科学之王 Kēxué zhī wáng --AP-- King of Science, what we throw out of Old Math as fakery// TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 3 for age 19-20 Sophomore year College, math textbook series, book 4

Discussion:

(too old to reply)

Archimedes Plutonium

2020-04-02 06:12:03 UTC

科学之王
Kēxué zhī wáng --AP-- King of Science, what we throw out of Old Math as fakery// TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 3 for age 19-20 Sophomore year College, math textbook series, book 4

First an aside for this is in the probability and statistics of Junior year College

#5
HISTORY OF THE PROTON MASS and the 945 MeV //Atom Totality series, book 5 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

In 2016-2017, AP discovered that the real proton has a mass of 840 MeV, not 938. The real electron was actually the muon and the muon stays inside the proton that forms a proton torus of 8 rings and with the muon as bar magnet is a Faraday Law producing magnetic monopoles. So this book is all about why researchers of physics and engineers keep getting the number 938MeV when they should be getting the number 840 MeV + 105 MeV = 945 MeV.

Cover Picture is a proton torus of 8 rings with a muon of 1 ring inside the proton torus, doing the Faraday Law and producing magnetic monopoles.
Length: 16 pages

Newsgroups: sci.math
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2019 06:50:12 -0800 (PST)
Subject: The 938MeV is in error because they fail to use the best modern up to
date physics of E^2 = p^2 c^2 + m_0^2 c^4, and if you use that, you get the
true value of proton + muon = 945MeV
From: Archimedes Plutonium <***@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2019 14:50:13 +0000

The 938MeV is in error because they fail to use the best modern up to date physics of E^2 = p^2 c^2 + m_0^2 c^4, and if you use that, you get the true value of proton + muon = 945MeV

Newsgroups: sci.physics
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2019 06:17:52 -0800 (PST)
Subject: I believe I spotted the reason Old Physics reports the proton at
938MeV when it should report it at 945MeV
Injection-Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2019 14:17:53 +0000
I believe I spotted the reason Old Physics reports the proton at 938MeV when it should report it at 945MeV
I believe I know where the error of the proton rest mass at 938 comes from when it truly is 945MeV as 840MeV proton + 105MeV muon
INTRODUCTION TO NUCLEAR AND PARTICLE PHYSICS, FOURTH EDITION
https://books.google.com › books
MITTAL, V. K., ‎VERMA, R. C., ‎GUPTA, S,\. C. - 2018 - ‎Science
This model obviously avoids the failures of proton–electron hypothesis. ... ́ 10–10 J » 945 MeV This value is slightly greater than the rest mass energy of proton, ...
In that last reference of Mittal, Verma, Gupta they probably pointed out the mistake in Old Physics as to the reason they report 938MeV when in truth the particle is 945MeV.
They get 1.51 *10^-10 J
From the relativistic equation E^2 = p^2 c^2 + m_0^2 c^4

Ever since my 2017 discovery that the real proton was 840 MeV with a muon inside it doing the Faraday Law making the total mass be 840+105 MeV = 945MeV, that I thought the reported 938MeV was due to statistical error in the lab set up to measure, where they were subtracting nonsense off their data, or were not including some energy.

But now I am beginning to realize where the error of 938 when it should be 945 is coming from. It is coming from the fact that ever since the proton was discovered with Rutherford in early 1900s, and its mass measured, did not use relativistic calculations. Rutherford did not have this formula of
E^2 = p^2 c^2 + m_0^2 c^4. And no physicist after Rutherford bothered to think straight, think clear.

The 938MeV is in error because they fail to use the best modern up to date physics of E^2 = p^2 c^2 + m_0^2 c^4, and if you use that, you get the true value of proton + muon = 945MeV

AP

Listing the Errors of Old Math

Now I do need to discuss the Errors of Math in General and the errors of math in geometry in particular. I have the feeling that Geometry is the more important of the two-- algebra - geometry. This list appears in Sophomore College year and now in Senior College year, meant to be a guide and a organizing of what must be covered before graduating from College.

Errors mostly, but not always, according to importance:

1) No curves exist in Geometry, only finer and smaller straight line segments attached to one another

2) Space has gaps in between one point and the next point. These gaps are empty space from one point to the next point, for example in 10 Grid there is no number between .1 and .2, and in 100 Grid there exists no number between .01 and .02.

3) Infinity has a borderline and there is a microinfinity compared to a macroinfinity. For example in 10 Grid, the microinfinity is .1 if we exclude 0 and so there is no number smaller than .1 and no number larger than 10 in 10 Grid, where 10 is macroinfinity.

4) The 1st Quadrant Only in Coordinate System Geometry. Sad that the first coordinate system of Descartes was correct but soon became corrupted with 4 quadrants. See Mathematical Thought, Volume 1, Kline, 1972, page 303. Where Fermat then Descartes starts the Cartesian Coordinate System as 1 axis only and from 0 rightwards, meaning in our modern day math, 1st Quadrant Only. Why did math screw up on coordinate systems? I suppose some clowns thought negative numbers were true and they wanted ease of drawing a circle with center at 0. When they could have just as easily drawn the circle in 1st Quadrant Only.

5) Calculus needed a Geometry proof of the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, but Old Math never provided such, instead they provided some stupid Limit argument. The reason for the creation of the Limit disaster was that the French mathematician Cauchy got sick and tired of hearing his smartest students complain that the width of rectangles in the integral are 0 width, and those smart students could not, for the life of them understand how a rectangle with 0 width has any interior area. So instead of the math community denouncing the limit, instead they elevated the fakery.

6) Further in Calculus, they knew you could do a transform of coordinate points to turn any function into a polynomial function, a method of Lagrange. However, they in Old Math were too stupid to take this transform to its highest form-- all functions are polynomial functions and only polynomial functions. When you learn that-- the derivative and integral of any and every function of math is a snap breeze simple and easy.

7) With the error filled 4 quadrants, when it should be 1st Quadrant Only, we have Trigonometry's sine and cosine with the fakery of sinusoid wave when it never was that. The sine and cosine are semicircle waves, and no sinusoid wave exists

8) There is only one Geometry-- Euclidean, and there is not three distinct geometries of elliptical Riemannian or hyperbolic Lobachevsky. Those two are just duals that make up Euclidean.

9) Torus, volume and surface area formulas in Old Math are all screwed up and in error because they imagined bending a cylinder to form a torus. This brings back memories, for I had to do a percentage formula, since I could not follow the fake way of bending a cylinder. Where 78.5% of Disc Torus (pi)R^2h - (pi)r^2h is the volume of Circle Torus, and 78.5% of Disc Torus 2(pi)Rh + 2(pi)rh + 2 ((pi)R^2 - (pi)r^2) is the surface area of Circle Torus.

10) Ellipse is never a conic slant cut, always a cylinder slant cut

11) Parallelepiped volume is simply a*b*c and the use of trigonometry is unnecessary. The Parallelepiped actually has the physics concept of angular momentum for a given rectangular box produces one and only one parallelepiped.

12) All of Old Logic such as the textbooks by Copi and Boole and Jevons with their messed up operators such as 10 OR 4 = 14, are thrown out onto the rubbish pile of shame. Set theory is thrown out completely, although we can use the word "set" to mean collection, group. All of Cantor set theory is phony baloney, not worth reading.

13) Rationals and Negative Numbers thrown out completely because the only true numbers are Decimal Grid Numbers. The Smallest set of numbers is the 10 Grid System with its infinitesimal being .1, and the entire collection of 10 Grid is 0, .1, .2, .3, . . , 9.9, 10.0 where .1 is microinfinity and 10 is macroinfinity. In 100 Grid the infinitesimal is .01, in 1000 Grid the infinitesimal is .001, etc etc. In such a true system of numbers, all the numbers are built by mathematical-induction. Not just one group of numbers-- counting, but all numbers from mathematical-induction.

14) Irrationals thrown out completely (ditto to Rationals and Negative numbers)

15) Reals thrown out completely (ditto)

16) Imaginary numbers and Complex numbers are b.s. and thrown out completely

17) Trigonometry pared down so much-- 90% thrown out, and no trigonometry ever enters Calculus. Only real use of trigonometry is when you have an angle and side, you can figure out the rest of the right triangle. But no, when you give true math to a gaggle of kooks, it is not long before they stretch true math way way out of its "zone of truth". And even fill up by 50% of calculus, when trig should never be in calculus.

18) Continuum and continuity thrown out as horrible fakery (in fact the Quantum Mechanic Physics of early 1900s had a better handle on the truth and reality of math with discrete space)

19) Topology is junk and a waste of time for many reasons such as continuum does not exist, and the fact that the idea of "bending" is not really ever a mathematical concept

20) Prime numbers are fakery for the Naturals never had division in the first place. The real true numbers of mathematics are the Decimal Grid Numbers and they do not have a concept of "prime". The key evidence that primes were silly stupid error, was the fact that there never existed a "pattern for primes". And all of mathematics is a science of "pattern". If any part of mathematics has no pattern, is indication that such was a phony fake concept to start with. Below begins a write-up of Math topics all have pattern, if not, then not math.

21) Limit in Old Math was a horrible fakery, built by lowly idiots of math who wanted to get away from the smart students asking them-- stupid professor, come back here,-- how does a zero width rectangle even have interior area

22) Lobachevsky, Riemann geometries and all NonEuclidean geometries are fakery and a waste of time. Many math professors want to spice up their boring math, so they ventured way way off into the twilight-zone of math with NonEuclidean geometry, like eating the hottest peppers in the world for breakfast

23) Boole logic a horrid gaggle of monumental mistakes; one colossal error was their insane 10 OR 4 = 14. Boole was a monumental idiot of logic that he went to college to teach in a rainstorm without umbrella and when he got there, shivering, and no commonsense to switch into dry clothes, taught in rain soaked clothes then ordered his wife to give him cold bathes and wet his bed in order to fight pneumonia, and western culture puts such a logical misfit as a figurehead of logic

24) Galois Algebra of Group, Ring, Field a fakery and waste of time

25) Dimension stops at 3rd, and 3rd is the last and highest dimension possible, for there is no 4th or higher dimensions.

26) High School in Old Math spends too much time on quadratic equations with their negative numbers and imaginary-complex numbers when such never existed in the first place and where they violate a principle of algebra-- that an equation of algebra-- the right-side of the equation must always have a greater than zero number. So we throw out all quadratic equations of Old Math as fake math.

27) High School in Old Math spends too much time on teaching in geometry the congruence of SSS, ASA etc etc and we should pare that back somewhat, as excess teaching of a tiny minor concept.

28) Ordinary and Partial Differential Equations are now seen as superfluous when all functions are polynomials

29) Graph theory-- 90% worthless for it is based on the fakery of continuum

30) Probability and Statistics theory now becomes a part of Sigma Error in New Math, the Old Math Probability and Statistics theory were wastrel and thrown out for it is based on a continuum and they had no proper definition of "probability" that fits with statistics. We keep Probability and Statistics in new math but revise and overhaul it completely.

31) We definitely throw out all Old Math Calculus textbooks as mostly propaganda, based on the silly Limit and the Continuum

32) We throw out the Euclidean Axioms of Geometry and start anew, with axioms based on Physics as geometry truth

33) Fractal theory totally junk and a waste-- uses ill-defined infinity

34) Vector Calculus (not the vector concept itself), Chaos theory, Complex Analysis, utter junk and waste of time since polynomial theory covers all functions

35) Differential geometry, Measure theory fakery since they never had the correct numbers of math, and they had the fakery continuum

36) We throw out all the Apollonius conic sections because he misidentified the ellipse. The ellipse is a cylinder section, never a conic section and the oval is the slant cut of the cone, never the ellipse. We replace the entire conic sections by the AP theory of axes of symmetry using Decimal Grid Numbers for algebra and strip-wavelength-geometry axioms.

37) Most of Algebra, starting with Linear Algebra is esoteric minutiae, or, just cute tools for specialized math, just as the Binomial Theorem and the Pascal triangle, all cute esoteric minutiae. Certainly none of which is appropriate in school math education. These topics are for those interested in sideline math, but does not belong in mainstream math. Algebra reaches its pinnacle of importance with the Polynomial Function transform. Anything else in Algebra is sideline esoteric minutiae. These are not wrong or false math, just not important enough math to be mainstream worthy of math education.

This list is ongoing, and is a bulletin-board of errors of Old Math and useful for Teaching True Mathematics. I insert this list into Sophomore College-year as a guide. To show students what math to avoid, to steer away from, as a total fake and waste of time.

Proof Stars shine from Faraday Law, not from fusion // (Physics series for High School Book 12) Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium

On 30JAN2020, while watching the BBC on TV, was news and video images of the Sun's surface, showing what looks like golden chips, with white flowing magnetism or electricity as the white flowing in between the golden chips. This was exciting, extremely exciting because with this "observational data" I could use it to prove that the Sun and stars shine not from fusion but from Faraday Law of each and every atom inside the Sun having its muons thrust through its attendant proton coil and producing electricity and magnetism via the Faraday and Ampere laws. This is what gives stars their shining outbursts of energy, their starshine or for the sun, sunshine. If star energy was due to fusion, there would be very little light in the universe. There would be no life on Earth. So with the 30 JAN2020 report, I can use those video imagines to actually prove our Sun is a Faraday Law machine, not a fusion machine.

Cover Picture is my photograph of the BBC video image. A BBC quote: "The Daniel K Inouye Solar Telescope on Hawaii has released pictures that show features as small as 30km across."

Length: 20 pages

Product details
File Size: 963 KB
Print Length: 20 pages
Publication Date: January 30, 2020

I re-opened the old newsgroup PAU of 1990s and there one can read my recent posts without the hassle of spammers, off-topic-misfits, front-page-hogs, churning imbeciles, stalking mockers, suppression-bullies, and demonizers.

Read my recent posts in peace and quiet.
https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe
Archimedes Plutonium

AP- 科学之王
Kēxué zhī wáng

Donald Trump

2020-04-02 14:17:49 UTC

Permalink

Post by Archimedes Plutonium
科学之王
Kēxué zhī wáng --AP-- King of Science, what we throw out of Old Math as fakery// TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 3 for age 19-20 Sophomore year College, math textbook series, book 4
First an aside for this is in the probability and statistics of Junior year College
#5
HISTORY OF THE PROTON MASS and the 945 MeV //Atom Totality series, book 5 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
In 2016-2017, AP discovered that the real proton has a mass of 840 MeV, not 938. The real electron was actually the muon and the muon stays inside the proton that forms a proton torus of 8 rings and with the muon as bar magnet is a Faraday Law producing magnetic monopoles. So this book is all about why researchers of physics and engineers keep getting the number 938MeV when they should be getting the number 840 MeV + 105 MeV = 945 MeV.

Vacuum-brained Plutonium, why do you insist on trying to destroy this
math group with such garbage posts?

Archimedes Plutonium

2021-09-25 04:17:42 UTC

Permalink

Thanks President Trump. Would Marcella Carena, have asked the question which is the atom's real electron, muon or 0.5MeV particle if she had attended your Trump Univ?

Head of Theory Division Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory.
Quoting her in Scientific American, Oct2021 "What is this wobble effect that has me and other scientists so intrigued? It has to do with the way a muon spins when it travels through a magnetic field."

AP writes: yes, well if the muon is the real electron of atoms, then it has spin as it thrusts through proton toruses in a Faraday law.

AP writes: Good Marcella, in that sentence, but then when you wander over into the garbage fake physics of Standard Model, you lost it Marcella. Instead, after that sentence of yours above, your next sentence should have been this---

We, physicists are looking to discover that the real true electron of atoms is the muon and not what JJ Thomson found in 1897 of a 0.5MeV particle. Because if the muon is the true electron of atoms, it is packed inside a proton torus thrusting through the proton torus in a Faraday law and producing electricity, some of which this produced electricity is the 0.5MeV particle. And because that is the job, function and task of the muon as true electron of atoms, the muon has a intrinsic spin inside the protons and outside the proton. And the Standard Model was a bizarre theory of physics proposed by clownish imps of physics with no logical brain to speak of, for their particles have no job, no task, no function to tie them together and ask why in the world do they exist at all.

SAVE// AP's 151st book of science// TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS, 1st year College.

Alright, I am trying my hardest to get this published before September 2021 ends.

And down on the home stretch, I come to realize more than ever how much dependent I am on using biology's DNA structure to model the structure of light-waves-photons.

Just today I am writing the passages of where the Electric field in the AP-EM equations of E' = (V/(CB))' The Coulomb gravity law of EM-theory, that I need a Light wave to be both a pencil ellipse closed loop where the source is always connected until the light wave ends up, and that one end of the light wave is electromotive push, while the other end of the light wave at the source is electromotive pull. In other words, light waves are Double Transverse Waves, and in electricity, those are split up at the source and combined in the path traveled. And this is duplicated in DNA as when in reproduction, the DNA is two single strands coming together to form a double strand.

The only physics experiments to date that can colloborate AP's intuition on this is the Harvard Dr. Hau slow light experiment, if for some logical reason she finally decides to flick the switch of the light source off in BEC and watch the entire column of light vanish at the --same time---. But Harvard's Dr. Hau is too stubborn and thus ignorant in complying.

AP
King of Science, especially Physics

In "week16" of my "This Week's Finds" series I described some of the
recent work on discrete spacetime models in which there is NOT an
absolute frame of reference. None of these have succeeded in modelling
much 4d physics, but it's certainly a possibility to keep in mind.

AP writes: does it matter whatever John writes about science, when he cannot admit a slant cut in cone is a oval, not ellipse. Earth may as well be flat in a mind like John Baez.

Here is an example of someone in physics, John Baez, Hartle, Hawking, who should never have been in physics. For they end up making big convoluted messes, never able to ask simple questions of true physics or math. For example, how simple is it to ask which is the real electron inside atoms-- is it the muon or the 0.5MeV particle. Or the simple question of , well Hawking you have the Pauli Exclusion principle that forbids collapse and black holes, so why are you freakishly thinking black holes exist at all.

Or the simple question of Ln(1.00005) does not come from a function Y = 1/x for that is a function (see AP's newsgroup of what is a function) unrelated to Ln(x) but close, still unrelated. And so the true value of Ln(1.00005) = 0.00005 and not what your computer or calculator throws at you.

John Baez is a failed physicist and mathematician, so caught up in abstraction messes and outright lies of science.

Watch the quantum cosmologists squirm. Hawking had for a while argued
that according to his formula for the wavefunction of the universe
(the Hartle-Hawking "no boundary boundary-value conditions") entropy
would increase to the point halfway between big bang and big crunch, and
then decrease. But in a recent paper (mentioned in my "This Week's
Finds") he says he thinks one can *derive* time asymmetry from his
wavefunction. I am very dubious of his argument, though, which seems to
handwave at crucial points.
In Andrei Linde's "chaotic inflation" scenario (another proposal for the
wavefunction of the universe), it probably is not right to think of the
hunk of the universe we see as being a closed system.
In any event, if you are puzzled by this problem, you can take some
consolation by knowing you are in good company!

Why bother John for you failed both math and physics, you cannot even acknowledge a oval is the slant cut in cone, never the ellipse. And when in the world will that small mind of yours ask the question which is the atom's real electron, the muon or the 0.5MeV particle. John, you have been a charlatan physicist all your life, but why not turn the corner and acknowledge a oval is the slant cut of cone.

Archimedes Plutonium

2022-02-24 02:31:16 UTC

Permalink

Give Ukraine cruise missiles that reach Moscow & Stalingrad, is what Donald Trump, the disgraced US president meant when he said "savvy"

Post by Donald Trump

Vacuum

Give Ukraine cruise missiles that reach Moscow & Stalingrad, is what Donald Trump, the disgraced US president meant when he said "savvy"

Archimedes Plutonium

2022-03-09 01:57:06 UTC

Permalink

Kibo & Trump--
Putin, Xi, --Biden, call up Xi telling him to call up Putin to withdraw from Ukraine-- for if Putin pushes the button, all major Chinese cities are leveled as is Russian cities// SCIENCE COUNCIL RULES EARTH

Kibo Parry Moroney

"Putin's Stooge"

When the invasion started two or more weeks ago of Russia invading Ukraine, I knew there was Chernobyl in Ukraine, but totally unaware that there were 4 other nuclear stations in Ukraine and one of them the largest in Europe.

So the horrible spectacle a few days ago of Russian artillery firing on one of those nuclear power stations, luckily it was not breeched and turned into a 2nd Chernobyl disaster.

So, Biden, this is Tuesday 8 March, please call up Xi and tell him to call up Putin that same day requesting Putin to withdraw all military out of Ukraine.

Tell Xi, that if Putin pushes the nuclear button that all major Chinese cities will be hit and vaporized as well as all major Russian cities. As well as Pyongyang North Korea.

Tell Xi, to call Putin on 8 March.

On 9 March, move the NATO forces into Ukraine to secure Ukraine to all its borders, even the Donbas and the Crimea stolen by Putin in previous years.

Secure the nuclear power stations.

If Putin pushes the nuclear button, every Russian city and Chinese city will become vaporized.

If things continue the way they are continuing now, then Putin will use those 5 nuclear plants as a dump waste site for all Russian radioactive materials to cower and suppress the Ukraine people. But also, Putin will cause Europe to be a radioactive sewer from the winds that blow the radioactive waste into Europe.

Putin will likely dump radioactive waste all along the western border of Ukraine and Belarus, so that the radioactivity in Europe will be almost unliveable.

Biden, call up Israel if this nuclear war ignites, to take care of Iran and Syria.

India and Pakistan in nuclear war 3. I do not know what to instruct there.

Biden, call up Germany and Japan and have them start building nuclear missiles as a wall on Russia and a wall on China.

The trouble with the world right now, is the economic sanctions on Russia should have been installed over 10 years ago when Putin was sending out assassins to kill people in England and Germany and elsewhere, where if the sanctions had been imposed over 10 years ago, we would not have this Ukraine nightmare we have today.

The science of psychology has done a poor job starting 1950, for this community of scientists should have a yearly evaluation report on leaders of countries that could affect Earth deletoriously, and reported that to goverments to start economic sanctions, such as Putin and such as Trump on the report making it impossible for him to be elected.

Going forward, if we escape a nuclear war 3, we need this yearly report of psychologists and make Earth safer in the future.

I had a report list of how many nuclear missiles each country had, and the West has as many as Russia, and China has few. What we have to count on here, is that the missiles of USA are superior to Russia and China, we have to pray they are superior in order for the crazy insane Putin to not push the buttons. But we have to meet his brutal invasion of Ukraine by sending in NATO forces, for if not, then Putin's Russia will make Europe a radioactive waste dump site.

Putin's Russia has already displaced millions of Ukraines and likely will end up being 20 million Ukraines outside of their homeland. That is reason enough to send the NATO army into Ukraine and repel the Russians.

As Putin already threatened to push the button, we have to be on the utmost alert and use our superiority of weapons.

Reinforcing again and again to Xi and Putin that all their major cities will be leveled.

I am using the past history of the Cuban Missile Crisis, that force needs a challenge of force. And that JFK used a naval blockade. And that Khrushchev was not insane but reasonable. In our plight of 2022, it looks like Putin is insane, and the hope and prayer to get us through a nuclear war 3, is the better precision of our missiles.

Putin is old, and so if we do not challenge him here and now, he will push the buttons regardless.

If we do not challenge Putin tomorrow, means Europe has 20 million refuges and likely 4 more Chernobyls and a radioactive wasteland of Europe.

Please, President Biden, call up Xi today and instruct him to call Putin.

AP
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium
3:44 AM (10 hours ago)



to
Biden, please tell Xi also, that if he is unsuccessful in getting Putin to withdraw his forces out of Ukraine that China will be economically sanctioned the day after. Which is actually good for the West as we bring all manufacturing jobs back to the West.
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium
3:53 AM (9 hours ago)



to
When a week ago Putin broadcast to the world, keep out, or he pushs the nuclear button.

The reply to Putin in that instant of time was to say to Putin-- we are on the ready and that every major city in Russia and China will be vaporized and leveled.

That was the only acceptable reply to Putin's threat. For only in that reply, is there a chance to reach some sanity in Putin.

Archimedes Plutonium

2023-08-22 20:09:49 UTC

Permalink

AP's beloved TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 2 for ages 5 to 18, math textbook series, book 2
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) (Amazon Kindle edition)

Re: AP may have to call the FBI, before too long, and imagine someone trying to "identity theft" as a person with the name Archimedes Plutonium (King of Science, especially Physics & Logic)
3:04 PM

***@gmail.com's profile photo
***@gmail.com
,

4
Re: Pres.Biden please examine the resignation of Dr.Panchanathan NSF (Trump appointee) as the root cause of Kibo's "analbuttfuckmanure" stalk 2017, Kibo's necrophilia stalking 2022, Kibo's hatred of Pope, and Kibo's "you need more punishment" stalks.
3:00 PM

Donald Trump's profile photo
Donald Trump
, …

4
Re: -- König der Wissenschaft --AP -- unter den Linden und uber der Tauber und Mathematik und Astronomie
2:49 PM


Read my recent posts in peace and quiet.
https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe
Archimedes Plutonium

#5-1, My 134th published book

Introduction to TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 1 for ages 5 through 26, math textbook series, book 1 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

The 134th book of AP, and belatedly late, for I had already written the series of TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS in a 7 volume, 8 book set. This would be the first book in that 8 book set (one of the books is a companion book to 1st year college). But I suppose that I needed to write the full series before I could write the Introduction and know what I had to talk about and talk about in a logical progression order. Sounds paradoxical in a sense, that I needed to write the full series first and then go back and write the Introduction. But in another sense, hard to write an introduction on something you have not really fully done and completed. For example to know what is error filled Old Math and to list those errors in a logical order requires me to write the full 7 volumes in order to list in order the mistakes.

Cover Picture: Mathematics begins with counting, with numbers, with quantity. But counting numbers needs geometry for something to count in the first place. So here in this picture of the generalized Hydrogen atom of chemistry and physics is a torus geometry of 8 rings of a proton torus and one ring where my fingers are, is a equator ring that is the muon and thrusting through the proton torus at the equator of the torus. So we count 9 rings in all. So math is created by atoms and math numbers exist because atoms have many geometry figures to count. And geometry exists because atoms have shapes and different figures.

Product details
• ASIN ‏ : ‎ B08K2XQB4M
• Publication date ‏ : ‎ September 24, 2020
• Language ‏ : ‎ English
• File size ‏ : ‎ 576 KB
• Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
• Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Print length ‏ : ‎ 23 pages
• Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Best Sellers Rank: #224,974 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
◦ #3 in 45-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
◦ #23 in Calculus (Kindle Store)
◦ #182 in Calculus (Books)

#5-2, My 45th published book.

TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 2 for ages 5 to 18, math textbook series, book 2
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) (Amazon Kindle edition)

Last revision was 2NOV2020. And this is AP's 45th published book of science.

Preface: Volume 2 takes the 5 year old student through to senior in High School for their math education.

This is a textbook series in several volumes that carries every person through all his/her math education starting age 5 up to age 26. Volume 2 is for age 5 year old to that of senior in High School, that is needed to do both science and math. Every other math book is incidental to this series of Teaching True Mathematics.

It is a journal-textbook because Amazon's Kindle offers me the ability to edit overnight, and to change the text, almost on a daily basis. A unique first in education textbooks-- almost a continual overnight editing. Adding new text, correcting text. Volume 2 takes the 5 year old student through to senior in High School for their math education. Volume 3 carries the Freshperson in College for their math calculus education.

Cover Picture: The Numbers as Integers from 0 to 100, and 10 Grid when dividing by 10, and part of the 100 Grid when dividing by 100. Decimal Grid Numbers are the true numbers of mathematics. The Reals, the rationals & irrationals, the algebraic & transcendentals, the imaginary & Complex, and the negative-numbers are all fake numbers. For, to be a true number, you have to "be counted" by mathematical induction. The smallest Grid system is the Decimal 10 Grid.

Product details
ASIN ‏ : ‎ B07RG7BVZW
Publication date ‏ : ‎ May 2, 2019
Language ‏ : ‎ English
File size ‏ : ‎ 2024 KB
Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
Print length ‏ : ‎ 423 pages
Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
Best Sellers Rank: #235,426 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
#15 in General Geometry
#223 in Geometry & Topology (Books)

#5-3, 55th published book

TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 3 for age 18-19, 1st year College Calculus, math textbook series, book 3 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Last revision was 25Jun2021. And this is AP's 55th published book of science.

Teaching True Mathematics, by Archimedes Plutonium 2019

Preface: This is volume 3, book 3 of Teaching True Mathematics, designed for College Freshperson students, 1st year college students of age 18-19. It is the continuation of volume 2 for ages 5 through 18 years old.

The main major topic is the AP-EM equations of electricity and magnetism, the mathematics for the laws of electricity and magnetism; what used to be called the Maxwell Equations of Physics. The 1st Year College Math has to prepare all students with the math for all the sciences. So 1st year college Math is like a huge intersection station that has to prepare students with the math they need to do the hard sciences such as physics, chemistry, biology, astronomy, geology, etc. What this means is, 1st year college is calculus that allows the student to work with electricity and magnetism. All the math that is needed to enable students to do electricity and magnetism. In Old Math before this textbook, those Old Math textbooks would end in 1/3 of the text about Arclength, vector space, div, curl, Line Integral, Green's, Stokes, Divergence theorem trying to reach and be able to teach Maxwell Equations. But sadly, barely any Old Math classroom reached that 1/3 ending of the textbook, and left all those college students without any math to tackle electricity and magnetism. And most of Old Math was just muddle headed wrong even if they covered the last 1/3 of the textbook. And that is totally unacceptable in science. This textbook fixes that huge hole and gap in Old Math education.

And there is no way around it, that a course in 1st year College Calculus is going to do a lot of hands on experiment with electricity and magnetism, and is required of the students to buy a list of physics apparatus-- multimeter, galvanometer, coil, bar magnet, alligator clip wires, electromagnet, iron filing case, and possibly even a 12 volt transformer, all shown in the cover picture. The beginning of this textbook and the middle section all leads into the ending of this textbook-- we learn the AP-EM Equations and how to use those equations. And there is no escaping the fact that it has to be hands on physics experiments in the classroom of mathematics.

But, do not be scared, for this is all easy easy easy. For if you passed and enjoyed Volume 2 TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS, then I promise you, you will not be stressed with Volume 3, for I go out of my way to make it clear and understandable.

Warning: this is a Journal Textbook, meaning that I am constantly adding new material, constantly revising, constantly fixing mistakes or making things more clear. So if you read this book in August of 2019, chances are it is different when you read it in September 2019. Ebooks allow authors the freedom to improve their textbooks on a ongoing basis.

The 1st year college math should be about the math that prepares any and all students for science, whether they branch out into physics, chemistry, biology, geology, astronomy, or math, they should have all the math in 1st year college that will carry them through those science studies. I make every attempt possible to make math easy to understand, easy to learn and hopefully fun.

Product details
• ASIN ‏ : ‎ B07WN9RVXD
• Publication date ‏ : ‎ August 16, 2019
• Language ‏ : ‎ English
• File size ‏ : ‎ 1390 KB
• Simultaneous device usage ‏ : ‎ Unlimited
• Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
• Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Print length ‏ : ‎ 236 pages
• Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Best Sellers Rank: #1,377,070 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
◦ #411 in Calculus (Kindle Store)
◦ #2,480 in Calculus (Books)

#5-4, 56th published book

COLLEGE CALCULUS GUIDE to help students recognize math professor spam from math truth & reality// math textbook series, book 4 Kindle Edition

by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

#1 New Releasein 15-Minute Science & Math Short Reads

This textbook is the companion guide book to AP's Teaching True Mathematics, 1st year College. It is realized that Old Math will take a long time in removing their fake math, so in the interim period, this Guide book is designed to speed up the process of removing fake Calculus out of the education system, the fewer students we punish with forcing them with fake Calculus, the better we are.
Cover Picture: This book is part comedy, for when you cannot reason with math professors that they have many errors to fix, that 90% of their Calculus is in error, you end up resorting to comedy, making fun of them, to prod them to fix their errors. To prod them to "do right by the students of the world" not their entrenched propaganda.
Length: 54 pages

Product details
File Size: 1035 KB
Print Length: 64 pages
Simultaneous Device Usage: Unlimited
Publication Date: August 18, 2019
Sold by: Amazon.com Services LLC
Language: English
ASIN: B07WNGLQ85
Text-to-Speech: Enabled
X-Ray:  Not Enabled  
Word Wise: Not Enabled
Lending: Enabled
Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled
Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #253,425 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
#38 in 90-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
#318 in Calculus (Books)
#48 in Calculus (Kindle Store)
 
#5-5, 72nd published book

TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 4 for age 19-20 Sophomore-year College, math textbook series, book 5 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Preface: This is volume 4, book 5 of Teaching True Mathematics, designed for College Sophomore-year students, students of age 19-20. It is the continuation of volume 3 in the end-goal of learning how to do the mathematics of electricity and magnetism, because everything in physics is nothing but atoms and atoms are nothing but electricity and magnetism. To know math, you have to know physics. We learned the Calculus of 2nd dimension and applied it to the equations of physics for electricity and magnetism. But we did not learn the calculus of those equations for 3rd dimension. So, you can say that Sophomore year College math is devoted to 3D Calculus. This sophomore year college we fill in all the calculus, and we start over on all of Geometry, for geometry needs a modern day revision. And pardon me for this book is mostly reading, and the students doing less calculations. The classroom of this textbook has the teacher go through page by page to get the students comprehending and understanding of what is being taught. There are many hands on experiments also.

Cover Picture shows some toruses, some round some square, torus of rings, thin strips of rings or squares and shows them laid flat. That is Calculus of 3rd dimension that lays a ring in a torus to be flat in 2nd dimension.
Length: 105 pages

Product details
• ASIN ‏ : ‎ B0828M34VL
• Publication date ‏ : ‎ December 2, 2019
• Language ‏ : ‎ English
• File size ‏ : ‎ 952 KB
• Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
• Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Print length ‏ : ‎ 105 pages
• Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Best Sellers Rank: #242,037 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
◦ #36 in Calculus (Kindle Store)
◦ #219 in Calculus (Books)

#5-6, 75th published book

TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 5 for age 20-21 Junior-year of College, math textbook series, book 6 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium 2019

This is volume 5, book 6 of Teaching True Mathematics, designed for College Junior-year students, students of age 20-21. In first year college Calculus we learned calculus of the 2nd dimension and applied it to the equations of physics for electricity and magnetism. And in sophomore year we learned calculus of 3rd dimension to complete our study of the mathematics needed to do the physics of electricity and magnetism. Now, junior year college, we move onto something different, for we focus mostly on logic now and especially the logic of what is called the "mathematical proof". Much of what the student has learned about mathematics so far has been given to her or him as stated knowledge, accept it as true because I say so. But now we are going to do math proofs. Oh, yes, we did prove a few items here and there, such as why the Decimal Grid Number system is so special, such as the Pythagorean Theorem, such as the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus with its right-triangle hinged up or down. But many ideas we did not prove, we just stated them and expected all students to believe them true. And you are now juniors in college and we are going to start to prove many of those ideas and teach you "what is a math proof". Personally, I myself feel that the math proof is overrated, over hyped. But the math proof is important for one reason-- it makes you better scientists of knowing what is true and what is a shaky idea. A math proof is the same as "thinking straight and thinking clearly". And all scientists need to think straight and think clearly. But before we get to the Mathematics Proof, we have to do Probability and Statistics. What you learned in Grade School, then High School, then College, called Sigma Error, now becomes Probability and Statistics. It is important because all sciences including mathematics needs and uses Probability and Statistics. So, our job for junior-year of college mathematics is all cut out and ahead for us, no time to waste, let us get going.

Cover Picture: is a sample of the Array Proof, a proof the ellipse is not a conic but rather a cylinder cut wherein the oval is the slant cut of a cone, not the ellipse.

Length: 175 pages

Product details
ASIN : B0836F1YF6
Publication date : December 26, 2019
Language : English
File size : 741 KB
Text-to-Speech : Enabled
Screen Reader : Supported
Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
X-Ray : Not Enabled
Word Wise : Not Enabled
Print length : 175 pages
Lending : Enabled
Best Sellers Rank: #3,768,255 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
◦ #3,591 in Probability & Statistics (Kindle Store)
◦ #19,091 in Probability & Statistics (Books)

#5-7, 89th published book

TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 6 for age 21-22 Senior-year of College, math textbook series, book 7 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium 2020

Last revision was 6Feb2021.
Preface: This is the last year of College for mathematics and we have to mostly summarize all of mathematics as best we can. And set a new pattern to prepare students going on to math graduate school. A new pattern of work habits, because graduate school is more of research and explore on your own. So in this final year, I am going to eliminate tests, and have it mostly done as homework assignments.

Cover Picture: Again and again, many times in math, the mind is not good enough alone to think straight and clear, and you need tools to hands-on see how it works. Here is a collection of tools for this senior year college classes. There is a pencil, clipboard, graph paper, compass, divider, protractor, slide-ruler. And for this year we spend a lot of time on the parallelepiped, showing my wood model, and showing my erector set model held together by wire loops in the corners. The plastic square is there only to hold up the erector set model.

Length: 110 pages

Product details
ASIN ‏ : ‎ B084V11BGY
Publication date ‏ : ‎ February 15, 2020
Language ‏ : ‎ English
File size ‏ : ‎ 826 KB
Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
Print length ‏ : ‎ 110 pages
Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
Best Sellers Rank: #224,965 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
◦ #345 in Mathematics (Kindle Store)
◦ #373 in Physics (Kindle Store)
◦ #2,256 in Physics (Books)

#5-8, 90th published book

TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 7 for age 22-26 Graduate school, math textbook series, book 8 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium 2020

Last revised 1NOV2020. This was AP's 90th published book of science.

Preface: This is College Graduate School mathematics. Congratulations, you made it this far. To me, graduate school is mostly research, research mathematics and that means also physics. So it is going to be difficult to do math without physics. Of course, we focus on the mathematics of these research projects.

My textbook for Graduate school is just a template and the professors teaching the graduate students are free of course to follow their own projects, but in terms of being physics and math combined. What I list below is a template for possible projects.

So, in the below projects, I list 36 possible research projects that a graduate student my like to undertake, or partake. I list those 36 projects with a set of parentheses like this (1), (2), (3), etc. Not to be confused with the chapters listing as 1), 2), 3), etc. I list 36 projects but the professor can offer his/her own list, and I expect students with their professor, to pick a project and to monitor the student as to his/her progresses through the research. I have listed each project then cited some of my own research into these projects, below each project is an entry. Those entries are just a help or helper in getting started or acquainted with the project. The entry has a date time group and a newsgroup that I posted to such as sci.math or plutonium-atom-universe Google newsgroups. Again the entry is just a help or helper in getting started.

Now instead of picking one or two projects for your Graduate years of study, some may select all 36 projects where you write a short paper on each project. Some may be bored with just one or two projects and opt for all 36.

Cover Picture: A photo by my iphone of a page on Permutations of the Jacobs book Mathematics: A Human Endeavor, 1970. One of the best textbooks ever written in Old Math, not for its contents because there are many errors, but for its teaching style. It is extremely rare to find a math textbook written for the student to learn. Probably because math professors rarely learned how to teach in the first place; only learned how to unintentionally obfuscate. The page I photographed is important because it is the interface between geometry's perimeter or surface area versus geometry's area or volume, respectively. Or, an interface of pure numbers with that of geometry. But I have more to say on this below.
Length: 296 pages

Product details
ASIN ‏ : ‎ B085DF8R7V
Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 1, 2020
Language ‏ : ‎ English
File size ‏ : ‎ 828 KB
Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
Print length ‏ : ‎ 296 pages
Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
Best Sellers Rank: #224,981 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
◦ #13 in General Geometry
◦ #213 in Geometry & Topology (Books)

#5-9, 221st published book

An Education Ladder Guideline for teaching mathematics and a Test to see if you are cut out to be a mathematician//Teaching True Mathematics
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) (Amazon's Kindle)

Preface: This book is written to improve math education in school and at home. Trouble is, you cannot improve math education if the professors of mathematics have much of their teachings in error. So I write this book mostly as a test for math professors because to shine a light on math professor failure is the best way to improve math teaching, and thereby improve school curriculums especially colleges and universities. But others, such as laypersons are welcomed to join in. And it is the laypersons and students that will make the greatest amount of use of this book because math professors are usually stubborn and idiotic and hard to change for the better. And so when students and laypersons keep asking questions of their math professors, their brainwashing and thus poor teaching, they eventually come around to the truth and then change their bad behavior and bad misunderstanding; to proper true mathematics.

Cover Picture: Is my iphone photograph of a rubber washer inside a plastic cone. The washer is at a steep slant angle to the cone perpendicular. Notice the washer near the apex is fully touching the side of the cone, but the washer directed towards the base has not yet cut through the side of the cone, and you can see a rainbow or a crescent shape of area where the washer will intersect the side of the cone, (where my two finger are), making a total figure of a Oval, never the ellipse. I was taking this picture as one person, so I had the iphone camera in one hand and the cone in another hand, and had to use a rubber washer to stay in place. The same green plastic cone used in this picture appears in both of my published books of the proof slant cut of cone is oval, never the ellipse.

My 3rd published book with the same green cone on cover.
AP's Proof-Ellipse was never a Conic Section // Math proof series, book 1 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

My 68th published book with the same green cone on cover.
Proofs Ellipse is never a Conic section, always a Cylinder section and a Well Defined Oval definition//Student teaches professor series, book 5 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Product details
• ASIN ‏ : ‎ B0BQDYMYKQ
• Publication date ‏ : ‎ December 16, 2022
• Language ‏ : ‎ English
• File size ‏ : ‎ 551 KB
• Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
• Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Sticky notes ‏ : ‎ On Kindle Scribe
• Print length ‏ : ‎ 65 pages

#5-10, 160th published book

MATHOPEDIA-- List of 82 fakes and mistakes of Old Math// mathematics & logic
by Archimedes Plutonium

Preface:
A Mathopedia is like a special type of encyclopedia on the subject of mathematics. It is about the assessment of the worth of mathematics and the subject material of mathematics. It is a overall examination and a evaluation of mathematics and its topics.

The ordering of Mathopedia is not a alphabetic ordering, nor does it have a index. The ordering is purely that of importance at beginning and importance at end.

The greatest use of Mathopedia is a guide to students of what not to waste your time on and what to focus most of your time. I know so many college classes in mathematics are just a total waste of time, waste of valuable time for the class is math fakery. I know because I have been there.

Now I am going to cite various reference sources of AP books if anyone wants more details and can be seen in the Appendix at the end of the book.

I suppose, going forward, mathematics should always have a mathopedia, where major parts of mathematics as a science are held under scrutiny and question as to correctness. In past history we have called these incidents as "doubters of the mainstream". Yet math, like physics, can have no permanent mainstream, since there is always question of correctness in physics, there then corresponds questions of correctness in mathematics (because math is a subset of physics). What I mean is that each future generation corrects some mistakes of past mathematics. If anyone is unsure of what I am saying here, both math and physics need constant correcting, of that which never belonged in science. This then converges with the logic-philosophy of Pragmatism (see AP's book of logic on Pragmatism).

Product details
• ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09MZTLRL5 and ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09ZWFLKHC
• Publication date ‏ : ‎ December 2, 2021
• Product details
• ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09ZWFLKHC
• Publication date ‏ : ‎ May 8, 2022
• Language ‏ : ‎ English
• File size ‏ : ‎ 1154 KB
• Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
• Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Sticky notes ‏ : ‎ On Kindle Scribe
• Print length ‏ : ‎ 71 pages

y z
| /
| /
|/______ x

Read my recent posts in peace and quiet.
https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe
Archimedes Plutonium

Volney

2023-08-23 00:49:44 UTC

Permalink

AP's despised TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 2 for ages 5 to 18, math textbook series, book 2

Why do you keep trying to brainwash little 5 year old kids?

WARNING TO STUDENTS, PARENTS and TEACHERS: Archimedes Plutonium is
offering to teach your children his broken physics and math. BEWARE! He
will corrupt the minds of your children! Mr. Plutonium is not content to
be a failure of math and physics all by himself. He wants everyone else
to fail as well! He teaches bizarre false physics and math, such as
atoms contain the unstable muon, water is H4O and not H2O, the ellipse
isn't a conic section, there are no negative numbers and no complex
numbers, that a sine wave isn't sinusoidal but semicircles, cycloids or
parabolas (depending on his mood), plus many, many other instances of
bad math and physics.

Plutonium has previously tried to corrupt our youth by posting his books
on Usenet. That has failed until now, perhaps in part due to the fact
Usenet is an old, dying medium, which few modern students even know of,
much less use. However, Mr. Plutonium has somehow duped Amazon into
providing his dangerous books for free on Kindle. This has greatly
increased the danger to our students!

One of his dangerous tricks is teach false Boolean logic such as 10 AND
2 = 12. His method at doing this is particularly insidious. He'll post a
false statement that nobody believes, such as 10 OR 2 = 12, say that it
is false (which it is), but then he'll try to replace it with another
similar false statement such as 10 AND 2 = 12, in order to really
confuse future computer scientists. Plutonium is taking advantage of the
fact that AND means different things in Boolean logic and elementary
arithmetic, as AND is an informal synonym for plus/addition. It is
important for future computer scientists to remember that in the bitwise
Boolean logic used by modern computers, 10 OR 2 = 10 and 10 AND 2 = 2.
Of course in pure Boolean logic the only possible values are true and
false (1 or 0), so in pure Boolean logic the statements "10 AND 2" and
"10 OR 2" don't even make sense. Don't let evil Plutonium's bad logic
confuse you!

Plutonium has been targeting children as young as 5. A new attempt to
corrupt the minds of young children is to teach that the alphabet has 12
letters, 6 vowels and 6 consonants. This sounds like a great way to
keep our children from reading!

Nobody knows why Plutonium wishes to corrupt the minds of our youth like
this. Perhaps Plutonium is envious of their potential success, which he
never had because he is a failure at math and science. Plutonium is not
content to be a failure at math and physics all by himself. He wants
everyone to fail as well. Some claim Plutonium is an agent of China, in
order for China to dominate the world economy. Maybe he is a minion of
Kim Jong Un of North Korea. Most likely, however, he is an agent of
Putin and Russia, since Plutonium has previously attempted to summon
Russian robots in 2017 "to create a new, true mathematics" in an attempt
to destroy mathematics.

Additionally, Plutonium has started a Cult of Failure. He is trying to
convince students to worship his evil pagan Plutonium atom god of
Failure. This cult is anti-science and anti-mathematics. Its only goal
is to promote failure in math and science.

There is some evidence this Cult of Failure may be a suicide cult.
Plutonium has advocated that the "good guy" nations join into a
supernation and threaten to "flatten" the (nuclear armed) "bad guy"
nations who misbehave. The idea may to initiate an all-out nuclear
war when "bad guy" nations retaliate. Not simply is Plutonium or his
cult committing suicide but would take Planet Earth with them. As the
war in Ukraine continues, Plutonium keeps asking NATO to attack the
Russians, starting a nuclear WW3, which he feels is unavoidable. More
evidence of Plutonium's Cult of Failure being a suicide cult.

Plutonium is now encouraging resistance fighters fighting the regimes
in Russia and Iran to attack power lines in Tehran and Moscow by
carrying long vertical aluminum poles under them, presumably to short
them out, complete with a diagram. Obviously, this will not end well
for for the resistance fighter. The question is, did he do this because
he is Putin's stooge trying to kill off resistance fighters? Or is this
part of Plutonium's Suicide Cult of Failure, meaning this is merely a
suggestion how to commit suicide while failing to harm the regimes? Or
both?

But the point is, stay away, if he offers to give or sell you one of his
dangerous books. Especially now since they are available for free from
otherwise legitimate Amazon.

Chris M. Thomasson

2023-08-23 01:43:52 UTC

Permalink

Post by Volney

☣ of Math and ☢ of Physics Archimedes "Putin's Stooge" Plutonium
AP's despised TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 2 for ages 5 to 18,
math textbook series, book 2

Why do you keep trying to brainwash little 5 year old kids?

[...]

Does he have any students that are 5 years old? Afaict, he is trying to
brainwash us all. Humm... Shit. Well, damn it. When I say brainwash us
all, well, that includes 5 years olds as well? Damn it.

Volney

2023-08-23 04:46:39 UTC

Permalink

Post by Chris M. Thomasson

Post by Volney

☣ of Math and ☢ of Physics Archimedes "Putin's Stooge" Plutonium
AP's despised TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 2 for ages 5 to 18,
math textbook series, book 2

Why do you keep trying to brainwash little 5 year old kids?

[...]
Does he have any students that are 5 years old? Afaict, he is trying to
brainwash us all. Humm... Shit. Well, damn it. When I say brainwash us
all, well, that includes 5 years olds as well? Damn it.

He does say his "book" is "for ages 5 to 18".

Chris M. Thomasson

2023-08-23 18:13:08 UTC

Permalink

Post by Volney

Post by Chris M. Thomasson

Post by Volney

☣ of Math and ☢ of Physics Archimedes "Putin's Stooge" Plutonium
AP's despised TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 2 for ages 5 to 18,
math textbook series, book 2

Why do you keep trying to brainwash little 5 year old kids?

[...]
Does he have any students that are 5 years old? Afaict, he is trying
to brainwash us all. Humm... Shit. Well, damn it. When I say brainwash
us all, well, that includes 5 years olds as well? Damn it.

He does say his "book" is "for ages 5 to 18".

Ohhhhh.... Shhhhhit!

Yikes! ;^o

Archimedes Plutonium

2024-01-24 06:24:23 UTC

Permalink

Prime cause of Global Warming is Sun gone Red Giant phase 75-90% and fossil fuel burning makes up only 25-10%
#26-1, 128th published book

Research Notebook: Earth has perhaps 1-10 million years, or, 140 million years before it is broiled by the Sun// consequence of starshine is Faraday law, not fusion// Astronomy series, book 1 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Last revision was 7Apr2021. This is AP's 128th published book of science.

Preface: This is a research notebook, meaning the entire book is an ongoing research program and many unanswered questions need a full answer, chief among those questions is whether we have 1-10 million years rush exit of Earth, or we have the more comfortable 140 million years gradual exit. As of August 2020, I have the fact that the Sun has gone into a Red Giant phase, I have that as a _certainty fact_ due to the Sun and Stars shine from Faraday Law, not from fusion. A certainty fact because all cosmic bodies double in their number of atoms every 140 million years time elapse. So that our Sun is in a Red Giant phase as of 2020, starting Red Giant phase and this phase initiation causes the amount of UV radiation by the Sun to increase steadily and steadily. I have the fact from NASA that the yearly increase in Solar Radiation is 0.005%. Such a yearly increase in radiation, especially UV radiation, regardless of the Ozone protection, regardless of the ozone and its hole, that such a yearly increase will see drastic deaths in Insect populations. The Ozone layer of protection can no longer protect us from a 0.005% steady yearly increase. There is research news that even blue visible light is deadly to small organisms. Small size animals will be the first big noticeable hit in a Red Giant phase. And even larger size animals such as birds, songbirds exposed to a increasing blue light visible and ultraviolet will destroy their eyes and seeing ability. And now we have the SCIENCE 24APR2020 report on its cover "Insect Decline". Where Earths Insect biomass is on a rapid decline 25% biomass per decade. With that rapid of a decline, it is not too many years that entire ecosystems start to decline as well, the plants, for the plants need insects.

What this research notebook is unable to ascertain at the moment, is whether Earth will become like Venus as non-liveable in 1 to 10 million years, or whether we have a more comfortable exit from Earth as 140 million years to do something about the inevitable Sun going Red Giant. A 25% decline of Insects in the last decade is news that indicates, strongly indicates we have just 1 to 10 million years to make Mars-Europa-Pluto our new home. I hate to see that if that is true, because I know 10 million years is a short time to do something of a total evacuation of planet Earth and try to live upon Mars-Europa-Pluto. Such a mass exodus sounds more like a horror story.

But all the science books prior to this book, were saying humanity has around 4 billion years to begin to contemplate a Sun going Red Giant phase. No, this book says Earth is like Venus in the next 140 million years, and possibly like Venus in just 1 to 10 million years. So where the 4 billion years -- no-one really cared about Red Giant phase, if that is truly 1-10 million years. Then, that science becomes number 1 science in every person alive. If we do not get out to Mars-Europa-Pluto in time, there will be no more humanity, and gone extinct. And funny, and ironic, that the average life span of any organism-species on Earth as found in the fossil record, is, you guessed it, 1 to 10 million years on average. There is something tantalizingly curious about the numbers 1 to 10 million years as the average life span of any species until it becomes extinct.

Cover Picture: is my iphone photograph of that SCIENCE "Insect Decline" and also my computer with the recent report of a 30% loss of all wild birds in North America.
Length: 124 pages

Product details
ASIN : B08FPQB2YQ
Publication date : August 11, 2020
Language : English
File size : 879 KB
Text-to-Speech : Enabled
Screen Reader : Supported
Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
X-Ray : Not Enabled
Word Wise : Enabled
Print length : 124 pages
Lending : Enabled

#26-2, 131st published book
Planetary, Stellar, and Galactic Evolution when starpower is Faraday Law// Astronomy series, book 2 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Last revision was 2Jun2022. This is AP's 131st published book of science.

Preface: While writing my book in August of 2020 about the loss of 25% of total Insect biomass in the past decade, and blaming that loss on the Sun going into initiation of red giant phase, it was during the course of that book, I realized I had to revise all of astronomy and cosmology on planetary, stellar and galactic evolution. This book is a direct result of my prior book of Sun going into Red Giant phase.

This book can be considered the world's first astronomy textbook that teaches astronomy as all electricity and magnetism. Following the Primal Axiom of Physics-- all is atom and atoms are nothing but electricity and magnetism. In this book, we learn astronomy as merely the dynamics of electricity and magnetism. No longer do we rely on Newton's laws and then the fakery of General Relativity. We learn astronomy as a subject that is all being electricity and magnetism, even the force of gravity is an electrical and magnetic force. Such simple questions as why 4 rocky planets then 4 gas giants, are explained by New Physics in terms of electricity and magnetism, never by the silly and dumb Nebular Dust Cloud, nor the stupid Big Bang and all the plethora of con-artist fakery of black holes, neutron stars and other assorted nonsense. In Old Physics and Old Astronomy, they were running around trying to gain fame and fortune with their stupid nonsense of big bang, black holes, neutron stars, etc etc, where imagination ran amok. Here we do real true astronomy.

This book is true astronomy.

Length: 83 pages

Product details
• File Size : 1013 KB
• Word Wise : Enabled
• Publication Date : September 3, 2020
• Print Length : 83 pages
• ASIN : B08HH2DJ8M
• Language: : English
• Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
• Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• Lending : Enabled

#26-3, 13th published book

Missing Moon of Planet MERCURY, I named Willis// Astronomy series, book 3 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

The reason I know that Willis, the missing moon of Mercury exists is because the maths of Mercury are such that a moon must exist. The maths are --
Mercury rotation is 58 days, Mercury orbit is 88 days, a 2 to 3 spin-orbit resonance

Because the rotation needs to be equal to orbit, so the rotation should be 88 days not 58 days. Because they are not equal, means Mercury has a moon that causes Mercury rotation to speed up to being 58 days. I believe I found the missing moon of Mercury and I have named it Willis. Surprise, big surprise, the missing moon is not in one lump big rock but is a cloud of magnetic-monopoles circling Mercury in the shape of a ring-torus.

Cover-picture: My photo of the website: Quoting: Messenger.jhuapl.edu
Magnetic field observations by the MESSENGER spacecraft in orbit about Mercury revealed flow of electric current from the magnetosphere.
Length: 74 pages

File Size: 1705 KB
Print Length: 74 pages
Publication Date: March 14, 2019
Sold by: Amazon Digital Services LLC
Language: English
ASIN: B07PQXQ9N8

#26-4, 149th published book

Best Astronomy Distance Measuring Tool// Astronomy series book 4 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Preface: Since I destroyed the Doppler Redshift of physics and astronomy, I may as well try to furnish a replacement measuring tool. Distance is one of the most difficult parameters to measure in astronomy, for that matter. Why that is, in theory, I do not know, but it is easy to see that building telescopes to view the universe is far easier in seeing galaxies than measuring the distance between galaxies or astro bodies. Perhaps in theory, it should not be this difficult, and that once we find this "best measuring tool" the difficulty of distance measuring will all be a long past memory.

Cover Picture: An attempt to photograph the EM spectrum through a prism from a light source but my iphone camera is not able to detect the spectrum as my eyes can detect such. Something about a camera that cannot pick up the spectrum as the eyes see it.
Length: 33 pages

Product details
• ASIN : B08VHS4QSK
• Publication date : January 31, 2021
• Language : English
• File size : 561 KB
• Text-to-Speech : Enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Word Wise : Enabled
• Print length : 33 pages
• Lending : Enabled

#26-5, My 159th published book

Weatherology (formerly called meteorology)-- described and explained totally as electricity and magnetism// Weather science Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Preface: I had lived through the horrible 2012 drought where we had zero rainfall the entire 3 months of summer. I first saw it in the lilacs, painfully needing watering, and spent the entire summer as being nothing but a water boy for the Plutonium Atom National Park, to keep everything alive. And chalked it up as a bad year. But then in 2020 we had another drought summer and back again to doing not much else but watering. And in August of 2020, my research landed me on the idea that the Sun had gone Red Giant phase with a yearly increase in solar radiation of 0.005%. And this put a deep scare into my soul for 2021 became as bad as 2012 in drought, and worse because it was a back to back year of drought 2020-2021. Not only was I scared, for I staked much of my life on Plutonium Atom National Park, and began to envision it would end up being grasses and cacti in the near future.
So scared was I that I realized I needed to know much much more about weather than I had known before. And since I recently completed in 2021, my TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS, 1st year College. I needed to explain weather all in terms of only electricity and magnetism. None of this cold front, warm front, low pressure, high pressure silly concepts. All had to be explained as forms of electricity and magnetism and how that causes wind, rain and all forms of weather.
Cover Picture: I had bought an expensive book, the most expensive I ever paid for in Electric Currents in Geospace and Beyond, 2018, Keiling, Marghitu, Wheatland, AGU, et al, and reading it I realized that their first several chapters should be this book that I write for it is weather all explained only in terms of electricity and magnetism. So on the cover of that book I placed "bent circles in sequence" to imitate a magnetic monopole. What is missing in that textbook by the American Geophysical Union AGU, is the true electron of atoms is the muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law of creating more magnetic monopoles of electricity. And the particle of 0.5MeV discovered by JJ Thomson in 1897 was not the electron of atoms but was Dirac's magnetic monopole. So that means all of the Maxwell Equations laws are either in error or missing several terms. And the book I reference of Electric Currents in Geospace needs to correct every page to be the truth of the real electron of atoms. Every page has mistakes because they have the wrong electron. And it is hoped by me, that this book becomes the first several chapters of a revised AGU textbook.

Product details
• ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09MZ1GXD7
• Publication date ‏ : ‎ December 2, 2021
• Language ‏ : ‎ English
• File size ‏ : ‎ 965 KB
• Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
• Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Print length ‏ : ‎ 174 pages
• Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Best Sellers Rank: #4,800,657 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
◦ #19,762 in Physics (Kindle Store)
◦ #115,116 in Physics (Books)

#26-6, 189th published book

True Exoplanet data from the correct math of Electric Field differential equation and not the singular Newton law of gravity // Astronomy science
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) , Amazon's Kindle edition

Preface: So many mistakes and errors in astronomy, especially exoplanet distances and size and mass, all because the astronomers and physicists by 2022 still use just Newtonian gravity mixed with General Relativity, when the true correct math of astronomy is the AP-EM differential equations. And one of the most awful case instances of this error filled astronomy is the nearby Kepler-90 star system with a star slightly larger than our Sun and with 8 planets, but in a tight orbit of where all 8 exoplanets are within the orbit of Earth in the Solar System. If the physicists and astronomers had used the correct proper mathematics on Kepler-90, they would find out that Kepler-90 is almost a mirror image of our Solar System with a distance spacing so much alike that of Mercury, Venus, Earth, Mars, Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, Neptune, that one can say Kepler-90 and Solar System were almost identical. And these errors and mistakes in distance are not only distance errors but errors of mass, spin-rotation.

Cover Picture: Is my iphone photograph of the Kepler-90 star system taken from a Google search of Kepler-90. And it is nice to report that the company Google itself is part of the study of Kepler-90 exoplanets.

Product details
• ASIN ‏ : ‎ B0B3R67KXS
• Publication date ‏ : ‎ June 9, 2022
• Language ‏ : ‎ English
• File size ‏ : ‎ 761 KB
• Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
• Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Print length ‏ : ‎ 42 pages
• Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled

#26-7, 201st published book

Top Priorities of Webb Telescope-- Oumuamua & Alpha Centauri // Astronomy
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) (Amazon Kindle edition)

Preface: It is a shame, that the highest priority of the new Webb Telescope, our most powerful telescope is not being prioritized to the most important information and data we need to know. We need to know of highest priority what Oumuamua is, and whether Alpha Centauri has advanced alien life. Yet here we are, gazing with the Webb Telescope into the furthest reaches of outer space. This would like trying to figure out what some people are doing 500 kilometers away, and not care or know about who your nearest neighbors are.

I guess it goes to show, you can become a scientist, yet have no logical marbles in the head on priorities.

Cover Picture: My iphone photograph of a Google Search of Oumuamua, the mysterious alien interloper into our Solar System. Is it a alien built structure? And did it come from Alpha Centauri? And this is what the Webb telescope should be focused on answering as quick as possible.

Product details
• ASIN ‏ : ‎ B0BBGB2RV6
• Publication date ‏ : ‎ August 21, 2022
• Language ‏ : ‎ English
• File size ‏ : ‎ 679 KB
• Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
• Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Print length ‏ : ‎ 36 pages
• Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled

#26-8, 206th published book

Universal-gravity is really R to 1/R to 1/R^2, not just 1/R^2 //Astronomy

by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) (Amazon's Kindle ed.)

Preface: This book is a close look at the law of Universal Gravitation which has three force strengths of proportionality-- to R, to 1/R and to 1/R^2. We learn that Newton's 1/R^2 gravity is only a tiny part of gravity and is missing the stronger forms of gravity of R and 1/R. We learn that Leibniz and Huygens were major contributors to the law of gravity. And most of all, we learn that gravity is just a law of Electromagnetism, the differential equation of Electric field.

Cover Picture: Is my iphone photograph of the conjunction of 3 of the satellites of Jupiter, a conjunction of all 4 satellites Io, Europa, Ganymede, and Callisto is impossible because of orbit resonance.

Product details
• ASIN ‏ : ‎ B0BG817ZB9
• Publication date ‏ : ‎ September 22, 2022
• Language ‏ : ‎ English
• File size ‏ : ‎ 708 KB
• Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
• Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Print length ‏ : ‎ 33 pages
• Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled was

#26-9, 225th published book

Concept of Stepping in Front of Sun's Forward Motion // Correcting Kepler's 3 laws// astronomy
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) (Amazon's Kindle)

Preface: The concept of Stepping in Front of Forward Motion of Sun, or that of satellites around planets is a missing concept in astronomy literature. Bizarre that it is missing and we see it missing in foolish videos on Internet saying the planets do not travel around the Sun in the Sun's path of forward motion. And this missing concept reveals that astronomers from 2017 back in time never understood the force of gravity as well as they should have. I devote this entire book to this concept of Stepping in Front of Forward Motion of Sun or satellites stepping in front of forward motion of planets. And as a better understanding of gravity, this concept reveals that all 3 Kepler laws were flawed, for the Kepler laws were based on the ellipse when they should be based on the Oval geometry figure.

Cover Picture: My iphone picture taken of Forbes magazine website of a video of Stepping in Front of Forward Motion of Sun. Forbes calls it Helical motion and contrasts it with Side by Side motion. AP thinks NASA, and most astronomers and physicists made a horrible mistake in siding with Side by Side motion of planets around the Sun and saying that helical motion is wrong and false.

Product details
• ASIN ‏ : ‎ B0BVB97TDQ
• Publication date ‏ : ‎ February 8, 2023
• Language ‏ : ‎ English
• File size ‏ : ‎ 702 KB
• Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
• Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Sticky notes ‏ : ‎ On Kindle Scribe
• Print length ‏ : ‎ 65 pages

#26-10, 226th published book

Geometry of all astronomy objects from the AP-EM Electromagnetic Equations// astronomy
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) (Amazon's Kindle)

Preface: This trio of books on astronomy started with explaining the concept of Stepping in Front of Sun's Forward Motion by Earth, and in solving the mathematics of that concept caused a morph into explaining all geometry of astro bodies, their configuration even their motion. So this book is a offshoot of the previous book. Likewise the next book is the third book of astronomy which also comes from the Stepping in Front concept. The third book is the magnetic field paths that the Sun creates for planets to have an orbit while the Sun shoots electricity into that magnetic field path, making the planet revolve around the Sun. It was noted that these magnetic field paths are similar to Spectral Lines Interference patterns of crests and troughs.

In writing books of science, I come to the point where one book seems to launch other new books.

This book has prerequisite of completed first year college calculus which has reached the Triple Integral of Old Math.

Cover Picture: The cover picture is my iphone camera photograph of Caltech's Jarrett mapping of the cosmos of galaxies, where he finds a Cosmic Ring. And where I claim he actually found not only 1 cosmic ring but 2 others, once he throws the Doppler RedShift into the trashcan. For if you run the mapping through a computer without a redshift measure, I claim you end up with 3 rings, 2 cosmic proton rings and part of the cosmic muon ring at 90 degrees inside the proton rings.

Product details
• ASIN ‏ : ‎ B0BW6L6T36
• Publication date ‏ : ‎ February 17, 2023
• Language ‏ : ‎ English
• File size ‏ : ‎ 898 KB
• Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
• Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Sticky notes ‏ : ‎ On Kindle Scribe
• Print length ‏ : ‎ 42 pages

#26-11, 227th published book

Atomic Spectral lines analogy to Interference Pattern in Force of Gravity-- crests-troughs// astronomy

by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) (Amazon's Kindle)

Preface: In January and February of 2023 I wrote a trio of science books on astronomy, my 225th, 226th and now this one 227th. Starting with the concept of Planets Stepping in Front of Sun's path of Forward Motion (my 225th) and in that writing, I needed a book on how Electromagnetic theory fetches all the math for the geometry of astro bodies and their motion (my 226th). But the 225th and 226th books also brought to illumination the need of a book explaining how magnetic field of Sun carves up space of the ecliptic into paths, paths where planets can orbit the Sun as the Sun shoots electric current fore and aft of the planet pushing and pulling the planet in orbit. So I needed this book the 227th detailing how the Sun creates these magnetic field paths for planetary orbit. But I also noticed that the Spectral Lines of Atomic Physics with their crests and troughs of a interference pattern is much the same as the lines-of-force of a magnetic field. So here I tie together Atomic physics of Spectral Lines with gravity planetary orbits and the spiral structure of spiral galaxies. All obtained from the AP-EM Equations, the mathematics of the 6 laws of Electromagnetic theory.

Prerequisites to study before reading this book: First year college calculus that covers Triple Integral polynomials and first year college physics that studies Balmer-Rydberg Spectral Lines formula.

Cover Picture: Is my iphone photograph of a Google search for "Magnetic lines of force". Notice the crests and troughs of the magnetic field. One can easily imagine that if that picture were enlarged to the size of the Sun's magnetic field that there would be 10 crests and troughs for the 10 planets to revolve around the Sun of Mercury, Venus, Earth, Mars, Asteroid belt, Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, Neptune, and Pluto.

Product details
• ASIN ‏ : ‎ B0BW7Y9GVX
• Publication date ‏ : ‎ February 18, 2023
• Language ‏ : ‎ English
• File size ‏ : ‎ 625 KB
• Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
• Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Sticky notes ‏ : ‎ On Kindle Scribe
• Print length ‏ : ‎ 23 pages

y z
| /
| /
|/______ x

Read my recent posts in peace and quiet.
https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe
Archimedes Plutonium

AP kindly asks Google to let AP run all three, sci.math, sci.physics, PAU as he runs PAU, now--- all pure science, no spam and no govt b.s. Why, did you know that because of the "cloud" every picture I take on my camera-- whether private personal picture-- is also viewed by the governments around the world, whether I like it or not, and that is because of the "cloud" for the cloud is open to governments. I now no longer have my Apple payed and bought for music, as a govt. bureaucrat felt like disabling AP's music, ever since AP rewrote "Chariots of Fire" as a praise hymnal "How Great Thou Art". And it is no wonder govt. wants Google newsgroups to collapse and fold, for the govt. hates it when they are not in "overwhelming force in control of what they think science education should be and what is taught as science". For the govt. reCAPTcha has now -- disallowed AP from making a new thread in sci.math and sci.physics, and that AP has to post in any old thread not AP's own, in order to get out a single post at all. Govt. bureaucrats love it when they can fully strangle its citizens, especially scientists.

PAU newsgroup is this.
https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe
Archimedes Plutonium

Very crude dot picture of 5f6 magnetosphere of 231Pu Atom Totality.

A torus shape doing the Faraday Law inside of each and every atom. The Cosmos of Astronomy looks like this.
   ____
.-' `-.
.' ::\ ::|:: /:: `.
/ ::\::|::/:: \
;   _ _   ;
| ___( O )___ |
; - -    ;
\ ::/::|::\::    /
   `. ::/ ::|:: \:: .'
   `-   _____ .-'

One of those dots in the magnetosphere is the Milky Way galaxy. And
each dot represents another galaxy. The O is the Cosmic nucleus and
certainly not as dense as what Old Physics thought because in New Physics
the interior of atoms has the Faraday law with the donut hole occupied by neutrons as storage capacitors.

I re-opened the old newsgroup PAU of 1990s and there one can read my recent posts without the hassle of spammers, govt-police drag net spam,off-topic-misfits, front-page-hogs, stalking mockers, suppression-bullies, and demonizers.

#27-1, My 80th published book

Reincarnation--AP's new mission: the Physics and Engineering of Reincarnation Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Last revision was June 2023. This is AP's 80th book of science.

Preface: This is going to be a encyclopedia long book. The _Science of the Gods_ is what this mission is all about. In 1974, AP set out on a mission, a quest, to make Darwin's biology theory of evolution to turn that into a pure mathematical structure. After 16 years on that mission, AP finally solved it with the Atom Totality theory in 1990 where biology evolution is a mere offshoot of the Bell theorem of physics, which is Superdeterminism. And in that discovery of Atom Totality, AP slowly realized he was the reincarnated soul of the Ancient Greek scientist Archos Archimedes of Siracusa. That idea, would naturally make AP investigate reincarnation as a physics manifestation. The mission of 1974 was so successful for AP, that in 2020, he decides, time is ripe for a new mission-- to solve the physics and engineering of Reincarnation. I give myself a slim chance of engineering it, but I give myself a 100% probability of advancing this science forward, and where my successors can take over with something to work with, something to stand on, for more progress.

Cover-Picture: Metamorphosis and Photosynthesis are key in unraveling the internal geometry of the photon, neutrino and magnetic monopoles-dipoles which is the underpinning of Reincarnation.

Product details
ASIN ‏ : ‎ B083LL9NGW
Publication date ‏ : ‎ January 7, 2020
Language ‏ : ‎ English
File size ‏ : ‎ 1166 KB
Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
Sticky notes ‏ : ‎ On Kindle Scribe
Print length ‏ : ‎ 358 pages
Best Sellers Rank: #1,591,180 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
◦ #142 in Electromagnetic Theory
◦ #320 in Electromagnetism (Kindle Store)
◦ #1,691 in Electromagnetism (Books)

y z
| /
| /
|/______ x

Read my recent posts in peace and quiet.
https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe
Archimedes Plutonium

AP kindly asks Google to let AP run all three, sci.math, sci.physics, PAU as he runs PAU, now--- all pure science, no spam and no govt b.s. Why, did you know that because of the "cloud" every picture I take on my camera-- whether private personal picture-- is also viewed by the governments around the world, whether I like it or not, and that is because of the "cloud" for the cloud is open to governments. I now no longer have my Apple payed and bought for music, as a govt. bureaucrat felt like disabling AP's music, ever since AP rewrote "Chariots of Fire" as a praise hymnal "How Great Thou Art". And it is no wonder govt. wants Google newsgroups to collapse and fold, for the govt. hates it when they are not in "overwhelming force in control of what they think science education should be and what is taught as science". For the govt. reCAPTcha has now -- disallowed AP from making a new thread in sci.math and sci.physics, and that AP has to post in any old thread not AP's own, in order to get out a single post at all. Govt. bureaucrats love it when they can fully strangle its citizens, especially scientists.

PAU newsgroup is this.
https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe
Archimedes Plutonium

Very crude dot picture of 5f6 magnetosphere of 231Pu Atom Totality.

A torus shape doing the Faraday Law inside of each and every atom. The Cosmos of Astronomy looks like this.
   ____
.-' `-.
.' ::\ ::|:: /:: `.
/ ::\::|::/:: \
;   _ _   ;
| ___( O )___ |
; - -    ;
\ ::/::|::\::    /
   `. ::/ ::|:: \:: .'
   `-   _____ .-'

One of those dots in the magnetosphere is the Milky Way galaxy. And
each dot represents another galaxy. The O is the Cosmic nucleus and
certainly not as dense as what Old Physics thought because in New Physics
the interior of atoms has the Faraday law with the donut hole occupied by neutrons as storage capacitors.

I re-opened the old newsgroup PAU of 1990s and there one can read my recent posts without the hassle of spammers, govt-police drag net spam,off-topic-misfits, front-page-hogs, stalking mockers, suppression-bullies, and demonizers.

Archimedes Plutonium

2021-09-24 01:39:57 UTC

Permalink

More people reading AP's newsgroup than sci.math for math science.
https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe

SCI.MATH FAQ, 20Sep2021// Usenet science dead, but AP's newsgroup up and running well--

Today's topic-- how AP is correcting the definition of Natural Logarithm base 2.71... for the Y= 1/x has no relation to the equiangular logarithmic spiral. See AP's 203rd book of science.

Take a look at the only pure science newsgroup, free of spammers, block-spam, and police drag net spam, free of stalkers.

The only thing worth discussing in sci.math and to shift the momentum of the entire Math Community to the TRUTH OF MATHEMATICS is the painful having to throw out cranks and crackpots of mathematics-- Andrew Wiles, Terence Tao, Thomas Hales, John Stillwell, Jill Pipher, Ken Ribet, and many others who refuse to recognize the single most important math of our times is a GEOMETRY PROOF OF THE FUNDAMENTAL THEOREM OF CALCULUS, for in doing such, it cleans out mathematics just like scrubbing and vacuuming to clean out our houses is a necessary function in going forward. And the above listed math fools are trying everything in their power to keep math entrenched in their stupidity.

Another item of huge concern is the correction of the OVAL as the slant cut in Conic Sections, not the ellipse, and we can see how mindless and idiotic is the ship of state of mathematics, when the above list of failed mathematicians even refuses to correct such a simple error.

Also, a third item which reveals that most math professors are good at calculations but mostly mindless fools of logic or just making a proof of mathematics, for all of the above listed fools of math still preach 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction. All because their tiny pea brained minds of logic can never understand how Boole screwed up on truth tables and that AND is never TFFF but always TTTF. Yet the above math fools use 2 OR 1= 3 every day in all their proofs of mathematics.

A fourth item is the Correction of SINE curve is SEMICIRCLE, for a sinusoid is a mistaken artifice of having one axis unequal to the other axis.

A fifth item is the error filled definition of Natural Logarithm base 2.71... for the Y = 1/x has no relation to a logarithmic spiral that demands to be equiangular.

These are just 5 of the errors of Old Math that you can begin to learn in AP's newsgroup and his 150 published books on science.

https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe

XXXXXXXXXXX

Principles of sci.math

1) Above all, do math in sci.math, for at the end of the day, end of the year, end of a life, it is the math that you do in sci.math that only counts.

2) When doing math in sci.math and talking to someone else that is seriously doing math with you-- be polite.

3) Most posters degenerate into ad hominem attackers. Reread (1).

4) Sci.math is open to all, sadly, to even those who never do math in sci.math, but the openness is a blessing in disguise, because the openness more often than not, gets at the truth of science that has been corrupted by other scientists. And sci.math is self-policing, meaning that if you continue to piss and poop, (like Jeff Relf offtopic in sci.physics) if you continue to piss and poop in sci.math, the others who seriously do math in sci.math will self police the miscreant out. For offtopic spammers like Relf is no better than a person invited to dinner and instead of using the bathroom, shits in the middle of the dining room floor.

5) Prime Minister Boris Johnson & President Joe Biden, please call off your police agencies and FBI, CIA, Mi5, Mi6 of their daily "police drag net spam" in sci.physics and sci.math, and leave those two newsgroups completely alone to do just physics and math. Totally inappropriate of govt agencies to ruin sci.math and sci.physics, you may as well have your agents in all church ceremonies applying drag net spam. The spammer "__" is never appropriate in sci.math or sci.physics, nor is the Stonehenge freak, or any of the other drag net spammers. We all thank the USA and British and other governments and agencies like CERN for inventing Usenet, but please, do not destroy what you built, with police drag net spam. Adhere to the tenet, that a forum sci.physics and sci.math are specifically devoted to physics and math, not to a govt bureaucracy chasing after criminals and terrorists with their highly flamed rhetoric and loud noises in sci.math, sci.physics.

6) Criminal-Stalking is defined as constant attacking of another person's character exclusive of science content in his/her threads for more than 1 year. In the case of criminal stalking the attackee, can just shred the attackers post and repost. For stalking is not science, nor academics nor debate nor discussion. Stalking is insanity and criminal behavior.

AP writes: AP no longer tolerates any Criminal Stalker and thus shreds his attack and spits the byproduct back into the lap of the stalker.

XXXXXXXXX
Some of the people responsible for the decline in sci.math and sci.physics.

---quoting Wikipedia ---
Controversy
Many government and university installations blocked, threatened to block, or attempted to shut-down The World's Internet connection until Software Tool & Die was eventually granted permission by the National Science Foundation to provide public Internet access on "an experimental basis."
--- end quote ---

When a govt pays people to stalk in science, that science body is going downhill for sure.

Why waste time on sci.math and sci.physics that NSF Dr. Panchanathan pays money? perhaps $100. per stalker post, in fraud waste and abuse hiring criminal stalkers such as Kibo Parry Moroney who was a Rensselaer failure with his 938 is 12% short of 945, or the monster logic fraudster of Canada's Dan Christensen who cannot acknowledge that Boole was wrong with his AND truth table is really TTTF not what Boole has of TFFF.

More people read AP than read sci.math or sci.physics, for who wants to waste time on spammers or paid for bigots like Jan Burse, Dan Christensen, Kibo Parry M, bwr fml, Earle Jones, Alan Mackenzie.
XXXXXXXXX

3rd published book

AP's Proof-Ellipse was never a Conic Section // Math proof series, book 1 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Ever since Ancient Greek Times it was thought the slant cut into a cone is the ellipse. That was false. For the slant cut in every cone is a Oval, never an Ellipse. This book is a proof that the slant cut is a oval, never the ellipse. A slant cut into the Cylinder is in fact a ellipse, but never in a cone.

Length: 21 pages

File Size: 1620 KB
Print Length: 21 pages
Publication Date: March 11, 2019
Sold by: Amazon Digital Services LLC
Language: English
ASIN: B07PLSDQWC
Text-to-Speech: Enabled
X-Ray: Not Enabled
Word Wise: Not Enabled
Lending: Enabled
Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled

11th published book

World's First Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus// Math proof series, book 2 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Last revision was 19May2021. This is AP's 11th published book of science.
Preface:
Actually my title is too modest, for the proof that lies within this book makes it the World's First Valid Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, for in my modesty, I just wanted to emphasis that calculus was geometry and needed a geometry proof. Not being modest, there has never been a valid proof of FTC until AP's 2015 proof. This also implies that only a geometry proof of FTC constitutes a valid proof of FTC.

Calculus needs a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus. But none could ever be obtained in Old Math so long as they had a huge mass of mistakes, errors, fakes and con-artist trickery such as the "limit analysis". To give a Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus requires math be cleaned-up and cleaned-out of most of math's mistakes and errors. So in a sense, a Geometry FTC proof is a exercise in Consistency of all of Mathematics. In order to prove a FTC geometry proof, requires throwing out the error filled mess of Old Math. Can the Reals be the true numbers of mathematics if the Reals cannot deliver a Geometry proof of FTC? Can the functions that are not polynomial functions allow us to give a Geometry proof of FTC? Can a Coordinate System in 2D have 4 quadrants and still give a Geometry proof of FTC? Can a equation of mathematics with a number that is _not a positive decimal Grid Number_ all alone on the right side of the equation, at all times, allow us to give a Geometry proof of the FTC?

Cover Picture: Is my hand written, one page geometry proof of the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, the world's first geometry proof of FTC, 2013-2015, by AP.

Length: 137 pages

Product details
ASIN : B07PQTNHMY
Publication date : March 14, 2019
Language : English
File size : 1307 KB
Text-to-Speech : Enabled
Screen Reader : Supported
Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
X-Ray : Not Enabled
Word Wise : Not Enabled
Print length : 137 pages
Lending : Enabled
Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #128,729 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
#2 in 45-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
#134 in Calculus (Books)
#20 in Calculus (Kindle Store)

5th published book

Suspend all College Classes in Logic, until they Fix their Errors // Teaching True Logic series, book 1 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Last revision was 29Mar2021. This is AP's 5th published book of science.
Preface:
First comes Logic-- think straight and clear which many logic and math professors are deaf dumb and blind to, and simply refuse to recognize and fix their errors.

The single biggest error of Old Logic of Boole and Jevons was their "AND" and "OR" connectors. They got them mixed up and turned around. For their logic ends up being that of 3 OR 2 = 5 with 3 AND 2 = either 3 or 2 but never 5, when even the local village idiot knows that 3 AND 2 = 5 (addition) with 3 OR 2 = either 3 or 2 (subtraction). The AND connector in Logic stems from the idea, the mechanism involved, that given a series of statements, if just one of those many statements has a true truth value, then the entire string of statements is overall true, and thus AND truth table is truly TTTF and never TFFF. And secondly, their error of the If->Then conditional. I need to make it clear enough to the reader why the true Truth Table of IF --> Then requires a U for unknown or uncertain with a probability outcome for F --> T = U and F --> F = U. Some smart readers would know that the reason for the U is because without the U, Logic has no means of division by 0 which is undefined in mathematics. You cannot have a Logic that is less than mathematics. A logic that is impoverished and cannot do a "undefined for division by 0 in mathematics". The true logic must be able to have the fact that division by 0 is undefined. True logic is larger than all of mathematics, and must be able to fetch any piece of mathematics from out of Logic itself. So another word for U is undefined. And this is the crux of why Reductio ad Absurdum cannot be a proof method of mathematics, for a starting falsehood in a mathematics proof can only lead to a probability end conclusion.

My corrections of Old Logic have a history that dates before 1993, sometime around 1991, I realized the Euclid proof of infinitude of primes was illogical, sadly sadly wrong, in that the newly formed number by "multiply the lot and add 1" was necessarily a new prime in the indirect proof method. So that my history of fixing Old Logic starts in 1991, but comes to a synthesis of correcting all four of the connectors of Equal/not, And, Or, If->Then, by 2015.

Cover picture: some may complain my covers are less in quality, but I have a good reason for those covers-- I would like covers of math or logic to show the teacher's own handwriting as if he were back in the classroom writing on the blackboard or an overhead projector.

Length: 72 pages

File Size: 773 KB
Print Length: 72 pages
Publication Date: March 12, 2019
Sold by: Amazon Digital Services LLC
Language: English
ASIN: B07PMB69F5
Text-to-Speech: Enabled
X-Ray:  Not Enabled  
Word Wise: Not Enabled
Lending: Enabled
Screen Reader: Supported
Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled
 

y z
| /
| /
|/______ x

More people reading and viewing AP's newsgroup than viewing sci.math, sci.physics. So AP has decided to put all NEW WORK, to his newsgroup. And there is little wonder because in AP's newsgroups, there is only solid pure science going on, not a gang of hate spewing misfits blighting the skies.

In sci.math, sci.physics there is only stalking hate spew along with Police Drag Net Spam of no value and other than hate spew there is Police drag net spam day and night.

I re-opened the old newsgroup PAU of 1990s and there one can read my recent posts without the hassle of stalkers and spammers, Police Drag Net Spam that floods each and every day, book and solution manual spammers, off-topic-misfits, front-page-hogs, churning imbeciles, stalking mockers, suppression-bullies, and demonizers. And the taxpayer funded hate spew stalkers who ad hominem you day and night on every one of your posts.

There is no discussion of science in sci.math or sci.physics, just one long line of hate spewing stalkers followed up with Police Drag Net Spam (easy to spot-- very offtopic-- with hate charged content). And countries using sci.physics & sci.math as propaganda platforms, such as tampering in elections with their mind-rot.

Read my recent posts in peace and quiet.
https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe
Archimedes Plutonium