Discussion:
There is no way to cross the bridge to infinity
(too old to reply)
Mitch Raemsch
2020-02-22 02:46:23 UTC
Permalink
The mathematician's would count without end...
and God would not need to.
g***@gmail.com
2020-02-22 02:59:30 UTC
Permalink
Post by Mitch Raemsch
The mathematician's would count without end...
and God would not need to.
and yet

|N| = oo

needs an answer
Mitch Raemsch
2020-02-22 03:20:43 UTC
Permalink
Post by g***@gmail.com
Post by Mitch Raemsch
The mathematician's would count without end...
and God would not need to.
and yet
|N| = oo
needs an answer
Does N stand for NUT?
g***@gmail.com
2020-02-22 04:26:56 UTC
Permalink
Post by Mitch Raemsch
Post by g***@gmail.com
Post by Mitch Raemsch
The mathematician's would count without end...
and God would not need to.
and yet
|N| = oo
needs an answer
Does N stand for NUT?
fine! we'll call it

|N| = -->oo
Zelos Malum
2020-02-24 06:39:42 UTC
Permalink
Post by Mitch Raemsch
Post by g***@gmail.com
Post by Mitch Raemsch
The mathematician's would count without end...
and God would not need to.
and yet
|N| = oo
needs an answer
Does N stand for NUT?
stands for natural numbers you fuckign retard
Sergio
2020-02-22 04:29:43 UTC
Permalink
Post by Mitch Raemsch
The mathematician's would count without end...
and God would not need to.
but the bridge is infinitely small...

it got stuck on my shoe, i think...
Mitch Raemsch
2020-02-22 04:33:31 UTC
Permalink
Post by Sergio
Post by Mitch Raemsch
The mathematician's would count without end...
and God would not need to.
but the bridge is infinitely small...
No. It would be an infinity made of the infinitely small.
djoyce099
2020-02-22 06:04:20 UTC
Permalink
Post by Mitch Raemsch
The mathematician's would count without end...
and God would not need to.
Why is this subject of infinity so difficult to comprehend where --->00
means infinity whether it is large or small can never be attained but
only approached. An unreachable concept whether it be in math or physical
distance large or small.
Just my take as a layman.

Dan
Ross A. Finlayson
2020-02-23 02:45:18 UTC
Permalink
Post by djoyce099
Post by Mitch Raemsch
The mathematician's would count without end...
and God would not need to.
Why is this subject of infinity so difficult to comprehend where --->00
means infinity whether it is large or small can never be attained but
only approached. An unreachable concept whether it be in math or physical
distance large or small.
Just my take as a layman.
Dan
Maybe a point of David Hilbert's calling Cantor's
trans-finite cardinals a paradise is that the
uncountable gave the "relatively infinite" to
the unbounded, thus that from the unbounded and
uncountability there's a simple proof of the infinite.

Of course many have there are as direct results
about infinity as simply defining an arbitrarily
large constant and relating rates in the bounded.
Mitch Raemsch
2020-02-23 04:21:09 UTC
Permalink
Post by Ross A. Finlayson
Post by djoyce099
Post by Mitch Raemsch
The mathematician's would count without end...
and God would not need to.
Why is this subject of infinity so difficult to comprehend where --->00
means infinity whether it is large or small can never be attained but
only approached. An unreachable concept whether it be in math or physical
distance large or small.
Just my take as a layman.
Dan
Maybe a point of David Hilbert's calling Cantor's
trans-finite cardinals a paradise is that the
uncountable gave the "relatively infinite" to
the unbounded, thus that from the unbounded and
uncountability there's a simple proof of the infinite.
Of course many have there are as direct results
about infinity as simply defining an arbitrarily
large constant and relating rates in the bounded.
There is no way to accelerate to the speed of light
as Gamma math sets the speed limit... but light can
start at light speed always...

Mitchell Raemsch
Ross A. Finlayson
2020-02-23 13:11:23 UTC
Permalink
Post by Mitch Raemsch
Post by Ross A. Finlayson
Post by djoyce099
Post by Mitch Raemsch
The mathematician's would count without end...
and God would not need to.
Why is this subject of infinity so difficult to comprehend where --->00
means infinity whether it is large or small can never be attained but
only approached. An unreachable concept whether it be in math or physical
distance large or small.
Just my take as a layman.
Dan
Maybe a point of David Hilbert's calling Cantor's
trans-finite cardinals a paradise is that the
uncountable gave the "relatively infinite" to
the unbounded, thus that from the unbounded and
uncountability there's a simple proof of the infinite.
Of course many have there are as direct results
about infinity as simply defining an arbitrarily
large constant and relating rates in the bounded.
There is no way to accelerate to the speed of light
as Gamma math sets the speed limit... but light can
start at light speed always...
Mitchell Raemsch
In the Newtonian, gravity's speed is: "infinite".

I.e., it's also in the Relativity's space-time
that the geodesy is always current, any "curve"
of the space-time is from instant to instant also
instantaneously evaluated everywhere, from moment
to moment, "flat", but, "curving".

In a sense then light is always "slowing" or "braking"
to light speed (in a vacuum in deep space).
Ross Finlayson
2024-07-28 15:56:47 UTC
Permalink
Post by Ross A. Finlayson
Post by djoyce099
Post by Mitch Raemsch
The mathematician's would count without end...
and God would not need to.
Why is this subject of infinity so difficult to comprehend where --->00
means infinity whether it is large or small can never be attained but
only approached. An unreachable concept whether it be in math or physical
distance large or small.
Just my take as a layman.
Dan
Maybe a point of David Hilbert's calling Cantor's
trans-finite cardinals a paradise is that the
uncountable gave the "relatively infinite" to
the unbounded, thus that from the unbounded and
uncountability there's a simple proof of the infinite.
Of course many have there are as direct results
about infinity as simply defining an arbitrarily
large constant and relating rates in the bounded.
Ross Finlayson
2025-01-01 18:07:49 UTC
Permalink
Post by Ross A. Finlayson
Post by djoyce099
Post by Mitch Raemsch
The mathematician's would count without end...
and God would not need to.
Why is this subject of infinity so difficult to comprehend where --->00
means infinity whether it is large or small can never be attained but
only approached. An unreachable concept whether it be in math or physical
distance large or small.
Just my take as a layman.
Dan
Maybe a point of David Hilbert's calling Cantor's
trans-finite cardinals a paradise is that the
uncountable gave the "relatively infinite" to
the unbounded, thus that from the unbounded and
uncountability there's a simple proof of the infinite.
Of course many have there are as direct results
about infinity as simply defining an arbitrarily
large constant and relating rates in the bounded.
Continue reading on narkive:
Loading...