Discussion:
#7-1, My 39th published book AP Atom Model replacing the Rutherford-Bohr Atom Model (Physics series for High School Book 1) by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) (Amazon's Kindle) #1 New Release in General Chemistry & Reference
(too old to reply)
Archimedes Plutonium
2024-01-19 05:58:09 UTC
Permalink
#7-1, My 39th published book

AP Atom Model replacing the Rutherford-Bohr Atom Model (Physics series for High School Book 1)
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) (Amazon's Kindle)

#1 New Release in General Chemistry & Reference

Last revision was April 2023. This is AP's 39th published book of science.

Preface: The Rutherford and Bohr model of the Atom is seen now as fake physics. And it will take a- lot of time before that nonsense is removed and replaced in science textbooks and classrooms for a truer model of the Atom. So to accelerate that movement towards the truth of what the Atom is, I present this short book for High School. In the age of the Internet, when we discover true science but am teaching fake science, we need a process to quicken the pace of exit of fake science. Not to wait around for 50 years to be teaching the true science, we should be teaching the true science as fast as possible and to remove the fake science in our school curriculums in a timely and orderly manner. So this small book is a pattern for future removal of fake science from school curriculums. This small book explains what the Rutherford-Bohr model was and why it was phony science. And I explain what replaces the Rutherford-Bohr model with the AP model of the Atom. So the pattern is -- show both -- and then authors of texts will eliminate the fake science until it is a passing footnote.

The Internet helps in this pace of cleaning up and cleaning out fake science. Back when Wegener tried to introduce his true theory of Continental Drift, the slow pace of correction took Wegener 50 years to get the true science in geology. We must not allow 50 years of fake science to be mainstream anymore.


Cover Picture is a coil and a bar magnet and a galvanometer that measures the current produced as the bar magnet is thrust through the coil. This is Faraday's Law and needs to be taught in High School.


Product details
• ASIN ‏ : ‎ B07QKHRWG8
• Publication date ‏ : ‎ April 10, 2019
• Language ‏ : ‎ English
• File size ‏ : ‎ 2214 KB
• Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
• Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Sticky notes ‏ : ‎ On Kindle Scribe
• Print length ‏ : ‎ 21 pages
• Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #220,321 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
#5 in 30-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
#39 in General Chemistry & Reference
#381 in General Chemistry



#7-2, 40th published book

How the Sun and Stars truly shine, not by fusion, but by Faraday's Law (Physics series for High School Book 2)
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) (Amazon's Kindle edition)

One of my recent books (published a few days ago) was the AP model of the interior of atoms replacing the Rutherford-Bohr model of the atom. And the differences are vast between these two atom models, for the AP model has the Faraday law going on, with actual work and job for the subatomic particles. And in that Atom model book, I was complaining that our modern science education school system has no good way of ridding itself of fake science where we keep on teaching propaganda and fake science for as much as 50 years beyond the discovery of what the true underlying science actually is. I gave as an example the Wegener Continental Drift theory in geology, where students had to suffer 50 years of a fake static-earth-theory when the Continental Drift theory was all around. One of the reasons for the delay in teaching the truth of science, is there is so much money interests involved of people selling fake science textbooks. And this is where the Internet can come in and play a vital role in school education, because the Internet can publish books of "true science" and get them exposed to a world audience, and so fake science like the static-earth theory would have been gone long before 50 years had elapsed if the internet were present for Wegener.

But now an even bigger and more important theory of science and physics is here and threatens to throw out as fake science the fusion theory of star energy, especially since it is "How the Sun shines". In effect, the question is, how do all stars shine? What is their energy source. And hard to believe that this topic in current science education with their explanation as "being fusion" is fake science. We all know what the answer is from present day science-- that stars and sun shine because of fusion. That they fuse hydrogen and light elements to make heavier elements like helium and in that fusion they give off energy which is sunshine. But is it true? Is that true science. You would be surprised to find out, that such is not the truth of how stars and Sun shine. They do not shine because of fusion. They shine because the Faraday law is going on inside each and every atom in that star or the Sun.

Now, here is another science teaching that needs to replace the fake science of fusion for the Sun and stars. And it should not take 50 years like Wegener's continental drift to push out the fake static earth theory. We should not have to wait 50 years for our teachers to teach the truth about how the stars and Sun shine with energy. And so, here again, just as in the previous book "AP's model of the Atom", I present the old theory of how stars shine and alongside that old fake theory, I present the new true theory. And in that presentation, we can give the entire science education community, give them about say 5 years of time in which to completely remove the old fake theory that fusion causes stars and Sun to shine with energy. When in fact, the truth is, Faraday Law causes stars and the Sun to shine.

Cover Picture is my photograph of a Google search on my computer of Sun images.

Product details
ASIN ‏ : ‎ B07QRPZQ4Q
Publication date ‏ : ‎ April 12, 2019
Language ‏ : ‎ English
File size ‏ : ‎ 1633 KB
Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
Sticky notes ‏ : ‎ On Kindle Scribe
Print length ‏ : ‎ 20 pages
Best Sellers Rank: #520,589 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
◦ #20 in 30-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
◦ #27 in Dynamics Physics (Kindle Store)
◦ #207 in Dynamics Physics (Books)

#7-3, My 26th published book

AP-Faraday Law replacing Nebular Dust Cloud theory (Physics series for High School Book 3)
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) (Amazon's Kindle)


Last revision was April 2023. This is AP's 26th published book of science.

Preface: When I first published this book in 2019, unfortunately it was not on the level of High School students comprehension. I have to tone it down for these young minds to learn what it is I am saying. So I make a massive overhaul revision that the High School students can grasp fully the ideas. This is a huge benefit of electronic book publishing in that a author can test his book and see if students comprehend the materials. Unfortunately for this book published in 2019 was far over the heads of High School students and now I correct that problem. In 2019 I was running a marathon of science book publishing, for college students mostly and unfortunately that college book writing seeped into this High School book.
Revising my 26th book of science:: AP-Faraday Law replacing Nebular Dust Cloud theory (Physics series for High School Book 3). I am in the process of revising my 26th book of science. It starts with the story of the Nebular Dust Cloud theory and why that is a terribly phony theory of science.

Cover Picture: Nasa pictures of some of the planets of our Solar System from my computer.



Product details
ASIN ‏ : ‎ B07NNXZ9Z8
Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 22, 2019
Language ‏ : ‎ English
File size ‏ : ‎ 1586 KB
Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
Sticky notes ‏ : ‎ On Kindle Scribe
Print length ‏ : ‎ 30 pages



#7-4, My 41st published book of science.

Unification of the 4 Forces of Physics as All being Electromagnetism (Physics series for High School Book 4)
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) (Amazon's Kindle edition)

Last revision was Feb2023. This is AP's 41st book of science.


Preface: Ever since I discovered the universe was one big atom in 1990 and that this atom was a plutonium atom, I vowed to solve what the unification of the 4 forces of physics was. Those 4 forces in 1990 were 1) Strong Nuclear force, 2) Weak Nuclear force, 3) Electricity/Magnetism force 4) Gravity. In physics, much of the 1900s was spent on finding a unification of those four forces. Most of the famous physicists of the 1900s were dabbling in this desire to unify those 4 forces. Trouble was, hardly anyone trying to unify the four forces of physics had a logical mind to be ever able to do that task. And, sadly, when the history books of physics are written on the topic of unification of the 4 forces of physics, it is not a achievement but rather a whisking away by a broom that sweeps away dust and dirt. There never were 4 forces of physics, all the forces of physics were just electricity and magnetism. If all the forces of physics is electricity and magnetism means there are no 3 other forces to have to unify. And the year was 2017 with AP's 8th edition of Atom Totality Universe that the slow reality was beginning to unfold. And the reasoning is utterly simple and easy. Since the proton is the coil of Faraday's Law and the electron muon is the bar magnet in Faraday's Law, there is no Strong Nuclear Force (see my book AP model of atoms). In addition, with the Faraday Law going on, there is no Weak Nuclear Force for the radioactivity of atoms is mostly the ejection of magnetic monopoles due to Faraday Law. Gravity as 10^-40 weaker than Electromagnetism and with the identical same formula as Coulomb law of EM, means there never was a gravity force apart from electricity and magnetism. Some in Old Physics complain that EM has both attract and repel. But they were wrong on that account also. For there are two concepts-- actual repel and then there is a concept of "denial of same space occupancy". Magnetism and Electricity have no repel force at all. They have a denial of same space occupancy which fools many in science and physics. So what happened in the history of Physics, with their quest to unify the 4 forces, ended in a whimper, where it was seen that the interior of atoms has a Faraday Law of EM going on, which immediately dismisses a Strong Nuclear force and a Weak Nuclear force. And gravity is just a minimal EM attraction force.

So Old Physics had a quest to unify 4 forces, but it turns out, there never was 4 different separate forces.

Cover Picture: My photograph of page 2-10 from The Feynman Lectures on Physics 1963, in which my first understanding that there were 4 forces of physics and how they compared to one another. I do not recall when I saw this, perhaps when 20 years old-- 1970 or thereabouts at the University of Cincinnati. I do remember taking a class in physics where all it was, was watching a film series of Feynman lecturing. I do not recall how many films that was, but I thoroughly enjoyed it. This film series on Feynman occurred at Utah State University circa 1978.

Product details
• ASIN ‏ : ‎ B07QMLMJDN
• Publication date ‏ : ‎ April 14, 2019
• Language ‏ : ‎ English
• File size ‏ : ‎ 1407 KB
• Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
• Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Sticky notes ‏ : ‎ On Kindle Scribe
• Print length ‏ : ‎ 28 pages
• Best Sellers Rank: #908,538 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
◦ #42 in Electromagnetic Theory
◦ #66 in 45-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
◦ #97 in Electromagnetism (Kindle Store)

#7-5, My 42nd published book.

Charge does not exist in Science, what does exist is WIRE-Vector-Direction in electromagnetism//(Physics series for High School Book 5) Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

If you ask me from 2010 to 2020 what the worst evil in physics and chemistry was, it would have been easy for me to say "charge" in physics and chemistry. Not only was charge wrong in physics but it kept the illusion and delusion of negative numbers alive in mathematics, with the physics -1 charge. So from about 2010 to 2020, I was desperately wanting to get rid of the physics "charge". To my pleasant surprise, I really could not get rid of physics charge until after 2017, when I discovered the real electron was the muon at 105MeV, not the tiny particle JJ Thomson found in 1897 of 0.5MeV and which Thomson assigned to be the electron of -1 charge. Turns out, what Thomson had found was the Dirac Magnetic Monopole of the 1930s. You see, Thomson found something that would not be known of as a particle until Dirac needed a particle of a magnetic monopole. The charge in physics and chemistry and biology and all other sciences that use electrons, protons and electricity, for the charge is this magnetic monopole. Let me explain this history below in a few chapters.

Cover Picture: Shows some wires on a Galvanometer and also shows some wires as being part of the Lewis Structure in Chemistry, those white arms or tentacles in Lewis theory of Chemistry are wires of magnetic monopole.

Length: 29 pages

Product details
File Size: 1398 KB
Print Length: 29 pages
Publication Date: April 15, 2019
Sold by: Amazon.com Services LLC
Language: English
ASIN: B07QSS4HZC
Text-to-Speech: Enabled 
X-Ray: 
Not Enabled  

Word Wise: Enabled
Lending: Enabled
Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled 


#7-6, 43rd published book

Doppler redshift (blueshift) has nothing to do with motion of source and cannot tell you distance// (Physics series for High School Book 6) Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Last revision was 29May2021. And this is AP's 43rd book of science published.

Preface:
What the Doppler redshift & blueshift really are-- heat and magnetism shifts of 8 Rings of the proton torus in hydrogen, or any other atom. Old Physics had the interior of atoms all messed-up, not knowing what the real electron of atoms was; and with that messed-up view and understanding and idea of atoms, they would mess-up on what is called the Doppler Redshift of spectral lines of atoms.

Product details
• ASIN : B07QTFYXZL
• Publication date : April 17, 2019
• Language : English
• File size : 2177 KB
• Text-to-Speech : Enabled
• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Word Wise : Enabled
• Print length : 17 pages
• Lending : Enabled
• Best Sellers Rank: #227,141 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
◦ #3 in 30-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
◦ #81 in Cosmology (Kindle Store)
◦ #332 in Cosmology (Books)




#7-7, 53rd published book

Quantum Entanglement, Physics series for High School, book 7 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Revised on 29Aug2021. This is AP's 53rd published book of science.

Since this is for High School, I need to keep it as simple as possible, for students in High School are just barely getting acquainted with physics. So I must come down to their level of understanding and comprehending. I write this for High School since NOVA did a TV program on the subject of Quantum Entanglement and once it appears on NOVA, we have to be able, in science, to explain the topic to High School students. For sure enough, many High School students will be watching that program. This book will explain Quantum Entanglement for them.

To explain Quantum Entanglement we have to start with what light is. And light comes in two forms, one is wave, and one is particle. Light is both these forms put together at all times. Light is both a wave and a particle simultaneously. In physics this is called a duality.

Cover picture is a picture taken by my iphone of a web search of Slow Light Experiments.

Product details
ASIN : B07VMZ698G
Publication date : July 26, 2019
Language : English
File size : 1801 KB
Simultaneous device usage : Unlimited
Text-to-Speech : Enabled
Screen Reader : Supported
Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
X-Ray : Not Enabled
Word Wise : Enabled
Print length : 22 pages
Lending : Enabled
Best Sellers Rank: #214,475 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
◦ #2 in 30-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
◦ #375 in Physics (Kindle Store)
◦ #1,960 in Physics (Books) 



#7-8, 62nd published book

Elementary Angular-Momentum with Force of Gravity// Angular-Momentum equals Electric Field// Physics series for High School, Book 8 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Last revision was 14Mar2021. This is AP's 62nd published book of science.

--------------------------
Table of Contents
--------------------------

1) Angular Momentum is one of the most difficult concepts of physics.

2) Strange motion of Uranus and its satellites.

3) UNITS of PHYSICS

4) Linear Momentum

5) Angular Momentum

6) Principle that Angular Momentum is represented by an ellipse.

7) Principle of Gravity

8) Return and Review of the Moons (satellites) of Uranus.

9) Quantum Duality that is Electricity to Magnetism, and that is Angular Momentum with Force of Gravity.

10) Angular-Momentum equals Electric-Field.


Product details
• File Size : 959 KB
• ASIN : B07XT4SP6N
• Word Wise : Enabled
• Print Length : 16 pages
• Publication Date : September 11, 2019
• Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
• Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• Simultaneous Device Usage : Unlimited
• Language: : English
• Lending : Enabled
• Best Sellers Rank: #171,127 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
◦ #2 in 15-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
◦ #12 in Electromagnetic Theory
◦ #21 in Electromagnetism (Kindle Store)

#7-9, 82nd published book

World's first experimental Proof that the Proton rest mass is 840 MeV and the real electron is the muon //Physics series for High School Book 9 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Last revision was 4Jul2022. And this is AP's 82nd published book on science.

Preface: I published this book on 22Jan2020 and wanting to get the message out to High School students in chemistry and physics what the true proton, and true electron and true Lewis Structure were. And for High School students not to be fooled into the Lewis 8 structure of chemistry, when it actually is a Lewis 6 structure, that the true structure is Lewis 6. And so I classified this book into the High School series of my books, hoping to avert the disaster of teaching High School students the wrong chemistry and wrong physics, only to have to re-learn the true chemistry and true physics when in College. This I consider a disaster in modern education, to teach in High School the wrong and false science and have students re-learn the truth.

It is a modern day tragedy of education, to teach students in High School fake science, only to have to re-learn it later.

World's first experimental proof that the real proton rest mass is 840MeV not 938, and the real electron was the muon of 105MeV, and that little particle of 0.5MeV that J.J. Thomson discovered in 1897 turns out not to be the electron of atoms but rather the Dirac magnetic monopoles of atoms. The experimental proof comes as a surprise, because most people would think some big physics machine such as CERN would prove the proton is 840MeV and muon is the true electron. Surprise, because it turns out that Lewis 6 structure proves the proton and electron from the molecule CO and N2, via dissociation energy and the cube has 6 faces, not 8. The Lewis structure of bonding, proves the proton must be 840 MeV and true electron is the muon at 105MeV. However, some big machines have also seen a 840MeV proton. But in a bizarre ironic twist, the Old Chemistry Lewis 8 structure helps to prove that the proton is a 8 ring torus. And this is a difficult thing to understand, that Lewis 8 was wrong for chemical bonds but was correct for number of rings a proton has.

Cover Picture are Lewis Structure models of the CO, N2, O2, and H2O molecules. The oxygen atoms are colored orange; the nitrogen atoms are colored blue; the hydrogen atoms are small and colored white with a blue ring around them; the carbon atom is colored black. Notice the unshared dipoles on O2 and H2O. Notice those two magnetic monopoles that are unshared on the O2 molecule and the H2O molecule those unshared dipoles are actually stuck together such as the arc of a magnetic field, although in the picture they are not connected. The magnetism of those end-caps in the picture were not strong enough to stick the two together to form a arc. I suppose I could have gotten a small magnet to stick the two unshared monopoles together. And notice the other two molecules CO and N2 have no unshared dipole or unshared pole. They, CO and N2, are among the strongest chemical bonds that exist and the reason is that they fill completely the Lewis 6 Structure, no unshared pole, magnetic monopole that is.

Product details
ASIN ‏ : ‎ B0845124DX
Publication date ‏ : ‎ January 22, 2020
Language ‏ : ‎ English
File size ‏ : ‎ 610 KB
Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
Print length ‏ : ‎ 59 pages
Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled


#7-10, 83rd published book

Airfoil Lift solved, true theory of how flight is possible///Physics series for High School book 10 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

When I was in High School, in the Cincinnati, Ohio region, I remember reading in "General Science" classrooms of what was the explanation of why planes flew in the sky. Of course, so young of age we never questioned the truth or veracity of such, we accepted it, especially since we are graded on ideas like that. And the picture we saw of how a airplane flies, is a picture of a wing with the air having many lines of pressure under the wing and few lines of pressure over the top of the wing. And then a arrow of lift upwards because the high pressure below the wing lifted the wing and airplane upwards. I do not think it was given the name Bernoulli's law, and I am certain that Newton's law of every action has equal and opposite reaction was not mentioned back then circa 1965 in Ohio classrooms.

But now, fast forward to January 23, 2020 some 55 years later, and to my pleasant surprise, in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN (SA) magazine, their FEB2020 issue starting page 44 is an article titled "The Enigma of Aerodynamic Lift" "No one can completely explain why planes stay in the air" by Ed Regis.

And I had just published a few days earlier in January, two books talking about the fact that the chemistry molecule of O2 that composes 21% of the air, is a polar molecular. Polar molecule just like water, H2O is a polar molecule. A polar molecule is filled with electricity and magnetism, just ready to go into action. And so, reading this SA article, and fresh in mind that O2 is brimming with electricity and magnetism, made me realize-- there is a new and third and better explanation for why airplanes fly. Thus was born the true theory of why planes fly, as you read the text below.

Cover Picture: Is my photo of a Google Search on Bumblebees.

Product details
Publication Date : January 24, 2020
Print Length : 25 pages
Language: : English
ASIN : B0846F1JKP
Word Wise : Enabled
File Size : 964 KB
Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
Screen Reader : Supported
X-Ray : Not Enabled
Lending : Enabled
Best Sellers Rank: #3,363,074 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
◦ #920 in 45-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
◦ #7,760 in General Technology & Reference
◦ #11,536 in Physics (Kindle Store)




#7-11, 85th published book

Proof Stars shine from Faraday Law, not from fusion // (Physics series for High School book 11) Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium

On 30JAN2020, while watching the BBC on TV, was news and video images of the Sun's surface, showing what looks like golden chips, with white flowing magnetism or electricity as the white flowing in between the golden chips. This was exciting, extremely exciting because with this "observational data" I could use it to prove that the Sun and stars shine not from fusion but from Faraday Law of each and every atom inside the Sun having its muons thrust through its attendant proton coil and producing electricity and magnetism via the Faraday and Ampere laws. This is what gives stars their shining outbursts of energy, their starshine or for the sun, sunshine. If star energy was due to fusion, there would be very little light in the universe. There would be no life on Earth. So with the 30 JAN2020 report, I can use those video imagines to actually prove our Sun is a Faraday Law machine, not a fusion machine.

Cover Picture is my photograph of the BBC video image. A BBC quote: "The Daniel K Inouye Solar Telescope on Hawaii has released pictures that show features as small as 30km across."

Product details
File Size: 963 KB
Print Length: 20 pages
Publication Date: January 30, 2020
Sold by: Amazon.com Services LLC
Language: English
ASIN: B084D54TH8
Text-to-Speech: Enabled 
X-Ray: 
Not Enabled  

Word Wise: Enabled
Lending: Enabled
Screen Reader: Supported 
Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled 


#7-12, 87th published book

Photosynthesis // Physics series for High School book 12 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Last revision was 14Nov2021. This is AP's 87th published book of science.
Preface:
Photosynthesis is big important science, it is the food foundation source for animal life on Earth. It is the science of how plants turn sunlight plus carbon dioxide CO2 gas plus water H2O into carbohydrates (sugar) for which is the basis of the food chain for animals. So here we study and learn how Photosynthesis works. How sunlight energy plus CO2 plus H2O are turned into a sugar carbohydrate of CH2O.
Cover Picture: Is a photo of a Google search for chlorophyll, magnesium, capacitor. The key to understanding how Photosynthesis works is the capacitor of physics, and the magnesium metal atom in chlorophyll forms a capacitor. Do you see that picture of all those balls in a planar sheet? That is a capacitor with the magnesium metal being the ball, and the tail hanging down from the ball are formed-sugars.

Product details
ASIN ‏ : ‎ B084T8NHXP
Publication date ‏ : ‎ February 13, 2020
Language ‏ : ‎ English
File size ‏ : ‎ 1134 KB
Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
Print length ‏ : ‎ 36 pages
Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled

#7-13, 116th published book

Rewrite of all Wave theory of Old Physics // Physics series for High School book 13 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium



#1 New Release in Electromagnetic Theory

For decades I have experimented with generating waves on strings, and never found a sinusoid wave on strings. I could not generate a down pulse, but only up pulses. And so I decided that Waves of Old Physics were fake and needs to be trashcanned. This topic affects not only physics and the hard sciences but also mathematics for they too, still believe in the fakery of sine, cosine and sinusoid waves. What replaces this fakery is the true waves of physics and mathematics, the Periodic Polynomials which are a sequence of parabolas.

Cover Picture: Is my iphone photograph of a set of experiments using a high speed motion camera of waves generated on a coil spring in the High School Physics textbook of PSSC, 1971, page 96.


Product details
File Size: 636 KB
Print Length: 21 pages
Publication Date: April 28, 2020
Sold by: Amazon.com Services LLC
Language: English
ASIN: B087TKZ3T9
Text-to-Speech: Enabled 
X-Ray: 
Not Enabled  

Word Wise: Enabled
Lending: Enabled
Screen Reader: Supported 
Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled 
Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #261,678 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
#17 in Electromagnetic Theory
#36 in Electromagnetism (Kindle Store)
#9 in 30-Minute Science & Math Short Reads

#7-14, 161st published book

PHYSICSOPEDIA -- List of 137 fakes and mistakes of Old Physics// Student teaches professor Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Last revision was 24Apr2022. This is AP's 161st published book of science.

Preface:
A Physicsopedia is a book of the overall assessment and evaluation of the state of the art of Physics. It is like a report card. It is a total view of the science and a judgement of the science, both of the past, present and the direction forward into the future. Its greatest use is to alert readers and people in science of what is wrong with their subject, and as a ancillary use, to alert students what to avoid in college as a waste of time.

It is not in alphabetical order but mostly, rather, has a ordering of what is most important at the start and only at the very very end. For there is no index.

Physics is the most important hard science for every other science is a specialized part of physics. And Old Physics has three key huge mistakes that this book addresses. The true theory of the Universe is the Atom Totality, not the Big Bang which is a ridiculous theory. The true electron of atoms is not the particle of 0.5MeV which turns out to be Dirac's magnetic monopole, while the true real electron of atoms is the muon of 105MeV which is stuck inside a proton torus of 8 rings of 840MeV. This causes another huge mistake, for a mistake in physics usually has a cascade effect of more and more mistakes. When we take the true electron of atoms is the muon, means the Sun and stars shine not from fusion, but from that muon thrusting through the proton torus in a Faraday law of electricity and magnetism producing electrical energy. So our Sun shines from the Faraday law, not fusion. And this implies the Sun has gone into Red Giant phase with a solar radiation increase of 0.005% yearly increase. That implies all life on Earth is in danger of going extinct as the Sun becomes more and more Red Giant, and unless humanity moves out to Europa, humanity goes extinct.


Product details
• ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09N18QPP1
• Publication date ‏ : ‎ December 3, 2021
• Language ‏ : ‎ English
• File size ‏ : ‎ 1139 KB
• Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
• Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Print length ‏ : ‎ 82 pages
• Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled


y  z
|  /
| /
|/______ x

Read my recent posts in peace and quiet.
https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe  
Archimedes Plutonium

AP kindly asks Google to let AP run all three, sci.math, sci.physics, PAU as he runs PAU, now--- all pure science, no spam and no govt b.s.
PAU newsgroup is this.
https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe        
Archimedes Plutonium
Mathin3D
2024-01-19 15:09:04 UTC
Permalink
Not even foe keen Archimedes Plutonium can keep up with the foe keen spammers!

See if you can post garbage more often - give them a run for the money!
Archimedes Plutonium
2024-01-19 21:31:55 UTC
Permalink
Mathin3D blocking and censoring AP's 259th book of science, the only book unpublished due to hatemongering censors of Mathin3D.
Post by Mathin3D
See if you can post
Solving the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict, the fastest-easiest way possible-- VOTING// political science
by Archimedes Plutonium

AP's 259th book of science, unfortunately unpublished as the publication establishment of the world at large keeps blocking this book and the truth and reality of Israel stealing land and committing genocide. Israel sparked 9-11 with its illegal settlement building stealing land and sparked 7Oct2023. Unless Israel is stopped, it has a good chance of sparking Nuclear World War 3 for the only agenda that Israel has is to steal all the land that was Ancient King David's land some 3,000 years ago. And if it means genocide to peoples now living on that land-- Israel does not mind nor care.

Preface: In 2019, there was word filtering down in the news that President Trump had a plan for Israel and Palestinians that would in my opinion make the Palestinians suffer even more of their 56 year occupation by Israel, their squalid living conditions and little hope of a free future. So I set myself to the task of figuring out the very finest and easiest solution to this nightmare of a problem for 4.8 million Palestinians opposed by 9.7 million Israelis that were occupying and oppressing them. The solution I came up with had to be such that it mobilized the Israelis along with the Palestinians in a tandem tied together solution. The solution I came up with was the simple act of Voting, especially voting for a prime minister in Israel. A solution that would end the bloodshed and ongoing violence. Sadly no-one took my recommendations in 2019, but now in October of 2023 with a huge attack upon Israelis by Hamas in Gaza strip, with hostages, and the threat of massive killing of Palestinians, here I am again proposing my solution.

Israelis are used to voting, not so the Arabs or Palestinians are __not used to voting__. But voting is what lifted Black Americans and lifted Native American Indians. And I am sure that voting will lift the Palestinians. For nothing is much worse than the present state of Palestinian peoples, living in poverty, squalor, little hope of a future.

Cover Picture: Is my photograph of a Google search on flags of Palestinians and Israel.

----------------------------------
Table of Contents
----------------------------------

1) My history on this idea of voting to solve Israel-Palestine Conflict.

2) Modern Israel seeks all the lands of Ancient Israel, an Anachronism of modern political-life.

3) Countries seeking their Ancient borderlines turns Earth into a hell-hole.

4) The March 2020 election between Gantz and Netanyahu.

5) Voting mechanism will drive Israel to seek a Two State Solution.

6) Israel has subjugated, oppressed and occupied Palestinians.

7) There are 4.8 million Palestinians and 9.7 Israelis.

8) Hamas, release the hostages safely, for violence does not work; Voting works.

9) Palestinians in their 56 year occupation, the longest occupation in history.

10) The ever increasing Israel settlement building on occupied Palestinian lands.

11) Russia is fast steal of land of Ukraine and genocide; Israel is slow steal of land Palestine and genocide.

12) Imagine a peaceful and happy Israel-Palestine, all because of Voting.


------------
Text
------------



1) My history on this idea of voting to solve Israel-Palestine Conflict.



My plan started in 2019 after hearing of more of the then President Trump enslavement plan of the Palestinians.

My plan picks up momentum by January of 2020.

AP's Peace Plan for Palestine-Israeli Peace Plan (far better than the Trump enslavement plan) // Science Council Ruling Earth rather than frail weak minds of dictators or democracies.


Newsgroups: sci.physics
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2020 22:53:54 -0800 (PST)
Subject: AP's Peace Plan for Palestine-Israel Peace Plan (far better than the Trump enslavement plan) // Science Council Ruling Earth rather than frail weak minds of dictators or democracies
From: Archimedes Plutonium

Alright, I was watching DW news tonight with talk about the Trump-Netanyahu Plan. And that plan is really a confiscation of all the most desirable land, leaving the Palestinians with deserts, no water, and underground tunnels to get around. DW is an excellent news agency, and describing this Trump plan is something you might see in a "science fiction", and I would say, a "science fiction horror movie" not a government plan for a race of people of the Palestinians. I mean, well, Trump treats the Palestinians as if they were what? For I see no glimmer of dignity for the Palestinians.

Trump's plan in summary still leaves a Israeli occupation over Palestinians for they have no Airspace and their borders sealed. So, what is in it for the Palestinians-- nothing, but enslavement. And underground tunnels to get around in? And the stealing of all the land that is worthy.

So, I like to offer AP's Peace Plan. A plan that gives "Dignity to a race of people, whose dignity has been denied and stripped of them, with decades of occupation and settlement incursions on their land".

I propose that in the upcoming election between Benny Gantz and BB Netanyahu, coming up I believe in March, very soon indeed.

That the entire Palestinian Peoples all rise up and vote on that very same day. Vote for either Gantz or Netanyahu. Vote on papers, so the Palestinian government or Authorities can collect all the ballots and if need be, deposit them in the International Courts.

So, if all the Palestinians vote for Gantz, and he would win with that vote. But the Israeli Netanyahu government not recognize the Palestinian vote and run off and say that BB won, for he only won by suppression of the Occupied Palestinians.

And here is where Abbas and the Palestinian Authority take all those paper votes and introduce them to the International Courts as evidence. Evidence of a occupied people, stripped of rights and dignity, with no land to call home.

Perhaps there is a law in International Laws that would dictate the Israeli's acknowledge the Palestinian votes of March 2020, and that Israel must accept those votes along with Israel's own votes. For there probably is something in International Laws, some precedent that forces Israel to accept the Palestinian votes on March 2020.

Saying that because the Palestinians are an Occupied and put in slavery by Israel, that the Palestinians have no land for which the Occupiers of Israel deny them of human dignity and rights of votes.

As long as Palestine is Occupied with no land, their rights of governance is denied them by Israel.

So, on the very same day that Israel votes for either Gantz or Netanyahu, have elections in Palestine on paper ballots voting for either Gantz or Netanyahu.

End this mockery of occupation, land stealing, and enslavement of a peoples.

The USA seems to have not wanted to be a "fair broker" especially since Trump gained office.

End the mockery, and let the International Courts settle this Palestine-Israel Conflict. USA seems unable to ever be a "fair broker", so let the International Court be the broker. And start that brokerage with the Israel March election.

Have the Palestinians all vote in that same election in their occupied territories, vote either for Gantz or Netanyahu. And if Israel does not count your votes, then haul all the paper ballots to the International Court, and let them decide, who the next Prime Minister of Israel is on March 2020.

The alternative then, is, Israel gives Palestinians all the West Bank and Gaza and removes the settlements, or, Palestine peoples will vote in every Israel election hence, forward.
--- end quoting from my 259th book ---


Very crude dot picture of 5f6 magnetosphere of 231Pu Atom Totality.

A torus shape doing the Faraday Law inside of each and every atom. The Cosmos of Astronomy looks like this.
             ____
       .-'               `-.      
   .'     ::\ ::|:: /::   `.
 /        ::\::|::/::        \               
;             _ _             ;
|      ___( O )___      |     
;               - -             ;
 \         ::/::|::\::         /      
   `.     ::/ ::|:: \::      .'             
      `-    _____   .-'
     
One of those dots in the magnetosphere is the Milky Way galaxy. And
each dot represents another galaxy. The O is the Cosmic nucleus and
certainly not as dense as what Old Physics thought because in New Physics
the interior of atoms has the Faraday law with the donut hole occupied by neutrons as storage capacitors.

I re-opened the old newsgroup PAU of 1990s and there one can read my recent posts without the hassle of spammers, govt-police drag net spam,off-topic-misfits, front-page-hogs, stalking mockers, suppression-bullies, and demonizers.  

Read my recent posts in peace and quiet. If you, the reader, is wondering why AP posts this to a thread which is off topic in sci.math or sci.physics, is because some stalkers track AP, such as kibo, dan, jan who have been paid to stalk for 3 decades and when they see AP trying to post to his own thread that is on-topic they throw a impossible reCAPTcha suppression and repression at me that only wastes my time. From what AP can make out-- Google is not the only one using reCAPTcha, apparently the US govt rents out reCAPTcha. So if you see a AP post in a thread off topic, is because kooks of reCAPTcha are making it impossible for AP to post to the on-topic thread.

ReCAPTcha is used by the govt to censor out posters they dislike. Of course the govt disguises this as robot checking. And the reason sci.math and sci.physics are destroyed newsgroups is the predominance of govt posters who are engaged in drag-net or spying or international spy information, or coercion, and thus, give a-hell-that these are science newsgroups. Few scientists will ever tolerate govt spam activities when it should be about science. And Google as a company has to do what the govt. tells them to do, that is why Google abuse reporting never worked, because the abusers are far and away govt tin badge bureaucrats enjoying their destruction of sci.math and sci.physics. Everytime AP posts one of his books in sci.math or sci.physics, some tin-pot tin badge bureaucrat like kibo parry or mathin3d flood the same newsgroup with 10 posts of spam such as gacor slots in Asia or Ebook spam, just to put AP's recent post on another page-- out of sight.

Read all of AP's post in peace and quiet in his newsgroup-- what sci.physics and sci.math should look like when govt spammers are not allowed in a newsgroup to wreck the newsgroup. Govt spammers have their agenda of drag net spam, and then their agenda of spy message codes, such as the "i sick, i cry" baloney, which only ends up ruining the newsgroups and why Google decided to close shop having fought govt bureaucrat mind sets for 30 years, and time to close shop.

AP kindly asks Google to let AP run all three, sci.math, sci.physics, PAU as he runs PAU, now--- all pure science, no spam and no govt b.s.

PAU newsgroup is this.
https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe        
Archimedes Plutonium
Archimedes Plutonium
2024-01-20 01:12:07 UTC
Permalink
My 5th published book

Suspend all College Classes in Logic, until they Fix their Errors // Teaching True Logic series, book 1
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) (Amazon's Kindle)

Last revision was 29Mar2021. This is AP's 5th published book of science.
Preface:
First comes Logic-- think straight and clear which many logic and math professors are deaf dumb and blind to, and simply refuse to recognize and fix their errors.

The single biggest error of Old Logic of Boole and Jevons was their "AND" and "OR" connectors. They got them mixed up and turned around. For their logic ends up being that of 3 OR 2 = 5 with 3 AND 2 = either 3 or 2 but never 5, when even the local village idiot knows that 3 AND 2 = 5 (addition) with 3 OR 2 = either 3 or 2 (subtraction). The AND connector in Logic stems from the idea, the mechanism involved, that given a series of statements, if just one of those many statements has a true truth value, then the entire string of statements is overall true, and thus AND truth table is truly TTTF and never TFFF. And secondly, their error of the If->Then conditional. I need to make it clear enough to the reader why the true Truth Table of IF --> Then requires a U for unknown or uncertain with a probability outcome for F --> T = U and F --> F = U. Some smart readers would know that the reason for the U is because without the U, Logic has no means of division by 0 which is undefined in mathematics. You cannot have a Logic that is less than mathematics. A logic that is impoverished and cannot do a "undefined for division by 0 in mathematics". The true logic must be able to have the fact that division by 0 is undefined. True logic is larger than all of mathematics, and must be able to fetch any piece of mathematics from out of Logic itself. So another word for U is undefined. And this is the crux of why Reductio ad Absurdum cannot be a proof method of mathematics, for a starting falsehood in a mathematics proof can only lead to a probability end conclusion.

My corrections of Old Logic have a history that dates before 1993, sometime around 1991, I realized the Euclid proof of infinitude of primes was illogical, sadly sadly wrong, in that the newly formed number by "multiply the lot and add 1" was necessarily a new prime in the indirect proof method. So that my history of fixing Old Logic starts in 1991, but comes to a synthesis of correcting all four of the connectors of Equal/not, And, Or, If->Then, by 2015.

Cover picture: some may complain my covers are less in quality, but I have a good reason for those covers-- I would like covers of math or logic to show the teacher's own handwriting as if he were back in the classroom writing on the blackboard or an overhead projector.

Product details
File Size: 773 KB
Print Length: 72 pages
Publication Date: March 12, 2019
Sold by: Amazon Digital Services LLC
Language: English
ASIN: B07PMB69F5
Text-to-Speech: Enabled 
X-Ray: 
Not Enabled 
Word Wise: Not Enabled
Lending: Enabled
Screen Reader: Supported 
Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled 


#10-2, My 27th published book.

Correcting Reductio Ad Absurdum// Teaching True Logic series, book 2 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)


Last revision was 9NOV2020. This is AP's 27th published book.

Preface:
These are the TRUE Truth Tables of the 4 connectors of Logic

Equal+Not                    
T = T  =  T                      
T = ~F = T                      
F = ~T = T
F = F   = T   

If--> then                  
T --> T  = T
T --> F  = F
F --> T  = U  (unknown or uncertain)           
F --> F  = U  (unknown or uncertain)

And
T  &  T = T                       
T  &  F = T                      
F  &  T = T                      
F  &  F = F                      


Or
T  or  T  = F
T  or  F  = T
F  or  T  = T
F  or  F  = F

Those can be analyzed as being Equal+Not is multiplication. If-->then is division. And is addition and Or is subtraction in mathematics. Now I need to emphasis this error of Old Logic, the If->Then conditional. I need to make it clear enough to the reader why the true Truth Table of IF --> Then requires a U for unknown or uncertain with a probability outcome for F --> T = U and F --> F = U. Some smart readers would know that the reason for the U is because without the U, Logic has no means of division by 0 which is undefined in mathematics. You cannot have a Logic that is less than mathematics. A logic that is impoverished and cannot do a "undefined for division by 0 in mathematics". The true logic must be able to have the fact that division by 0 is undefined. True logic is larger than all of mathematics, and must be able to fetch any piece of mathematics from out of Logic itself. So another word for U is undefined. And this is the crux of why Reductio ad Absurdum cannot be a proof method of mathematics, for a starting falsehood in a mathematics proof can only lead to a probability unknown, undefined end conclusion.

Now in Old Logic they had for Reductio Ad Absurdum as displayed by this schematic:

|    | ~p
|    |---
|    | .
|    | .
|    | q
|    | .
|    | .
|    | ~q
| p

Which is fine except for the error of not indicating the end conclusion of "p" is only a probability of being true, not guaranteed as true. And this is the huge huge error that mathematicians have fallen victim of. For the Reductio Ad Absurdum is not a proof method for mathematics, it is probability of being true or false. Math works on guaranteed truth, not probability. This textbook is written to fix that error.


Product details
• ASIN : B07Q18GQ7S
• Publication date : March 23, 2019
• Language : English
• File size : 1178 KB
• Text-to-Speech : Enabled
• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Word Wise : Not Enabled
• Print length : 86 pages
• Lending : Enabled
• Best Sellers Rank: #346,875 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
◦ #28 in Logic (Kindle Store)
◦ #95 in Two-Hour Science & Math Short Reads
◦ #217 in Mathematical Logic



#10-3, 143rd published book

DeMorgan's Laws are fantasies, not laws// Teaching True Logic series, book 3 Kindle Edition
By Archimedes Plutonium

Last revision was 30Apr2021. This is AP's 143rd published book.

Preface: The Logic community never had the correct truth table of the primitive 4 connectors of Logic, (1) Equal compounded with NOT, (2) AND, (3) OR, (4) IF->THEN. In 1800s, the founders of Logic messed up in terrible error all 4 of the primitive logic connectors. And since the 1990s, AP has wanted an explanation of why Old Logic got all 4 connectors in total error? What was the reason for the mess up? And in the past few years, I finally pinned the reason to starting Logic with DeMorgan's fake laws, from which Boole, a close friend of DeMorgan, was going to keep his friendship and accept the DeMorgan Laws. That meant that DeMorgan, Boole, Jevons accepted OR as being that of Either..Or..Or..Both, what is called the inclusive OR. But the inclusive OR is a contradiction in terms, for there never can exist a combo of OR with AND simultaneously. This book goes into detail why the DeMorgan laws are fake and fantasy.

Cover Picture: Looks a bit rough, but I want students and readers to see my own handwriting as if this were a lecture and the cover picture a blackboard where I write out DeMorgan's two (fake) laws of logic.

Product details
• ASIN ‏ : ‎ B08M4BY4XM
• Publication date ‏ : ‎ October 27, 2020
• Language ‏ : ‎ English
• File size ‏ : ‎ 620 KB
• Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
• Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Sticky notes ‏ : ‎ On Kindle Scribe
• Print length ‏ : ‎ 39 pages
• Best Sellers Rank: #3,508,308 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
◦ #757 in One-Hour Science & Math Short Reads
◦ #1,816 in Logic & Language Philosophy
◦ #5,961 in Philosophy of Logic & Language


#10-4, 100th published book

Pragmatism, the only Philosophy I loved // Teaching True Logic series, book 4 Kindle Edition
By Archimedes Plutonium

I need to give credit to the philosophy of Pragmatism, the only philosophy that I know of that is based on science. Credit for my discovery of the Plutonium Atom Totality in 1990, came in part, partially due to a passage of the Pragmatist Charles Sanders Peirce in Peirce's Cosmology:

 Peirce's The Architecture of Theories...
         ...would be a Cosmogonic Philosophy. It would suppose that in the beginning - infinitely remote - there was a chaos of unpersonalized feeling, which being without connection or regularity would properly be without existence. This feeling, sporting here and there in pure arbitrariness, would have
started the germ of a generalizing tendency. Its other sportings would be evanescent, but this would have a growing virtue. Thus, the tendency to habit would be started; and from this, with the other principles of evolution, all the regularities of the universe would be evolved. At any time, however, an element of pure chance survives and will remain until the world becomes an absolutely perfect, rational, and symmetrical system, in which mind is at last crystallized in the infinitely distant future.
--- end quoting Peirce's Cosmology ---

But also I must give credit to Pragmatism for making it a philosophy one can actually live their lives by, for living a life of pragmatic solutions to everyday problems that occur in my life. A case in point example is now in March 2020, being the pragmatist that I am, and enduring the 2020 corona virus pandemic. No other philosophy that I know of is so keenly in tune with a person, the surrounding environment and how to live.


Product details
• File size : 807 KB
• Word Wise : Enabled
• Print length : 123 pages
• Publication date : March 14, 2020
• ASIN : B085X863QW
• Language: : English
• Text-to-Speech : Enabled
• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Lending : Enabled
• Best Sellers Rank: #4,160,707 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
◦ #61,471 in Philosophy (Kindle Store)
◦ #193,599 in Science & Math (Kindle Store)
◦ #240,849 in Philosophy (Books)


#10-6, 172nd published book

Occam's Razor Extended to be a part of Physics and Math// Logic science
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) Kindle Edition


Preface: Logic needs to have Occam's Razor fully incorporated into logic itself, and to amplify and extend Occam's Razor to be a actual part of Physics science. This book clarifies what Occam's Razor is, and where it is found in physics. AP uses Occam's Razor many times in his research. In a very real sense of common languages and philosophy and Logic, that Occam's Razor is to language what angular momentum is to physics.
Cover Picture: My iphone photograph of New Scientist, Dec18-31, 2021 of the article "Razor sharp" explaining what Occam's Razor is.


Product details
• ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09SDMZ4XH
• Publication date ‏ : ‎ February 11, 2022
• Language ‏ : ‎ English
• File size ‏ : ‎ 918 KB
• Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
• Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Print length ‏ : ‎ 20 pages
• Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Best Sellers Rank: #3,978,181 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
◦ #631 in 30-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
◦ #2,411 in Logic & Language Philosophy
◦ #7,964 in Philosophy of Logic & Language


#10-7, 169th published book

Mathematics Consistency// Logic science Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Preface: I decided to place this book that talks all about mathematics into my logic section of books because Old Math was dumb and stupid about logic, where math professors for the most part never studied formal logic. They were arrogant to think they needed no training in logic. And it shows quite spectacularly in the mistakes made in Old Math, quite laughable even with their idea that the slant cut in single cone was a ellipse, yet a single cone has but one axis of symmetry, meaning by logic, it is impossible for the slant cut in single cone to be an ellipse, rather instead, it is a oval. This is just one example of where math professors are stupid in logic and then arrive at mistaken ideas. And in all my math education in college, not once did I hear a lecture on the logic of the mathematics studied. And the proofs of Old Math, not once did I see mathematicians arrange their proofs in a logical format, just off the cuff spiel of what they thought should be a proof.

It is even hard to tell if math professors know what Consistency means and how it is tested. For most have never taken formal logic, most have never read up on Logic. Is it arrogance? Is it stupidity? Probably a mix of the two.

So this book is a detailed attempt to teach the mathematics community what is Consistency and a look at the Consistency of Mathematics itself. This is AP's 169th published book of science and I deal with 4 major tests of Mathematics consistency (1) geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus (2) polynomials as only valid functions (3) Oresme mess-up of Harmonic series (4) mess-up of dimensions.

Cover Picture: Sometimes a picture is so important that it needs to be the cover picture of several books. This cover picture is another iphone photograph of my handwritten proof of the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, where the rectangle under the graph function is the integral and the hypotenuse of right-triangle when lifted up from its hinge forms the derivative. The Calculus geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus is the topmost important test of Consistency of all of Mathematics.

Product details
• ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09RHSJRKY
• Publication date ‏ : ‎ January 29, 2022
• Language ‏ : ‎ English
• File size ‏ : ‎ 964 KB
• Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
• Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Print length ‏ : ‎ 63 pages
• Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled



#10-8, 188th published book

Practice in converting statements of Language into formulas and equations of science, math and logic// Logic science

by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) Kindle Edition


Preface:
My 188th book of science// Practice in turning statements of language into formulas and equations of math and logic.

This book is a potpourri of topics all under one umbrella of a Language translated into a math, logic or physics formula or equation. This is about the conversion of language to formulas or equations. An exercise we did in High School algebra where we read sentences of language and had to convert to math formulas or equations. Not an easy task but valuable for a clear logical mind. I would not see such homework until I took Logic in College, 2 years of logic and translating or converting sentences of language into formulas or equations of logic.

Cover Picture: After assembling the topics of discussion I wondered what particular topic was the stand out topic. And I finally decided the Gigantic Dragonflies of Devonian with its math table, which is the perfect best example to teach when teaching parametric equations in 1st year college. So I took a iphone photograph of my Dragonfly table of my 104th book of science (picture inset of my cover to that book). This is my 188th book of science.

Product details
• ASIN ‏ : ‎ B0B2FF45ZH
• Publication date ‏ : ‎ May 25, 2022
• Language ‏ : ‎ English
• File size ‏ : ‎ 390 KB
• Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
• Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Print length ‏ : ‎ 103 pages
• Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled



#10-9, 160th published book

MATHOPEDIA-- List of 82 fakes and mistakes of Old Math// mathematics & logic
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) Kindle Edition

Preface:
A Mathopedia is like a special type of encyclopedia on the subject of mathematics. It is about the assessment of the worth of mathematics and the subject material of mathematics. It is a overall examination and a evaluation of mathematics and its topics.

The ordering of Mathopedia is not a alphabetic ordering, nor does it have a index. The ordering is purely that of importance at beginning and importance at end.

The greatest use of Mathopedia is a guide to students of what not to waste your time on and what to focus most of your time. I know so many college classes in mathematics are just a total waste of time, waste of valuable time for the class is math fakery. I know because I have been there.

Now I am going to cite various reference sources of AP books if anyone wants more details and can be seen in the Appendix at the end of the book.

I suppose, going forward, mathematics should always have a mathopedia, where major parts of mathematics as a science are held under scrutiny and question as to correctness. In past history we have called these incidents as "doubters of the mainstream". Yet math, like physics, can have no permanent mainstream, since there is always question of correctness in physics, there then corresponds questions of correctness in mathematics (because math is a subset of physics). What I mean is that each future generation corrects some mistakes of past mathematics. If anyone is unsure of what I am saying here, both math and physics need constant correcting, of that which never belonged in science. This then converges with the logic-philosophy of Pragmatism (see AP's book of logic on Pragmatism).

Product details
• ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09MZTLRL5 and ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09ZWFLKHC
• Publication date ‏ : ‎ December 2, 2021
• Language ‏ : ‎ English
• File size ‏ : ‎ 1155 KB
• Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
• Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Print length ‏ : ‎ 70 pages
• Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled


#10-10, 199th published book

The Pattern most-often found in the Counterintuitive Paradox-Riddle // Logic
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) (format Amazon-Kindle edition)

Preface: There is a pattern to most paradoxes, an underlying pattern that makes the riddle counterintuitive. This book examines several paradoxes-- Monty Hall problem, Hotel problem, Special Relativity of Physics and why a fast speedy traveler ages slower. I also go into biology paradoxes and see that the pattern is there also. So this book examines various counterintuitive riddles, paradoxes and pinpoints the reason they are so counterintuitive, thereby, making them easier to understand.

Cover Picture: Is my iphone photo of a Google search on the Monty Hall problem.

Product details
• ASIN ‏ : ‎ B0B9QL6WXQ
• Publication date ‏ : ‎ August 14, 2022
• Language ‏ : ‎ English
• File size ‏ : ‎ 421 KB
• Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
• Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Print length ‏ : ‎ 31 pages
• Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled



#10-11, 231st published book

All Things are made up of Atoms. The Universe is a Thing. Therefore the Universe is one single Atom of 231Plutonium // Logic

by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) (Amazon's Kindle)

Last revision was May 2023. And this is AP's 231st published book of science.

Preface: The last time I worked on this idea was 2017, when I wrote it in my 8th edition of Atom Totality. And when I wrote it there, I was wanting to switch out the term "things" for a more scientific term such as "matter". For I was not comfortable with All things are made up of Atoms-- The Universe is a thing, therefore the Universe is an Atom. The upshot of switching "things" for "matter" made it better, but never eased my discomfort. I still felt there was room for improvement in the syllogism. Here on, 6 years later, I have finally found what makes me totally comfortable about the syllogism I have in 2023. It is not the switching of terms, but rather the inclusion of both quantifiers into the syllogism. Inclusion of the "Every or All" Universal quantifier along with the Existential quantifier that solves the logic. It ends up with "All Existence..." And the case can be made in life in general-- if stumped by a problem, best lay it aside and let the mind in subconscious find the best answer. I know in projects around the house, if I jump into them immediately I often have to "undo" that work. But if I rest and sleep on the problem for 3 weeks, I find the best way to tackle the work. In this case, I rested on the problem for 6 years, and now reaping the rewards.

When you combine All Existence.... or Everything that Exists.... combine that with All Matter is only one single atom of 1 of 118 possible chemical elements, then you end up with the Universe itself is one single atom of 1 of 118 single possible chemical elements. Plutonium atom fits all the special numbers of physics and math.

This book is about the Logic form of the Atomic Theory as a syllogism. And I dare say, my book would be a nice companion book to Titus Lucretius, poet and scientist with his magnificent De Rerum Natura poem on the Atomic Theory. If not for Lucretius, much of our history knowledge of the Ancient Greek Atomic Theory would have been lost and unknown.

A Logic Syllogism can be seen to some extent as verses of a poem, Titus Lucretius lovely poem to the Atomic Theory. And for which AP believes the calendar of the world was set as year 0000 as Lucretius writes the poem in year 0000, and now we are 2,023 years later from the poem on Atomic Theory.

Cover Picture: The cover picture is my iphone photograph of a old book of 1931, so old that the pages have "yellowed". It is the only book in which I have proof that the idea the entire Universe is one big atom, is stated. It is by a chemist who has excellent writing skills and writes of the history of the Atomic Theory. I took the photograph of page 4-- A SHORT HISTORY OF ATOMISM 
 by J. Gregory, Univ. Leeds, 1931, page 4-- and capturing the passage where Gregory talks of the Democritean Atom the size of the entire Universe. The only difference really between Democritus Atomic Theory in Ancient Greek times almost 3,000 years ago, and AP in 2023, is that if Democritus knew the chemical table of elements, he would be looking for what element is the Atom Totality.



Product details
• ASIN ‏ : ‎ B0BY778BJK
• Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 11, 2023
• Language ‏ : ‎ English
• File size ‏ : ‎ 944 KB
• Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
• Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Sticky notes ‏ : ‎ On Kindle Scribe
• Print length ‏ : ‎ 44 pages


y  z
|  /
| /
|/______ x

Read my recent posts in peace and quiet.
https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe  
Archimedes Plutonium

More people reading and viewing AP's newsgroup than viewing sci.math, sci.physics. So AP has decided to put all NEW WORK, to his newsgroup. And there is little wonder because in AP's newsgroups, there is only solid pure science going on, not a gang of hate spewing misfits blighting the skies.


AP kindly asks Google to let AP run all three, sci.math, sci.physics, PAU as he runs PAU, now--- all pure science, no spam and no govt b.s.

PAU newsgroup is this.
https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe        
Archimedes Plutonium

Loading...