*Post by Dan Christensen**Post by bassam king karzeddin*Can you genius professional mathematicians express exactly the magnitude of the arithmetical fifth root of two, denoted as 2^{1/5}, but please without using that decimal notation point denoted by (.)?

You have banned the numbers 0 and 1. Now you want to ban decimal points??? Too bad! It ain't going to happen outside--not outside the psych ward anyway.

Dan C-T, Copied a wrong answer from Trollish machine of Wolfram -Alpha that is a calculator only where it is impossible to think

*Post by Dan Christensen*2^(1/5) = approx.

1.14869835499703500679862694677792758944385088909779750551371111849360320625351305681147311301150847391457571782825280872990018972855371267615994917020637676959403854539263226492033301322122190625130645468320078386350285806907949085127708283982797043969640382563667945344431106523789654147255972578315704103326302050272017414235255993151553782375173884359786924137881735354092890268530342009402133755822717151679559278360263800840317501093689917495888199116...

See the clear idiocy of Dan C-T (and so, unfortunately, the vast majorities of YOU mathematicians as well)

Not that started by (x = approx., and ended with those most stupid achievements of modern mathematics and denoted by three stupid meaningless dots as (...) after a number of digits are obtained as an approximation but never exact)

Just because they never like to understand thousands of years very important issue about insolvable Diophantine Equations

Note that any approximation for the fifth root of two is perpetually expressed in this rational or decimal form as [A(n)/10^{n - 1}], where A(n) is a natural number with (n) number of digits (saying here in our current 10-base number system)

Where it is not permissible in the holy grail of mathematics principles to consider (n--> (No number or your infinity), and only because this absolutely impossible task nor because there is no such pure human mind fiction as infinity in your modern mathematics strictly, but because you would have a ratio of two integers (which aren't existing numbers, since each would be with an infinite sequence of digits)

Where no existing limits for [A(n)/10^{n - 1}], When (n--> oo)

In short, it becomes as (No number/No number = No number) as per our **ORIGINAL** insolvable Diaphontine Eqn. of:

[A(n)]^5 = 5(10^{n - 1}^5

Please, smart people & students, don't ever be conned anymore with the magic (the cheaters create) of that decimal notation that alleged top-most genus academic mathematicians usually hide behind, nor the fiction of infinity they hide behind since all that fails drastically before the simplest D. Eqns, that are impossible to be solved (in any case) by all those carpentry terms like

(Limits, infinity, decimal notation, convergence, Newton's approximations, infamous Dedikined cuts, endless Cauchy sequences, Intermediate empty theorems, Euler unfinished sum, Diagonal Contour idiot theorem, Godel nonsense, KUNT madness, potential infinity, ..., etc)

**********END OF NO NUMBERS THAT AREN'T CONSTRUCTIBLE (by all the means)******

Say the truth, that the algebraic fifth root number of a prime number is no existing number and then legalize your claimed approximations (in a constructible form number) for whatever other carpentry reasons (but strictly not in truer and superior mathematics)

That is the whole problem where YOU mathematicians and alike refuse to understand (under the sunlight and full understanding of every wise person (if ever existing)

*Post by Dan Christensen*Source: https://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=2%5E%281%2F5%29

The source is also not understanding their mind fallacies since these situations are quite global

*Post by Dan Christensen*This result can apparently be determined to any number of significant figures. Do you know what that means, Crank Boy?

Still, Dan T, INCAPABLE for the true understanding that no irrational numbers exist except constructible numbers in their surd form with proofs from the Pythagorian theorem strictly

How do you know the fact that you are the eternal Psycho Troll, Dan? wonders!

*Post by Dan Christensen*“Those many challenges of mine (in my posts) weren't actually designed for human beings, but for the future artificial beings that would certainly replace them not far away from now, for sure.”

-- BKK, Dec. 6, 2017

"The Devils deeds that are strictly and basically sourced from mathematicians like humans, FOR SURE!"

-- BKK, June 11, 2020 *** NEW ***

“You know certainly that I'm the man, and more specially the KING who is going to upside down most of your current false mathematics for all future generations.”

-- BKK, Nov. 22, 2018

“Despite thousands of years of continuous juggling and false definitions of what is truly the real number, they [us carbon-based lifeforms?] truly don't want to understand it as was discovered strictly by the *KING* [BKK Himself!]”

-- BKK, Nov. 28, 2019

“I don't believe even in one being a number”

-- BKK, Dec. 31, 2019

Math failure, BKK, doesn't believe in negative numbers, zero, one or numbers like pi and root 2. He doesn't even believe in 40 degree angles or circles. Really! Needless to say his own goofy system is getting nowhere and never will. As such he is insanely jealous of wildly successful mainstream mathematics. He seems to believe these super-intelligent artificial beings of his will somehow be enlisting his aid to "reform" mathematics worldwide when they take over the planet in the near future. He is truly delusional.

Dan

Download my DC Proof 2.0 freeware at http://www.dcproof.com

Visit my Math Blog at http://www.dcproof.wordpress.com

Don't lie in some issues like sqrt(2), change it to the cube root of two

And don't mix the endless decimal notation of sqrt(2) wich isn't a number either

I guess that my posts are only visible to the same well-known hired Trolls of sci. math! wonders!

Since it is absolutely the seventh impossible itself for educated humans with at least middle schools levels education to be with such unbelievable stupidities FOR (100%) SURE

Bassam King Karzeddin