*Post by g***@gmail.com**Post by Zelos Malum**Post by Eram semper recta**Post by Zelos Malum**Post by Eram semper recta**Post by Zelos Malum**Post by Eram semper recta**Post by Sergio**Post by Erasmo Scobee**Post by Eram semper recta**Post by Jan*It's all very strange, people insisting on doing precisely the things

they have no talent for. All that results is nonsense and frustration,

nothing to do with reality and truth. It's all just one big stifling

fog. -- Jan

Stupid fuck. When you don't know any mathematics, you should do the

right thing and shut the fuck up you incorrigible MORON.

I can't see the tensor equation, you two guys are debating the solution

of. Without rigorous PDE and tensorial description of the model/problem,

I can't state anything. Try again.

no tensors at all, need to step *way down to high school math*.

JG can't figure out the slope of a line, let him show you how his math

works on y = tan(x) + Ln(x) + e^(-x)

Trump moron eh?

notice how you never take anyone up on the challenge on showing your thing on more complicated functions?

Because it has been done many times, you dishonest piece of filth.

It hasn't, you avoid it because you know you can't.

Talking about your inability to provide any counter-example eh?

show us how, using your method, we find and/or confirm the derivative of f(x)=ln x.

Not until you admit you are wrong.

JG => show us how, using your method, we find and/or confirm the

derivative of f(x)=ln(x).

Show us NOW. If you do not, we declare your math phony, fake,

unworkable, discard it totally.

SO show us up, and find f'(x) for f'(x) = ln(x)

and show all the steps.

I have shown you many examples, but you are a dishonest, stubborn little

swine.

JG => show us how, using your method, we find and/or confirm the

derivative of f(x)=ln(x).

Show us NOW. If you do not, we declare your math phony, fake,

unworkable, discard it totally.

SO show us up, and find f'(x) for f'(x) = ln(x)

and show all the steps.

*Post by g***@gmail.com*If you were in my class, I would throw you out as toxic material.

JG => show us how, using your method, we find and/or confirm the

derivative of f(x)=ln(x).

Show us NOW. If you do not, we declare your math phony, fake,

unworkable, discard it totally.

SO show us up, and find f'(x) for f'(x) = ln(x)

and show all the steps.

*Post by g***@gmail.com*My theorem is 100% correct.

JG => show us how, using your method, we find and/or confirm the

derivative of f(x)=ln(x).

Show us NOW. If you do not, we declare your math phony, fake,

unworkable, discard it totally.

SO show us up, and find f'(x) for f'(x) = ln(x)

and show all the steps.

*Post by g***@gmail.com*The beauty about GEOMETRY is that you can't debate it as you do the bullshit of set theory and propositional logic.

JG => show us how, using your method, we find and/or confirm the

derivative of f(x)=ln(x).

Show us NOW. If you do not, we declare your math phony, fake,

unworkable, discard it totally.

SO show us up, and find f'(x) for f'(x) = ln(x)

and show all the steps.

*Post by g***@gmail.com*It is either correct or it is not.

JG => show us how, using your method, we find and/or confirm the

derivative of f(x)=ln(x).

Show us NOW. If you do not, we declare your math phony, fake,

unworkable, discard it totally.

SO show us up, and find f'(x) for f'(x) = ln(x)

and show all the steps.

JG => show us how, using your method, we find and/or confirm the

derivative of f(x)=ln(x).

Show us NOW. If you do not, we declare your math phony, fake,

unworkable, discard it totally.

SO show us up, and find f'(x) for f'(x) = ln(x)

and show all the steps.

*Post by g***@gmail.com*There are NO rules or beliefs (axioms) in sound mathematics which is based on FACT.

JG => show us how, using your method, we find and/or confirm the

derivative of f(x)=ln(x).

Show us NOW. If you do not, we declare your math phony, fake,

unworkable, discard it totally.

SO show us up, and find f'(x) for f'(x) = ln(x)

and show all the steps.

*Post by g***@gmail.com*Do you even realise that you are harming thousands of your countrymen who couldn't put up with the bullshit you had to memorise in college?

JG => show us how, using your method, we find and/or confirm the

derivative of f(x)=ln(x).

Show us NOW. If you do not, we declare your math phony, fake,

unworkable, discard it totally.

SO show us up, and find f'(x) for f'(x) = ln(x)

and show all the steps.

*Post by g***@gmail.com*Stop thinking about yourself for once and think about others.

JG => show us how, using your method, we find and/or confirm the

derivative of f(x)=ln(x).

Show us NOW. If you do not, we declare your math phony, fake,

unworkable, discard it totally.

SO show us up, and find f'(x) for f'(x) = ln(x)

and show all the steps.

*Post by g***@gmail.com*Why should they have to endure the same bullshit you did?

JG => show us how, using your method, we find and/or confirm the

derivative of f(x)=ln(x).

Show us NOW. If you do not, we declare your math phony, fake,

unworkable, discard it totally.

SO show us up, and find f'(x) for f'(x) = ln(x)

and show all the steps.

*Post by g***@gmail.com*By supporting the orangutans who brainwashed you, you are simply continuing the cycle of intellectual abuse and destroying thousands of lives in the process.

JG => show us how, using your method, we find and/or confirm the

derivative of f(x)=ln(x).

Show us NOW. If you do not, we declare your math phony, fake,

unworkable, discard it totally.

SO show us up, and find f'(x) for f'(x) = ln(x)

and show all the steps.

*Post by g***@gmail.com*Students are not as stupid as you think!

JG => show us how, using your method, we find and/or confirm the

derivative of f(x)=ln(x).

Show us NOW. If you do not, we declare your math phony, fake,

unworkable, discard it totally.

SO show us up, and find f'(x) for f'(x) = ln(x)

and show all the steps.

*Post by g***@gmail.com*Even those who are uneducated can sense bullshit from a great distance.

JG => show us how, using your method, we find and/or confirm the

derivative of f(x)=ln(x).

Show us NOW. If you do not, we declare your math phony, fake,

unworkable, discard it totally.

SO show us up, and find f'(x) for f'(x) = ln(x)

and show all the steps.

*Post by g***@gmail.com*99% of your ideas and the way you think, is just drivel.

JG => show us how, using your method, we find and/or confirm the

derivative of f(x)=ln(x).

Show us NOW. If you do not, we declare your math phony, fake,

unworkable, discard it totally.

SO show us up, and find f'(x) for f'(x) = ln(x)

and show all the steps.

*Post by g***@gmail.com*You have a very superficial understanding which is equivalent to NO understanding.

JG => show us how, using your method, we find and/or confirm the

derivative of f(x)=ln(x).

Show us NOW. If you do not, we declare your math phony, fake,

unworkable, discard it totally.

SO show us up, and find f'(x) for f'(x) = ln(x)

and show all the steps.

*Post by g***@gmail.com*Mathematics is about measure and number.

JG => show us how, using your method, we find and/or confirm the

derivative of f(x)=ln(x).

Show us NOW. If you do not, we declare your math phony, fake,

unworkable, discard it totally.

SO show us up, and find f'(x) for f'(x) = ln(x)

and show all the steps.

*Post by g***@gmail.com*Anything else is NOT mathematics.

JG => show us how, using your method, we find and/or confirm the

derivative of f(x)=ln(x).

Show us NOW. If you do not, we declare your math phony, fake,

unworkable, discard it totally.

SO show us up, and find f'(x) for f'(x) = ln(x)

and show all the steps.