Discussion:
is RH proved this way?
(too old to reply)
Oussama Basta
2024-01-30 19:22:28 UTC
Permalink
hey everyone,

what do you think, https://vixra.org/abs/2307.0086
Julio Di Egidio
2024-01-30 19:52:04 UTC
Permalink
Post by Oussama Basta
hey everyone,
what do you think, https://vixra.org/abs/2307.0086
"4. However, for large prime numbers, we can observe that
the argument [pi*k*ln(k)] will be close to an integer multiple of [pi]."

Which is the same as saying that [k*ln(k)] approaches an integer
for [k] that goes to infinity, which is false.

Julio
Oussama Basta
2024-01-30 20:06:42 UTC
Permalink
Post by Julio Di Egidio
Post by Oussama Basta
hey everyone,
what do you think, https://vixra.org/abs/2307.0086
"4. However, for large prime numbers, we can observe that
the argument [pi*k*ln(k)] will be close to an integer multiple of [pi]."
Which is the same as saying that [k*ln(k)] approaches an integer
for [k] that goes to infinity, which is false.
Julio
for any large real number you can ignore the fractional part in an approximation
Julio Di Egidio
2024-01-31 10:27:00 UTC
Permalink
Post by Oussama Basta
Post by Julio Di Egidio
Post by Oussama Basta
hey everyone,
what do you think, https://vixra.org/abs/2307.0086
"4. However, for large prime numbers, we can observe that
the argument [pi*k*ln(k)] will be close to an integer multiple of [pi]."
Which is the same as saying that [k*ln(k)] approaches an integer
for [k] that goes to infinity, which is false.
for any large real number you can ignore the fractional part in an approximation
Another little piece of nonsense.

Sure, keep going as it's going great...

Julio
Oussama Basta
2024-01-31 11:49:45 UTC
Permalink
Post by Julio Di Egidio
Post by Oussama Basta
Post by Julio Di Egidio
Post by Oussama Basta
hey everyone,
what do you think, https://vixra.org/abs/2307.0086
"4. However, for large prime numbers, we can observe that
the argument [pi*k*ln(k)] will be close to an integer multiple of [pi]."
Which is the same as saying that [k*ln(k)] approaches an integer
for [k] that goes to infinity, which is false.
for any large real number you can ignore the fractional part in an approximation
Another little piece of nonsense.
Sure, keep going as it's going great...
Julio
Another fraction of a mathematician and can be ignored integral of u=0
Loading...