Discussion:
Failures of math-- two biggest at the moment Dan Christensen, Jan Burse-- never any math
(too old to reply)
Archimedes Plutonium
2017-06-14 06:11:39 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Just stalk stalk stalk

attack attack

no math, just hatred

The two are failures, losers of math

Do not waste your time with them, just report them under Google Abuse reports so to hide from view

AP
bassam king karzeddin
2017-06-14 07:07:17 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Archimedes Plutonium
Just stalk stalk stalk
attack attack
no math, just hatred
The two are failures, losers of math
Do not waste your time with them, just report them under Google Abuse reports so to hide from view
AP
Dan Christensen, Jan Burse-- are not necessarily failures since they had the best chances to be educated more than anybody else here at Sci.math in new topics that are far ahead advanced than the current maths, but so, unfortunately, they most likely pretend of not understanding any hint, thus diverging and the many innocent people attention deliberately from so many issues that are too.... easy to grasp, since it is anti-modern standard maths

Considering there constant huge contributions and attitudes, one may easily conclude that they are secret agents for some big business establishment in maths industry, so like for few others suspected in this regard

Because, frankly, it is almost impossible for such level of foolishness to exist independently and so innocently without any real devilish purpose of protecting the so-called modern maths establishments

Anyway, and so sorry for this opinion of being my own attitude after quite long experience with those alleged mathematickers, wonder!

But, on the contrary, their turn of spoiling facts and blinding the innocent people is actually working to raise the facts much stronger and clearer even to non-specialists

And nobody can really bring back something old to live after being collapsed rigorously even to school kids, for sure

And my war on fake illegal maths would continue...

BKK
Archimedes Plutonium
2017-06-14 09:23:24 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
For years now i have asked Google to engineer a "author owns his own thread" so if the original author dislikes a stalker can delete the stalker from his thread
b***@gmail.com
2017-06-14 10:35:22 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
How did you ask them, by a fly-by in your brain fart rocket?
Post by Archimedes Plutonium
For years now i have asked Google to engineer a "author owns his own thread" so if the original author dislikes a stalker can delete the stalker from his thread
Dan Christensen
2017-06-14 12:08:12 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Archimedes Plutonium
For years now i have asked Google to engineer a "author owns his own thread" so if the original author dislikes a stalker can delete the stalker from his thread
If you post some idiotic nonsense at an unmoderated math forum like this day in and day out, you have to expect some negative comments. If you want to post such idiocies and want to delete all negative comments, use your own newsgroup (I know, you already have one) or a blog site (e.g. one hosted free of charge by Wordpress.com).


Dan
bassam king karzeddin
2017-06-15 09:18:00 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by bassam king karzeddin
Post by Archimedes Plutonium
Just stalk stalk stalk
attack attack
no math, just hatred
The two are failures, losers of math
Do not waste your time with them, just report them under Google Abuse reports so to hide from view
AP
Dan Christensen, Jan Burse-- are not necessarily failures since they had the best chances to be educated more than anybody else here at Sci.math in new topics that are far ahead advanced than the current maths, but so, unfortunately, they most likely pretend of not understanding any hint, thus diverging and the many innocent people attention deliberately from so many issues that are too.... easy to grasp, since it is anti-modern standard maths
Considering there constant huge contributions and attitudes, one may easily conclude that they are secret agents for some big business establishment in maths industry, so like for few others suspected in this regard
Because, frankly, it is almost impossible for such level of foolishness to exist independently and so innocently without any real devilish purpose of protecting the so-called modern maths establishments
Anyway, and so sorry for this opinion of being my own attitude after quite long experience with those alleged mathematickers, wonder!
But, on the contrary, their turn of spoiling facts and blinding the innocent people is actually working to raise the facts much stronger and clearer even to non-specialists
And nobody can really bring back something old to live after being collapsed rigorously even to school kids, for sure
And my war on fake illegal maths would continue...
BKK
But truly there are so many notable references between the two

The Jan Burse (with so many allies - not necessarily one person with many accounts), so he is not one relative to the big size of so long responses he creates immediately with so many links to references added in his posts

They are a kind of fabricated Encyclopaedia references, where they make it impossible for any talented mathematicians to post any new idea, concept, solutions, ..., etc, without labelling them as old issue deliberately and of course purposely

But others like Dan may be indeed as an innocent Troll who defends his damn education and thinking wrongly that technology was a result of those mere mathematicians, despite the strong facts that Technology was a result of many effoorts of scientists and Engineers who are also far better mathematicians to be admitted in more higher suitable scientific branches that require basically higher mathematical abilities

BKK
Archimedes Plutonium
2017-06-15 12:54:45 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Burse is such a failure in math, he thought that a ellipse was a conic section when it turns out it is a oval, guess that is why he is a janitor
Dan Christensen
2017-06-15 21:19:50 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Burse is such a failure in math, he thought that a ellipse was a conic section when it turns out it is a oval...
A typical idiocy from a notorious crank who truly also believes that 10^666 is an "infinite number" and that the universe just one gigantic plutonium atom!


Dan
g***@gmail.com
2017-06-16 03:44:53 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Dan Christensen
Burse is such a failure in math, he thought that a ellipse was a conic section when it turns out it is a oval...
A typical idiocy from a notorious crank who truly also believes that 10^666 is an "infinite number" and that the universe just one gigantic plutonium atom!
Dan
Dan and Jan both develop very advanced COMPUTER VERIFICATION SOFTWARE


Problem is they dont know where to start with ARCHIE!
Archimedes Plutonium
2017-06-16 06:14:51 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by g***@gmail.com
Dan and Jan both develop very advanced COMPUTER VERIFICATION SOFTWARE
Problem is they dont know where to start with ARCHIE!
That is funny, even though I don't understand the joke here, Graham

Do you mean, I single handedly have the two encircled?
b***@gmail.com
2017-06-16 06:53:27 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Yes sure, single handedly encircled, with your brain
fart smog. Cough, Cough, is worse than in Beijing.
Post by Archimedes Plutonium
Post by g***@gmail.com
Dan and Jan both develop very advanced COMPUTER VERIFICATION SOFTWARE
Problem is they dont know where to start with ARCHIE!
That is funny, even though I don't understand the joke here, Graham
Do you mean, I single handedly have the two encircled?
Archimedes Plutonium
2017-06-16 20:51:19 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Jan Burse, what a utter total failure of mathematics. The fool thinks Calculus derivative is a point tangent to a function curve, and so, how does the idiot think a tangent to a curve tells anyone, any information of the future of that function curve. Like W.C. Fields said-- a fool is borne every minute
Archimedes Plutonium
2017-06-20 09:04:47 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Burse failure of math-- so dumb he thinks a derivative can be a tangent to a function graph, which a tangent is unable to provide any information of future of function graph

When did he go insane?

On Tuesday, June 20, 2017 at 3:15:00 AM UTC-5, ***@gmail.com wrote:

Archimedes Plutonium is an Alzheimer Faggot

By "The Aesop fable for this lesson, is that when you do
fake science, it consumes a lifetime" you are talking about
your own brain farts? No math for 30 years?
Archimedes Plutonium
2017-06-20 23:41:03 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Archimedes Plutonium
Burse failure of math-- so dumb he thinks a derivative can be a tangent to a function graph, which a tangent is unable to provide any information of future of function graph
So dumb in math that Burse thinks there is such a thing as a sinusoid, when in fact it is a semicircle wave for sine and cosine.
Simon Roberts
2017-06-21 04:20:16 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Archimedes Plutonium
Post by Archimedes Plutonium
Burse failure of math-- so dumb he thinks a derivative can be a tangent to a function graph, which a tangent is unable to provide any information of future of function graph
So dumb in math that Burse thinks there is such a thing as a sinusoid, when in fact it is a semicircle wave for sine and cosine.
And he also probably believes that 10^666 is NOT an infinite number. And that the universe is NOT just one gigantic plutonium atom. HA, HA, HA!!! What an idiot, eh, Archie!
With the delusional Archie P. here, it's just one idiocy after another like this -- day after day, year after year. Every one of his childlike misunderstandings and his comical blunders seems to result in yet another earth-shattering "breakthrough" for which we must trash every math and science text ever printed and start over again.
Dan
Oh, Dan. Damn.
Dan Christensen
2017-06-21 03:17:55 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Archimedes Plutonium
Post by Archimedes Plutonium
Burse failure of math-- so dumb he thinks a derivative can be a tangent to a function graph, which a tangent is unable to provide any information of future of function graph
So dumb in math that Burse thinks there is such a thing as a sinusoid, when in fact it is a semicircle wave for sine and cosine.
And he also probably believes that 10^666 is NOT an infinite number. And that the universe is NOT just one gigantic plutonium atom. HA, HA, HA!!! What an idiot, eh, Archie!

With the delusional Archie P. here, it's just one idiocy after another like this -- day after day, year after year. Every one of his childlike misunderstandings and his comical blunders seems to result in yet another earth-shattering "breakthrough" for which we must trash every math and science text ever printed and start over again.


Dan
Dan Christensen
2017-06-21 00:19:11 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Archimedes Plutonium
Post by Archimedes Plutonium
Burse failure of math-- so dumb he thinks a derivative can be a tangent to a function graph, which a tangent is unable to provide any information of future of function graph
So dumb in math that Burse thinks there is such a thing as a sinusoid, when in fact it is a semicircle wave for sine and cosine.
And he probably believes that 10^666 is NOT an infinite number. And that the universe is NOT just one gigantic plutonium atom. HA, HA, HA!!! What an idiot!

With the delusional Archie P. here, it's just one idiocy after another like this -- day after day, year after year. Every one of his childlike misunderstandings, every one of his comical blunders, nearly every hour of every day is turned into what he believes to be another earth-shattering breakthrough for which we must trash every math and science text ever printed. What a pathetic loser.


Dan
b***@gmail.com
2017-06-14 07:17:07 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Lets not forget that spammers like AP are scum.
Post by Archimedes Plutonium
Just stalk stalk stalk
attack attack
no math, just hatred
The two are failures, losers of math
Do not waste your time with them, just report them under Google Abuse reports so to hide from view
AP
William Elliot
2017-06-14 08:43:41 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Thou be naught but reducing thyself to dear olde Archie Plu.
Oh him, whose posts never appear, is about to accept you into
his select group of friends whose posts I never see.

On Wed, 14 Jun 2017, ***@gmail.com wrote:
Sylvie
2017-06-22 11:45:06 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
On Thursday, June 15, 2017 at 10:44:58 PM UTC-5,
Post by g***@gmail.com
Dan and Jan both develop very advanced COMPUTER
VERIFICATION SOFTWARE
Post by g***@gmail.com
Problem is they dont know where to start with
ARCHIE!
That is funny, even though I don't understand the
joke here, Graham
Do you mean, I single handedly have the two
encircled?
It was a special humor.

Loading...