Archimedes Plutonium

2018-03-08 22:15:01 UTC

Reply

PermalinkNow there is a Science lifelong-generation Test for the past 30 years in General Science (each generation has its science test, and ours is Global Warming). It has but one question, do you believe and accept Global Warming Climate Change, and has never vocalized any opposition to it? If yes, well, you pass, if no, well, you were never a scientist in the first place, never, and science is not for you.

Now, Math has a lifelong-generation Test. Here again, only one question is needed.

MATH TEST::

Can you provide a Geometry proof of the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus? If not, well, you flunked mathematics.

Andrew Wiles flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test.

But Andrew Wiles stupidity in mathematics does not stop with Calculus, for, Wiles thought he was good at Fermat's Last Theorem, but it turns out. That Wiles was so very very stupid in even Arithmetic, because Euler supposedly proved FLT for exponent 3 and Wiles accepted Euler's fake proof. For Euler forgot that he needed to prove the case of A^3 + B^3 = C^3 had no solutions, Euler forgot to prove in the case of when A,B,C are even numbers. Totally forgot, and so Euler never had a proof of FLT in exp3. Yet when a dumbo of math like Wiles reads Euler's fake proof, it goes in one ear and out the other. You see, Wiles is so much like other mathematicians, they care not about truth in math, they care only about fame and fortune.

SEE PICTURE DIAGRAM of FUNDAMENTAL THEOREM OF CALCULUS below, professors hate teaching this for it shows their "limit calculus to be a joke"

PICTURE DIAGRAM OF FUNDAMENTAL THEOREM OF CALCULUS

By April 2015, was there for the first time a picture diagram proof of the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, FTC, not just an analysis argument, but a geometry proof (see below). Old Math could never assemble a picture diagram of the FTC. All they could do is argue with limit concept an analysis argument, never a geometry proof of FTC.

A picture diagram proof of FTC changes all of calculus and thus, changes all of mathematics for it requires a infinity borderline to produce an actual number for the infinitesimal, and that number is the inverse of the infinity borderline. Requiring a infinity borderline to produce the infinitesimal changes all of mathematics, and throwing out the limit concept. By changing all of Calculus and thus correcting mathematics, all of math before 2015 was just trash math.

Picture Diagram needed for Fundamental Theorem of Calculus

Why no continuum and no curves exist in Math, so that the Calculus

can exist, and does exist

by Archimedes Plutonium

Calculus is based upon there being Grid points in geometry, no

continuum, but actually, empty space between two neighboring points.

This is called Discrete geometry, and in physics, this is called

Quantum Mechanics. In 10 Grid, the first few numbers are 0, .1, .2,

.3, etc. That means there does not exist any number between 0 and .1,

no number exists between .1 and .2. Now if you want more precise

numbers, you go to a higher Grid like that of 100 Grid where the first

few numbers are 0, .01, .02, .03, etc.

Calculus in order to exist at all, needs this empty space between

consecutive numbers or successor numbers. It needs that empty space so

that the integral of calculus is actually small rectangles whose

interior area is not zero. So in 10 Grid, the smallest width of any

Calculus rectangle is of width .1. In 100 Grid the smallest width is

.01.

But, this revolutionary understanding of Calculus does not stop with

the Integral, for having empty space between numbers, means no curves

in math exist, but are ever tinier straight-line segments.

It also means, that the Derivative in Calculus is part and parcel of

the function graph itself. So that in a function such as y = x^2, the

function graph is the derivative at a point. In Old Math, they had the

folly and idiocy of a foreign, alien tangent line to a function graph

as derivative. In New Math, the derivative is the same as the function

graph itself. And, this makes commonsense, utter commonsense, for the

derivative is a prediction of the future of the function in question,

and no way in the world can a foreign tangent line to a point on the

function be able to predict, be able to tell where the future point of

that function be. The only predictor of a future point of a function,

is the function graph itself.

If the Calculus was done correctly, conceived correctly, then a

minimal diagram explains all of Calculus. Old Math never had such a

diagram, because Old Math was in total error of what Calculus is, and

what Calculus does.

The fundamental picture of all of Calculus are these two of a

trapezoid and rectangle. In fact, call the picture, the

FUNDAMENTAL THEOREM OF CALCULUS, Picture

Trapezoid for derivative as the roof-top of

the trapezoid, which must be a straight-line segment. If it is curved,

you cannot fold it down to form a integral rectangle. And the

rectangle for integral as area.

From this:

B

/|

/ |

A /----|

/ |

| |

|____|

The trapezoid roof has to be a straight-line segment (the derivative)

so that it can be hinged at A, and swiveled down to form rectangle for

integral.

To this:

______

| |

| |

| |

---------

And the derivative of x= A, above is merely the dy/dx involving points

A and B. Thus, it can never be a curve in Calculus. And the AB is part

of the function graph itself. No curves exist in mathematics and no

continuum exists in mathematics.

In the above we see that CALCULUS needs and requires a diagram in

which you can go from derivative to integral, or go from integral to

derivative, by simply a hinge down to form a rectangle for area, or a

hinge up to form the derivative from a given rectangle.

Why in Old Math could no professor of math ever do the Calculus

Diagram? Why? The answer is simple, no-one in Old Math pays attention

to Logic, and that no-one in Old Math was required to take formal

Logic when they attended school. So a person bereft of Logic, is never

going to find mistakes of Logic and think clear and think straight.

by Archimedes Plutonium

------------------

-------------------