Are you ready, kids??? Bend over, er...

Dan

Download my DC Proof 2.0 freeware at http://www.dcproof.com

Visit my Math Blog at http://www.dcproof.wordpress.com

Christensen harps// McGill Univ teaches idiocies//Jack Sankey, Jonathan Sievers, Bradley Siwick, Mark Sutton, Brigitte Vachon,Andreas Warburton, Tracy Webb//ellipse is not conic; real proton= 840MeV not 938; 10 AND 4 = 14 not 10 OR 4 = 14

1.2Christensen harps//Univ Toronto teaches idiocies//Chandler Davis, Spyros Alexakis, Edward Barbeau, Thomas Bloom, Man-Duen Choi, Stephen Cook //ellipse is not conic; real proton= 840MeV not 938; 10 AND 4 = 14 not 10 OR 4 = 14

AP writes: Yes, how does one stop an education parasite like Christensen? Who thinks everyone must learn what "Dan thinks is true", for Dan is a fascist teacher as evidence of his 10 + years of nonstop stalking of AP with his insane 10 OR 4 = 14. Dan should not be in education but in jail or an asylum, in my opinion.

Dan Christensen harps//Univ Western Ontario teaches idiocies// Lisa Thompson, Dan Christensen, Graham Denham, Ajneet Dhillon,Nicole Lemire, Jan Mináč,//ellipse is not conic; real proton= 840MeV not 938; 10 AND 4 = 14 not 10 OR 4 = 14

Dan Christensen wrote:

WARNING TO STUDENTS: Don't become a victim

On Saturday, June 1

AP writes: yes a victim of Dan's 10 OR 4 = 14 with 10 AND 4 = 6

AP writes: Is the reason Canada has not yet confirmed real proton is 840MeV not 938, because its scientists behave like Christensen-- cesspool mind of hatred with daily hate sheets on people rather than spend their daily activity on uncovering the true proton is 840MeV stuck with the real electron as muon doing the Faraday law to create Dirac magnetic monopoles.

o-:^>___?

`~~c--^c'

Navy dog says: yea yea

Remember the time the Dan Christensen could not tell the difference between distinct and nondistinct.

PAGE58, 8-3, True Geometry / correcting axioms, 1by1 tool, angles of logarithmic spiral, conic sections unified regular polyhedra, Leaf-Triangle, Unit Basis Vector

The axioms that are in need of fixing is the axiom that between any two points lies a third new point.

The should be "between and any two DISTINCT points."

What a monsterous fool you are

OMG. You are serious. Stupid and proud of it.

And yet Mr Plutonium is right. Two points are distinct (else they would

be one) and it is not necessary to say so.

McGill University Physics department

Kartiek Agarwal, Robert Brandenberger, Thomas Brunner, Fritz Buchinger, Simon Caron-Huot, Cynthia Chiang, Lily Childress, Jim Cline, Bill Coish, David Cooke, Francois Corriveau, Nicolas Cowan, Andrew Cumming, Keshav Dasgupta, Matt Dobbs, Paul Francois, Charles Gale, Guillaume Gervais, Martin Grant, Peter Grutter, Hong Guo, Daryl Haggard, David Hanna, Sarah Harrison, Michael Hilke, Sangyong Jeon, Victoria M. Kaspi, Eve Lee, Sabrina Leslie, Adrian Liu, Shaun Lovejoy, Alexander Maloney, Tami Pereg-Barnea, Nikolas Provatas, Kenneth Ragan, Walter Reisner, Steven Robertson, Robert E. Rutledge, Dominic H. Ryan, Jack Sankey, Jonathan Sievers, Bradley Siwick, Mark Sutton, Brigitte Vachon, Andreas Warburton, Tracy Webb, Paul Wiseman

Univ of Victoria physics dept

Justin Albert, Arif Babul, Devika Chithrani, Byoung-Chul Choi, Rogerio de Sousa, Ruobing Dong, Sara L. Ellison, Falk Herwig, Dean Karlen, Richard K. Keeler, Jody Klymak, Pavel Kovtun, Robert V. Kowalewski, Mark Laidlaw, Michel Lefebvre, Travis Martin, Julio Navarro, Maxim Pospelov, Adam Ritz, J.Michael Roney, Geoffrey M. Steeves, Kim Venn, Jon Willis

Univ Western Ontario math dept

Janusz Adamus, Tatyana Barron, Dan Christensen, Graham Denham, Ajneet Dhillon, Matthias Franz, John Jardine, Massoud Khalkhali, Nicole Lemire, Jan Mináč, Victoria Olds, Martin Pinsonnault, Lex Renner, David Riley, Rasul Shafikov, Gordon Sinnamon

Chancellor Linda Hasenfratz

President Alan Shepard

Amit Chakma (chem engr)

Univ. Western Ontario physics dept

Pauline Barmby, Shantanu Basu, Peter Brown, Alex Buchel, Jan Cami, Margret Campbell-Brown, Blaine Chronik, Robert Cockcroft, John R. de Bruyn, Colin Denniston, Giovanni Fanchini, Sarah Gallagher, Lyudmila Goncharova, Wayne Hocking, Martin Houde, Jeffrey L. Hutter, Carol Jones, Stan Metchev, Silvia Mittler, Els Peeters, Robert Sica, Aaron Sigut, Peter Simpson, Mahi Singh, Paul Wiegert, Eugene Wong, Martin Zinke-Allmang

Univ Toronto, physics, Gordon F. West, Michael B. Walker, Henry M. Van Driel, David J. Rowe, John W. Moffat, John F. Martin, Robert K. Logan, Albert E. Litherland, Roland List, Philipp Kronberg, James King, Anthony W. Key, Bob Holdom, Ron M. Farquhar, R. Nigel Edwards, David J. Dunlop, James Drummond, Tom E. Drake, R.Fraser Code, Richard C. Bailey, Robin Armstrong

Univ Toronto math dept

Mustafa Akcoglu, Spyros Alexakis, Edward Barbeau, Thomas Bloom, Man-Duen Choi, Stephen Cook, Chandler Davis, Nicholas Derzko, Eric Ellers, Ilya Gekhtman, Ian Graham, Steve Halpern, Wahidul Haque, Abe Igelfeld, Velimir Jurdjevic, Ivan Kupka, Anthony Lam, Michael Lorimer, James McCool, Eric Mendelsohn, Kunio Murasugi, Jeremy Quastel, Peter Rosenthal, Paul Selick, Dipak Sen, Rick Sharpe, Stuart Smith, Frank Tall, Steve Tanny

can't figure out prime numbers (like so many things), so he calls them "fake." What an idiot!

Christensen says Lisa Thompson,Univ Toronto & Western Ontario, David J. Dunlop, James Drummond, Tom E. Drake, R.Fraser Code, Richard C. Bailey-- cannot confirmed real proton = 840MeV, real electron is the muon and .5MeV was Dirac monopole, can't figure

AP writes: Yes we are fed up with the likes of the failure of Dan Christensen who preaches 10 OR 4 = 14 with 10 AND 4 = 6; never has a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, and preaches the ellipse is a conic when it never was.

1.0-Set theory completely thrown out of science and math

WARNING TO STUDENTS: Don't be a victim of AP's fake math and science

I like to laugh at people in wheelchairs and people with white sticks.

..

.- " `-. ,..-''' ```....'`-..

, . `.' ' `.

.' .' ` ` ' `.. ;

. ; .' . `. ;

; . ' `. . '

. ' ` `. |

. '. '

. 0 0 ' `.

' `

; `

.' `

; U `

; '; `

: | ;.. :` `

: `;. ```. .-; | '

'. ` ``.., .' :' '

; ` ;'.. ..-'' ' ' I am Christensen,I am such a stupid insane imp of math and logic that I thought a vertex has a derivative, that distinct means not-distinct, and that 10 OR 4 = 14 with 10 AND 4 = 6, when a 8 year old knows 10 AND 4= 14 . And I love spam reading of vvgra and tomato hello, and I am a failure of academics and so I spend most days making out hate-lists of people who actually succeed in science for my pea sized brain is envious of those who succeed in science yet I failed in science.

` ` ; ````'''""' ; ' '

` ` ; ; ' '

` ` ; ; ' '

` `. ````'''''' ' '

` . ' '

/ ` `. ' ' .

/ ` .. ..' .'"""""...'

/ .` ` ``........-' .'` .....'''

/ .'' ; ` .' `

...'.' ; .' ` .' `

"" .' .' | ` .; \ `

; .' | `. . . . ' . \ `

:' | ' ` , `. `

| ' ` ' `. `

` ' ` ; `. |

`.' ` ; `-'

`...'

Christensen asks Univ Western Ontario Drs Peter Brown, Alex Buchel, Jan Cami which is AP's 2nd greatest theory- Sun and Stars are powered by Faraday Law of atoms, or, AP theory that Real Proton = 840 MeV with electron= muon and .5MeV was Dirac magnetic monopole

Canadian Educ Ministers-- endorsing stalking hypocrites like Dan Christensen with his insane 2 OR 10 = 12 when even a Canadian 8 year old knows 2 AND 10 = 12. Endorsing the "perpetual stalking by Dan Christensen"

Lisa Thompson, Sebastien Proulx, Jordan Brown, David Eggen, Gordon Wyant, Zach Churchill, Ian Wishart, Rob Fleming.

David Eggen, Gordon Wyant, Zach Churchill,UWO's,Matthias Franz,John Jardine,Massoud Khalkhali,Nicole Lemire// Are you as ignorant and a education parasite as Christensen on the ELLIPSE is never a conic??

Definition: education parasite: a person or a group of people that values money or convenience ahead of the Truth. They never want to fix errors but teach errors forever because it takes time and money out of them to teach the truth.

/\-------/\

\::O:::O::/

(::_ ^ _::)

\_`-----'_/

You mean the classroom is the world, not just my cubbyhole in Canada.

And, even though you-- professors of physics, want to remain stupid in not knowing what is really the electron in atoms has to be the muon at 105MeV and proton at 840MeV with Dirac's magnetic monopole being .5MeV, your students deserve better. Or math professors remaining stupid on ellipse is never a conic, 3 OR 2 = 5 is bad failed logic and Trig is based on semicircle wave, not sinusoid.

The world no longer needs physics professors who cannot understand Angular Momentum and that the Chemical bond cannot exist with proton = 938MeV, electron= .5MeV.

Yes, there, what did they say-- the power of Sun and stars is not really fusion but is the Faraday Law inside of atoms creating monopoles and turning Space into energy that fuels the Sun and stars. My rough estimate is that fusion only supplies 10% or less of Sun and stars.

But of course, I could not have discovered the true starpower when under the idiotic idea that the electron was a mere .5MeV when it truly is 105 MeV.

What answer did they give?

And what is this connection of Dan Christensen with John Baez if such. Are they aiding and abetting stalking?? Running some computer program of stalking in sci.math & sci.physics, if such.

UC Riverside Math Dept, provost: Cynthia Larive- chemist,

Mark Alber, John Baez, Mei-Chu Chang, Vyjayanthi Chari, Kevin Costello, Po-Ning Chen, Wee Liang Gan, Gerhard Gierz, Jacob Greenstein, Jose Gonzalez, Zhuang-dan Guan, Jim Kelliher, Sara Lapan, Michel Lapidus, Carl Mautner, Amir Moradifam, Yat Sun Poon, Ziv Ran, David Rush, Reinhard Schultz, Stefano Vidussi, David Weisbart, Fred Wilhelm, Bun Wong, Yulong Xing, Feng Xu, Qi Zhang

/\-------/\

\::O:::O::/

(::_ ^ _::)

\_`-----'_/

You mean the classroom is the world, not just my cubbyhole in Canada?

Yes, what did they say-- the power of Sun and stars is not really fusion but is the Faraday Law inside of atoms creating monopoles and turning Space into energy that fuels the Sun and stars. My rough estimate is that fusion only supplies 10% or less of Sun and stars.

But of course, I could not have discovered the true starpower when under the silly idea that the electron was a mere .5MeV when it truly is 105 MeV.

In that manner, physics departments are racist physicists for the knowledge that Real Electron = 105MeV, Real Proton = 840 MeV, and the .5MeV was Dirac's Magnetic Monopole is going on 2 years now in the public eye starting 2017, yet none of these physicists (these poor physicists lacking understanding of angular momentum has raised a single peep). The reason they keep their mouths shut, is because they are so poor in physics, they do not want to be embarrassed. These gentlemen and ladies are not physicists, for a real physicist would debate the issue, not hide from the issue. And real physicist would not discount a discovery because of the person-- Archimedes Plutonium who discovered it.

Cynthia Larive,Mark Alber,John Baez, UC-Riverside vs. Matthias Franz,Nicole Lemire,UWO// Dan asks for sine of 45 degrees in your goofy math--when you still teach the ellipse is a conic when it never was-- are you all education parasites?(see proof)

Did you ever figure out the sine of 45 degrees in your new trig system,

Cynthia Larive,Mark Alber,John Baez, UC-Riverside vs. Matthias Franz,Nicole Lemire,UWO// Dan asks for sine of 45 degrees in you goofy math-- when you still teach the ellipse is a conic when it never was-- are you all education parasites? (see proof below)

Newsgroups: sci.physics

Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2017 00:28:31 -0800 (PST)

In-Reply-To: <421c6f56-7355-4ec6-9747-***@googlegroups.com>

Complaints-To: ***@google.com

Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=192.208.232.34;

posting-account=jPnQ2goAAAA461y3QD0lbyw0oKeThma1

NNTP-Posting-Host: 192.208.232.34

References: <0f307785-464a-4e59-b400-***@googlegroups.com>

<a06f5f30-857e-4c33-9094-***@googlegroups.com> <afe56d2e-3fca-4c76-81da-***@googlegroups.com>

<421c6f56-7355-4ec6-9747-***@googlegroups.com>

User-Agent: G2/1.0

MIME-Version: 1.0

Message-ID: <69d8bde6-bcb6-472f-9765-***@googlegroups.com>

Subject: asshole

From: noTthaTguY <***@gmail.com>

Injection-Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2017 08:28:33 +0000

ellipses are ovals, but not all ovals are elipses, of course;

just grab a dictionary, asshole

Robin Armstrong,Mustafa Akcoglu,Spyros Alexakis,Univ Toronto asked by UWO Dan Christensen asks for the sine of 45 degrees in their goofy trig system, never realizing the sine function is actually a semicircle wave?

Robin Armstrong,Mustafa Akcoglu,Spyros Alexakis,Univ Toronto asked by UWO Dan Christensen asks for the sine of 45 degrees in their goofy trig system, never realizing the sine function is actually a semicircle wave?

STILL cannot even give us the sine of 45 degrees in his goofy trig system. Again, he just runs away and hides, desperately trying to change the subject.

Dan

David Eggen, Gordon Wyant, Zach Churchill,UWO's,Matthias Franz,John Jardine,Massoud Khalkhali,Nicole Lemire// Are you as ignorant and a education parasite as Christensen on the ELLIPSE is never a conic??

Definition: education parasite: a person or a group of people that values money or convenience ahead of the Truth. They never want to fix errors but teach errors forever because it takes time and money out of them to teach the truth.

/\-------/\

\::O:::O::/

(::_ ^ _::)

\_`-----'_/

You mean the classroom is the world, not just my cubbyhole in Canada.

And, even though you-- professors of physics, want to remain stupid in not knowing what is really the electron in atoms has to be the muon at 105MeV and proton at 840MeV with Dirac's magnetic monopole being .5MeV, your students deserve better. Or math professors remaining stupid on ellipse is never a conic, 3 OR 2 = 5 is bad failed logic and Trig is based on semicircle wave, not sinusoid.

The world no longer needs physics professors who cannot understand Angular Momentum and that the Chemical bond cannot exist with proton = 938MeV, electron= .5MeV.

And, even though you-- professors of physics/math, want to remain silent and stupid in Real Electron = muon, and true real Calculus with a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, your students deserve better.

Yes, there, what did they say-- the power of Sun and stars is not really fusion but is the Faraday Law inside of atoms creating monopoles and turning Space into energy that fuels the Sun and stars. My rough estimate is that fusion only supplies 10% or less of Sun and stars.

But of course, I could not have discovered the true starpower when under the idiotic idea that the electron was a mere .5MeV when it truly is 105 MeV.

What answer did they give?

Christensen asks Univ Western Ontario Drs Peter Brown, Alex Buchel, Jan Cami which is AP's 2nd greatest theory- Sun and Stars are powered by Faraday Law of atoms, or, AP theory that Real Proton = 840 MeV with electron= muon and .5MeV was Dirac magnetic monopole

Canadian Educ Ministers-- endorsing stalking hypocrites like Dan Christensen with his insane 2 OR 10 = 12 when even a Canadian 8 year old knows 2 AND 10 = 12. Endorsing the "perpetual stalking by Dan Christensen"

Sebastien Proulx, Jordan Brown, David Eggen, Gordon Wyant, Zach Churchill, Ian Wishart, Rob Fleming, Justin Trudeau

Alan Richard Bundy, Gregory Chaitin,Jack Copeland, John Corcoran, are you a moron of logic, like Christensen in Logic with 3 OR 2 = 5 with 3 AND 2 = 1 embracing the contradiction of Either..Or..Or..Both

Alan Richard Bundy, Gregory Chaitin,Jack Copeland, John Corcoran, are you a moron of logic, like Christensen in Logic with 3 OR 2 = 5 with 3 AND 2 = 1 embracing the contradiction of Either..Or..Or..Both

Were you ever able to obtain a value for the sine of 45 degrees in your goofy trig system,

AP writes: Forget about trig for the moment for Alan Richard Bundy, Gregory Chaitin,Jack Copeland, John Corcoran have far larger problems.

Definition: education parasite: a person or a group of people that values money or convenience ahead of the Truth. They never want to fix errors but teach errors forever because it takes time and money out of them to fix errors and teach the truth.

Jean-Yves Beziau,Andrea Bonomi,Nicolas Bourbaki (a group of logic fumblers) are you? an education parasite on Logic as is Christensen with 3 OR 2= 5 while their 3 AND 2 = 1, embracing the contradiction Either..Or..Or..Both

Peter Bruce Andrews, Lennart Aqvist, Henk Barendregt, John Lane Bell, are you an education parasite on Logic as is Christensen with 3 OR 2= 5 while their 3 AND 2 = 1, embracing the contradiction Either..Or..Or..Both

Dan

Download my DC Proof 2.0,,,,

Visit my Math Blog,,,

(be foolish and download that worthless moneygrub parasite of Logic-- Christensen)

Scientists that are just memorization not masters Re: Analysis of failures..Logic with failures of Physics// one thinks 3 OR 2 =5 with 3 AND 2 = 1 while the other thinks proton to electron is 938MeV vs .5MeV when truly it is 840MeV to 105MeV

Dan Christensen (the stalking insane Canadian of 6 years) wrote on 20Dec2018

8:19 AM (11 hours ago)

WARNING TO PARENTS

Archie Pu's fake logic

A B A & B

T T T

T F T

F T T

F F F

A B A & B

T T T

T F F

F T F

F F F

A B A OR B

T T T

T F T

F T T

F F F

Partial List of the World's Crackpot Logicians-- should be in a college Abnormal-Psychology department, not Logic//

Peter Bruce Andrews, Lennart Aqvist, Henk Barendregt, John Lane Bell, Nuel Belnap,

Paul Benacerraf, Jean Paul Van Bendegem, Johan van Benthem, Jean-Yves Beziau,

Andrea Bonomi, Nicolas Bourbaki (a group of logic fumblers), Alan Richard Bundy, Gregory Chaitin,

Jack Copeland, John Corcoran, Dirk van Dalen, Martin Davis, Michael A.E. Dummett, John Etchemendy, Hartry Field, Kit Fine, Melvin Fitting, Matthew Foreman, Michael Fourman,

Harvey Friedman, Dov Gabbay, L.T.F. Gamut (group of logic fumblers), Sol Garfunkel, Jean-Yves Girard, Siegfried Gottwald, Jeroen Groenendijk, Susan Haack, Leo Harrington, William Alvin Howard,

Ronald Jensen, Dick de Jongh, David Kaplan, Alexander S. Kechris, Howard Jerome Keisler,

Robert Kowalski, Georg Kreisel, Saul Kripke, Kenneth Kunen, Karel Lambert, Penelope Maddy,

David Makinson, Isaac Malitz, Gary R. Mar, Donald A. Martin, Per Martin-Lof,Yiannis N. Moschovakis, Jeff Paris, Charles Parsons, Solomon Passy, Lorenzo Pena, Dag Prawitz,

Graham Priest, Michael O. Rabin, Gerald Sacks, Dana Scott, Stewart Shapiro, Theodore Slaman,

Robert M. Solovay, John R. Steel, Martin Stokhof, Anne Sjerp Troelstra, Alasdair Urquhart,

Moshe Y. Vardi, W. Hugh Woodin, John Woods

Now I should include the authors of Logic textbooks for they, more than most, perpetuate and crank the error filled logic, the Horrible Error of 4 OR 3 = 7 with 4 AND 3 = 1, that is forced down the throats of young students, making them cripples of ever thinking straight and clearly.

Many of these authors have passed away but their error filled books are a scourge to modern education

George Boole, William Jevons, Bertrand Russell, Kurt Godel, Rudolf Carnap,

Ludwig Wittgenstein, Willard Quine, Alfred North Whitehead, Irving Copi, Michael Withey,

Patrick Hurley, Harry J Gensler, David Kelley, Jesse Bollinger, Theodore Sider,

David Barker-Plummer, I. C. Robledo, John Nolt, Peter Smith, Stan Baronett, Jim Holt,

Virginia Klenk, David Agler, Susanne K. Langer, Gary M. Hardegree, Raymond M. Smullyan,

John Venn, William Gustason, Richmond H. Thomason,

All of them are clowns of logic, although they have interest in logic, none are past a baby stage understanding of what Logic is. They are all worse than the fool George Boole. All of them are a disgrace to the subject we call Logic. All of them are in the same boat as George Boole-- catching pneumonia and then having his wife douse him in bed with cold freezing water and taking cold showers-- thinking that combatting pneumonia is done by getting colder.

All of the above listed should never be allowed to teach their nonsense and pollute the minds of youngsters with their crazy 9 OR 5 = 14 with 9 AND 5 = 4, all because a crazy Boole with Jevons in the 1800s thought that OR was add and AND was subtract. All because a true logician has more than a microgram brain of Logic in his head, and realizes that if you had a string of statements, say 10 statements and if just one single statement of those ten is true, makes the entire set of 10 to be true also, regardless of the truth value of the other 9 statements. Said in a different manner, if you have a truth of a single statement, and, no matter how you surround that single statement with 9 other statements, regardless of their truth value, because of the truth of the one statement makes the combined all 10 statements have a true value.

The stupid microgram brain of Boole and Jevons in the subject of Logic (witness their history with pneumonia) is not a Logic at all, for it leads to the incredibly stupid formulation that 3 AND 2 = 1 with 3 OR 2 = 5. Yes, those two logical idiots Boole and Jevons and every idiot of Logic since those two, have thought the truth table of AND was TFFF, when according to a real true logical person-- you need just 1 true statement to make a compound statements as a whole be true. So the true true truth table of AND was TTTF. And this makes sense in the above idiots of Logic with their OR, so confused were those idiots that they combined a "or" with an "and" and generated a "inclusive or" of TTTF. I mean what clowns are these? Who think that OR has to be compounded or a composite of "and", with "or" forming the idiot idea of an "inclusive or" and, not even realizing that you no longer have a primitive-connector. The true truth table of OR is exclusive and is FTTF, which is subtraction in mathematics.

Inclusive OR, INCLUSIVE OR, is the invention of an idiot of logic, pure slab of bonehead worthless bonehead of Logic, for the "inclusive or" is a village idiot mind that stacks together the OR and the AND all into one idiotic product of Either ,,Or,, Or Both. Not an accident waiting to happen in Logic, a multiple chain collision on the expressway is the Either Or Or Both. It is not a primitive logical Connector that the 4 primitive logic Connectors need to be, no, the Either Or Or Both is already a fool's built compound connector pretending to be primitive connector. A village idiot of the 1800s like George Boole and his compatriot Jevons would not have enough of a logical mind to see that Either Or Or Both is a compound piece of worthless nonsense. Even a 8 year old can see that Either Or Or Both is a compounded piece of crap and has no business of being in Logic primitive connectors.

To be in Logic, you need a Logical Mind to even do logic, and to come up with a SELF CONTRADICTION in terms like it is updown or it is overeasy-hard, is the same as Inclusive-Or, a term and idea that is a self-contradiction. Logic is about staying away from contradiction. And here, starting with Boole and Jevons, they built their logic on a Contradiction of the inclusive-or. It would be like at the Olympics in the 100 meter dash, at the sound of the gun, a runner, instead of going forwards, goes backwards in running step in the dash, not to the finish line but to oblivion running backwards.

So, please stop torturing the brains and minds of our young students just because you are a clown of microgram brain of logic. And throw out all the OLD LOGIC textbooks for they are not learning or teaching but brainwashing by polluting moneygrubs, more concerned over money flow than what is the truth of logic.

#1 first comes Logic-- think straight and clear which many math professors are deaf dumb and blind to

My corrections of Old Logic have a history that dates before 1993, sometime around 1991, I realized the Euclid proof of infinitude of primes was illogical, sadly sadly wrong, in that the newly formed number by "multiply the lot and add 1" was necessarily a new prime in the indirect proof method. So that my history of fixing Old Logic starts in 1991, but comes to a synthesis of correcting all four of the connectors of Equal/not, And, Or, If->Then, by 2015.

History of AP Logic starts with 1991 and culminates with New Logic that replaces Old Logic by 2015. Old Logic is like comparing a flat earth theory to a true round earth theory.

Before you do Mathematics, you need to be able to think correctly, straight and clear. Unfortunately schools across the world do not teach proper true Logic. They teach a mish mash gaggle of error filled garbage and call it Logic.

The 4 connectors of Logic are:

1) Equal (equivalence) plus Not (negation) where the two are combined as one

2) And (conjunction)

3) Or (exclusive or) (disjunction)

4) Implication

New Logic

EQUAL/NOT table:

T = T = T

T = not F = T

F = not T = T

F = F = T

Equality must start or begin logic because in the other connectors, we

cannot say a result equals something if we do not have equality built

already. Now to build equality, it is unary in that T=T and F =F. So

we need another unary connector to make equality a binary. Negation is

that other connector and when we combine the two we have the above

table.

Equality combined with Negation allows us to proceed to build the

other three logic connectors.

Now, unfortunately, Logic must start with equality allied with

negation and in math what this connector as binary connector ends up

being-- is multiplication for math. One would think that the first

connector of Logic that must be covered is the connector that ends up

being addition of math, not multiplication. But maybe we can find a

philosophy-logic answer as to why Logic starts with equal/not and is

multiplication rather than addition. That explanation is of course the Space in which the Logic operators govern, and the full space is area, so that is multiplication. And we see that in a geometry diagram

T T

T T where all four small squares are T valued making a 4 square

While addition is and with a Space like this

T T

T F and we have just 3 of the 4 smaller squares covered by addition.

Here you we have one truth table equal/not whose endresult is 4 trues and now we move on to AND as addition.

New Logic

AND

T & T = T

T & F = T

F & T = T

F & F = F

AND is ADD in New Logic, and that makes a whole lot of common sense.

AND feels like addition, the joining of parts. And the truth table for

AND should be such that if given one true statement in a series of

statements then the entire string of statements is true. So if I had P

and Q and S and R, I need only one of those to be true to make the

string true P & Q & S & R = True if just one statement is true.

The truth table of AND results in 3 trues and 1 false.

New Logic

OR(exclusive)

T or T = F

T or F = T

F or T = T

F or F = F

OR is seen as a choice, a pick and choose. So if I had T or T, there

is no choice and so it is False. If I had T or F there is a choice and

so it is true. Again the same for F or T, but when I have F or F,

there is no choice and so it is false. OR in mathematics, because we

pick and discard what is not chosen, that OR is seen as subtraction.

OR is a truth table whose endresult is 2 trues, 2 falses.

New Logic

IMPLIES (Material Conditional)

IF/THEN

MOVES INTO

T -> T = T

T -> F = F

F -> T = U probability outcome

F -> F = U probability outcome

A truth table that has a variable which is neither T or F, but U for

unknown or a probability outcome. We need this U so that we can do

math where 0 divided into something is not defined.

Now notice there are four truth tables where the endresult is 4 trues,

3 trues with 1 false, 2 trues with 2 falses and finally a truth table

with a different variable other than T or F, with variable U. This is

important in New Logic that the four primitive connectors, by

primitive I mean they are independent of one another so that one

cannot be derived by the other three. The four are axioms,

independent. And the way you can spot that they are independent is

that if you reverse their values so that 4 trues become 4 falses. For

AND, reversal would be FFFT instead of TTTF. For OR, a reversal would

be TFFT instead of FTTF.

To be independent and not derivable by the other three axioms you need

a condition of this:

One Table be 4 of the same

One Table be 3 of the same

One Table be 2 of the same

And to get division by 0 in mathematics, one table with a unknown variable.

So, how did Old Logic get it all so wrong so bad? I think the problem

was that in the 1800s when Logic was being discovered, is that the

best minds of the time were involved in physics, chemistry, biology

and looked upon philosophy and logic as second rate and that second

rate minds would propose Old Logic. This history would be from Boole

1854 The Laws of Thought, and Jevons textbook of Elementary Lessons on

Logic, 1870. Boole started the Old Logic with the help of Jevons and

fostered the wrong muddleheaded idea that OR was ADD, when it truly is

AND.

Now the way people actually live, is an indicator of how well they

thought and how well any of their ideas should be taken seriously. In

the case of Boole, he went to class in a downpour rain, why without a

raincoat? And reaching class, instead of changing into dry warm

clothes, stood for hours in front of students, sopping wet and

shivering. Of course he caught pneumonia, but instead of being

sensible, common sense that even a fly would have, he insisted his

wife give him cold showers and make the bed all wet and freezing. Of

course, he would die from this. Now, does anyone today, think that a

mind like that has anything to offer Logic or mathematics, is as crazy

as what Boole was.

But once you have textbooks about Logic, it is difficult to correct a

mistake because of the money making social network wants to make more

money, not go around fixing mistakes. So this nightmarish mistakes of

the truth tables was not seen by Frege, by Russell, by Whitehead, by

Carnap, by Godel, and by 1908 the symbols and terminology of the Old

Logic truth tables were so deeply rooted into Logic, that only a

Logical minded person could ever rescue Logic.

1.1 The "and" truth table should be TTTF not what Boole thought TFFF.

Only an utter gutter mind of logic would think that in a series of

statements, that AND is true when all statements are true, but to the

wise person-- he realizes that if just one statement is true, the

entire series is true, where we toss aside all the irrelevant and

false statements --(much what life itself is-- we pick out the true

ones and ignore all the false ones). In fact, in a proof in mathematics, the proof can be full of false and nonsense statements, so long as the proof itself is there and be seen as overall True. For example the proof of SAS in geometry, side angle side, can be packed with false statements and irrelevant statements and still be true.

1.2 The error of "if-then" truth table should be TFUU, not that of TFTT

1.3 The error of "not" and "equal", neither unary, but should be binary

1.4 The error that Reductio Ad Absurdum is a proof method, when it is

merely probability-truth, not guaranteed

1.5 The error, the "or" connector is truth table FTTF, never that of TTTF, for the idea of an inclusive "or", --- either A or B or both, is a self contradiction. And funny, how the fathers of Logic-- Boole and Jevons had a connector that was self contradictory, as if the fathers of logic had no logical mind to be doing logic in the first place.

1.6 So that begs the question, what in mathematics has a truth table of TFFF. Well the simple answer is that it is a reverse of TTTF which is AND, and so the former can be got by that of a NOT function on AND. But in isolation, what is a table of TFFF in mathematics? My guess is it is Absolute Value, a form of Absolute Value in mathematics, but that is only a guess. In 2016 I gave a half hearted argument that TFFF was absolute value.