Dekota Tzederbaum
2023-10-26 16:29:33 UTC
I think it's time to have a rational discussion of tachyonic
10.13189/ujpa.2023.170101 present a proof that tachyons, even if they
existed, could not violate causality by sending a message into the past.
Some of the salient points in that paper are listed below.
(1) The four-momentum formalism (4MF) isn't immune from criticism
because it's declared to be a "definition. Nature doesn't care about
what humans assert.
idiot, you don't undrestand anything. If "tachyons" doesn't, so doesn't10.13189/ujpa.2023.170101 present a proof that tachyons, even if they
existed, could not violate causality by sending a message into the past.
Some of the salient points in that paper are listed below.
(1) The four-momentum formalism (4MF) isn't immune from criticism
because it's declared to be a "definition. Nature doesn't care about
what humans assert.
light, hence photons. You don't undrestand Nature and manifolds.