Discussion:
Psychology reason math professors cannot make calculus super easy with add or subtract 1 from polynomial exponent-- job security. When making calculus super easy, half the math departments in colleges are no longer needed.
(too old to reply)
Archimedes Plutonium
2024-02-03 23:23:32 UTC
Permalink
Math professors prefer job security, over that of making calculus super easy for the polynomial is the easiest function to find derivative and integral. And if the news got out in academia that calculus can be made a million times easier, no vomiting in classrooms, no torture chamber, no more nervous breakdowns.

Why half of the math dept in colleges could be dismissed because calculus made so easy, and no more subjects like ordinary and partial differential equations, as those are super easy to solve in polynomials.

The psychological reason math professors cannot admit Polynomials are the only valid function and if not already a polynomial it is easy to convert a nonpolynomial, is that fear of being layed off, since math is made a million times easier.

My 221st published book


An Education Ladder Guideline for teaching mathematics and a Test to see if you are cut out to be a mathematician//Teaching True Mathematics
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) (Amazon's Kindle)

Preface: This book is written to improve math education in school and at home. Trouble is, you cannot improve math education if the professors of mathematics have much of their teachings in error. So I write this book mostly as a test for math professors because to shine a light on math professor failure is the best way to improve math teaching, and thereby improve school curriculums especially colleges and universities. But others, such as laypersons are welcomed to join in. And it is the laypersons and students that will make the greatest amount of use of this book because math professors are usually stubborn and idiotic and hard to change for the better. And so when students and laypersons keep asking questions of their math professors, their brainwashing and thus poor teaching, they eventually come around to the truth and then change their bad behavior and bad misunderstanding; to proper true mathematics.

Cover Picture: Is my iphone photograph of a rubber washer inside a plastic cone. The washer is at a steep slant angle to the cone perpendicular. Notice the washer near the apex is fully touching the side of the cone, but the washer directed towards the base has not yet cut through the side of the cone, and you can see a rainbow or a crescent shape of area where the washer will intersect the side of the cone, (where my two finger are), making a total figure of a Oval, never the ellipse. I was taking this picture as one person, so I had the iphone camera in one hand and the cone in another hand, and had to use a rubber washer to stay in place. The same green plastic cone used in this picture appears in both of my published books of the proof slant cut of cone is oval, never the ellipse.

My 3rd published book with the same green cone on cover.
AP's Proof-Ellipse was never a Conic Section // Math proof series, book 1 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

My 68th published book with the same green cone on cover.
Proofs Ellipse is never a Conic section, always a Cylinder section and a Well Defined Oval definition//Student teaches professor series, book 5 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Product details
• ASIN ‏ : ‎ B0BQDYMYKQ
• Publication date ‏ : ‎ December 16, 2022
• Language ‏ : ‎ English
• File size ‏ : ‎ 551 KB
• Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
• Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Sticky notes ‏ : ‎ On Kindle Scribe
• Print length ‏ : ‎ 65 pages



My 134th published book

Introduction to TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 1 for ages 5 through 26, math textbook series, book 1 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

The 134th book of AP, and belatedly late, for I had already written the series of TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS in a 7 volume, 8 book set. This would be the first book in that 8 book set (one of the books is a companion book to 1st year college). But I suppose that I needed to write the full series before I could write the Introduction and know what I had to talk about and talk about in a logical progression order. Sounds paradoxical in a sense, that I needed to write the full series first and then go back and write the Introduction. But in another sense, hard to write an introduction on something you have not really fully done and completed. For example to know what is error filled Old Math and to list those errors in a logical order requires me to write the full 7 volumes in order to list in order the mistakes.

Cover Picture: Mathematics begins with counting, with numbers, with quantity. But counting numbers needs geometry for something to count in the first place. So here in this picture of the generalized Hydrogen atom of chemistry and physics is a torus geometry of 8 rings of a proton torus and one ring where my fingers are, is a equator ring that is the muon and thrusting through the proton torus at the equator of the torus. So we count 9 rings in all. So math is created by atoms and math numbers exist because atoms have many geometry figures to count. And geometry exists because atoms have shapes and different figures.

Product details
• ASIN ‏ : ‎ B08K2XQB4M
• Publication date ‏ : ‎ September 24, 2020
• Language ‏ : ‎ English
• File size ‏ : ‎ 576 KB
• Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
• Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Print length ‏ : ‎ 23 pages
• Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Best Sellers Rank: #224,974 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
◦ #3 in 45-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
◦ #23 in Calculus (Kindle Store)
◦ #182 in Calculus (Books)


#5-2, My 45th published book.

TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 2 for ages 5 to 18, math textbook series, book 2
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) (Amazon Kindle edition)

Last revision was 2NOV2020. And this is AP's 45th published book of science.

Preface: Volume 2 takes the 5 year old student through to senior in High School for their math education.

This is a textbook series in several volumes that carries every person through all his/her math education starting age 5 up to age 26. Volume 2 is for age 5 year old to that of senior in High School, that is needed to do both science and math. Every other math book is incidental to this series of Teaching True Mathematics.

It is a journal-textbook because Amazon's Kindle offers me the ability to edit overnight, and to change the text, almost on a daily basis. A unique first in education textbooks-- almost a continual overnight editing. Adding new text, correcting text. Volume 2 takes the 5 year old student through to senior in High School for their math education. Volume 3 carries the Freshperson in College for their math calculus education.

Cover Picture: The Numbers as Integers from 0 to 100, and 10 Grid when dividing by 10, and part of the 100 Grid when dividing by 100. Decimal Grid Numbers are the true numbers of mathematics. The Reals, the rationals & irrationals, the algebraic & transcendentals, the imaginary & Complex, and the negative-numbers are all fake numbers. For, to be a true number, you have to "be counted" by mathematical induction. The smallest Grid system is the Decimal 10 Grid.



Product details
ASIN ‏ : ‎ B07RG7BVZW
Publication date ‏ : ‎ May 2, 2019
Language ‏ : ‎ English
File size ‏ : ‎ 2024 KB
Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
Print length ‏ : ‎ 423 pages
Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
Best Sellers Rank: #235,426 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
#15 in General Geometry
#223 in Geometry & Topology (Books)


#5-3, 55th published book

TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 3 for age 18-19, 1st year College Calculus, math textbook series, book 3 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Last revision was 25Jun2021. And this is AP's 55th published book of science.

Teaching True Mathematics, by Archimedes Plutonium 2019

Preface: This is volume 3, book 3 of Teaching True Mathematics, designed for College Freshperson students, 1st year college students of age 18-19. It is the continuation of volume 2 for ages 5 through 18 years old.

The main major topic is the AP-EM equations of electricity and magnetism, the mathematics for the laws of electricity and magnetism; what used to be called the Maxwell Equations of Physics. The 1st Year College Math has to prepare all students with the math for all the sciences. So 1st year college Math is like a huge intersection station that has to prepare students with the math they need to do the hard sciences such as physics, chemistry, biology, astronomy, geology, etc. What this means is, 1st year college is calculus that allows the student to work with electricity and magnetism. All the math that is needed to enable students to do electricity and magnetism. In Old Math before this textbook, those Old Math textbooks would end in 1/3 of the text about Arclength, vector space, div, curl, Line Integral, Green's, Stokes, Divergence theorem trying to reach and be able to teach Maxwell Equations. But sadly, barely any Old Math classroom reached that 1/3 ending of the textbook, and left all those college students without any math to tackle electricity and magnetism. And most of Old Math was just muddle headed wrong even if they covered the last 1/3 of the textbook. And that is totally unacceptable in science. This textbook fixes that huge hole and gap in Old Math education.

And there is no way around it, that a course in 1st year College Calculus is going to do a lot of hands on experiment with electricity and magnetism, and is required of the students to buy a list of physics apparatus-- multimeter, galvanometer, coil, bar magnet, alligator clip wires, electromagnet, iron filing case, and possibly even a 12 volt transformer, all shown in the cover picture. The beginning of this textbook and the middle section all leads into the ending of this textbook-- we learn the AP-EM Equations and how to use those equations. And there is no escaping the fact that it has to be hands on physics experiments in the classroom of mathematics.

But, do not be scared, for this is all easy easy easy. For if you passed and enjoyed Volume 2 TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS, then I promise you, you will not be stressed with Volume 3, for I go out of my way to make it clear and understandable.

Warning: this is a Journal Textbook, meaning that I am constantly adding new material, constantly revising, constantly fixing mistakes or making things more clear. So if you read this book in August of 2019, chances are it is different when you read it in September 2019. Ebooks allow authors the freedom to improve their textbooks on a ongoing basis.

The 1st year college math should be about the math that prepares any and all students for science, whether they branch out into physics, chemistry, biology, geology, astronomy, or math, they should have all the math in 1st year college that will carry them through those science studies. I make every attempt possible to make math easy to understand, easy to learn and hopefully fun.

Product details
• ASIN ‏ : ‎ B07WN9RVXD
• Publication date ‏ : ‎ August 16, 2019
• Language ‏ : ‎ English
• File size ‏ : ‎ 1390 KB
• Simultaneous device usage ‏ : ‎ Unlimited
• Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
• Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Print length ‏ : ‎ 236 pages
• Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Best Sellers Rank: #1,377,070 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
◦ #411 in Calculus (Kindle Store)
◦ #2,480 in Calculus (Books)

#5-4, 56th published book

COLLEGE CALCULUS GUIDE to help students recognize math professor spam from math truth & reality// math textbook series, book 4 Kindle Edition

by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)


#1 New Releasein 15-Minute Science & Math Short Reads


This textbook is the companion guide book to AP's Teaching True Mathematics, 1st year College. It is realized that Old Math will take a long time in removing their fake math, so in the interim period, this Guide book is designed to speed up the process of removing fake Calculus out of the education system, the fewer students we punish with forcing them with fake Calculus, the better we are.
Cover Picture: This book is part comedy, for when you cannot reason with math professors that they have many errors to fix, that 90% of their Calculus is in error, you end up resorting to comedy, making fun of them, to prod them to fix their errors. To prod them to "do right by the students of the world" not their entrenched propaganda.
Length: 54 pages


Product details
File Size: 1035 KB
Print Length: 64 pages
Simultaneous Device Usage: Unlimited
Publication Date: August 18, 2019
Sold by: Amazon.com Services LLC
Language: English
ASIN: B07WNGLQ85
Text-to-Speech: Enabled 
X-Ray: 
Not Enabled  

Word Wise: Not Enabled
Lending: Enabled
Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled 
Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #253,425 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
#38 in 90-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
#318 in Calculus (Books)
#48 in Calculus (Kindle Store)

#5-5, 72nd published book

TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 4 for age 19-20 Sophomore-year College, math textbook series, book 5 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Preface: This is volume 4, book 5 of Teaching True Mathematics, designed for College Sophomore-year students, students of age 19-20. It is the continuation of volume 3 in the end-goal of learning how to do the mathematics of electricity and magnetism, because everything in physics is nothing but atoms and atoms are nothing but electricity and magnetism. To know math, you have to know physics. We learned the Calculus of 2nd dimension and applied it to the equations of physics for electricity and magnetism. But we did not learn the calculus of those equations for 3rd dimension. So, you can say that Sophomore year College math is devoted to 3D Calculus. This sophomore year college we fill in all the calculus, and we start over on all of Geometry, for geometry needs a modern day revision. And pardon me for this book is mostly reading, and the students doing less calculations. The classroom of this textbook has the teacher go through page by page to get the students comprehending and understanding of what is being taught. There are many hands on experiments also.

Cover Picture shows some toruses, some round some square, torus of rings, thin strips of rings or squares and shows them laid flat. That is Calculus of 3rd dimension that lays a ring in a torus to be flat in 2nd dimension.
Length: 105 pages

Product details
• ASIN ‏ : ‎ B0828M34VL
• Publication date ‏ : ‎ December 2, 2019
• Language ‏ : ‎ English
• File size ‏ : ‎ 952 KB
• Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
• Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Print length ‏ : ‎ 105 pages
• Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Best Sellers Rank: #242,037 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
◦ #36 in Calculus (Kindle Store)
◦ #219 in Calculus (Books)


#5-6, 75th published book

TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 5 for age 20-21 Junior-year of College, math textbook series, book 6 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium 2019

This is volume 5, book 6 of Teaching True Mathematics, designed for College Junior-year students, students of age 20-21. In first year college Calculus we learned calculus of the 2nd dimension and applied it to the equations of physics for electricity and magnetism. And in sophomore year we learned calculus of 3rd dimension to complete our study of the mathematics needed to do the physics of electricity and magnetism. Now, junior year college, we move onto something different, for we focus mostly on logic now and especially the logic of what is called the "mathematical proof". Much of what the student has learned about mathematics so far has been given to her or him as stated knowledge, accept it as true because I say so. But now we are going to do math proofs. Oh, yes, we did prove a few items here and there, such as why the Decimal Grid Number system is so special, such as the Pythagorean Theorem, such as the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus with its right-triangle hinged up or down. But many ideas we did not prove, we just stated them and expected all students to believe them true. And you are now juniors in college and we are going to start to prove many of those ideas and teach you "what is a math proof". Personally, I myself feel that the math proof is overrated, over hyped. But the math proof is important for one reason-- it makes you better scientists of knowing what is true and what is a shaky idea. A math proof is the same as "thinking straight and thinking clearly". And all scientists need to think straight and think clearly. But before we get to the Mathematics Proof, we have to do Probability and Statistics. What you learned in Grade School, then High School, then College, called Sigma Error, now becomes Probability and Statistics. It is important because all sciences including mathematics needs and uses Probability and Statistics. So, our job for junior-year of college mathematics is all cut out and ahead for us, no time to waste, let us get going.

Cover Picture: is a sample of the Array Proof, a proof the ellipse is not a conic but rather a cylinder cut wherein the oval is the slant cut of a cone, not the ellipse.

Length: 175 pages


Product details
ASIN : B0836F1YF6
Publication date : December 26, 2019
Language : English
File size : 741 KB
Text-to-Speech : Enabled
Screen Reader : Supported
Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
X-Ray : Not Enabled
Word Wise : Not Enabled
Print length : 175 pages
Lending : Enabled
Best Sellers Rank: #3,768,255 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
◦ #3,591 in Probability & Statistics (Kindle Store)
◦ #19,091 in Probability & Statistics (Books)


#5-7, 89th published book

TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 6 for age 21-22 Senior-year of College, math textbook series, book 7 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium 2020

Last revision was 6Feb2021.
Preface: This is the last year of College for mathematics and we have to mostly summarize all of mathematics as best we can. And set a new pattern to prepare students going on to math graduate school. A new pattern of work habits, because graduate school is more of research and explore on your own. So in this final year, I am going to eliminate tests, and have it mostly done as homework assignments.

Cover Picture: Again and again, many times in math, the mind is not good enough alone to think straight and clear, and you need tools to hands-on see how it works. Here is a collection of tools for this senior year college classes. There is a pencil, clipboard, graph paper, compass, divider, protractor, slide-ruler. And for this year we spend a lot of time on the parallelepiped, showing my wood model, and showing my erector set model held together by wire loops in the corners. The plastic square is there only to hold up the erector set model.

Length: 110 pages

Product details
ASIN ‏ : ‎ B084V11BGY
Publication date ‏ : ‎ February 15, 2020
Language ‏ : ‎ English
File size ‏ : ‎ 826 KB
Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
Print length ‏ : ‎ 110 pages
Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
Best Sellers Rank: #224,965 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
◦ #345 in Mathematics (Kindle Store)
◦ #373 in Physics (Kindle Store)
◦ #2,256 in Physics (Books)

#5-8, 90th published book

TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 7 for age 22-26 Graduate school, math textbook series, book 8 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium 2020

Last revised 1NOV2020. This was AP's 90th published book of science.

Preface: This is College Graduate School mathematics. Congratulations, you made it this far. To me, graduate school is mostly research, research mathematics and that means also physics. So it is going to be difficult to do math without physics. Of course, we focus on the mathematics of these research projects.

My textbook for Graduate school is just a template and the professors teaching the graduate students are free of course to follow their own projects, but in terms of being physics and math combined. What I list below is a template for possible projects.

So, in the below projects, I list 36 possible research projects that a graduate student my like to undertake, or partake. I list those 36 projects with a set of parentheses like this (1), (2), (3), etc. Not to be confused with the chapters listing as 1), 2), 3), etc. I list 36 projects but the professor can offer his/her own list, and I expect students with their professor, to pick a project and to monitor the student as to his/her progresses through the research. I have listed each project then cited some of my own research into these projects, below each project is an entry. Those entries are just a help or helper in getting started or acquainted with the project. The entry has a date time group and a newsgroup that I posted to such as sci.math or plutonium-atom-universe Google newsgroups. Again the entry is just a help or helper in getting started.

Now instead of picking one or two projects for your Graduate years of study, some may select all 36 projects where you write a short paper on each project. Some may be bored with just one or two projects and opt for all 36.

Cover Picture: A photo by my iphone of a page on Permutations of the Jacobs book Mathematics: A Human Endeavor, 1970. One of the best textbooks ever written in Old Math, not for its contents because there are many errors, but for its teaching style. It is extremely rare to find a math textbook written for the student to learn. Probably because math professors rarely learned how to teach in the first place; only learned how to unintentionally obfuscate. The page I photographed is important because it is the interface between geometry's perimeter or surface area versus geometry's area or volume, respectively. Or, an interface of pure numbers with that of geometry. But I have more to say on this below.
Length: 296 pages

Product details
ASIN ‏ : ‎ B085DF8R7V
Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 1, 2020
Language ‏ : ‎ English
File size ‏ : ‎ 828 KB
Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
Print length ‏ : ‎ 296 pages
Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
Best Sellers Rank: #224,981 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
◦ #13 in General Geometry
◦ #213 in Geometry & Topology (Books)


#5-9,
#5-10, 160th published book

MATHOPEDIA-- List of 82 fakes and mistakes of Old Math// mathematics & logic
by Archimedes Plutonium

Preface:
A Mathopedia is like a special type of encyclopedia on the subject of mathematics. It is about the assessment of the worth of mathematics and the subject material of mathematics. It is a overall examination and a evaluation of mathematics and its topics.

The ordering of Mathopedia is not a alphabetic ordering, nor does it have a index. The ordering is purely that of importance at beginning and importance at end.

The greatest use of Mathopedia is a guide to students of what not to waste your time on and what to focus most of your time. I know so many college classes in mathematics are just a total waste of time, waste of valuable time for the class is math fakery. I know because I have been there.

Now I am going to cite various reference sources of AP books if anyone wants more details and can be seen in the Appendix at the end of the book.

I suppose, going forward, mathematics should always have a mathopedia, where major parts of mathematics as a science are held under scrutiny and question as to correctness. In past history we have called these incidents as "doubters of the mainstream". Yet math, like physics, can have no permanent mainstream, since there is always question of correctness in physics, there then corresponds questions of correctness in mathematics (because math is a subset of physics). What I mean is that each future generation corrects some mistakes of past mathematics. If anyone is unsure of what I am saying here, both math and physics need constant correcting, of that which never belonged in science. This then converges with the logic-philosophy of Pragmatism (see AP's book of logic on Pragmatism).

Product details
• ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09MZTLRL5 and ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09ZWFLKHC
• Publication date ‏ : ‎ December 2, 2021
• Product details
• ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09ZWFLKHC
• Publication date ‏ : ‎ May 8, 2022
• Language ‏ : ‎ English
• File size ‏ : ‎ 1154 KB
• Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
• Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Sticky notes ‏ : ‎ On Kindle Scribe
• Print length ‏ : ‎ 71 pages



y z
| /
| /
|/______ x


Very crude dot picture of 5f6 magnetosphere of 231Pu Atom Totality.

A torus shape doing the Faraday Law inside of each and every atom. The Cosmos of Astronomy looks like this.
____
.-' `-.
.' ::\ ::|:: /:: `.
/ ::\::|::/:: \
; _ _ ;
| ___( O )___ |
; - - ;
\ ::/::|::\:: /
`. ::/ ::|:: \:: .'
`- _____ .-'

One of those dots in the magnetosphere is the Milky Way galaxy. And
each dot represents another galaxy. The O is the Cosmic nucleus and
certainly not as dense as what Old Physics thought because in New Physics
the interior of atoms has the Faraday law with the donut hole occupied by neutrons as storage capacitors.

AP kindly asks Google to let AP run all three, sci.math, sci.physics, PAU as he runs PAU, now--- all pure science, no spam and no govt b.s.

PAU newsgroup is this.
https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe
Archimedes Plutonium

Psychology reason math professors cannot make calculus super easy with add or subtract 1 from polynomial exponent-- job security. When making calculus super easy, half the math departments in colleges are no longer needed.
Archimedes Plutonium
2024-02-10 23:20:13 UTC
Permalink
My 14th published book of science.

Correcting Math// Math focus series, book 1 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

In the 1990s, I took a survey of Math Professors doing a simple math proof of Euclid's Infinitude of Primes Proof, and found that 84% of Math Professors failed to deliver a valid proof in that survey. The reason I believe this poor performance is that math professors for the most part are never required to take Logic courses while in college, to teach them how to think straight, think clearly. As a result, the world is cluttered with their fake mathematics with no hope of cleaning up their messes. And instead of fixing their mistakes and errors, they keep on cluttering the world with more fake math.

I propose that all math professors be required to take Logic in College as a mandatory requirement. Further, I recommend that all math prizes such as Abel, Fields, etc, that all math prizes awarded to those that can show they first fixed errors "fixed something of Old Math" before any of their manuscript of a proof of something else new in math be considered or given a look-over. That is-- prove yourself first -- you can fix math before we want to look at your new offerings. Show yourself as being math intelligent by fixing errors, rather than throw another error filled fake-proof onto mathematics-- Appel & Haken fake 4 Color Mapping, Wiles's fake FLT, Hales's fake Kepler Packing, Tao & Green fake number theory proof. Show us you can fix math, then we can consider anything new you want to offer.

Cover picture: A tractrix formed by a pocket-watch on graph paper, for this is how infinity borderline is determined.

Product details
• ASIN ‏ : ‎ B07PQ2CXBY
• Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 15, 2019
• Language ‏ : ‎ English
• File size ‏ : ‎ 2020 KB
• Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
• Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Sticky notes ‏ : ‎ On Kindle Scribe
• Print length ‏ : ‎ 721 pages




#11-2, 35th published book

True Trigonometry and remove all trigonometry out of Calculus// Math focus series, book 2
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) (Amazon's Kindle)

Last revision was 18Jan2022. And this is AP's 35th published book of science.

Preface: This book was published by Amazon's Kindle in 5 April 2019, with 33 pages. And the book explains several important principles about mathematics, trigonometry and the relationship of numbers to angles. Unfortunately, as I wrote the book starting 2016 and up to publishing in 5 April 2019, I thought I had the matter mostly closed for the subject of trigonometry. That sine and cosine were Semicircle Waves, bobbing up and down in semicircle pattern looking like this ^v^v^v^. But then comes May and June of 2019 and another major discovery about trigonometry. A major discovery that changes all of Trigonometry graphing of functions and what those functions are, in the first place. So instead of making a singular correction-- no sinusoid wave but rather a semicircle wave, by May of 2019, I was having to throw out even the Semicircle wave and replace it with its true Trigonometry wave-- the cycloid, where you can have the Pure Cycloid wave or the Semicircle Cycloid Wave and all sorts of cycloid waves in-between pure and semicircle. That discovery of May 2019, changes all of Trigonometry and forces me now to make this book be a "History of True Trigonometry".

The sine and cosine are truly and really Semicircle-Cycloid Waves, and not Semicircle Waves. The difference is that a Cycloid wave is not an up and down wave, but a movement "across" such as this picture ^^^^^^^^^^

Cover Picture: My graphing of a Semicircle-Cycloid Wave atop Harold Jacob's book, 1970, "Mathematics a Human Endeavor", page 293 showing a Pure-Cycloid Wave. A sinusoid wave of Old Math is purely muddle headed wrong trash fiction math.



Product details
• ASIN ‏ : ‎ B07QDG5TH2
• Publication date ‏ : ‎ April 5, 2019
• Language ‏ : ‎ English
• File size ‏ : ‎ 1421 KB
• Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
• Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Print length ‏ : ‎ 126 pages
• Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Best Sellers Rank: #673,548 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
◦ #31 in Trigonometry (Kindle Store)
◦ #205 in Trigonometry (Books)


#11-3, 52nd published book

When does an equation of math, (or Logic), exist? AP's famous Axiom of Algebra// Math focus series, book 3 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

When vacationing in Siracusa Sicily in 1999 and buying oranges from a roadside fruit stand and weighing the oranges makes one realize that you cannot have 0 all alone on one side of a equation and still be a math equation.

Then in 2000s, especially 2015 I was writing math textbooks and the issue arose where I was removing all negative numbers out of mathematics. And how that can be done for polynomials. In that removal process, I discovered the now famous Algebra Axiom, that you cannot have a equation of mathematics if the rightside has only 0. Also, you have no math equation if the rightside is a negative number. Also, no equation exists if the rightside is a imaginary number.

The only time you have an equation in mathematics, is when the rightside has a positive, nonzero Decimal Grid Number, all alone by itself. Then you have a math equation that you can work with.

Makes sense in logic, makes sense in physics, that you need some true physical reality on one side of a equation, a balancing beam, and then measure that physical reality by weights or numbers of math on the other side of the equation.

This book is the history of my discovery of the famous Algebra Axiom of Equations of Math.

Cover Picture: an equation is the same as a balancing beam, and you have no equation if you have nothing on the rightside.


Product details
File Size: 1110 KB
Print Length: 36 pages
Simultaneous Device Usage: Unlimited
Publication Date: July 24, 2019
Sold by: Amazon Digital Services LLC
Language: English
ASIN: B07VRVBD91
Text-to-Speech: Enabled 
X-Ray: 
Not Enabled  

Word Wise: Not Enabled
Lending: Enabled
Screen Reader: Supported 
Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled 


#11-4, 73rd published book

Chess Optimal Strategy OS: once and for always // Math focus series, book 4 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Last revision was 22-Oct2022, and this is my 73rd published book on science.

Preface: I am happy to announce I finally conquered chess, with solving of its optimal strategy OS, and it is a draw if both players play by the OS. This victory of solving happened on 6 December 2019, as seen below. And then a cheating row broke out in the chess world in late 2022 between Magnus Carlsen and Hans Niemann; accusations of hidden electronics. For which AP sees as the death-knell of chess tournaments of the long time play action and the only worthwhile chess tournaments now are that of speed chess, exclusively speed chess. And the new research into Chess is whether humans are better at Speed Chess than ever can a computer be at speed-chess.

Cover Picture is my favorite chess set because it is magnetic and because the squares are black and white, not a circus of different colors. Somehow my psychological mind is disturbed if the set is green and white, or red and black, really repulsive. But so be it, in a world, even esthetics, to me, has to be logical.


Product details
ASIN ‏ : ‎ B082GS2HW3
Publication date ‏ : ‎ December 7, 2019
Language ‏ : ‎ English
File size ‏ : ‎ 994 KB
Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
Print length ‏ : ‎ 259 pages
Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #329,786 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
#692 in Mathematics (Kindle Store)
#143 in Chess (Kindle Store)
#489 in Chess (Books)

#11-5, My 107th published book.

History of 4 Arithmetic-Algebra Axioms// History of why negative-numbers never exist// Math Focus series, book 5
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) (Amazon's Kindle)

Last revision was 22Jun2021. This was AP's 107th published book on science.

Preface: This is somewhat a history book of math on the subject of arithmetic axioms for which Old Math failed miserably. And their failure cost math, centuries and even millennium of fake math in algebra. So costly was that failure that many minds in mathematics wasted their entire career in mathematics. The peak of stupidity of mathematics in not recognizing these three axioms of Arithmetic-Algebra, that peak of silliness ends with the ever-unprovable Riemann Hypothesis and why that conjecture is a failure of mathematics. I needed to write a entire whole book on just this topic for it affects both math and science in large part. To emphasize how critically important it is to have the primal axioms of arithmetic-algebra in logical order and correctness.

Cover Picture: The 10 Decimal Grid Numbers Coordinate System, all in 1st Quadrant Only for math has no negative numbers. And Descartes started the Coordinate System in 1637, as 1st Quadrant Only, with only one axis, not even two axes.

Product details
File Size: 1151 KB
Print Length: 56 pages
Publication Date: April 1, 2020
Sold by: Amazon.com Services LLC
Language: English
ASIN: B086QBY5TT
Text-to-Speech: Enabled 
X-Ray: 
Not Enabled  

Word Wise: Not Enabled
Lending: Enabled
Screen Reader: Supported 
Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled 

#11-6, 108th published book

New Math's FUNDAMENTAL THEOREM OF ALGEBRA// Math focus series, book 6

by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) (Amazon's Kindle)

Old Math had a Fundamental Theorem of Algebra, abbreviated as FTA, only big problem was, they forgot two critically important axioms of arithmetic for they forgot the subtraction axiom and the "what is a valid equation of mathematics axiom". When you are missing these vital important axioms of arithmetic and mathematics and try to assemble a Fundamental Theorem of Algebra, there is no hope in the world that your FTA is going to be correct without those axioms.

This book is what the true Fundamental Theorem of Algebra, FTA is an what it looks like. This book follows the previous book of this series: Arithmetic-Algebra Axioms// History of why negative-numbers never exist// Math Focus series, book 5. That prior book went into details of 3 axioms that Old Math either missed or severely neglected. For even the idea of having in Old Math the zero alone on the rightside of an equation for a polynomial runs into danger with the axiom of -- no division by zero. For when you demand all valid equations of mathematics have a nonzero positive decimal Grid number all alone by itself on the rightside of the equation. You can thence divide the entire Polynomial equation by that positive nonzero decimal Grid Number and hence, reduce every polynomial in existence to be a equation with 1 on the rightside of the equation, all alone. You cannot do that in a stupid Old Math program of focusing on zero as all alone on the rightside of the equation, which only goes to show, people in Old Math had no brain for reasoning, for they built their polynomial theory on zero, and forgot about a vital axiom that you cannot divide by zero, and you cannot reduce all polynomials to equal 1. People in Old Math went to school and learned the 4 R's-- reading, writing, arithmetic, remember (memorization), but never learned the 5th R-- reasoning.

Cover Picture is a Quintic, a 5th degree polynomial that opened up the case of FTA and what its proof looks like. Photograph picture on my lawn of 5APR2020, for I do so much adore Springtime and green plants. It revitalizes the soul to see plants spring back to life. My Rock Elm are producing seeds and my blackberries soon will explode in growth.


Product details
File Size: 848 KB
Print Length: 47 pages
Publication Date: April 5, 2020
Sold by: Amazon.com Services LLC
Language: English
ASIN: B086SPBM7F
Text-to-Speech: Enabled 
X-Ray: 
Not Enabled  

Word Wise: Not Enabled
Lending: Enabled
Screen Reader: Supported 
Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled 

#11-7, 110th published book

World's First One Variable Periodic Functions; utilizing Polynomials such as x^3 -6x^2 +11x = 6 // Math focus series, book 7
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) (Amazon's Kindle)

While working on the true Fundamental Theorem of Algebra, I ran across amazingly beautiful polynomials that offer science and physics periodic functions of one variable. This is a first in physics and science where we have periodic functions and not be sine or cosine or a trigonometry function, but rather instead a simple polynomial. This is a huge huge revolution in physics and mathematics both for polynomials are the easiest functions to do the calculus upon. For it means we can dismiss and dispel trigonometry functions as periodic and replace all periodic functions with polynomial functions.

Cover Picture is my iphone photograph of one of these remarkable periodic polynomial functions showing a plot of F(x) = x^3 -6x^2 + 11x. I labeled the minor trough keeping in mind that (0,0) is the major trough. If we plot a quartic periodic polynomial, a 4th degree periodic polynomial such as (x-1)(x-2)(x-3)(x-4) we have more up and down wavelets. Plot the 5th degree periodic polynomial (x-1)(x-2)(x-3)(x-4)(x-5) we have even more up and down smooth wavelets.


Product details
File Size: 902 KB
Print Length: 23 pages
Publication Date: April 10, 2020
Sold by: Amazon.com Services LLC
Language: English
ASIN: B086Z93X71
Text-to-Speech: Enabled 
X-Ray: 
Not Enabled  

Word Wise: Enabled
Lending: Enabled
Screen Reader: Supported 
Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled 


#11-8, 111th published book

WHY DID OLD MATH fail on the Divisional-Reverse, for they surely had Multiplicative-Inverse but too stupid to have Divisional Reverse // Math focus series, book 8
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) (Amazon's Kindle)


Funny how the mind seems to converge and focus on a topic that was referred to in other topics ongoing and very much unrelated. For instance in February 2020 I wanted to include Scientific Notation to the common core standards of writing out a number in decimals, as seen in the cover picture of this book. Then in the months of March and April 2020, I was working on dragonflies of the Devonian geological period and needed to know the mass of Earth back in Devonian, which connected me to a number in mathematics called the Divisional-reverse. Then in April, I was doing the physics constants of Planck, Fine-Structure constant and the speed of light constant and for me to solve them again required the Divisional-reverse. So I had a confluence of research topics all needing a mathematical tool called the Divisional-reverse. This book is devoted to that tool of mathematics.

Cover Picture: Is my iphone photograph of a Google search for 5th grade common core standards of what is taught in school about writing out decimal numbers.

Product details
File Size: 1095 KB
Print Length: 56 pages
Publication Date: April 14, 2020
Sold by: Amazon.com Services LLC
Language: English
ASIN: B08742MBLL
Text-to-Speech: Enabled 
X-Ray: 
Not Enabled  

Word Wise: Not Enabled
Lending: Enabled
Screen Reader: Supported 
Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled 



#11-9, 126th published book

Fourier Transform theory overhauled and replaced by Cycloid & Parabola Periodic Polynomials, Math focus series, book 9
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) (Amazon's Kindle)


Last revision was 18Jan2022. And this is AP's 126th published book of science.
Preface: All functions, true functions of mathematics are polynomials. Anything that is not a polynomial has to be converted into a polynomial before it can be called and treated as a function. This book is the work book of converting all non-polynomials into being transformed into a polynomial and thus a function of mathematics.
Cover Picture: My iphone photograph of a Google search for "cycloid".

Product details
ASIN : B08D5NGQSP
Publication date : July 15, 2020
Language : English
File size : 1109 KB
Text-to-Speech : Enabled
Screen Reader : Supported
Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
X-Ray : Not Enabled
Word Wise : Not Enabled
Print length : 64 pages
Lending : Enabled
Best Sellers Rank: #167,200 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
◦ #16 in 90-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
◦ #23 in Calculus (Kindle Store)
◦ #136 in Calculus (Books)


#11-10, 182nd published book

The Structure and Theory behind Mathematical Induction, and why it works// Math focus
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) (Amazon's Kindle)


Preface: Shedding new light on Mathematical Induction method of proof. Simplifying and making the method easier. I debated whether to put this in logic science or math science. Finally chose math focus, even though Mathematical Induction has tones of rising above mathematics itself, like a piece of meta-math, even a hint of philosophy. But no, Mathematical Induction is down to earth mathematics.
And the cause of this book was my prior book on showing that the torus volume was related to the donut hole of that specific torus, related by the golden ratio number phi = 1.61.... and all its variants. My proof of that relationship was a proof by Mathematical Induction. And in so doing that proof, I saw I needed to fill in huge gaps and holes in Old Math and its Mathematical Induction. For the Mathematical Induction presented in this book, overpowers Old Math's Mathematical Induction. Far more easy, far more comprehensible, far easier to understand, and to apply.
Cover Picture: Is the full Decimal 10 Grid Number System and next to it is a partial listing of the 100 Grid. One can easily see that the 10 Grid is inside the 100 Grid and any further larger Grid System contains all the lower grid systems. So this is Mathematical Induction of the very existence of numbers themselves.



Product details
• ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09XX7DTC9
• Publication date ‏ : ‎ April 13, 2022
• Language ‏ : ‎ English
• File size ‏ : ‎ 828 KB
• Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
• Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Print length ‏ : ‎ 75 pages
• Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled



#11-11, 200th published book

Primes are ILL defined in Mathematics // Math focus
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) (Amazon's Kindle)

Preface: AP's 200th book of science// Primes are ILL defined in Mathematics // Math focus  by Archimedes Plutonium.

A shame that Galois invented Groups, Ring,Field over the nonsense of quintic. But by 1830 in math history, it was not known that a Well Defined Equation of math had to have a positive nonzero number to the rightside of the equation at all times, and never be zero. Because the moment you do that, there never arises a problem of quintic.

And what Galois should have done with his time, was reason that groups rings and fields need to be invented for the purpose of a Well Defined Operator in mathematics.

It should not be AP that corrects all of Algebra of mathematics, but it should have been Galois or Gauss or Riemann to have done that by 1830.

Prime concept is a hallucination of Old Math. Ask any physicist where does the concept of prime arise in physics? It never does, and the reason being is mathematicians are kooks in defining prime.

Sure, mathematicians have known for centuries that primes have No Pattern, have No Formula. But you would then expect at least one marble of brain power from these mathematicians to notice that if No Pattern, No Formula, that something is wrong with the definition of primes.

What is wrong in the definition? It is simple and tells us why primes have no pattern, have no formula. To be Well Defined Operator, a operator must obey N#M = P where # is the operator (in our case, division) and N,M,P must be Counting Numbers to be well defined. So in other words a Well Defined operator over a set of numbers, must deliver to you when you operate N#M, must deliver to you another Counting Number P. Primes of Old Math only sometimes obeys that axiom of well defined. And, immediately we have numbers outside of Counting Numbers such as 1/2, 1/3, 2/3, etc etc.

Cover Picture: Is my photograph of my hand written formula of Well Defined Operator N # M = P. The N,M,P represent numbers from a given set. The symbol # represents the operator. A operator is well defined if all N,M,P are inside the given set. The operator is ILL defined if some P are not inside the original set.

Product details
• ASIN ‏ : ‎ B0BB6PWW2B
• Publication date ‏ : ‎ August 18, 2022
• Language ‏ : ‎ English
• File size ‏ : ‎ 384 KB
• Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
• Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Print length ‏ : ‎ 64 pages
• Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled


#11-12, 228th published book

Brief History of *True Calculus*--including new integration methods / math focus

by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) (Amazon's Kindle)

Last revision was March 2023. And this is AP's 228th published book of science.

Preface: AP as a teenager had a wish at University in 1969-- to make all of calculus as easy as the Power Rules over polynomial functions. And by 2015, AP's wish came true. For calculus really is easy math, as easy as add, subtract, multiply and divide. But only when people see the light of day about calculus. And where math professors stop chasing fame and fortune in publishing nonsense and spend more time teaching better in classrooms and making calculus be easy.

The history of True Calculus is far different from that which is written in math history books. True Calculus requires a true valid geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, which none was ever given until 2015. Once a geometry proof of FTC arrived, can we write a true history of calculus. The Old Math history of calculus is filled with error and fake science such as the "limit concept", the concept of "continuity". And where Old Math never even had a proper well defined "function" concept. No wonder Old Math history of calculus is trash. AP provides a brief history of True Calculus. But while studying this subject, AP has new insights into the right-circular-cone. And a new method of integration of varying sized circles over a distance length.


Cover Picture: My iphone photograph of a Wikipedia entry of Cavalieri quadrature formula (area formula) that was so critical in Calculus history for it is the formula of integrals under the function graph curve for polynomial functions. Cavalieri's discovery of the Power Rule for integrals marks the beginning of modern day calculus.



Product details
• ASIN ‏ : ‎ B0BXJ4RRZR
• Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 4, 2023
• Language ‏ : ‎ English
• File size ‏ : ‎ 646 KB
• Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
• Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Sticky notes ‏ : ‎ On Kindle Scribe
• Print length ‏ : ‎ 50 pages


#11-13, 233rd published book


Utter garbage of Cantor's work on infinity especially the diagonal method// math focus
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) (Amazon's Kindle)

Preface: So much of the Usenet newsgroup sci.math are discussions concerning why 0.9999... should equal 1 or about infinity and specifically Cantor's work with his diagonal method. I thought the time is ripe for me to write a independent book on why and how Cantor was wrong, and to lay the subject to rest. For the flaws of logical reasoning in infinity discussions are really abominable and abysmal and deserves an entire book of clarity packed with simple reasoning.

It amazes me how resembling is the science of geography with borderlines makes clear what countries there are, yet the borderline concept was so foreign to all mathematicians until AP discovered the infinity borderline starting 2009.


Cover Picture: My iphone photograph of two world globes showing countries with borderlines. Borderlines are beacons of clarity from one concept as it transitions into a newer concept.


Product details
• ASIN ‏ : ‎ B0BZLZ9WY1
• Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 24, 2023
• Language ‏ : ‎ English
• File size ‏ : ‎ 743 KB
• Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
• Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Sticky notes ‏ : ‎ On Kindle Scribe
• Print length ‏ : ‎ 40 pages


#11-14, 160th published book

MATHOPEDIA-- List of 82 fakes and mistakes of Old Math// mathematics & logic
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) (Amazon's Kindle)

Preface:
A Mathopedia is like a special type of encyclopedia on the subject of mathematics. It is about the assessment of the worth of mathematics and the subject material of mathematics. It is a overall examination and a evaluation of mathematics and its topics.

The ordering of Mathopedia is not a alphabetic ordering, nor does it have a index. The ordering is purely that of importance at beginning and importance at end.

The greatest use of Mathopedia is a guide to students of what not to waste your time on and what to focus most of your time. I know so many college classes in mathematics are just a total waste of time, waste of valuable time for the class is math fakery. I know because I have been there.

Now I am going to cite various reference sources of AP books if anyone wants more details and can be seen in the Appendix at the end of the book.

I suppose, going forward, mathematics should always have a mathopedia, where major parts of mathematics as a science are held under scrutiny and question as to correctness. In past history we have called these incidents as "doubters of the mainstream". Yet math, like physics, can have no permanent mainstream, since there is always question of correctness in physics, there then corresponds questions of correctness in mathematics (because math is a subset of physics). What I mean is that each future generation corrects some mistakes of past mathematics. If anyone is unsure of what I am saying here, both math and physics need constant correcting, of that which never belonged in science. This then converges with the logic-philosophy of Pragmatism (see AP's book of logic on Pragmatism).

Product details
• ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09MZTLRL5 and ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09ZWFLKHC
• Publication date ‏ : ‎ December 2, 2021
• Language ‏ : ‎ English
• File size ‏ : ‎ 1155 KB
• Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
• Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Print length ‏ : ‎ 70 pages
• Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled




y  z
|  /
| /
|/______ x

Read my recent posts in peace and quiet.
https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe  
Archimedes Plutonium


AP kindly asks Google to let AP run all three, sci.math, sci.physics, PAU as he runs PAU, now--- all pure science, no spam and no govt b.s.

PAU newsgroup is this.
https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe        
Archimedes Plutonium
Archimedes Plutonium
2024-02-12 17:29:42 UTC
Permalink
Math professors do not want to make calculus supereasy, for then likely 1/2 of the math departments in Colleges and Universities would be given the pink slip.

Why math professors will not make calculus super easy as add or subtract 1 from exponent of a polynomial, for the only valid function of math is the polynomial-- they want calculus a torture chamber for job security.

Why if calculus were made super easy, half the math departments in colleges would be pink slipped.

My 134th published book of science.

Introduction to TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 1 for ages 5 through 26, math textbook series, book 1 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

The 134th book of AP, and belatedly late, for I had already written the series of TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS in a 7 volume, 8 book set. This would be the first book in that 8 book set (one of the books is a companion book to 1st year college). But I suppose that I needed to write the full series before I could write the Introduction and know what I had to talk about and talk about in a logical progression order. Sounds paradoxical in a sense, that I needed to write the full series first and then go back and write the Introduction. But in another sense, hard to write an introduction on something you have not really fully done and completed. For example to know what is error filled Old Math and to list those errors in a logical order requires me to write the full 7 volumes in order to list in order the mistakes.

Cover Picture: Mathematics begins with counting, with numbers, with quantity. But counting numbers needs geometry for something to count in the first place. So here in this picture of the generalized Hydrogen atom of chemistry and physics is a torus geometry of 8 rings of a proton torus and one ring where my fingers are, is a equator ring that is the muon and thrusting through the proton torus at the equator of the torus. So we count 9 rings in all. So math is created by atoms and math numbers exist because atoms have many geometry figures to count. And geometry exists because atoms have shapes and different figures.

Product details
• ASIN ‏ : ‎ B08K2XQB4M
• Publication date ‏ : ‎ September 24, 2020
• Language ‏ : ‎ English
• File size ‏ : ‎ 576 KB
• Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
• Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Print length ‏ : ‎ 23 pages
• Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Best Sellers Rank: #224,974 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
◦ #3 in 45-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
◦ #23 in Calculus (Kindle Store)
◦ #182 in Calculus (Books)


#5-2, My 45th published book.

TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 2 for ages 5 to 18, math textbook series, book 2
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) (Amazon Kindle edition)

Last revision was 2NOV2020. And this is AP's 45th published book of science.

Preface: Volume 2 takes the 5 year old student through to senior in High School for their math education.

This is a textbook series in several volumes that carries every person through all his/her math education starting age 5 up to age 26. Volume 2 is for age 5 year old to that of senior in High School, that is needed to do both science and math. Every other math book is incidental to this series of Teaching True Mathematics.

It is a journal-textbook because Amazon's Kindle offers me the ability to edit overnight, and to change the text, almost on a daily basis. A unique first in education textbooks-- almost a continual overnight editing. Adding new text, correcting text. Volume 2 takes the 5 year old student through to senior in High School for their math education. Volume 3 carries the Freshperson in College for their math calculus education.

Cover Picture: The Numbers as Integers from 0 to 100, and 10 Grid when dividing by 10, and part of the 100 Grid when dividing by 100. Decimal Grid Numbers are the true numbers of mathematics. The Reals, the rationals & irrationals, the algebraic & transcendentals, the imaginary & Complex, and the negative-numbers are all fake numbers. For, to be a true number, you have to "be counted" by mathematical induction. The smallest Grid system is the Decimal 10 Grid.



Product details
ASIN ‏ : ‎ B07RG7BVZW
Publication date ‏ : ‎ May 2, 2019
Language ‏ : ‎ English
File size ‏ : ‎ 2024 KB
Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
Print length ‏ : ‎ 423 pages
Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
Best Sellers Rank: #235,426 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
#15 in General Geometry
#223 in Geometry & Topology (Books)


#5-3, 55th published book

TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 3 for age 18-19, 1st year College Calculus, math textbook series, book 3 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Last revision was 25Jun2021. And this is AP's 55th published book of science.

Teaching True Mathematics, by Archimedes Plutonium 2019

Preface: This is volume 3, book 3 of Teaching True Mathematics, designed for College Freshperson students, 1st year college students of age 18-19. It is the continuation of volume 2 for ages 5 through 18 years old.

The main major topic is the AP-EM equations of electricity and magnetism, the mathematics for the laws of electricity and magnetism; what used to be called the Maxwell Equations of Physics. The 1st Year College Math has to prepare all students with the math for all the sciences. So 1st year college Math is like a huge intersection station that has to prepare students with the math they need to do the hard sciences such as physics, chemistry, biology, astronomy, geology, etc. What this means is, 1st year college is calculus that allows the student to work with electricity and magnetism. All the math that is needed to enable students to do electricity and magnetism. In Old Math before this textbook, those Old Math textbooks would end in 1/3 of the text about Arclength, vector space, div, curl, Line Integral, Green's, Stokes, Divergence theorem trying to reach and be able to teach Maxwell Equations. But sadly, barely any Old Math classroom reached that 1/3 ending of the textbook, and left all those college students without any math to tackle electricity and magnetism. And most of Old Math was just muddle headed wrong even if they covered the last 1/3 of the textbook. And that is totally unacceptable in science. This textbook fixes that huge hole and gap in Old Math education.

And there is no way around it, that a course in 1st year College Calculus is going to do a lot of hands on experiment with electricity and magnetism, and is required of the students to buy a list of physics apparatus-- multimeter, galvanometer, coil, bar magnet, alligator clip wires, electromagnet, iron filing case, and possibly even a 12 volt transformer, all shown in the cover picture. The beginning of this textbook and the middle section all leads into the ending of this textbook-- we learn the AP-EM Equations and how to use those equations. And there is no escaping the fact that it has to be hands on physics experiments in the classroom of mathematics.

But, do not be scared, for this is all easy easy easy. For if you passed and enjoyed Volume 2 TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS, then I promise you, you will not be stressed with Volume 3, for I go out of my way to make it clear and understandable.

Warning: this is a Journal Textbook, meaning that I am constantly adding new material, constantly revising, constantly fixing mistakes or making things more clear. So if you read this book in August of 2019, chances are it is different when you read it in September 2019. Ebooks allow authors the freedom to improve their textbooks on a ongoing basis.

The 1st year college math should be about the math that prepares any and all students for science, whether they branch out into physics, chemistry, biology, geology, astronomy, or math, they should have all the math in 1st year college that will carry them through those science studies. I make every attempt possible to make math easy to understand, easy to learn and hopefully fun.

Product details
• ASIN ‏ : ‎ B07WN9RVXD
• Publication date ‏ : ‎ August 16, 2019
• Language ‏ : ‎ English
• File size ‏ : ‎ 1390 KB
• Simultaneous device usage ‏ : ‎ Unlimited
• Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
• Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Print length ‏ : ‎ 236 pages
• Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Best Sellers Rank: #1,377,070 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
◦ #411 in Calculus (Kindle Store)
◦ #2,480 in Calculus (Books)

#5-4, 56th published book

COLLEGE CALCULUS GUIDE to help students recognize math professor spam from math truth & reality// math textbook series, book 4 Kindle Edition

by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)


#1 New Releasein 15-Minute Science & Math Short Reads


This textbook is the companion guide book to AP's Teaching True Mathematics, 1st year College. It is realized that Old Math will take a long time in removing their fake math, so in the interim period, this Guide book is designed to speed up the process of removing fake Calculus out of the education system, the fewer students we punish with forcing them with fake Calculus, the better we are.
Cover Picture: This book is part comedy, for when you cannot reason with math professors that they have many errors to fix, that 90% of their Calculus is in error, you end up resorting to comedy, making fun of them, to prod them to fix their errors. To prod them to "do right by the students of the world" not their entrenched propaganda.
Length: 54 pages


Product details
File Size: 1035 KB
Print Length: 64 pages
Simultaneous Device Usage: Unlimited
Publication Date: August 18, 2019
Sold by: Amazon.com Services LLC
Language: English
ASIN: B07WNGLQ85
Text-to-Speech: Enabled 
X-Ray: 
Not Enabled  

Word Wise: Not Enabled
Lending: Enabled
Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled 
Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #253,425 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
#38 in 90-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
#318 in Calculus (Books)
#48 in Calculus (Kindle Store)

#5-5, 72nd published book

TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 4 for age 19-20 Sophomore-year College, math textbook series, book 5 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Preface: This is volume 4, book 5 of Teaching True Mathematics, designed for College Sophomore-year students, students of age 19-20. It is the continuation of volume 3 in the end-goal of learning how to do the mathematics of electricity and magnetism, because everything in physics is nothing but atoms and atoms are nothing but electricity and magnetism. To know math, you have to know physics. We learned the Calculus of 2nd dimension and applied it to the equations of physics for electricity and magnetism. But we did not learn the calculus of those equations for 3rd dimension. So, you can say that Sophomore year College math is devoted to 3D Calculus. This sophomore year college we fill in all the calculus, and we start over on all of Geometry, for geometry needs a modern day revision. And pardon me for this book is mostly reading, and the students doing less calculations. The classroom of this textbook has the teacher go through page by page to get the students comprehending and understanding of what is being taught. There are many hands on experiments also.

Cover Picture shows some toruses, some round some square, torus of rings, thin strips of rings or squares and shows them laid flat. That is Calculus of 3rd dimension that lays a ring in a torus to be flat in 2nd dimension.
Length: 105 pages

Product details
• ASIN ‏ : ‎ B0828M34VL
• Publication date ‏ : ‎ December 2, 2019
• Language ‏ : ‎ English
• File size ‏ : ‎ 952 KB
• Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
• Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Print length ‏ : ‎ 105 pages
• Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Best Sellers Rank: #242,037 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
◦ #36 in Calculus (Kindle Store)
◦ #219 in Calculus (Books)


#5-6, 75th published book

TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 5 for age 20-21 Junior-year of College, math textbook series, book 6 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium 2019

This is volume 5, book 6 of Teaching True Mathematics, designed for College Junior-year students, students of age 20-21. In first year college Calculus we learned calculus of the 2nd dimension and applied it to the equations of physics for electricity and magnetism. And in sophomore year we learned calculus of 3rd dimension to complete our study of the mathematics needed to do the physics of electricity and magnetism. Now, junior year college, we move onto something different, for we focus mostly on logic now and especially the logic of what is called the "mathematical proof". Much of what the student has learned about mathematics so far has been given to her or him as stated knowledge, accept it as true because I say so. But now we are going to do math proofs. Oh, yes, we did prove a few items here and there, such as why the Decimal Grid Number system is so special, such as the Pythagorean Theorem, such as the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus with its right-triangle hinged up or down. But many ideas we did not prove, we just stated them and expected all students to believe them true. And you are now juniors in college and we are going to start to prove many of those ideas and teach you "what is a math proof". Personally, I myself feel that the math proof is overrated, over hyped. But the math proof is important for one reason-- it makes you better scientists of knowing what is true and what is a shaky idea. A math proof is the same as "thinking straight and thinking clearly". And all scientists need to think straight and think clearly. But before we get to the Mathematics Proof, we have to do Probability and Statistics. What you learned in Grade School, then High School, then College, called Sigma Error, now becomes Probability and Statistics. It is important because all sciences including mathematics needs and uses Probability and Statistics. So, our job for junior-year of college mathematics is all cut out and ahead for us, no time to waste, let us get going.

Cover Picture: is a sample of the Array Proof, a proof the ellipse is not a conic but rather a cylinder cut wherein the oval is the slant cut of a cone, not the ellipse.

Length: 175 pages


Product details
ASIN : B0836F1YF6
Publication date : December 26, 2019
Language : English
File size : 741 KB
Text-to-Speech : Enabled
Screen Reader : Supported
Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
X-Ray : Not Enabled
Word Wise : Not Enabled
Print length : 175 pages
Lending : Enabled
Best Sellers Rank: #3,768,255 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
◦ #3,591 in Probability & Statistics (Kindle Store)
◦ #19,091 in Probability & Statistics (Books)


#5-7, 89th published book

TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 6 for age 21-22 Senior-year of College, math textbook series, book 7 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium 2020

Last revision was 6Feb2021.
Preface: This is the last year of College for mathematics and we have to mostly summarize all of mathematics as best we can. And set a new pattern to prepare students going on to math graduate school. A new pattern of work habits, because graduate school is more of research and explore on your own. So in this final year, I am going to eliminate tests, and have it mostly done as homework assignments.

Cover Picture: Again and again, many times in math, the mind is not good enough alone to think straight and clear, and you need tools to hands-on see how it works. Here is a collection of tools for this senior year college classes. There is a pencil, clipboard, graph paper, compass, divider, protractor, slide-ruler. And for this year we spend a lot of time on the parallelepiped, showing my wood model, and showing my erector set model held together by wire loops in the corners. The plastic square is there only to hold up the erector set model.

Length: 110 pages

Product details
ASIN ‏ : ‎ B084V11BGY
Publication date ‏ : ‎ February 15, 2020
Language ‏ : ‎ English
File size ‏ : ‎ 826 KB
Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
Print length ‏ : ‎ 110 pages
Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
Best Sellers Rank: #224,965 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
◦ #345 in Mathematics (Kindle Store)
◦ #373 in Physics (Kindle Store)
◦ #2,256 in Physics (Books)

#5-8, 90th published book

TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 7 for age 22-26 Graduate school, math textbook series, book 8 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium 2020

Last revised 1NOV2020. This was AP's 90th published book of science.

Preface: This is College Graduate School mathematics. Congratulations, you made it this far. To me, graduate school is mostly research, research mathematics and that means also physics. So it is going to be difficult to do math without physics. Of course, we focus on the mathematics of these research projects.

My textbook for Graduate school is just a template and the professors teaching the graduate students are free of course to follow their own projects, but in terms of being physics and math combined. What I list below is a template for possible projects.

So, in the below projects, I list 36 possible research projects that a graduate student my like to undertake, or partake. I list those 36 projects with a set of parentheses like this (1), (2), (3), etc. Not to be confused with the chapters listing as 1), 2), 3), etc. I list 36 projects but the professor can offer his/her own list, and I expect students with their professor, to pick a project and to monitor the student as to his/her progresses through the research. I have listed each project then cited some of my own research into these projects, below each project is an entry. Those entries are just a help or helper in getting started or acquainted with the project. The entry has a date time group and a newsgroup that I posted to such as sci.math or plutonium-atom-universe Google newsgroups. Again the entry is just a help or helper in getting started.

Now instead of picking one or two projects for your Graduate years of study, some may select all 36 projects where you write a short paper on each project. Some may be bored with just one or two projects and opt for all 36.

Cover Picture: A photo by my iphone of a page on Permutations of the Jacobs book Mathematics: A Human Endeavor, 1970. One of the best textbooks ever written in Old Math, not for its contents because there are many errors, but for its teaching style. It is extremely rare to find a math textbook written for the student to learn. Probably because math professors rarely learned how to teach in the first place; only learned how to unintentionally obfuscate. The page I photographed is important because it is the interface between geometry's perimeter or surface area versus geometry's area or volume, respectively. Or, an interface of pure numbers with that of geometry. But I have more to say on this below.
Length: 296 pages

Product details
ASIN ‏ : ‎ B085DF8R7V
Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 1, 2020
Language ‏ : ‎ English
File size ‏ : ‎ 828 KB
Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
Print length ‏ : ‎ 296 pages
Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
Best Sellers Rank: #224,981 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
◦ #13 in General Geometry
◦ #213 in Geometry & Topology (Books)


#5-9, 221st published book

An Education Ladder Guideline for teaching mathematics and a Test to see if you are cut out to be a mathematician//Teaching True Mathematics
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) (Amazon's Kindle)

Preface: This book is written to improve math education in school and at home. Trouble is, you cannot improve math education if the professors of mathematics have much of their teachings in error. So I write this book mostly as a test for math professors because to shine a light on math professor failure is the best way to improve math teaching, and thereby improve school curriculums especially colleges and universities. But others, such as laypersons are welcomed to join in. And it is the laypersons and students that will make the greatest amount of use of this book because math professors are usually stubborn and idiotic and hard to change for the better. And so when students and laypersons keep asking questions of their math professors, their brainwashing and thus poor teaching, they eventually come around to the truth and then change their bad behavior and bad misunderstanding; to proper true mathematics.

Cover Picture: Is my iphone photograph of a rubber washer inside a plastic cone. The washer is at a steep slant angle to the cone perpendicular. Notice the washer near the apex is fully touching the side of the cone, but the washer directed towards the base has not yet cut through the side of the cone, and you can see a rainbow or a crescent shape of area where the washer will intersect the side of the cone, (where my two finger are), making a total figure of a Oval, never the ellipse. I was taking this picture as one person, so I had the iphone camera in one hand and the cone in another hand, and had to use a rubber washer to stay in place. The same green plastic cone used in this picture appears in both of my published books of the proof slant cut of cone is oval, never the ellipse.

My 3rd published book with the same green cone on cover.
AP's Proof-Ellipse was never a Conic Section // Math proof series, book 1 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

My 68th published book with the same green cone on cover.
Proofs Ellipse is never a Conic section, always a Cylinder section and a Well Defined Oval definition//Student teaches professor series, book 5 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Product details
• ASIN ‏ : ‎ B0BQDYMYKQ
• Publication date ‏ : ‎ December 16, 2022
• Language ‏ : ‎ English
• File size ‏ : ‎ 551 KB
• Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
• Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Sticky notes ‏ : ‎ On Kindle Scribe
• Print length ‏ : ‎ 65 pages


#5-10, 160th published book

MATHOPEDIA-- List of 82 fakes and mistakes of Old Math// mathematics & logic
by Archimedes Plutonium

Preface:
A Mathopedia is like a special type of encyclopedia on the subject of mathematics. It is about the assessment of the worth of mathematics and the subject material of mathematics. It is a overall examination and a evaluation of mathematics and its topics.

The ordering of Mathopedia is not a alphabetic ordering, nor does it have a index. The ordering is purely that of importance at beginning and importance at end.

The greatest use of Mathopedia is a guide to students of what not to waste your time on and what to focus most of your time. I know so many college classes in mathematics are just a total waste of time, waste of valuable time for the class is math fakery. I know because I have been there.

Now I am going to cite various reference sources of AP books if anyone wants more details and can be seen in the Appendix at the end of the book.

I suppose, going forward, mathematics should always have a mathopedia, where major parts of mathematics as a science are held under scrutiny and question as to correctness. In past history we have called these incidents as "doubters of the mainstream". Yet math, like physics, can have no permanent mainstream, since there is always question of correctness in physics, there then corresponds questions of correctness in mathematics (because math is a subset of physics). What I mean is that each future generation corrects some mistakes of past mathematics. If anyone is unsure of what I am saying here, both math and physics need constant correcting, of that which never belonged in science. This then converges with the logic-philosophy of Pragmatism (see AP's book of logic on Pragmatism).

Product details
• ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09MZTLRL5 and ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09ZWFLKHC
• Publication date ‏ : ‎ December 2, 2021
• Product details
• ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09ZWFLKHC
• Publication date ‏ : ‎ May 8, 2022
• Language ‏ : ‎ English
• File size ‏ : ‎ 1154 KB
• Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
• Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Sticky notes ‏ : ‎ On Kindle Scribe
• Print length ‏ : ‎ 71 pages



y z
| /
| /
|/______ x


AP kindly asks Google to let AP run all three, sci.math, sci.physics, PAU as he runs PAU, now--- all pure science, no spam and no govt b.s.

PAU newsgroup is this.
https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe        
Archimedes Plutonium
Archimedes Plutonium
2024-02-13 07:31:54 UTC
Permalink
Primes are ILL defined in Mathematics // Math focus
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) (Amazon's Kindle)

Preface: AP's 200th book of science// Primes are ILL defined in Mathematics // Math focus  by Archimedes Plutonium.

A shame that Galois invented Groups, Ring,Field over the nonsense of quintic. But by 1830 in math history, it was not known that a Well Defined Equation of math had to have a positive nonzero number to the rightside of the equation at all times, and never be zero. Because the moment you do that, there never arises a problem of quintic.

And what Galois should have done with his time, was reason that groups rings and fields need to be invented for the purpose of a Well Defined Operator in mathematics.

It should not be AP that corrects all of Algebra of mathematics, but it should have been Galois or Gauss or Riemann to have done that by 1830.

Prime concept is a hallucination of Old Math. Ask any physicist where does the concept of prime arise in physics? It never does, and the reason being is mathematicians are kooks in defining prime.

Sure, mathematicians have known for centuries that primes have No Pattern, have No Formula. But you would then expect at least one marble of brain power from these mathematicians to notice that if No Pattern, No Formula, that something is wrong with the definition of primes.

What is wrong in the definition? It is simple and tells us why primes have no pattern, have no formula. To be Well Defined Operator, a operator must obey N#M = P where # is the operator (in our case, division) and N,M,P must be Counting Numbers to be well defined. So in other words a Well Defined operator over a set of numbers, must deliver to you when you operate N#M, must deliver to you another Counting Number P. Primes of Old Math only sometimes obeys that axiom of well defined. And, immediately we have numbers outside of Counting Numbers such as 1/2, 1/3, 2/3, etc etc.

Cover Picture: Is my photograph of my hand written formula of Well Defined Operator N # M = P. The N,M,P represent numbers from a given set. The symbol # represents the operator. A operator is well defined if all N,M,P are inside the given set. The operator is ILL defined if some P are not inside the original set.

Product details
• ASIN ‏ : ‎ B0BB6PWW2B
• Publication date ‏ : ‎ August 18, 2022
• Language ‏ : ‎ English
• File size ‏ : ‎ 384 KB
• Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
• Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Print length ‏ : ‎ 64 pages
• Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled


#11-1, My 14th published book of science.

Correcting Math// Math focus series, book 1 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

In the 1990s, I took a survey of Math Professors doing a simple math proof of Euclid's Infinitude of Primes Proof, and found that 84% of Math Professors failed to deliver a valid proof in that survey. The reason I believe this poor performance is that math professors for the most part are never required to take Logic courses while in college, to teach them how to think straight, think clearly. As a result, the world is cluttered with their fake mathematics with no hope of cleaning up their messes. And instead of fixing their mistakes and errors, they keep on cluttering the world with more fake math.

I propose that all math professors be required to take Logic in College as a mandatory requirement. Further, I recommend that all math prizes such as Abel, Fields, etc, that all math prizes awarded to those that can show they first fixed errors "fixed something of Old Math" before any of their manuscript of a proof of something else new in math be considered or given a look-over. That is-- prove yourself first -- you can fix math before we want to look at your new offerings. Show yourself as being math intelligent by fixing errors, rather than throw another error filled fake-proof onto mathematics-- Appel & Haken fake 4 Color Mapping, Wiles's fake FLT, Hales's fake Kepler Packing, Tao & Green fake number theory proof. Show us you can fix math, then we can consider anything new you want to offer.

Cover picture: A tractrix formed by a pocket-watch on graph paper, for this is how infinity borderline is determined.

Product details
• ASIN ‏ : ‎ B07PQ2CXBY
• Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 15, 2019
• Language ‏ : ‎ English
• File size ‏ : ‎ 2020 KB
• Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
• Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Sticky notes ‏ : ‎ On Kindle Scribe
• Print length ‏ : ‎ 721 pages


#31-4, My 272nd published book of science.


Reals are fake, and the only true valid numbers of math are Decimal Grid Numbers//math-physics

by Archimedes Plutonium

Preface: The largest holding back of modern day math is they have the wrong numbers for mathematics. They have what they call the "Reals" which is a rag bag collection of integers, rationals, irrationals. How did it get to be so bad that mathematics never even had the correct numbers that compose mathematics? It was all because of a underlying quest for ever more and more continuity, the continuum. Which is really just a silly idealization. And opposite of where Physics went starting the year 1900 with Planck introducing Quantum Mechanics into the world of science. "Quantum" means discrete; means no continuum. However, the people in mathematics from 1900 to AP's 2013 geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus were just not intelligent enough to say "stop- if physics is discrete-- should not mathematics be discrete and no continuums".


Cover Picture: My iphone photograph of the first 50 numbers, excluding 0, in the 1000 Decimal Grid System. What replaces the fake Reals of mathematics are the Decimal Grid Systems of numbers, starting with the 10 Grid, then the 100 Grid, then the 1000 Grid and going out to the infinity borderline as the 10^604 Grid. It does not have to go far in Grids where the numbers are so small that the eyes and mind feel like there is continuity, as the holes and gaps from one number to the successor number gets smaller and smaller. So continuity is just a illusion-delusion-idealization of the mind for which physics in Quantum Mechanics proved is fakery. And even the Electromagnetic Spectrum of light waves are discrete, not a continuum.


Product details
• ASIN ‏ : ‎ B0CT499CPY
• Publication date ‏ : ‎ January 22, 2024
• Language ‏ : ‎ English
• File size ‏ : ‎ 653 KB
• Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
• Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Sticky notes ‏ : ‎ On Kindle Scribe
• Print length ‏ : ‎ 76 pages


#31-5, My 273rd published book of science.


True proper graphing coordinate system of math and physics// math-physics

by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) (Amazon's Kindle)

Preface: I revolutionized the number theory of mathematics with Decimal Grid Number Systems and while doing my 272nd book of science the question kept occurring to me as to how many points of a Grid Graph paper will intersect with a circle. As I was playing around with the question I come to some remarkable facts and conclusions. For a decade I have been troubled with the idea that circles could not be made in grid systems because only 4 points of intersection at maximum. Now I see that I have a minimum 24 points of intersection as the cover picture shows. However, the most remarkable conclusion of all is that Old Math Geometry never had a **well-defined point in mathematics geometry ** and this book is the first time in math history we well-define what it means to be a point in geometry!!!


Cover Picture: The key to my success in this book is making two quarter-circles, one of radius 3 and the other of radius 3.14. Both 3 and 3.14 are well defined in Decimal Grid Numbers as two points in 100 Grid. I was thinking only 4 points of intersection occurred with any full circle. But what if we make the entire small square in the graphing paper, call it the point. When we do this, there are 6 squares or points in a quarter-circle, meaning 4 x 6 = 24 at minimum intersections for the whole of 2 circles as bandwidth circles.

----------------------------------
Table of Contents
----------------------------------

1) My history of the ideas in this book.

2) I find myself lost and stumped, maybe turn to geometry hands-on drawing.

3) My 2013 geometry proof of the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus.

4) The axioms of geometry must be reviewed and overhauled where curves like circles have width and depth.

5) My cover picture is two circles radius of 3 and 3.14 and what that produces.

6) A connection between square root 2 = 1.414... and pi = 3.141....

7) A connection between square root 10 = 3.162... and the Golden Mean Ratio 1.618....

8) Well-Defined point in mathematics geometry.

9) Conclusion.

10) Summary.

11) Postscript: Is there a Axiom for living Life?


Product details
• ASIN ‏ : ‎ B0CT8C9YRK
• Publication date ‏ : ‎ January 24, 2024
• Language ‏ : ‎ English
• File size ‏ : ‎ 808 KB
• Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
• Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Sticky notes ‏ : ‎ On Kindle Scribe
• Print length ‏ : ‎ 25 pages


#11-2, 35th published book

True Trigonometry and remove all trigonometry out of Calculus// Math focus series, book 2
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) (Amazon's Kindle)

Last revision was 18Jan2022. And this is AP's 35th published book of science.

Preface: This book was published by Amazon's Kindle in 5 April 2019, with 33 pages. And the book explains several important principles about mathematics, trigonometry and the relationship of numbers to angles. Unfortunately, as I wrote the book starting 2016 and up to publishing in 5 April 2019, I thought I had the matter mostly closed for the subject of trigonometry. That sine and cosine were Semicircle Waves, bobbing up and down in semicircle pattern looking like this ^v^v^v^. But then comes May and June of 2019 and another major discovery about trigonometry. A major discovery that changes all of Trigonometry graphing of functions and what those functions are, in the first place. So instead of making a singular correction-- no sinusoid wave but rather a semicircle wave, by May of 2019, I was having to throw out even the Semicircle wave and replace it with its true Trigonometry wave-- the cycloid, where you can have the Pure Cycloid wave or the Semicircle Cycloid Wave and all sorts of cycloid waves in-between pure and semicircle. That discovery of May 2019, changes all of Trigonometry and forces me now to make this book be a "History of True Trigonometry".

The sine and cosine are truly and really Semicircle-Cycloid Waves, and not Semicircle Waves. The difference is that a Cycloid wave is not an up and down wave, but a movement "across" such as this picture ^^^^^^^^^^

Cover Picture: My graphing of a Semicircle-Cycloid Wave atop Harold Jacob's book, 1970, "Mathematics a Human Endeavor", page 293 showing a Pure-Cycloid Wave. A sinusoid wave of Old Math is purely muddle headed wrong trash fiction math.



Product details
• ASIN ‏ : ‎ B07QDG5TH2
• Publication date ‏ : ‎ April 5, 2019
• Language ‏ : ‎ English
• File size ‏ : ‎ 1421 KB
• Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
• Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Print length ‏ : ‎ 126 pages
• Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Best Sellers Rank: #673,548 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
◦ #31 in Trigonometry (Kindle Store)
◦ #205 in Trigonometry (Books)


#11-3, 52nd published book

When does an equation of math, (or Logic), exist? AP's famous Axiom of Algebra// Math focus series, book 3 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

When vacationing in Siracusa Sicily in 1999 and buying oranges from a roadside fruit stand and weighing the oranges makes one realize that you cannot have 0 all alone on one side of a equation and still be a math equation.

Then in 2000s, especially 2015 I was writing math textbooks and the issue arose where I was removing all negative numbers out of mathematics. And how that can be done for polynomials. In that removal process, I discovered the now famous Algebra Axiom, that you cannot have a equation of mathematics if the rightside has only 0. Also, you have no math equation if the rightside is a negative number. Also, no equation exists if the rightside is a imaginary number.

The only time you have an equation in mathematics, is when the rightside has a positive, nonzero Decimal Grid Number, all alone by itself. Then you have a math equation that you can work with.

Makes sense in logic, makes sense in physics, that you need some true physical reality on one side of a equation, a balancing beam, and then measure that physical reality by weights or numbers of math on the other side of the equation.

This book is the history of my discovery of the famous Algebra Axiom of Equations of Math.

Cover Picture: an equation is the same as a balancing beam, and you have no equation if you have nothing on the rightside.


Product details
File Size: 1110 KB
Print Length: 36 pages
Simultaneous Device Usage: Unlimited
Publication Date: July 24, 2019
Sold by: Amazon Digital Services LLC
Language: English
ASIN: B07VRVBD91
Text-to-Speech: Enabled 
X-Ray: 
Not Enabled  

Word Wise: Not Enabled
Lending: Enabled
Screen Reader: Supported 
Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled 


#11-4, 73rd published book

Chess Optimal Strategy OS: once and for always // Math focus series, book 4 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Last revision was 22-Oct2022, and this is my 73rd published book on science.

Preface: I am happy to announce I finally conquered chess, with solving of its optimal strategy OS, and it is a draw if both players play by the OS. This victory of solving happened on 6 December 2019, as seen below. And then a cheating row broke out in the chess world in late 2022 between Magnus Carlsen and Hans Niemann; accusations of hidden electronics. For which AP sees as the death-knell of chess tournaments of the long time play action and the only worthwhile chess tournaments now are that of speed chess, exclusively speed chess. And the new research into Chess is whether humans are better at Speed Chess than ever can a computer be at speed-chess.

Cover Picture is my favorite chess set because it is magnetic and because the squares are black and white, not a circus of different colors. Somehow my psychological mind is disturbed if the set is green and white, or red and black, really repulsive. But so be it, in a world, even esthetics, to me, has to be logical.


Product details
ASIN ‏ : ‎ B082GS2HW3
Publication date ‏ : ‎ December 7, 2019
Language ‏ : ‎ English
File size ‏ : ‎ 994 KB
Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
Print length ‏ : ‎ 259 pages
Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #329,786 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
#692 in Mathematics (Kindle Store)
#143 in Chess (Kindle Store)
#489 in Chess (Books)

#11-5, My 107th published book.

History of 4 Arithmetic-Algebra Axioms// History of why negative-numbers never exist// Math Focus series, book 5
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) (Amazon's Kindle)

Last revision was 22Jun2021. This was AP's 107th published book on science.

Preface: This is somewhat a history book of math on the subject of arithmetic axioms for which Old Math failed miserably. And their failure cost math, centuries and even millennium of fake math in algebra. So costly was that failure that many minds in mathematics wasted their entire career in mathematics. The peak of stupidity of mathematics in not recognizing these three axioms of Arithmetic-Algebra, that peak of silliness ends with the ever-unprovable Riemann Hypothesis and why that conjecture is a failure of mathematics. I needed to write a entire whole book on just this topic for it affects both math and science in large part. To emphasize how critically important it is to have the primal axioms of arithmetic-algebra in logical order and correctness.

Cover Picture: The 10 Decimal Grid Numbers Coordinate System, all in 1st Quadrant Only for math has no negative numbers. And Descartes started the Coordinate System in 1637, as 1st Quadrant Only, with only one axis, not even two axes.

Product details
File Size: 1151 KB
Print Length: 56 pages
Publication Date: April 1, 2020
Sold by: Amazon.com Services LLC
Language: English
ASIN: B086QBY5TT
Text-to-Speech: Enabled 
X-Ray: 
Not Enabled  

Word Wise: Not Enabled
Lending: Enabled
Screen Reader: Supported 
Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled 

#11-6, 108th published book

New Math's FUNDAMENTAL THEOREM OF ALGEBRA// Math focus series, book 6

by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) (Amazon's Kindle)

Old Math had a Fundamental Theorem of Algebra, abbreviated as FTA, only big problem was, they forgot two critically important axioms of arithmetic for they forgot the subtraction axiom and the "what is a valid equation of mathematics axiom". When you are missing these vital important axioms of arithmetic and mathematics and try to assemble a Fundamental Theorem of Algebra, there is no hope in the world that your FTA is going to be correct without those axioms.

This book is what the true Fundamental Theorem of Algebra, FTA is an what it looks like. This book follows the previous book of this series: Arithmetic-Algebra Axioms// History of why negative-numbers never exist// Math Focus series, book 5. That prior book went into details of 3 axioms that Old Math either missed or severely neglected. For even the idea of having in Old Math the zero alone on the rightside of an equation for a polynomial runs into danger with the axiom of -- no division by zero. For when you demand all valid equations of mathematics have a nonzero positive decimal Grid number all alone by itself on the rightside of the equation. You can thence divide the entire Polynomial equation by that positive nonzero decimal Grid Number and hence, reduce every polynomial in existence to be a equation with 1 on the rightside of the equation, all alone. You cannot do that in a stupid Old Math program of focusing on zero as all alone on the rightside of the equation, which only goes to show, people in Old Math had no brain for reasoning, for they built their polynomial theory on zero, and forgot about a vital axiom that you cannot divide by zero, and you cannot reduce all polynomials to equal 1. People in Old Math went to school and learned the 4 R's-- reading, writing, arithmetic, remember (memorization), but never learned the 5th R-- reasoning.

Cover Picture is a Quintic, a 5th degree polynomial that opened up the case of FTA and what its proof looks like. Photograph picture on my lawn of 5APR2020, for I do so much adore Springtime and green plants. It revitalizes the soul to see plants spring back to life. My Rock Elm are producing seeds and my blackberries soon will explode in growth.


Product details
File Size: 848 KB
Print Length: 47 pages
Publication Date: April 5, 2020
Sold by: Amazon.com Services LLC
Language: English
ASIN: B086SPBM7F
Text-to-Speech: Enabled 
X-Ray: 
Not Enabled  

Word Wise: Not Enabled
Lending: Enabled
Screen Reader: Supported 
Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled 

#11-7, 110th published book

World's First One Variable Periodic Functions; utilizing Polynomials such as x^3 -6x^2 +11x = 6 // Math focus series, book 7
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) (Amazon's Kindle)

While working on the true Fundamental Theorem of Algebra, I ran across amazingly beautiful polynomials that offer science and physics periodic functions of one variable. This is a first in physics and science where we have periodic functions and not be sine or cosine or a trigonometry function, but rather instead a simple polynomial. This is a huge huge revolution in physics and mathematics both for polynomials are the easiest functions to do the calculus upon. For it means we can dismiss and dispel trigonometry functions as periodic and replace all periodic functions with polynomial functions.

Cover Picture is my iphone photograph of one of these remarkable periodic polynomial functions showing a plot of F(x) = x^3 -6x^2 + 11x. I labeled the minor trough keeping in mind that (0,0) is the major trough. If we plot a quartic periodic polynomial, a 4th degree periodic polynomial such as (x-1)(x-2)(x-3)(x-4) we have more up and down wavelets. Plot the 5th degree periodic polynomial (x-1)(x-2)(x-3)(x-4)(x-5) we have even more up and down smooth wavelets.


Product details
File Size: 902 KB
Print Length: 23 pages
Publication Date: April 10, 2020
Sold by: Amazon.com Services LLC
Language: English
ASIN: B086Z93X71
Text-to-Speech: Enabled 
X-Ray: 
Not Enabled  

Word Wise: Enabled
Lending: Enabled
Screen Reader: Supported 
Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled 


#11-8, 111th published book

WHY DID OLD MATH fail on the Divisional-Reverse, for they surely had Multiplicative-Inverse but too stupid to have Divisional Reverse // Math focus series, book 8
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) (Amazon's Kindle)


Funny how the mind seems to converge and focus on a topic that was referred to in other topics ongoing and very much unrelated. For instance in February 2020 I wanted to include Scientific Notation to the common core standards of writing out a number in decimals, as seen in the cover picture of this book. Then in the months of March and April 2020, I was working on dragonflies of the Devonian geological period and needed to know the mass of Earth back in Devonian, which connected me to a number in mathematics called the Divisional-reverse. Then in April, I was doing the physics constants of Planck, Fine-Structure constant and the speed of light constant and for me to solve them again required the Divisional-reverse. So I had a confluence of research topics all needing a mathematical tool called the Divisional-reverse. This book is devoted to that tool of mathematics.

Cover Picture: Is my iphone photograph of a Google search for 5th grade common core standards of what is taught in school about writing out decimal numbers.

Product details
File Size: 1095 KB
Print Length: 56 pages
Publication Date: April 14, 2020
Sold by: Amazon.com Services LLC
Language: English
ASIN: B08742MBLL
Text-to-Speech: Enabled 
X-Ray: 
Not Enabled  

Word Wise: Not Enabled
Lending: Enabled
Screen Reader: Supported 
Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled 



#11-9, 126th published book

Fourier Transform theory overhauled and replaced by Cycloid & Parabola Periodic Polynomials, Math focus series, book 9
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) (Amazon's Kindle)


Last revision was 18Jan2022. And this is AP's 126th published book of science.
Preface: All functions, true functions of mathematics are polynomials. Anything that is not a polynomial has to be converted into a polynomial before it can be called and treated as a function. This book is the work book of converting all non-polynomials into being transformed into a polynomial and thus a function of mathematics.
Cover Picture: My iphone photograph of a Google search for "cycloid".

Product details
ASIN : B08D5NGQSP
Publication date : July 15, 2020
Language : English
File size : 1109 KB
Text-to-Speech : Enabled
Screen Reader : Supported
Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
X-Ray : Not Enabled
Word Wise : Not Enabled
Print length : 64 pages
Lending : Enabled
Best Sellers Rank: #167,200 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
◦ #16 in 90-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
◦ #23 in Calculus (Kindle Store)
◦ #136 in Calculus (Books)


#11-10, 182nd published book

The Structure and Theory behind Mathematical Induction, and why it works// Math focus
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) (Amazon's Kindle)


Preface: Shedding new light on Mathematical Induction method of proof. Simplifying and making the method easier. I debated whether to put this in logic science or math science. Finally chose math focus, even though Mathematical Induction has tones of rising above mathematics itself, like a piece of meta-math, even a hint of philosophy. But no, Mathematical Induction is down to earth mathematics.
And the cause of this book was my prior book on showing that the torus volume was related to the donut hole of that specific torus, related by the golden ratio number phi = 1.61.... and all its variants. My proof of that relationship was a proof by Mathematical Induction. And in so doing that proof, I saw I needed to fill in huge gaps and holes in Old Math and its Mathematical Induction. For the Mathematical Induction presented in this book, overpowers Old Math's Mathematical Induction. Far more easy, far more comprehensible, far easier to understand, and to apply.
Cover Picture: Is the full Decimal 10 Grid Number System and next to it is a partial listing of the 100 Grid. One can easily see that the 10 Grid is inside the 100 Grid and any further larger Grid System contains all the lower grid systems. So this is Mathematical Induction of the very existence of numbers themselves.



Product details
• ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09XX7DTC9
• Publication date ‏ : ‎ April 13, 2022
• Language ‏ : ‎ English
• File size ‏ : ‎ 828 KB
• Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
• Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Print length ‏ : ‎ 75 pages
• Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled



#11-11, My 200th published book of science.

Primes are ILL defined in Mathematics // Math focus
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) (Amazon's Kindle)

Preface: AP's 200th book of science// Primes are ILL defined in Mathematics // Math focus  by Archimedes Plutonium.

A shame that Galois invented Groups, Ring,Field over the nonsense of quintic. But by 1830 in math history, it was not known that a Well Defined Equation of math had to have a positive nonzero number to the rightside of the equation at all times, and never be zero. Because the moment you do that, there never arises a problem of quintic.

And what Galois should have done with his time, was reason that groups rings and fields need to be invented for the purpose of a Well Defined Operator in mathematics.

It should not be AP that corrects all of Algebra of mathematics, but it should have been Galois or Gauss or Riemann to have done that by 1830.

Prime concept is a hallucination of Old Math. Ask any physicist where does the concept of prime arise in physics? It never does, and the reason being is mathematicians are kooks in defining prime.

Sure, mathematicians have known for centuries that primes have No Pattern, have No Formula. But you would then expect at least one marble of brain power from these mathematicians to notice that if No Pattern, No Formula, that something is wrong with the definition of primes.

What is wrong in the definition? It is simple and tells us why primes have no pattern, have no formula. To be Well Defined Operator, a operator must obey N#M = P where # is the operator (in our case, division) and N,M,P must be Counting Numbers to be well defined. So in other words a Well Defined operator over a set of numbers, must deliver to you when you operate N#M, must deliver to you another Counting Number P. Primes of Old Math only sometimes obeys that axiom of well defined. And, immediately we have numbers outside of Counting Numbers such as 1/2, 1/3, 2/3, etc etc.

Cover Picture: Is my photograph of my hand written formula of Well Defined Operator N # M = P. The N,M,P represent numbers from a given set. The symbol # represents the operator. A operator is well defined if all N,M,P are inside the given set. The operator is ILL defined if some P are not inside the original set.

Product details
• ASIN ‏ : ‎ B0BB6PWW2B
• Publication date ‏ : ‎ August 18, 2022
• Language ‏ : ‎ English
• File size ‏ : ‎ 384 KB
• Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
• Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Print length ‏ : ‎ 64 pages
• Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled


#11-12, 228th published book

Brief History of *True Calculus*--including new integration methods / math focus

by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) (Amazon's Kindle)

Last revision was March 2023. And this is AP's 228th published book of science.

Preface: AP as a teenager had a wish at University in 1969-- to make all of calculus as easy as the Power Rules over polynomial functions. And by 2015, AP's wish came true. For calculus really is easy math, as easy as add, subtract, multiply and divide. But only when people see the light of day about calculus. And where math professors stop chasing fame and fortune in publishing nonsense and spend more time teaching better in classrooms and making calculus be easy.

The history of True Calculus is far different from that which is written in math history books. True Calculus requires a true valid geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, which none was ever given until 2015. Once a geometry proof of FTC arrived, can we write a true history of calculus. The Old Math history of calculus is filled with error and fake science such as the "limit concept", the concept of "continuity". And where Old Math never even had a proper well defined "function" concept. No wonder Old Math history of calculus is trash. AP provides a brief history of True Calculus. But while studying this subject, AP has new insights into the right-circular-cone. And a new method of integration of varying sized circles over a distance length.


Cover Picture: My iphone photograph of a Wikipedia entry of Cavalieri quadrature formula (area formula) that was so critical in Calculus history for it is the formula of integrals under the function graph curve for polynomial functions. Cavalieri's discovery of the Power Rule for integrals marks the beginning of modern day calculus.



Product details
• ASIN ‏ : ‎ B0BXJ4RRZR
• Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 4, 2023
• Language ‏ : ‎ English
• File size ‏ : ‎ 646 KB
• Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
• Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Sticky notes ‏ : ‎ On Kindle Scribe
• Print length ‏ : ‎ 50 pages


#11-13, 233rd published book


Utter garbage of Cantor's work on infinity especially the diagonal method// math focus
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) (Amazon's Kindle)

Preface: So much of the Usenet newsgroup sci.math are discussions concerning why 0.9999... should equal 1 or about infinity and specifically Cantor's work with his diagonal method. I thought the time is ripe for me to write a independent book on why and how Cantor was wrong, and to lay the subject to rest. For the flaws of logical reasoning in infinity discussions are really abominable and abysmal and deserves an entire book of clarity packed with simple reasoning.

It amazes me how resembling is the science of geography with borderlines makes clear what countries there are, yet the borderline concept was so foreign to all mathematicians until AP discovered the infinity borderline starting 2009.


Cover Picture: My iphone photograph of two world globes showing countries with borderlines. Borderlines are beacons of clarity from one concept as it transitions into a newer concept.


Product details
• ASIN ‏ : ‎ B0BZLZ9WY1
• Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 24, 2023
• Language ‏ : ‎ English
• File size ‏ : ‎ 743 KB
• Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
• Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Sticky notes ‏ : ‎ On Kindle Scribe
• Print length ‏ : ‎ 40 pages


#11-14, 160th published book

MATHOPEDIA-- List of 82 fakes and mistakes of Old Math// mathematics & logic
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) (Amazon's Kindle)

Preface:
A Mathopedia is like a special type of encyclopedia on the subject of mathematics. It is about the assessment of the worth of mathematics and the subject material of mathematics. It is a overall examination and a evaluation of mathematics and its topics.

The ordering of Mathopedia is not a alphabetic ordering, nor does it have a index. The ordering is purely that of importance at beginning and importance at end.

The greatest use of Mathopedia is a guide to students of what not to waste your time on and what to focus most of your time. I know so many college classes in mathematics are just a total waste of time, waste of valuable time for the class is math fakery. I know because I have been there.

Now I am going to cite various reference sources of AP books if anyone wants more details and can be seen in the Appendix at the end of the book.

I suppose, going forward, mathematics should always have a mathopedia, where major parts of mathematics as a science are held under scrutiny and question as to correctness. In past history we have called these incidents as "doubters of the mainstream". Yet math, like physics, can have no permanent mainstream, since there is always question of correctness in physics, there then corresponds questions of correctness in mathematics (because math is a subset of physics). What I mean is that each future generation corrects some mistakes of past mathematics. If anyone is unsure of what I am saying here, both math and physics need constant correcting, of that which never belonged in science. This then converges with the logic-philosophy of Pragmatism (see AP's book of logic on Pragmatism).

Product details
• ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09MZTLRL5 and ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09ZWFLKHC
• Publication date ‏ : ‎ December 2, 2021
• Language ‏ : ‎ English
• File size ‏ : ‎ 1155 KB
• Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
• Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Print length ‏ : ‎ 70 pages
• Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled




y  z
|  /
| /
|/______ x

Read my recent posts in peace and quiet.
https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe  
Archimedes Plutonium


AP kindly asks Google to let AP run all three, sci.math, sci.physics, PAU as he runs PAU, now--- all pure science, no spam and no govt b.s.

PAU newsgroup is this.
https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe        
Archimedes Plutonium

Professors of Old-Math proved they are mindless fools on Algebra-- their Galois group ring field theory a total waste of time, for math professors never understand what a valid Equation of math was-- you cannot have 0 all alone on the rightside
Archimedes Plutonium
2024-02-14 21:46:15 UTC
Permalink
The psychology problem is scientists are so jeolose of AP's acumen, that they refuse to complete their experiment, for their jeolosy wants to deny AP his victory in science, that water is really H4O and not H2O. And Harvard's Dr.Hau would rather deny the AP victory that Light Waves are closed loop circuits, so when Dr. Hau turns out the light source in slow light experiments, all the light goes out--even the slow light simultaneously and proving AP's claim-- light is not a straightline arrow with head and tail, but a closed loop circuit, a pencil ellipse, with source in the circuit.

Psychological analysis of why physicists and chemists cannot finish their experiments -- Water Electrolysis --- Caltech Dr. Goodstein H4O and Harvard Dr. Hau slow light experiment.

Can
Dr.David Goodstein,Dr.Thomas Phillips,
Dr.John Schwarz, Dr.Barry Simon, Dr.Kip Thorne, Dr.Petr Vogel,
Dr.Rochus Vogt, Dr.Ward Whaling, Dr.Michael E. Brown, Dr.Felix Boehm, Dr.Steven Frautschi, can they ever, ever simply weigh the mass of hydrogen and oxygen in water electrolysis, instead of looking at volume, or remain as Earle Jones wrote recently-- rectums of physics???

Dr.Konstantin Batygin, Dr.Frances Arnold (chem), Dr.Barry Barish, Dr.Rudolph Marcus (chem), Dr.Hugh Politzer
the hydrogen and oxygen in Water Electrolysis, for it is unusual that Caltech physics is so shoddy in logical thought as to think of stopping Water Electrolysis by observation of Volume and not weighing the masses.

Volney (CIA) selling CalTech because they cannot do Water Electrolysis properly-- forgetting to actually weigh the mass of hydrogen compared to oxygen, and stop at observing volume. Caltech science is so shoddy of logical reasoning.

Volney Physics failures..CalTech_Dr.David Goodstein,Dr.Frances Arnold (chem), Dr.Barry Barish, Dr.Rudolph Marcus (chem), Dr.Hugh Politzer NSF Dr.Panchanathan,Alejandro Adem, Purdue Univ_France Cordova,

Physics failures..Rensselaer,Dr.Esther A. Wertz,Dr.Heidi Jo Newberg,Dr.Glenn Ciolek,Dr.Charles Martin,Dr.Joseph Darryl Michael,NSF Dr.Panchanathan,Alejandro Adem,Purdue Univ_France Cordova,..

Why Volney?? Because they are so sloppy and slipshod in Physics experiment of Water Electrolysis, stopping and ceasing the experiment before weighing the mass of the hydrogen compared to mass of oxygen. Is it that they are stupid silly thinking volume and mass are the same. For AP needs to prove decisively, if Water is really H4O or H2O. And of course, this experiment would destroy the Standard Model-- that post-diction theory of physics that never gave a single prediction in all of its tenure.

And they even know that a weighing balance of Quartz Crystal MicroBalance has been around since the 1960s, what are they waiting for???

Or is it because they cannot admit the truth of math geometry that slant cut of cone is oval, not ellipse for you need the symmetry of slant cut of cylinder to yield a ellipse.


Re: 2-Looking for a concordance of Dr. Richard Feynmann talking about AP-- on suffering of fools
by Volney 3:57 PM, 17Oct2023


This is Volney-Kibo Parry Moroney spam (CIA connected drag net spam b.s.), and no matter how much you report it to Google Abuse-- they cannot kick the miscreant out-- I suggest reporting this spam to your Congress-person. Not only do they stalk you for 30 years but destroy the newsgroup they pollute. Just look at sci.chem which is a destroyed newsgroup. The Google Abuse report only hides the miscreant, but the next day-- new fresh b.s.spam is there.

Kibo Parry Moron-Volney blowing his cover with the CIA in 1997
Re: Archimedes Vanadium, America's most beloved poster
Re: Dan is the Kibo Parry Moroney Volney CIA equivalent for Canada-- using Usenet but destroying newsgroups of science in the process


Volney
3
Dan Christensen using TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS at Univ Western Ontario instead of the fake Old Math calculus with its thousands of rules and memorization of trig functions. New Math has 1 rule-- Power Rule
9:03 PM


,
Volney
3
WM using AP's TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS to teach 13-14 year olds CALCULUS, those heading for Gottingen & Uni Berlin for AP reduced Calculus to its most simple form-- add or subtract 1 from exponent.
9:01 PM


182b-Volney uses TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS to teach 13-14 year olds CALCULUS, those heading for Berkeley,Caltech, Stanford, for AP reduced Calculus to its most simple form-- add or subtract 1 from exponent.
8:52 PM


,
Volney
2
Volney uses TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS to teach 13-14 year olds CALCULUS, those heading for Berkeley,Caltech, Stanford, for AP reduced Calculus to its most simple form-- add or subtract 1 from exponent.
8:45 PM

Dan Christensen's profile photo
Dan Christensen
, …
Volney
14
unread,
Re: Dr.Terence Tao along with Dr. Gene D.Block fired from UCLA for teaching propaganda -- truth is slant cut of cone is Oval, never the ellipse, yet UCLA continues their propaganda of ellipse as slant cut.
8:43 PM



Caltech Physics Dept

Felix Boehm, Steven Frautschi
Murray Gell-Mann, David Goodstein, Thomas Phillips,
John Schwarz, Barry Simon, Kip Thorne, Petr Vogel,
Rochus Vogt, Ward Whaling, Michael E. Brown,
Konstantin Batygin, Dr.Frances Arnold (chem), Dr.Barry Barish, Dr.Rudolph Marcus (chem), Dr.Hugh Politzer

Apparently Kibo realized he was a science failure when he could not even do a proper percentage. But then one has to wonder how much he paid to bribe Rensselaer to graduate from the school in engineering unable to do a percentage properly???? For I certainly would not hire a engineer who cannot even do proper percentage.
Silly boy, that's off by more than 12.6 MeV, or 12% of the mass of a muon.
Hardly "exactly" 9 muons.
Or, 938.2720813/105.6583745 = 8.88024338572. A proton is about the mass
of 8.88 muons, not 9. About 12% short.
Why Volney?? Because they stop short of completing the Water Electrolysis Experiment by only looking at volume, when they are meant to weigh the mass of hydrogen versus oxygen?? Such shoddy minds in experimental physics and chemistry.

Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Physics dept Dr.Martin Schmidt (ee), Dr.Ivar Giaever
Vincent Meunier, Ethan Brown, Glenn Ciolek, Julian S. Georg, Joel T. Giedt, Yong Sung Kim, Gyorgy Korniss, Toh-Ming Lu, Charles Martin, Joseph Darryl Michael, Heidi Jo Newberg, Moussa N'Gom, Peter Persans, John Schroeder, Michael Shur, Shawn-Yu Lin, Humberto Terrones, Gwo Ching Wang, Morris A Washington, Esther A. Wertz, Christian M. Wetzel, Ingrid Wilke, Shengbai Zhang

Rensselaer math department
Donald Schwendeman, Jeffrey Banks, Kristin Bennett, Mohamed Boudjelkha, Joseph Ecker, William Henshaw, Isom Herron, Mark H Holmes, David Isaacson, Elizabeth Kam, Ashwani Kapila, Maya Kiehl, Gregor Kovacic, Peter Kramer, Gina Kucinski, Rongjie Lai, Fengyan Li, Chjan Lim, Yuri V Lvov, Harry McLaughlin, John E. Mitchell, Bruce Piper, David A Schmidt, Daniel Stevenson, Yangyang Xu, Bulent Yener, Donald Drew, William Siegmann
Physics minnow
What warning is that Kibo Parry failure of science-- warning that insane persons like Kibo Parry Moroney Volney spends their entire life in a hate-mill, never doing anything in science itself. And paid to stalk hate spew

Kibo Parry Moroney-Volney blowing his cover with the CIA in 1997
Re: Archimedes Vanadium, America's most beloved poster
---quoting Wikipedia ---
Controversy
Many government and university installations blocked, threatened to block, or attempted to shut-down The World's Internet connection until Software Tool & Die was eventually granted permission by the National Science Foundation to provide public Internet access on "an experimental basis."
--- end quote ---
NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
Dr. Panchanathan , present day
NSF Dr. Panchanathan, F. Fleming Crim, Dorothy E Aronson, Brian Stone, James S Ulvestad (math), Rebecca Lynn Keiser, Vernon D. Ross, Lloyd Whitman, John J. Veysey (physics), Scott Stanley
France Anne Cordova
Subra Suresh (bioengineer)
Arden Lee Bement Jr. (nuclear engineering)
Rita R. Colwell (microbiology)
Neal Francis Lane
John Howard Gibbons 1993
Barry Shein, kibo parry std world
Jim Frost, Joe "Spike" Ilacqua
Canada-- NSERC , Alejandro Adem (math) , Navdeep Bains, Francois-Philippe Champagne
News starting to come in that AP's Water Electrolysis Experiment proves the true formula of Water is H4O, not H2O is starting to come in.
Aug 30, 2023, 10:19:20 PM
to Plutonium Atom Universe
News starting to come in that AP's Water Electrolysis Experiment proves the true formula of Water is H4O, not H2O is starting to come in.
I received a letter today of Experiment results on Water Electrolysis of weighing the hydrogen test tube versus oxygen test tube and the result is 1/4 atomic mass units of Hydrogen compared to Oxygen.
The researcher weighing 1600 micrograms of hydrogen, using a Eisco-Brownlee-Water-Electrolysis Apparatus.
Using sulfuric acid as electrolyte on ultra pure water. Using low voltage DC of 1.5 volts, 1 amp.
I am not surprised that news of the true formula of Water is H4O comes so quickly. For not much in science is more important than knowing the truth of Water. And this means the start of the complete downfall and throwing out the sick Standard Model of Physics, for it is such an insane theory that it cannot get passed the idea of its subatomic particles as stick and ball, with no job, no function, no task. The Standard Model of Physics, is crazy insane physics for it is all postdiction, never prediction. The idea that the hydrogen atom is H2 not H, is because of the prediction of Atom Totality Theory where a atom is a proton torus with muon inside doing the Faraday law and all atoms require at least 1 capacitor. That means the one proton in H2 serves as a neutron to the other proton, storaging the electricity produced by the other proton.
The true Hydrogen Atom is H2 for all atoms need at least one capacitor, and one of the protons in H2 serves as a neutron.
Sad that chemistry and physics throughout the 20th century were too stupid to actually weigh the mass of hydrogen and oxygen in electrolysis, no, the ignorant fools stopped at looking when they saw the volume of hydrogen was twice that of oxygen. A real scientist is not that shoddy and slipshod ignorant, the real scientist then proceeds with -- let us weigh the hydrogen test tube mass versus the oxygen test tube mass.
Thanks for the news!!!!!
AP
News starting to come in that AP's Water Electrolysis Experiment proves the true formula of Water is H4O, not H2O is starting to come in.
There is another experiment that achieves the same result that Water is truly H4O and not H2O, but I suspect this second method is hugely fraught with difficulty.
The prediction of H4O comes from the Physics idea that a Atom is composed, all atoms mind you, is composed of a proton torus with muon/s inside going round and round thrusting through the torus in the Faraday law and producing electricity. So that when you have Hydrogen without a neutron, there is no way to collect the electricity produced by the Faraday law. Think of it as a automobile engine, you cannot have a engine if there is no crank shaft to collect the energy from the thrusting piston inside the crankcase.
Same thing with an Atom, it needs 3 parts-- muon as bar magnet, proton as torus of coils, and a capacitor to storage the produced electricity. If one of those parts is missing, the entity is a Subatomic particle and not a atom.
So, when we have Hydrogen as a proton with muon inside, it is not a Atom, until it has a neutron, or, has another proton of hydrogen H2, then it is a Atom.
So that H2 is not a molecule but a Atom. H alone is a subatomic particle.
Much harder than Water Electrolysis.
We need to get two identical containers.
We need to be able to make pure heavy-water with deuterium. Deuterium is proton + neutron as hydrogen. Proton + proton is H2 as hydrogen.
So we have two identical containers and we fill one with pure heavy water, deuterium water.
We have the second container and we fill it with pure (light) water.
We now weigh both of them.
If AP is correct, that water is really H4O and not H2O, then both containers should weigh almost the same. Only a tiny fraction difference because the neutron is known to be 940MeV versus proton in Old Physics as 938MeV a tiny difference of 2MeV, but we realize we have a huge number of water molecules in the two identical containers.
If water is truly H4O, the weights should be almost the same. If water is H2O, then there is a **large difference** in weights.
But the Water Electrolysis experiment is much easier to conduct and get results.
And, there is the biological processes that apparently cannot distinguish between heavy water and that of regular normal water.
Deuterium Water is the same in biology as is normal regular water. This means that water must be H4O, due to biology as proof.
Deuterium Water in atomic mass units is 16 for the oxygen and 4 for the deuterium.
Regular normal Water in atomic mass units is 16 for the oxygen and 4 for the 4 protons in H4O.
Old Physics and Old Chemistry had regular water as H2O in atomic mass units of 16 oxygen and 2 hydrogen for 2 protons.
If biology functions whether heavy water or normal water all the same, then water itself must be H4O.
Now, there maybe some animal or plant that can separate out heavy water from H4O water???
Searching the literature today for where biology needs as essential deuterium water. And not too surprised that it is a essential requirement in metabolism. In fact one web site listed the need for deuterium more than the need of many minerals and vitamins.
Now tonight I came up with two new exciting experiments to verify that Water is truly H4O and not H2O.
H4O is 4 protons with muons inside the 840MeV proton toruses.
Deuterium water is DOD. And the difference between D2O and H4O is merely the difference of 4MeV for as last reported, neutron = 940MeV and proton (with muon inside) is 938MeV, a difference of 2MeV but for water is 2+2 = 4MeV.
So these two new experiments take advantage of the fact that what we think is normal regular water is actually very close to heavy water of D2O, with only a 4MeV difference.
EXPERIMENT #3 Water layers in still pond of D2O mixed with H4O (what we thought was H2O.
So in this experiment we get a clear glass container and mix H4O with D2O. If Old Physics is correct, the heavy water should sink rapidly in the container while the light water floats to the top rapidly. And we have some sort of beam of photons that can distinguish D2O from H4O (thought of as H2O. We obtain pure D2O and pure H4O each filling 1/2 of the container. We stir and mix them. And then we observe with the EM beam for separation. If the light water is truly H4O, it takes a long time for the D2O to be on bottom and H4O on top. We measure the time of a settled container and determine this time from the theoretical 4MeV difference should take a long time, whereas if Old Physics is correct, the separation would be almost instantly and quick time.
EXPERIMENT #4 also plays on this minor difference of 4MeV. We devise a sort of squirt gun for D2O and a identical squirt gun for H4O (what we call H2O). We put pure D2O in one squirt gun and the H40 or light water in the other squirt gun. Both guns forcing the water a certain distance.
If AP is correct that light water is really H4O and not H2O as we squirt both guns, where the water lands should be almost the same distance considering H4O is only 4MeV apart from D2O.
If Old Physics and Old Chemistry is correct, then D2O water is 940 + 940 = 1880MeV apart from light water of H2O, and H4O is only 4MeV apart.
So where the squirt gun lands the D2O is a very much shorter distance than a H2O land, but a H4 land distance is nearly the same as the D2O land.
These two experiments are very exciting and would be a very nice confirming evidence to Water Electrolysis actual weighing the mass in atomic mass units.
Searching the literature today for where biology needs as essential deuterium water. And not too surprised that it is a essential requirement in metabolism. In fact one web site listed the need for deuterium more than the need of many minerals and vitamins.
Now tonight I came up with two new exciting experiments to verify that Water is truly H4O and not H2O.
H4O is 4 protons with muons inside the 840MeV proton toruses.
Deuterium water is DOD. And the difference between D2O and H4O is merely the difference of 4MeV for as last reported, neutron = 940MeV and proton (with muon inside) is 938MeV, a difference of 2MeV but for water is 2+2 = 4MeV.
So these two new experiments take advantage of the fact that what we think is normal regular water is actually very close to heavy water of D2O, with only a 4MeV difference.
EXPERIMENT #3 Water layers in still pond of D2O mixed with H4O (what we thought was H2O.
So in this experiment we get a clear glass container and mix H4O with D2O. If Old Physics is correct, the heavy water should sink rapidly in the container while the light water floats to the top rapidly. And we have some sort of beam of photons that can distinguish D2O from H4O (thought of as H2O. We obtain pure D2O and pure H4O each filling 1/2 of the container. We stir and mix them. And then we observe with the EM beam for separation. If the light water is truly H4O, it takes a long time for the D2O to be on bottom and H4O on top. We measure the time of a settled container and determine this time from the theoretical 4MeV difference should take a long time, whereas if Old Physics is correct, the separation would be almost instantly and quick time.
Apparently this Experiment is already done and called for-- There is Uniform Distribution of heavy water Deuterium Water in the Oceans, Lakes, Ponds, Streams and Rivers. Heavy Water is not layered in the oceans or lakes or ponds or streams or rivers. Uniformity means that the difference between D2O and H4O is so slight of a difference (only 4MeV, compared to 1880MeV for H2O, that Brownian motion keeps the D2O and H4O in a Uniform Distribution in all bodies of water. I was going through the research literature today and find that scientists discover Uniformity of Distribution of deuterium water. This thus closes the case on Water, for uniformity of distribution of D2O implies that Water is itself H4O and not H2O.
My 250th published book.
TEACHING TRUE CHEMISTRY; H2 is the hydrogen Atom and water is H4O, not H2O// Chemistry
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) (Amazon's Kindle)
Prologue: This textbook is 1/2 research history and 1/2 factual textbook combined as one textbook. For many of the experiments described here-in have not yet been performed, such as water is really H4O not H2O. Written in a style of history research with date-time markers, and fact telling. And there are no problem sets. This book is intended for 1st year college. Until I include problem sets and exercises, I leave it to the professor and instructor to provide such. And also, chemistry is hugely a laboratory science, even more so than physics, so a first year college student in the lab to test whether Water is really H4O and not H2O is mighty educational.
Preface: This is my 250th book of science, and the first of my textbooks on Teaching True Chemistry. I have completed the Teaching True Physics and the Teaching True Mathematics textbook series. But had not yet started on a Teaching True Chemistry textbook series. What got me started on this project is the fact that no chemistry textbook had the correct formula for water which is actually H4O and not H2O. Leaving the true formula for hydroxyl groups as H2O and not OH. But none of this is possible in Old Chemistry, Old Physics where they had do-nothing subatomic particles that sit around and do nothing or go whizzing around the outside of balls in a nucleus, in a mindless circling. Once every subatomic particle has a job, task, function, then water cannot be H2O but rather H4O. And a hydrogen atom cannot be H alone but is actually H2. H2 is not a molecule of hydrogen but a full fledged Atom, a single atom of hydrogen.
Cover Picture: Sorry for the crude sketch work but chemistry and physics students are going to have to learn to make such sketches in a minute or less. Just as they make Lewis diagrams or ball & stick diagrams. My 4-5 minute sketch-work of the Water molecule H4O plus the subatomic particle H, and the hydrogen atom H2. Showing how one H is a proton torus with muon inside (blue color) doing the Faraday law. Protons are toruses with many windings. Protons are the coils in Faraday law while muons are the bar magnets. Neutrons are the capacitors as parallel plates, the outer skin cover of atoms.
Product details
• ASIN ‏ : ‎ B0CCLPTBDG
• Publication date ‏ : ‎ July 21, 2023
• Language ‏ : ‎ English
• File size ‏ : ‎ 788 KB
• Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
• Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Sticky notes ‏ : ‎ On Kindle Scribe
• Print length ‏ : ‎ 168 pages
Caltech & Rensselaer Polytech do only slipshod physics-chemistry experiments of Water Electrolysis, too dumb to weigh the hydrogen & oxygen to see if H4O or H2O

AP kindly asks Google to let AP run all three, sci.math, sci.physics, PAU as he runs PAU, now--- all pure science, no spam and no govt b.s.

PAU newsgroup is this.
https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe        
Archimedes Plutonium
Archimedes Plutonium
2024-02-15 22:01:20 UTC
Permalink
AP's 280th book of science// Chronicling the two most sloppy famous Physics-Chemistry Experiments-- Electrolysis of Water & Rutherford-Bohr nucleus

AP's 280th book of science// Chronicling the two most sloppy famous recent Physics-Chemistry Experiments-- Electrolysis of Water & Rutherford-Bohr nucleus


AP's 280th book of science// Chronicling the two most sloppy famous Physics-Chemistry Experiments-- Electrolysis of Water & Rutherford-Bohr nucleus
22m views

Archimedes Plutonium
Aug 15, 2023, 4:57:36 PM
to Plutonium Atom Universe
AP's 257th book of science// Chronicling the two most sloppy famous Physics-Chemistry Experiments-- Electrolysis of Water & Rutherford-Bohr nucleus

The two sloppiest Famous Science Experiments in Recorded History, AP's 280th book of science

The first sloppiest Science Experiment in Science History is Water Electrolysis.

The second sloppiest Science Experiment is Rutherford-Bohr-Geiger-Marsden gold foil experiment where they end up concluding atoms have nuclei.

One of the most sloppiest physical science experiments in recorded history. It was started by Humphry Davy in 1806 in England, the electrolysis of water. Not the experiment of splitting water into hydrogen and oxygen, but the sloppiness of where no-one bothered to weigh the hydrogen and oxygen to see if water is H4O or is H2O.

Of course, well Davy and his pupil Faraday probably could never measure the weight of hydrogen to oxygen. But sometime in the 20th century, we had precision instruments to weigh the hydrogen test tube versus oxygen test tube. But no physicist or chemist had enough brain marbles to do that.

No, these half marbled scientists looked at the hydrogen test tube and said " behold us, thy tube is twice the volume of the oxygen tube" and stopped all further experimentation.

Not a single physicist or chemist had enough of a marbled brain case to ask, well, let us measure the weight of the test tubes, and in atomic mass units amu, if the hydrogen in the hydrogen test tube is 1/4 the weight of the oxygen in the oxygen test tube, then AP is correct, Water formula is really H4O. But if the hydrogen is 1/8 the mass in amu of the oxygen then mainstream physics and chemistry is correct, water is H2O.

So, well, does Dr. Nigel Lockyer or Dr. Lia Merminga or Sanford Lab have a 1/2 marbled brain case or do they have more marbles to complete and fulfill a thorough investigation of Water, and its true formula.


The two sloppiest Famous Science Experiments in Recorded History, AP's 257th book of science

Archimedes Plutonium
to Plutonium Atom Universe
The second sloppiest experiment that is famous is the Rutherford-Bohr-Geiger-Marsden gold foil experiment where they concluded Atoms have a dense solid nucleus. When they should have focused attention on the fact that the bounce back alpha particles at 180 degrees had more velocity coming out than going in. This means a Head-On Collision with something more massive and moving at a far faster speed than the alpha particle. This means atoms have no nucleus but a chain of muons thrusting through a proton torus.

Fools are today's current physicists, with their balls of subatomic particle clumped in a nucleus, started by the Rutherford gold leaf experiment. But Rutherford and Bohr were absent minded on interpretation of gold leaf experiment for a alpha particle that bounces back at 180degrees with a faster exit speed than entrance speed, is because the alpha particle hit Head-On collision with a chain of 79 gold atom muons doing the Faraday law inside a 79x840 windings of a gold proton torus. Bohr and Rutherford became absent minded about physics-- not realizing that a bounce back with faster speed out meant the collision was not a sedentary nucleus of large mass, but becuase 79 muons rammed head-on into the incoming alpha particle.


Physics 7 fools of Standard Model of Physics-Pallab Ghosh,Dr.Sheldon Glashow,Dr.Peter Higgs,Dr.Ed Witten,Dr.Mitesh Patel, Dr.Brendan Casey,Prof Graziano Venanzoni.

Fools cannot understand that in Rutherford gold foil experiment when the alpha particle bounces back at greater velocity then what it entered the gold atom.

AP's favorite argument against the Rutherford-Bohr Model of atomic nucleus, is the argument where a car collides head-on with a truck, and note what happens.

Before collision
Car Truck
1000 3000 mass
20 -20 speed
20000 -60000 momentum

After collision
1000 3000 mass
-40 0 speed
-40000 0 momentum

So in the Rutherford experiment of 1909, if they had noted the faster speed, they could have decided that the correct interpretation was some alpha particles collided with a more massive object like the 79 Muons inside of a 79 Proton torus for each gold atom. A alpha particle that hits 79 muons head on going in the opposite direction would eject the alpha particle at 180 degrees back to the source with increased velocity of the alpha particle.

Fermilab & brainwashed fools, Dr.Mitesh Patel, Dr.Brendan Casey,Prof Graziano Venanzoni, too brainwashed to see muon is true electron of atoms stuck inside 840MeV Proton torus doing Faraday law, and the reason for its excess wobble.


Fermilab & brainwashed fools, Dr.Mitesh Patel, Dr.Brendan Casey,Prof Graziano Venanzoni, too brainwashed to see muon is true electron of atoms stuck inside 840MeV Proton torus doing Faraday law, and the reason for its excess wobble.

Physicists of today are too stupid to do physics. They cannot see that 105MeV X 9 is within sigma error of the neutron and proton of 940MeV and 938MeV, meaning that the actual proton is just 840MeV with a muon stuck inside going round and round in the Faraday law.

In fact our physicists of today are all failures with their Standard Model and their subatomic particles that are balls that sit around and have no purpose, function, or task or job.

Idiots and fools are today's current physicists, with their balls of subatomic particle clumped in a nucleus, started by the Rutherford gold leaf experiment. But Rutherford and Bohr were absent minded on interpretation of gold leaf experiment for a alpha particle that bounces back at 180degrees with a faster exit speed than entrance speed, is because the alpha particle hit Head-On collision with a chain of 79 gold atom muons doing the Faraday law inside a 79x840 windings of a gold proton torus. Bohr and Rutherford became absent minded about physics-- not realizing that a bounce back with faster speed out meant the collision was not a sedentary nucleus of large mass, but becuase 79 muons rammed head-on into the incoming alpha particle.

Why so dumb are present day physicists that they rather have Maxwell's antisymmetric Equations of EM theory rather than admit, the Dirac magnetic monopole is the 0.5MeV particle that the fools of Fermilab and CERN think is the Atom's electron.

This story below by BBC, tells us more about how far brainwashing can go and extend as to make utter fools of today's current physics professors. Not a one of them has a 1/2 marble of logical intelligence, no, they have feed by mouth and suckled tit of brainwashing.

--- quoting BBC ---
Scientists near Chicago say they may be getting closer to discovering the existence of a new force of nature.
They have found more evidence that sub-atomic particles, called muons, are not behaving in the way predicted by the current theory of sub-atomic physics.
Scientists believe that an unknown force could be acting on the muons.
More data will be needed to confirm these results, but if they are verified, it could mark the beginning of a revolution in physics.

All of the forces we experience every day can be reduced to just four categories: gravity, electromagnetism, the strong force and the weak force. These four fundamental forces govern how all the objects and particles in the Universe interact with each other.
The findings have been made at a US particle accelerator facility called Fermilab. They build on results announced in 2021 in which the Fermilab team first suggested the possibility of a fifth force of nature.
Since then, the research team has gathered more data and reduced the uncertainty of their measurements by a factor of two, according to Dr Brendan Casey, a senior scientist at Fermilab.
"We're really probing new territory. We're determining the (measurements) at a better precision than it has ever been seen before."
In an experiment with the catchy name 'g minus two (g-2)' the researchers accelerate the sub-atomic particles called muons around a 15m-diameter ring, where they are circulated about 1,000 times at nearly the speed of light. The researchers found that they might be behaving in a way that can't be explained by the current theory, which is called the Standard Model, because of the influence of a new force of nature.

Scientists say they have found "strong evidence" for the existence of a new force of nature
Although the evidence is strong, the Fermilab team hasn't yet got conclusive proof.
They had hoped to have it by now, but uncertainties in what the standard model says the amount of wobbling in muons should be, has increased, because of developments in theoretical physics.
In essence, the goal posts have been moved for the experimental physicists.
Fermilab

Based on a 2,700-hectare site near Chicago, Fermilab is America's premier particle physics lab
The researchers believe that they will have the data they need, and that the theoretical uncertainty will have narrowed in two years' time sufficiently for them to get their goal. That said, a rival team at Europe's Large Hadron Collider (LHC) are hoping to get there first.
Dr Mitesh Patel from Imperial College London is among the thousands of physicists at the LHC attempting to find flaws in the Standard Model. He told BBC News that the first people to find experimental results at odds with the standard model would be one of the all time breakthroughs in physics.
"Measuring behaviour that doesn't agree with the predictions of the Standard Model is the holy grail for particle physics. It would fire the starting-gun for a revolution in our understanding because the model has withstood all experimental tests for more than 50 years."
Fermilab says that its next set of results will be "the ultimate showdown" between theory and experiment that may uncover new particles or forces.
LHCb in 2018

Scientists at the Large Hadron Collider in Europe are also in the race to find inconsistencies with the Standard Model
So what is the Standard Model and why is getting an experimental result that doesn't quite fit in with its predictions such a big deal?
Everything in the world around us is made from atoms - which in turn are made from even smaller particles. These interact to create the four forces of nature: electricity and magnetism (electromagnetism), two nuclear forces and gravity.
Their behaviour is predicted by the standard model, and for fifty years it has predicted their behaviour perfectly, with no errors whatsoever.
Muons are similar to electrons which orbit atoms and are responsible for electrical currents, but they are about 200 times as massive.
In the experiment they were made to wobble, using powerful, superconducting magnets.
Spiral galaxy

Galaxies are accelerating apart from each other faster than predicted by teh Standard Model
The results showed that the muons wobbled faster than the standard model said it should. Prof Graziano Venanzoni, of Liverpool University, who is one of the leading researchers on the project, told BBC News that this might be caused by an unknown new force.
"We think there could be another force, something that we are not aware of now. It is something different, which we call the 'fifth force'.
"It is something different, something we don't know about yet, but it should be important, because it says something new about the Universe."
If confirmed, this would represent arguably one of the biggest scientific breakthroughs for a hundred years, since Einstein's theories of relativity. That is because a fifth force and any particles associated with it are not part of the Standard Model of particle physics.
Researchers know that there is what they describe as "physics beyond the Standard Model" out there, because the current theory can't explain lots of things that astronomers observe in space.
These include the fact that galaxies are continuing to accelerate apart after the Big Bang that created the Universe, rather than the expansion slowing down. Scientists say the acceleration is being driven by an unknown force, called dark energy.
Galaxies are also spinning faster than they should, according to our understanding of how much material is in them. Researchers believe it's because of invisible particles called dark matter, which again are not part of the Standard Model.
The results have been published in the Journal Physical Review Letters.
--- end quoting BBC ---

AP

AP's 280th book of science// Chronocling the two most sloppy famous Physics-Chemistry Experiments-- Electrolysis of Water & Rutherford-Bohr nucleus

Archimedes Plutonium
Aug 15, 2023, 5:12:11 PM
to Plutonium Atom Universe
I do this book as a instruction guide and aid to advanced research, whether physics, chemistry, biology or what ever science.

I notice a huge huge pattern of error in science research. Other than a lack of logic in the steps taken and the construction of the experiment. But the worst mistake happens near the end or at the end of the experiment. When it is time to interpret the experiment and its result.

Everything in the Rutherford-Geiger-Marsden and then Bohr; gold leaf experiment of early 1900s was fine and dandy, except for the last bit-- their interpretation. And all 4 fell victims of silly interpretation. A model of protons and neutrons as tiny spheres clustered in a nucleus rather sedentary as a incoming alpha particle hits this nucleus. Yet bounces back at 180 degrees, ... fine so far..., but has a greater velocity on exit than the alpha particle had on entrance.

This can only be interpreted as that the Atoms of gold have No Nucleus, but has something in rapid constant motion like a chain of 79 muons in a 79X 840 winding Gold Proton torus. Going round and round the proton torus in a Faraday law. Thus when the incoming alpha particle slams head-on into a chain of 79 Muons inside the Proton torus, it is ejected 180 degrees with a faster velocity.

If anyone does not believe me-- try this::


AP's favorite argument against the Rutherford-Bohr Model of atomic nucleus, is the argument where a car collides head-on with a truck, and note what happens.

Before collision
Car Truck
1000 3000 mass
20 -20 speed
20000 -60000 momentum

After collision
1000 3000 mass
-40 0 speed
-40000 0 momentum


Archimedes Plutonium
Aug 16, 2023, 1:17:50 AM
to Plutonium Atom Universe
Honestly I do not know what year in physics history was it possible to weigh the hydrogen compared to oxygen in Electrolysis. I doubt the equipment in the 1800s could do that weighing. Sometime in the 1900s would it be possible to engineer electrolysis to the point where you can get a pure bifurcation of a hydrogen test tube compared to a oxygen test tube and have a weighing scale delicate enough to weigh the hydrogen versus oxygen.

If AP is correct, hydrogen is 1/4 the weight of oxygen in Water and thus the true formula is H4O. If it comes back as 1/8 the weight of oxygen, then mainstream physics and chemistry is correct.

What this book is about, is the psychology of experimental science and the lack of logical reasoning. That the conclusions drawn by scientists from experiment results are often shoddy and sloppy. That the weighing probably could have been done by 1930, yet here it is 2023 and still no-one attempting to weigh the electrolysis.

The psychology of seeing volume of hydrogen twice that of oxygen and everyone thinking the experiment is done and go home.

How can we compare that with daily life? Is it like going to the beach and never getting in the water? Is it like going to school and sleeping the whole time? Is it like going shopping, yet never buying anything, wasting a day. A feeling of doing something, but never finishing it. Like making a painting 3/4 done and never finishing it.

In the case of Rutherford-Bohr model of a Atom with a nucleus, what is the psychology of sloppiness there? Of course, not noticing that the velocity was greater on exit than entrance. And one has to wonder why that fact never slipped into the minds of Rutherford, Geiger, Marsden, Bohr after 1909. For I find myself constantly in contemplation of past ideas and works I have done. Surely, it should have impinged on the minds of Rutherford, Geiger, Marsden, Bohr on occasion, that the exit speed was greater than entrance for the alpha particles to bounce back at 180 degrees. And then the mind would have raised doubt that the Atom has a nucleus, but rather hit something head-on going in the opposite direction.

For the psychology of my work-- it is constantly active, and reflection back, and was the conclusion correct?

Apparently interpretation and conclusions in science is one of the most difficult steps in a science experiment. And sadly can lead to a failed experiment, all the hard work going in to engineer the set-up, and make the wrong interpretation and conclusion, and someone else in the world gets all the credit for the correct interpretation. Take AP for example, when water comes back as having formula H4O, not H2O, that AP will be credited, and everyone of the past with their H2O made outcasts. Or that Rutherford-Bohr model seen as silly with a big mistake, yet the experiment itself was done correctly-- just the interpretation was all wrong.

And of course we can jump forward to modern times with these big accelerators and new fangled particles here there and everywhere. Yes, they found a new particle, but their intrepretation of what they found is nothing but silly garbage.


Archimedes Plutonium
Aug 16, 2023, 6:11:09 PM
to Plutonium Atom Universe
_AP's 257th book of science// Chronicling the two most sloppy famous Physics-Chemistry Experiments and the sloppy diagram pictures of Atoms-- Electrolysis of Water & Rutherford-Bohr nucleus

Archimedes Plutonium
Aug 16, 2023, 8:33:46 PM
to Plutonium Atom Universe
Alright, I am adding a third to the 2 experiments, a third that is the picture mindset or diagram drawn of atoms through the history of physics. A picture is often more damaging to learning and understanding true physics when that picture is wrong.

The picture of an atom as a tiny ball sphere was alright for the majority of physics history starting in Ancient Greek times and right up to Dalton's Atomic theory 1804.

But, it was no longer acceptable to draw Atoms as little ball spheres from 1870 onwards. I say 1870 because Maxwell Electromagnetic equations were well known 1860-1870. And a prime law in that Maxwell theory was Faraday law with a geometry of a coil with thrusting bar magnet.

What I am saying is that from 1870 onwards, the drawing and picturing of Atoms should have discarded the little ball drawing and start replacing it with a Coil and a bar-magnet thrusting through the coil as the picture of the true Atom. Other EM laws should then enhanced the coil + bar-magnet.

Then of course, we started to get subatomic particles with JJ Thomson 1897, Rutherford 1908 and many others-- the proton, electron, neutron, photon.

And here the drawings of Atoms and subatomic particles should have completely discarded the silly little balls pictures of Atoms and their subatomic particles. And a wholescale attempt at making atoms and their subatomic particles be pictures and diagrams of the laws of Electromagnetic theory-- the neutron a parallel plate capacitor, the muon the true electron of atoms as bar magnet thrusting through proton torus of 840MeV. The Dirac magnetic monopole-- which Thomson and all the physicists of the 20th century thought was the electron of atoms turns out to be the Dirac magnetic monopole and its picture is a closed pencil ellipse, same as the picture of a photon.

You see, crude cave-man pictures and drawings hinder science, and retards science. For if the drawings and pictures of Atoms and subatomic particles had started to utilize EM laws as the drawings, we would not have been plagued by that colossal dunce physics program called the Standard Model, a model for logic failures and idiots of physics.


AP kindly asks Google to let AP run all three, sci.math, sci.physics, PAU as he runs PAU, now--- all pure science, no spam and no govt b.s.

PAU newsgroup is this.
https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe        
Archimedes Plutonium
Archimedes Plutonium
2024-02-19 04:18:20 UTC
Permalink
AP's 278th book of science starts a series on Experiments of Science that need a Logic- OverView of mistakes, grave errors and simple stupidity of reasoning starting with Magnetism.
17 views
Subscribe

Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium
Feb 17, 2024, 6:03:00 PM (yesterday)

AP's 278-289th books of science on correcting and chronicling famous experiments of science. I
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium
Feb 17, 2024, 6:17:45 PM (yesterday)

I was fed up with the Old Physics, Old Chemistry community of do-nothing error filled professors who
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium
Feb 17, 2024, 7:37:58 PM (yesterday)

The Chronicling list keeps going and hopefully I will not forget any important experiment in the next
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium
Feb 17, 2024, 8:09:07 PM (yesterday)

On Saturday, February 17, 2024 at 7:37:58 PM UTC-6 Archimedes Plutonium wrote: The Chronicling list
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium
Feb 17, 2024, 9:21:31 PM (yesterday)

List keeps growing, but nothing is more important to science than Experiment, experiment and more
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium<***@gmail.com>
Feb 17, 2024, 10:30:54 PM (24 hours ago)



to Plutonium Atom Universe
On Saturday, February 17, 2024 at 9:21:31 PM UTC-6 Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
List keeps growing, but nothing is more important to science than Experiment, experiment and more experiment. I failed to include biology so far, and here so, I include biology.

Alright, almost ready to write this series of books on science experiments and to point out the gaps and holes in Logic in each, the blaring mistakes.

But I need to include superconductivity, for recently I made a major discovery in superconductivity which highlights the errors of missing elements.

And I probably will combine some of these listed experiments as they are pretty much similar such as DNA and superdeterminism of Bell Inequality. Probably combine Cavendish and Millikan experiments. Probably combine Double Slit experiment with the Harvard's Dr. Hau slow light for the fundamental flaw in both are looking at light as straightline arrows with a front tip and and tail end, when in truth they are closed loop circuits of pencil ellipse.

Once I finish this series, I should write a series on how Psychology Frame of Mind holds back so many math professors and mathematicians from doing "good honest true mathematics" and how a twisted mind of psychological makes them losers of mathematics. A fate far worse than in physics where we have lapses of logical judgement.

Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium<***@gmail.com>
Feb 17, 2024, 11:00:02 PM (23 hours ago)



to Plutonium Atom Universe

Chronology


Ancient Greek magnetism-- Lodestone. And also considering a new form of magnetism in recent news.

Ben Franklin kite flying in lightning storm 1700s

Jan Deiman- Adrian van Troostwijk, 1778 water electrolysis. Here I should include the history that two of the most famous scientists did water electrolysis-- Davy and Faraday, but both can be excused because a weighing scale of the accuracy needed was never available in the early 1800s to weigh the masses of hydrogen to oxygen. It is after precision scales were made that chemists and physicists became fools and derelict of duty.


Cavendish Gravity Constant experiment 1798.

Double Slit Experiment 1801 with Thomas Young.

Ohm's law 1827.

Michelson-Morley experiment 1887.

JJ Thomson experiment of electron 1897.

Millikan-Fletcher 1909 electric monopole oil drop.

Rutherford, Geiger, Marsden gold leaf scattering experiment 1908-1913.

1911 and later 1986 experiments in Superconductivity, starting with Onnes where he discoveries conductivity with no resistance when in cold temperature. Then in 1986 Bednorz & Muller with high temperature superconductors. My 270th book of science--
2nd Law of Thermodynamics is connected to Superconductivity-- Explained as New Ohm's Law// Physics research
by Archimedes Plutonium


1921, and how stars make their energy-- Harkins, 1921 Eddington, Atkinson-Houtermans, Blackett, Oliphant, Bethe all making claims the the Sun and Stars energy comes from fusion of light elements into heavier elements. But AP sees a huge flaw of logic in this reasoning for fusion is dependent on rare probabilities, yet Sun and Stars are so reliable and so constant in outpouring of energy which apparently increases over time (not decrease) as evidenced in Red Giant stars, that AP says the main bulk of star energy is the Faraday law perhaps as high as 90-99% of star energy. For the Faraday law is a constant energy source.

Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium<***@gmail.com>
3:03 AM (19 hours ago)



to Plutonium Atom Universe
The list keeps growing bigger. I need my new insights into what superconductivity actually is, and it comes directly out of the Faraday law of Maxwell Equations which Feynman talked about the conundrum of 2 phenomenon. Where I get the sine of an angle of thrust. If the sine is that of 90 degrees I have the full current with no resistance as superconductivity. In other words, the pencil ellipse becomes straightline perpendicularity allowing for superconductivity. This is really really exciting for it also is the most beautiful explanation of the 4 seasons, why we have winter cold and summer hot and in between. All due to sine of angle that the Sun rays hit Earth. We can demonstrate this easily in front of a heater. If I hold me hand perpendicular, the most heat is felt. If I hold my hand at an angle only a fraction of the heat is felt. If I hold my hand on edge to the heater almost no heat is felt.

In this series of books I need to outline what Fallacy of Logic the mistakes that were made. For instance the fallacy of logic for the mistakes on the Faraday law is that the Maxwell Equations should all come from New Ohm's law, all four laws coming out of New Ohm's law and not each made up helter skelter. See AP's Teaching True Physics.


On Saturday, February 17, 2024 at 11:00:02 PM UTC-6 Archimedes Plutonium wrote:

Chronology

Ancient Greek magnetism-- Lodestone. And also considering a new form of magnetism in recent news.

Ben Franklin kite flying in lightning storm 1700s

Jan Deiman- Adrian van Troostwijk, 1778 water electrolysis. Here I should include the history that two of the most famous scientists did water electrolysis-- Davy and Faraday, but both can be excused because a weighing scale of the accuracy needed was never available in the early 1800s to weigh the masses of hydrogen to oxygen. It is after precision scales were made that chemists and physicists became fools and derelict of duty.


Cavendish Gravity Constant experiment 1798.

Double Slit Experiment 1801 with Thomas Young.

Ohm's law 1827.



1845-1860s Neumann- Maxwell the formal math laws of Faraday magnetic induction to produce electricity from thrusting magnetic field.

Two phenomena
Faraday's law is a single equation describing two different phenomena: the motional emf generated by a magnetic force on a moving wire (see the Lorentz force), and the transformer emf generated by an electric force due to a changing magnetic field (described by the Maxwell–Faraday equation).
James Clerk Maxwell drew attention to this fact in his 1861 paper On Physical Lines of Force. In the latter half of Part II of that paper, Maxwell gives a separate physical explanation for each of the two phenomena.
A reference to these two aspects of electromagnetic induction is made in some modern textbooks. As Richard Feynman states:
So the "flux rule" that the emf in a circuit is equal to the rate of change of the magnetic flux through the circuit applies whether the flux changes because the field changes or because the circuit moves (or both) ...
Yet in our explanation of the rule we have used two completely distinct laws for the two cases – v × B for "circuit moves" and ∇ × E = −∂tB for "field changes".
We know of no other place in physics where such a simple and accurate general principle requires for its real understanding an analysis in terms of two different phenomena.
— Richard P. Feynman, The Feynman Lectures on Physics

Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium<***@gmail.com>
5:18 PM (5 hours ago)



to Plutonium Atom Universe

Alright, I need to make a Experiment myself, a world class experiment probably far more important than any on those long list below. The experiment involves heat and Light Waves and electricity and magnetism and why we have winter and summer. We are taught this lesson in Junior High School science but taught sloppily, never well enough that we can remember the cause of winter. For the complexity of the science involved makes teaching this subject difficult.

And it is this complexity of science that has evaded our understanding of Superconductivity. For if we analyzed how Sun Light Waves heat Earth, we can understand how superconductivity happens and why it exists. But first--- the full explanation of Winter.

We know from Junior High School that the tilt on axis of Earth is the cause of the 4 seasons, but we rarely are taught the particular details of how this occurs. So I want to make a Experimental Model.

And several Models.

The first model is on a cold wintry day, you have a space heater-- a warm electric heater with grill fins in between and you put your hands between the fins to instantly warm them. Now you have your hand and fingers perpendicular to the grill fins to get the most heat. But now you tilt your fingers and hands and you feel less and less heat.

Now we shift to the AP Model Experiment of the entire Globe of Earth and we use a package of new pencils, of 4 by 4 or 16 pencils in all in a plastic package. We pretend each pencil is a Light Wave from the Sun as heat. Now if those 16 pencils hits directly overhead on Earth would maximize density of 16 and that spot on Earth would be the hottest that day. But now those same 16 heading for a northern latitude on Earth in Winter has to contend with the curvature of Earth itself, but also has to contend with a axis tilt of Earth by 23 degrees. So we have a multitude of variables that we cannot use a simple math of a trigonometry function.

So on the Equator, all 16 pencil tips would hit the Equator with maximum density and all impacts would impart their total energy in the form of heat, and the Equator is really hot in this direct hit. But the polar region in winter, of those 16 pencils as Sun heat Light Waves, how many impact directly? How many impact at an angle?

Hard to believe, but the explanation of why summer and winter is this analysis but also; how Superconductivity works.

Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium<***@gmail.com>
10:11 PM (now)



to Plutonium Atom Universe
AP's Model of why Earth has Winters and Summers, due to Earth as sphere and tilt of axis 23 degrees.

So I get out the box of 16 pencils and pretend they are Sun Light Waves each. When they strike land in the tropics they come in packed maximum density 4 by 4 for a surface area of 16. Now when those same 16 Light Waves strike the Polar Region because the surface of Earth is curved, the curvature of Earth, plus the tilt in axis in winter of 23 degrees we have a different situation where the 16 light waves are spread out and hit Earth in a area of 16 by 16 = 256.

Now let us do this Model in Celsius. A typical tropical temperature would be 25 Celcius. So we have a ratio of this.

256 25Celsius
------- ---------------
16 XCelsius

Solving the ratio we have 256X = 400 Celsius
X the polar temperature is thus 400/256 = 1.5 Celsius, just shy of water freezing.

A similar model relates to the Faraday law as we thrust a bar magnet through a coil. But what if the bar magnet is at a slant to the coil perpendicular? Then we have to factor a fractional electric current production.

Now how does this relate to superconductivity? We see in a capacitor or battery as holding static electric current because the plates are perpendicular to the current held. If we short circuit the battery, all the current rushes out with superconduction, and no loss of electricity. If the capacitor or battery are not perfectly perpendicular then the current inside gradually wear away as internal heat. The cold temperatures needed to create superconductivity is to make all the plates perpendicular. For as the electricity is moving around inside the capacitor or battery it needs to keep hitting the walls perpendicular. Back to the Model, by perpendicular hitting of the walls or bouncing off the walls, all 16 of the Light Waves or electric current monopoles hit the walls as a maximum density of 16, none are thinned out into 256. (Sort of reminds me of Snell's law that the bent light means resistance and loss of electric current.)

More later.....

AP, King of Science
Mathin3D
2024-02-19 05:21:58 UTC
Permalink
Do you realise how pathetic it is to reply to your own comments???
Post by Archimedes Plutonium
AP's 278th book of science starts a series on Experiments of Science that need a Logic- OverView of mistakes, grave errors and simple stupidity of reasoning starting with Magnetism.
17 views
S
Loading...