showing you the solution, but I would prefer

giving a big hint to it from my PUBLISHED and well

documented and also irrefutable formula (certified by

others) for the real number (r), for (x^r + y^r =

z^r), where (x, y, z) are distinct positive integers,

And don't pretend that you didn't see my formula

a that was announced repeatedly and in other sites

too

However, the formula was done (in 1990) by the

e formal mathematical analysis that mathematicians

usually are familiar

BKK