Psychological analysis of why physicists and chemists cannot finish their experiments -- Water Electrolysis --- Caltech Dr. Goodstein H4O and Harvard Dr. Hau slow light experiment.

[Archimedes Plutonium]

The psychology problem is scientists are so jeolose of AP's acumen, that they refuse to complete their experiment, for their jeolosy wants to deny AP his victory in science, that water is really H4O and not H2O. And Harvard's Dr.Hau would rather deny the AP victory that Light Waves are closed loop circuits, so when Dr. Hau turns out the light source in slow light experiments, all the light goes out--even the slow light simultaneously and proving AP's claim-- light is not a straightline arrow with head and tail, but a closed loop circuit, a pencil ellipse, with source in the circuit.

Psychological analysis of why physicists and chemists cannot finish their experiments -- Water Electrolysis --- Caltech Dr. Goodstein H4O and Harvard Dr. Hau slow light experiment.

Can
Dr.David Goodstein,Dr.Thomas Phillips,
Dr.John Schwarz, Dr.Barry Simon, Dr.Kip Thorne, Dr.Petr Vogel,
Dr.Rochus Vogt, Dr.Ward Whaling, Dr.Michael E. Brown, Dr.Felix Boehm, Dr.Steven Frautschi, can they ever, ever simply weigh the mass of hydrogen and oxygen in water electrolysis, instead of looking at volume, or remain as Earle Jones wrote recently-- rectums of physics???

Dr.Konstantin Batygin, Dr.Frances Arnold (chem), Dr.Barry Barish, Dr.Rudolph Marcus (chem), Dr.Hugh Politzer
the hydrogen and oxygen in Water Electrolysis, for it is unusual that Caltech physics is so shoddy in logical thought as to think of stopping Water Electrolysis by observation of Volume and not weighing the masses.

Volney (CIA) selling CalTech because they cannot do Water Electrolysis properly-- forgetting to actually weigh the mass of hydrogen compared to oxygen, and stop at observing volume. Caltech science is so shoddy of logical reasoning.

Volney Physics failures..CalTech_Dr.David Goodstein,Dr.Frances Arnold (chem), Dr.Barry Barish, Dr.Rudolph Marcus (chem), Dr.Hugh Politzer NSF Dr.Panchanathan,Alejandro Adem, Purdue Univ_France Cordova,

Physics failures..Rensselaer,Dr.Esther A. Wertz,Dr.Heidi Jo Newberg,Dr.Glenn Ciolek,Dr.Charles Martin,Dr.Joseph Darryl Michael,NSF Dr.Panchanathan,Alejandro Adem,Purdue Univ_France Cordova,..

Why Volney?? Because they are so sloppy and slipshod in Physics experiment of Water Electrolysis, stopping and ceasing the experiment before weighing the mass of the hydrogen compared to mass of oxygen. Is it that they are stupid silly thinking volume and mass are the same. For AP needs to prove decisively, if Water is really H4O or H2O. And of course, this experiment would destroy the Standard Model-- that post-diction theory of physics that never gave a single prediction in all of its tenure.

And they even know that a weighing balance of Quartz Crystal MicroBalance has been around since the 1960s, what are they waiting for???

Or is it because they cannot admit the truth of math geometry that slant cut of cone is oval, not ellipse for you need the symmetry of slant cut of cylinder to yield a ellipse.


Re: 2-Looking for a concordance of Dr. Richard Feynmann talking about AP-- on suffering of fools
by Volney 3:57 PM, 17Oct2023


This is Volney-Kibo Parry Moroney spam (CIA connected drag net spam b.s.), and no matter how much you report it to Google Abuse-- they cannot kick the miscreant out-- I suggest reporting this spam to your Congress-person. Not only do they stalk you for 30 years but destroy the newsgroup they pollute. Just look at sci.chem which is a destroyed newsgroup. The Google Abuse report only hides the miscreant, but the next day-- new fresh b.s.spam is there.

Kibo Parry Moron-Volney blowing his cover with the CIA in 1997
Re: Archimedes Vanadium, America's most beloved poster
Re: Dan is the Kibo Parry Moroney Volney CIA equivalent for Canada-- using Usenet but destroying newsgroups of science in the process


Volney
3
Dan Christensen using TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS at Univ Western Ontario instead of the fake Old Math calculus with its thousands of rules and memorization of trig functions. New Math has 1 rule-- Power Rule
9:03 PM


,
Volney
3
WM using AP's TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS to teach 13-14 year olds CALCULUS, those heading for Gottingen & Uni Berlin for AP reduced Calculus to its most simple form-- add or subtract 1 from exponent.
9:01 PM


182b-Volney uses TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS to teach 13-14 year olds CALCULUS, those heading for Berkeley,Caltech, Stanford, for AP reduced Calculus to its most simple form-- add or subtract 1 from exponent.
8:52 PM


,
Volney
2
Volney uses TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS to teach 13-14 year olds CALCULUS, those heading for Berkeley,Caltech, Stanford, for AP reduced Calculus to its most simple form-- add or subtract 1 from exponent.
8:45 PM

Dan Christensen's profile photo
Dan Christensen
, …
Volney
14
unread,
Re: Dr.Terence Tao along with Dr. Gene D.Block fired from UCLA for teaching propaganda -- truth is slant cut of cone is Oval, never the ellipse, yet UCLA continues their propaganda of ellipse as slant cut.
8:43 PM



Caltech Physics Dept

Felix Boehm, Steven Frautschi
Murray Gell-Mann, David Goodstein, Thomas Phillips,
John Schwarz, Barry Simon, Kip Thorne, Petr Vogel,
Rochus Vogt, Ward Whaling, Michael E. Brown,
Konstantin Batygin, Dr.Frances Arnold (chem), Dr.Barry Barish, Dr.Rudolph Marcus (chem), Dr.Hugh Politzer

Apparently Kibo realized he was a science failure when he could not even do a proper percentage. But then one has to wonder how much he paid to bribe Rensselaer to graduate from the school in engineering unable to do a percentage properly???? For I certainly would not hire a engineer who cannot even do proper percentage.

Silly boy, that's off by more than 12.6 MeV, or 12% of the mass of a muon.
Hardly "exactly" 9 muons.
Or, 938.2720813/105.6583745 = 8.88024338572. A proton is about the mass
of 8.88 muons, not 9. About 12% short.

Why Volney?? Because they stop short of completing the Water Electrolysis Experiment by only looking at volume, when they are meant to weigh the mass of hydrogen versus oxygen?? Such shoddy minds in experimental physics and chemistry.

Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Physics dept Dr.Martin Schmidt (ee), Dr.Ivar Giaever
Vincent Meunier, Ethan Brown, Glenn Ciolek, Julian S. Georg, Joel T. Giedt, Yong Sung Kim, Gyorgy Korniss, Toh-Ming Lu, Charles Martin, Joseph Darryl Michael, Heidi Jo Newberg, Moussa N'Gom, Peter Persans, John Schroeder, Michael Shur, Shawn-Yu Lin, Humberto Terrones, Gwo Ching Wang, Morris A Washington, Esther A. Wertz, Christian M. Wetzel, Ingrid Wilke, Shengbai Zhang

Rensselaer math department
Donald Schwendeman, Jeffrey Banks, Kristin Bennett, Mohamed Boudjelkha, Joseph Ecker, William Henshaw, Isom Herron, Mark H Holmes, David Isaacson, Elizabeth Kam, Ashwani Kapila, Maya Kiehl, Gregor Kovacic, Peter Kramer, Gina Kucinski, Rongjie Lai, Fengyan Li, Chjan Lim, Yuri V Lvov, Harry McLaughlin, John E. Mitchell, Bruce Piper, David A Schmidt, Daniel Stevenson, Yangyang Xu, Bulent Yener, Donald Drew, William Siegmann

Physics minnow

What warning is that Kibo Parry failure of science-- warning that insane persons like Kibo Parry Moroney Volney spends their entire life in a hate-mill, never doing anything in science itself. And paid to stalk hate spew

Kibo Parry Moroney-Volney blowing his cover with the CIA in 1997

Re: Archimedes Vanadium, America's most beloved poster

---quoting Wikipedia ---

Controversy
Many government and university installations blocked, threatened to block, or attempted to shut-down The World's Internet connection until Software Tool & Die was eventually granted permission by the National Science Foundation to provide public Internet access on "an experimental basis."

--- end quote ---

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
Dr. Panchanathan , present day
NSF Dr. Panchanathan, F. Fleming Crim, Dorothy E Aronson, Brian Stone, James S Ulvestad (math), Rebecca Lynn Keiser, Vernon D. Ross, Lloyd Whitman, John J. Veysey (physics), Scott Stanley
France Anne Cordova
Subra Suresh (bioengineer)
Arden Lee Bement Jr. (nuclear engineering)
Rita R. Colwell (microbiology)
Neal Francis Lane
John Howard Gibbons 1993
Barry Shein, kibo parry std world
Jim Frost, Joe "Spike" Ilacqua
Canada-- NSERC , Alejandro Adem (math) , Navdeep Bains, Francois-Philippe Champagne

News starting to come in that AP's Water Electrolysis Experiment proves the true formula of Water is H4O, not H2O is starting to come in.

Aug 30, 2023, 10:19:20 PM
to Plutonium Atom Universe
News starting to come in that AP's Water Electrolysis Experiment proves the true formula of Water is H4O, not H2O is starting to come in.
I received a letter today of Experiment results on Water Electrolysis of weighing the hydrogen test tube versus oxygen test tube and the result is 1/4 atomic mass units of Hydrogen compared to Oxygen.
The researcher weighing 1600 micrograms of hydrogen, using a Eisco-Brownlee-Water-Electrolysis Apparatus.
Using sulfuric acid as electrolyte on ultra pure water. Using low voltage DC of 1.5 volts, 1 amp.
I am not surprised that news of the true formula of Water is H4O comes so quickly. For not much in science is more important than knowing the truth of Water. And this means the start of the complete downfall and throwing out the sick Standard Model of Physics, for it is such an insane theory that it cannot get passed the idea of its subatomic particles as stick and ball, with no job, no function, no task. The Standard Model of Physics, is crazy insane physics for it is all postdiction, never prediction. The idea that the hydrogen atom is H2 not H, is because of the prediction of Atom Totality Theory where a atom is a proton torus with muon inside doing the Faraday law and all atoms require at least 1 capacitor. That means the one proton in H2 serves as a neutron to the other proton, storaging the electricity produced by the other proton.
The true Hydrogen Atom is H2 for all atoms need at least one capacitor, and one of the protons in H2 serves as a neutron.
Sad that chemistry and physics throughout the 20th century were too stupid to actually weigh the mass of hydrogen and oxygen in electrolysis, no, the ignorant fools stopped at looking when they saw the volume of hydrogen was twice that of oxygen. A real scientist is not that shoddy and slipshod ignorant, the real scientist then proceeds with -- let us weigh the hydrogen test tube mass versus the oxygen test tube mass.
Thanks for the news!!!!!
AP
News starting to come in that AP's Water Electrolysis Experiment proves the true formula of Water is H4O, not H2O is starting to come in.
There is another experiment that achieves the same result that Water is truly H4O and not H2O, but I suspect this second method is hugely fraught with difficulty.
The prediction of H4O comes from the Physics idea that a Atom is composed, all atoms mind you, is composed of a proton torus with muon/s inside going round and round thrusting through the torus in the Faraday law and producing electricity. So that when you have Hydrogen without a neutron, there is no way to collect the electricity produced by the Faraday law. Think of it as a automobile engine, you cannot have a engine if there is no crank shaft to collect the energy from the thrusting piston inside the crankcase.
Same thing with an Atom, it needs 3 parts-- muon as bar magnet, proton as torus of coils, and a capacitor to storage the produced electricity. If one of those parts is missing, the entity is a Subatomic particle and not a atom.
So, when we have Hydrogen as a proton with muon inside, it is not a Atom, until it has a neutron, or, has another proton of hydrogen H2, then it is a Atom.
So that H2 is not a molecule but a Atom. H alone is a subatomic particle.
Much harder than Water Electrolysis.
We need to get two identical containers.
We need to be able to make pure heavy-water with deuterium. Deuterium is proton + neutron as hydrogen. Proton + proton is H2 as hydrogen.
So we have two identical containers and we fill one with pure heavy water, deuterium water.
We have the second container and we fill it with pure (light) water.
We now weigh both of them.
If AP is correct, that water is really H4O and not H2O, then both containers should weigh almost the same. Only a tiny fraction difference because the neutron is known to be 940MeV versus proton in Old Physics as 938MeV a tiny difference of 2MeV, but we realize we have a huge number of water molecules in the two identical containers.
If water is truly H4O, the weights should be almost the same. If water is H2O, then there is a **large difference** in weights.
But the Water Electrolysis experiment is much easier to conduct and get results.
And, there is the biological processes that apparently cannot distinguish between heavy water and that of regular normal water.
Deuterium Water is the same in biology as is normal regular water. This means that water must be H4O, due to biology as proof.
Deuterium Water in atomic mass units is 16 for the oxygen and 4 for the deuterium.
Regular normal Water in atomic mass units is 16 for the oxygen and 4 for the 4 protons in H4O.
Old Physics and Old Chemistry had regular water as H2O in atomic mass units of 16 oxygen and 2 hydrogen for 2 protons.
If biology functions whether heavy water or normal water all the same, then water itself must be H4O.
Now, there maybe some animal or plant that can separate out heavy water from H4O water???
Searching the literature today for where biology needs as essential deuterium water. And not too surprised that it is a essential requirement in metabolism. In fact one web site listed the need for deuterium more than the need of many minerals and vitamins.
Now tonight I came up with two new exciting experiments to verify that Water is truly H4O and not H2O.
H4O is 4 protons with muons inside the 840MeV proton toruses.
Deuterium water is DOD. And the difference between D2O and H4O is merely the difference of 4MeV for as last reported, neutron = 940MeV and proton (with muon inside) is 938MeV, a difference of 2MeV but for water is 2+2 = 4MeV.
So these two new experiments take advantage of the fact that what we think is normal regular water is actually very close to heavy water of D2O, with only a 4MeV difference.
EXPERIMENT #3 Water layers in still pond of D2O mixed with H4O (what we thought was H2O.
So in this experiment we get a clear glass container and mix H4O with D2O. If Old Physics is correct, the heavy water should sink rapidly in the container while the light water floats to the top rapidly. And we have some sort of beam of photons that can distinguish D2O from H4O (thought of as H2O. We obtain pure D2O and pure H4O each filling 1/2 of the container. We stir and mix them. And then we observe with the EM beam for separation. If the light water is truly H4O, it takes a long time for the D2O to be on bottom and H4O on top. We measure the time of a settled container and determine this time from the theoretical 4MeV difference should take a long time, whereas if Old Physics is correct, the separation would be almost instantly and quick time.
EXPERIMENT #4 also plays on this minor difference of 4MeV. We devise a sort of squirt gun for D2O and a identical squirt gun for H4O (what we call H2O). We put pure D2O in one squirt gun and the H40 or light water in the other squirt gun. Both guns forcing the water a certain distance.
If AP is correct that light water is really H4O and not H2O as we squirt both guns, where the water lands should be almost the same distance considering H4O is only 4MeV apart from D2O.
If Old Physics and Old Chemistry is correct, then D2O water is 940 + 940 = 1880MeV apart from light water of H2O, and H4O is only 4MeV apart.
So where the squirt gun lands the D2O is a very much shorter distance than a H2O land, but a H4 land distance is nearly the same as the D2O land.
These two experiments are very exciting and would be a very nice confirming evidence to Water Electrolysis actual weighing the mass in atomic mass units.

Searching the literature today for where biology needs as essential deuterium water. And not too surprised that it is a essential requirement in metabolism. In fact one web site listed the need for deuterium more than the need of many minerals and vitamins.
Now tonight I came up with two new exciting experiments to verify that Water is truly H4O and not H2O.
H4O is 4 protons with muons inside the 840MeV proton toruses.
Deuterium water is DOD. And the difference between D2O and H4O is merely the difference of 4MeV for as last reported, neutron = 940MeV and proton (with muon inside) is 938MeV, a difference of 2MeV but for water is 2+2 = 4MeV.
So these two new experiments take advantage of the fact that what we think is normal regular water is actually very close to heavy water of D2O, with only a 4MeV difference.
EXPERIMENT #3 Water layers in still pond of D2O mixed with H4O (what we thought was H2O.
So in this experiment we get a clear glass container and mix H4O with D2O. If Old Physics is correct, the heavy water should sink rapidly in the container while the light water floats to the top rapidly. And we have some sort of beam of photons that can distinguish D2O from H4O (thought of as H2O. We obtain pure D2O and pure H4O each filling 1/2 of the container. We stir and mix them. And then we observe with the EM beam for separation. If the light water is truly H4O, it takes a long time for the D2O to be on bottom and H4O on top. We measure the time of a settled container and determine this time from the theoretical 4MeV difference should take a long time, whereas if Old Physics is correct, the separation would be almost instantly and quick time.

Apparently this Experiment is already done and called for-- There is Uniform Distribution of heavy water Deuterium Water in the Oceans, Lakes, Ponds, Streams and Rivers. Heavy Water is not layered in the oceans or lakes or ponds or streams or rivers. Uniformity means that the difference between D2O and H4O is so slight of a difference (only 4MeV, compared to 1880MeV for H2O, that Brownian motion keeps the D2O and H4O in a Uniform Distribution in all bodies of water. I was going through the research literature today and find that scientists discover Uniformity of Distribution of deuterium water. This thus closes the case on Water, for uniformity of distribution of D2O implies that Water is itself H4O and not H2O.

My 250th published book.

TEACHING TRUE CHEMISTRY; H2 is the hydrogen Atom and water is H4O, not H2O// Chemistry
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) (Amazon's Kindle)
Prologue: This textbook is 1/2 research history and 1/2 factual textbook combined as one textbook. For many of the experiments described here-in have not yet been performed, such as water is really H4O not H2O. Written in a style of history research with date-time markers, and fact telling. And there are no problem sets. This book is intended for 1st year college. Until I include problem sets and exercises, I leave it to the professor and instructor to provide such. And also, chemistry is hugely a laboratory science, even more so than physics, so a first year college student in the lab to test whether Water is really H4O and not H2O is mighty educational.
Preface: This is my 250th book of science, and the first of my textbooks on Teaching True Chemistry. I have completed the Teaching True Physics and the Teaching True Mathematics textbook series. But had not yet started on a Teaching True Chemistry textbook series. What got me started on this project is the fact that no chemistry textbook had the correct formula for water which is actually H4O and not H2O. Leaving the true formula for hydroxyl groups as H2O and not OH. But none of this is possible in Old Chemistry, Old Physics where they had do-nothing subatomic particles that sit around and do nothing or go whizzing around the outside of balls in a nucleus, in a mindless circling. Once every subatomic particle has a job, task, function, then water cannot be H2O but rather H4O. And a hydrogen atom cannot be H alone but is actually H2. H2 is not a molecule of hydrogen but a full fledged Atom, a single atom of hydrogen.
Cover Picture: Sorry for the crude sketch work but chemistry and physics students are going to have to learn to make such sketches in a minute or less. Just as they make Lewis diagrams or ball & stick diagrams. My 4-5 minute sketch-work of the Water molecule H4O plus the subatomic particle H, and the hydrogen atom H2. Showing how one H is a proton torus with muon inside (blue color) doing the Faraday law. Protons are toruses with many windings. Protons are the coils in Faraday law while muons are the bar magnets. Neutrons are the capacitors as parallel plates, the outer skin cover of atoms.
Product details
• ASIN ‏ : ‎ B0CCLPTBDG
• Publication date ‏ : ‎ July 21, 2023
• Language ‏ : ‎ English
• File size ‏ : ‎ 788 KB
• Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
• Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Sticky notes ‏ : ‎ On Kindle Scribe
• Print length ‏ : ‎ 168 pages

Caltech & Rensselaer Polytech do only slipshod physics-chemistry experiments of Water Electrolysis, too dumb to weigh the hydrogen & oxygen to see if H4O or H2O


AP kindly asks Google to let AP run all three, sci.math, sci.physics, PAU as he runs PAU, now--- all pure science, no spam and no govt b.s.

PAU newsgroup is this.
https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe
Archimedes Plutonium

[Archimedes Plutonium]

USA's Biden & EU expect land stealing Israel (pastoral outlaws) to walk through crowded hospitals of 30,000 children to be "quiet and orderly". Bibi-- are you planning "illegal settlements" in Southern Turkey-- river to sea?? Putin fast steal Ukraine

Israel slow steal Palestine with genocide. Land land land is more important than any people.

Israel caused 9-11 then 7Oct and heading for sparking Nuclear WW3. I do noit think this world of people can stomach any more of Israel's nonstop land stealing, not in an age of nuclear weapons. When Earth peoples need to colonize Europa because our Sun has gone Red Giant phase and all of Earth is going to be killed by the Sun. We have no time to be a babysitter for a rogue, arrogant ignorant Israel with their heads stuck back 3,000 years to King David outlaw stealing neighboring land from neighboring tribes. Bibi is a throwback to 3,000 years ago of a warrior King who thought life was all about stealing land.

USA's Biden & EU expect land stealing Israel (pastoral outlaws) to walk through crowded hospitals of 30,000 children to be "quiet and orderly". Bibi-- are you planning "illegal settlements" in Southern Turkey-- river to sea?? Putin fast steal Ukraine

*AP's 338th book of science-- Reform the Jewish religion of its ugly racism-- Chosen People & Promised Chosen Land as if others are God-rejects; and religion should come from the "heart" not from the zygote-uterus of a woman 6m views

Subscribe

Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium<***@gmail.com>
Feb 14, 2024, 5:38:05 PM (22 hours ago)



to Plutonium Atom Universe
It is no mystery that AP uses Usenet often as a "rough draft" of many of my ideas, which then get turned into published books. But AP is finding it extremely difficult to get any book published upon the mention of the word "Jew". My 259th book where I say that Putin's Russia is fast steal of Ukraine with genocide and Israel is slow steal of Palestine lands and genocide. And of course this book will likely meet the same stiff resistance to publication. All because Jewish influence has penetrated the publishing industry so so heavily, that anyone who mentions "Jew" in their work is often denied. This is one of the reasons also, that Jews win Nobel science prizes, not because of merit, but only because they are Jews and the selection committee is run by Jews. Jews have a knack of penetration into industries where they skew everything into their favor and eliminate the true worthiness of science. I certainly will try to publish every book of mine, regardless of whether it mentions "Jew". But likely they will be censored out. That is why I loved Usenet Google for so long, where nothing I said was filtered out, by hatemongers or even Jews.

**AP's 338th book of science-- Reform the Jewish religion of its ugly racism-- Chosen People & Promised Chosen Land as if others are God-rejects; and religion should come from the "heart" not from the zygote-uterus of a woman 6m views


And AP does, so kindly ask Google to let me run both sci.math and sci.physics as I run PAU newsgroup come 22Feb2024. It is govt spammers that destroyed Usenet, for the majority of spam is done by some govt imbecile in a swivel chair paid to send 40 spams of Ebooks and Asia slot machines every 2 hours. It is the govt that ruined and destroyed sci.math and sci.physics, unable to ever keep little bureaucrats out of those two newsgroups. You find a govt bureaucrat with a 1 marble brain, and it is only a matter of time the gimp destroys the newsgroups.

AP's 338th book of science-- Reform the Jewish religion of its ugly racism-- Chosen People & Promised Chosen Land as if others are God-rejects; and religion should come from the "heart" not from the zygote-uterus of a woman
6m views
Subscribe

Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium<***@gmail.com>
Feb 13, 2024, 7:21:46 PM (22 hours ago)



to Plutonium Atom Universe, sci.math, sci.physics
Hate to say it, how blissfully ignorant I was of the Jewish religion, Judaism, up into my late 40s of age. For it was in my 40s posting on the Usenet sci.math and sci.physics that I learned how rascist of a religion is the Jewish religion.

I posted in the late 1990s that Feynman did not want to be listed as Jewish under any account, because Feynman believed in science, in Darwin Evolution, not some religion fairy tale.

But then, someone on the Usenet posted back, informing me it was far worse than that. The Feynman never had a say in what his religion was, or could be, because in Jewish religion, you are automatically Jew and can never change that, because all persons born from a Jewish mother are here and forever a Jew.

Now, I write this book because Israel is about to commit genocide in Gaza in order to steal the Gaza land and connect up back with the land that King David in Ancient history ruled.

I write this book because our Sun has gone Red Giant Phase and will destroy all of Earth and kill all life on Earth unless we move out to Europa. So that we must have full attention on going to Europa and colonizing it and then move as much of Earth life out to Europa. We cannot be bothered with stupid ancient minds with stupid ancient dreams of stitching together a Ancient land. For no land is worth anything once Sun has gone Red Giant Phase.

And in recent years 2023, 2024, this tiny nation of Israel can spark a Nuclear World War 3 with its abhorrent practice of stealing land.

So I write this book to make sure everyone is on the same page of history, to move beyond the constant propaganda and irrelevancies emitted from the Israel government for their killing of 30,000 Palestinian children in Gaza and trying to push the rest into Egypt so they can steal the land.

No religion on Earth should be based on who they were borne from. No religion.

Religion comes from the heart, of a person, his/her fiber of morals and ideals, not from the gametes zygote and cervic of some women.

The Jewish religion of ideas of Chosen People and of Chosen Land, is utterly rascist and anti-religion. Those premisses of chosen people and chosen land is hate speech, not religion.

In this book I am going to use the book The New World of Philosophy by Kaplan as a reference guide.

If we had the same situation in the Middle East as we have now. Only if Buddhists were the Israel nation and the Palestinians the same as they are now, then the Buddhists would have built a 2 state solution around 1950.

If we had Muslims in Israel instead of Jews, they would have built a 2 state solution with Palestinians circa 1950.

If we had Christians in Israel instead of Jews, they would have built a 2 state solution with Palestinians circa 1950.

If we had Taoist in Israel instead of Jews, they would have built a 2 state solution with Palestinians circa 1950.

If we had Hindi in Israel instead of Jews, they would have built a 2 state solution with Palestinians circa 1950.

The only religion on Earth with Palestine and Israel in Conflict, the only religion on Earth that wants to steal Palestine all for themselves, and never a 2 state solution is the greedy selfish indoctrinated Chosen People wanting their delusional Chosen Land, and to hell with anyone else on Earth. Judaism is a rascist and stealing religion, not a religion from the heart or of the heart.

AP, King of Science

AP's 338th book of science-- Either the Jewish religion reform or go extinct in its rascist philosophy-- religion should come from the "heart" not from the gametes-zygote-cervic of a woman.
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium<***@gmail.com>
Feb 13, 2024, 9:18:32 PM (20 hours ago)



to Plutonium Atom Universe
Now for the Jewish religion to reform is super super easy, if only they be willing to. Although we must consider the generations of propaganda the modern Jew has been subjected to. But reform is super easy. Much easier to reform the Jewish religion than for math professors to admit slant cut of cone is Oval not ellipse or for math professors to teach super easy calculus by making the Polynomial the only valid function then calculus becomes the simple add or subtract 1 from exponent for the integral and derivative.

Easy Reformation of Jewish Religion.

The repulsive elements, the repulsive and rascist elements are the "chosen people" and the "chosen land".

So really all that needs to be done in a reformation of Judaism, (by the way has there ever been a reformation in Judaism or would this be a first?), so all we need do here is Replace the term "chosen people" with something far more accurate-- the Wandering People. And replace the term "chosen land or promised land" with something more akin to modern reality-- the Wandering People gone International. For Jews live in almost all countries.

Now the reformation needs to be to revise all books of Torah and cut out any reference to Chosen People, to Promised Land and to Chosen Land. Every Jewish Bible revised. And every synagogue sermon or lecture never say "chosen people, or promised land or chosen land".

One thing that is troubling about Jewish life can be seen even on TV, where the "Stories from the Stage" ads are often run. One of those "Stories from the Stage" is a Jewish woman talking about Jewish life and she says -- all electronics were not used or automobiles used that day and in the sermon was talked about "how to handle the other". Meaning that if not a Jew-- how to handle this person who God rejects, and God only accepts and loves the chosen humans-- the Jews.

This is hugely troubling and the more so that Jews themselves never seem to understand that if you treat them (Gentiles) as God rejects because Jews are the only chosen by God, troubling troubling.

And so, I think Jews with Judaism never understand how awful ugly and hateful it is to classify a person as a God reject and only Jews are worthy of fair treatment.

As if AP, a gentile in the eyes of Jews, that AP exists on Earth so that Jews can strip AP of valued assets and enrich Jews and to hell with AP for he is a God reject gentile.

Troubling troubling and that Jews seem blissfully ignorant that if you preach and practice a religion that divides everyone as God chosen or a God reject, when you classify the world in such a rascist view, no wonder you have hatred come back to you.

So in the Reform of Judaism, announce to the World that Jewish Religion is undergoing reform where you replace Chosen people with Wandering People and you replace Chosen or Promised Land with International Wandering People. Do this for the Torah and any other bible like books of Judaism. Scrub it out of the history books. And do it in all synagogue sermons or preaching.

Cleanse Judaism of its hate speech of rascism.

AP
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium<***@gmail.com>
12:50 AM (16 hours ago)



to Plutonium Atom Universe
So had the Jewish peoples, Israel, ever read the Ancient Greek tragedies, where time and time again the Greeks wrote about hubris and pride and then angering the Gods who then smittened the prideful sinner.

And what could be more disdainful to a God than to see a tribe of Israel, a King David rule and a Jewish religion that declares-- they are God's Chosen People and will receive God's Promised Chosen land while every other human is a God reject because only Jews are Chosen by God.

Did not a single Jew in all of Israel's long history, did not a single Jew understand a thread of Logical reasoning--- existence of God means no humans are Chosen while everyone else is dirt dreg rejects.

Did this rascist religion of Judaism so much intoxicate Isreal and Jews that they were the Chosen Ones, so much drowning in glory of being Chosen, that it would upset God so much, that like the Greek tragedies-- the Jews would pay and suffer for their hubris.

And we still see this today, that Israel and Jews around the world for most of the 1900s and now 2000s, this tiny nation and small population stir up so much hatred in Gentiles, the nonchosen (according to Jews). As the Jews try to steal all the Promised Land.

Is there not a single Jew in all the world that can understand if you label your religion as The Chosen and the Promised Chosen land, that God and the rest of humanity are not going to tolerate your rascist insanity.

Has any Jew, throughout history asked-- why do so many people hate us??? Well, if you believe God has chosen you and everyone else is a dreg reject of God, stands to reason, you will have a difficult time of making friends.

But now, start the process of reform, for if the same old same old continues, this arrogant and hubris packed racist religion of Judaism Israel easily can and likely will Spark Nuclear World War 3, and thus dooming all of life on Earth to extinction and oblivion for we are supposed to colonize Europa since our Sun gone Red Giant phase. We do not have the time to babysit the rascist Israel stealing King David's land all in the name of Chosen people and their dumb Promised Chosen land.

The only Promised Chosen land is Europa-- the faster the better.

AP, King of Science
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium<***@gmail.com>
1:42 AM (16 hours ago)



to Plutonium Atom Universe
Let me change the title to this: AP's 338th book of science-- Either the Jewish religion reform or go extinct in its rascist philosophy-- religion should come from the "heart" not from the zygote-uterus of a woman
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium<***@gmail.com>
1:55 AM (15 hours ago)



to Plutonium Atom Universe
No mistake about it, ever since England formed Israel-Palestine circa 1948, that violence upon violence has come to the Middle East, for it is in the driving mechanism of the Jewish religion-- its Chosen People with their Promised Chosen Land to constantly agitate until they stolen all the land that was Ancient King David's land, stretching all the way from southern Turkey through Syria through Lebanon even extending into northern Egypt.

Israel, never accepting a two state solution, rather always prying to steal more land. It is Israel in its agitation for land that caused 9-11 in the USA killing and injuring thousands of brave and fine firefighters and police and 1st responders due to making young Arabs so hateful of Sharon's illegal settlements stealing Palestinian land. It is Israel in its Occupation of West Bank, East Jerusalem and Gaza strip that caused 7Oct2023. At this rate, the rogue nation Israel will spark a Nuclear ICBM world war 3.

Throughout the history, stretching as far back as Ancient Rome, the Israel people have been constant agitators, and in this modern world of nuclear weapons, this is too dangerous to continue. Israel must be forced into a Two State Solution and then watched carefully for further agitation, for it seems to me, in my opinion that their religion is nothing but agitation upon its neighbors.

AP

AP kindly asks Google to let AP run all three, sci.math, sci.physics, PAU as he runs PAU, now--- all pure science, no spam and no govt b.s.

PAU newsgroup is this.
https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe
Archimedes Plutonium
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium<***@gmail.com>
3:19 PM (1 minute ago)



to Plutonium Atom Universe
Lovely and delightful reading is this clip from THE NEW YORKER-- In Search of King David's Lost Empire.

AP was trying to find out how far north King David's empire stretched for someone said as far north as Turkey. And I know Israel and Turkey do not get along. And I was wondering if Bibi Netanyahu was going to start *illegal settlement building in southern Turkey to reclaim and steal that land also as they attempt to steal West Bank, East Jerusalem and Gaza strip. For Bibi said tonight on TV, that he is now going to attack Rafah.

Bibi, will you send illegal settlers into Turkey or the IDF???? We all know how important it is to reclaim all of Ancient King David's land, even more important than sparking nuclear world war 3, with all the land stealing in the Middle East.


--- quoting THE NEW YORKER-- In Search of King David's Lost Empire ---


The Bible, of course, tells it differently. In the Old Testament story, Canaan is where the Hebrews ended their exodus, and where David secured for his people a glorious kingdom. From about 1,000 B.C., he and his son Solomon ruled over a vast monarchy that encompassed four defeated kingdoms, stretching as far north as the Euphrates River and as far south as the Negev Desert. (Archeologists derive the date from an inscription on a portal gate in the Egyptian city of Karnak, which lists the military conquests of King Shoshenq—thought to be the same king mentioned in the Bible as Shishak.) The United Monarchy, as it is known, represented the golden age of ancient Israel; though it probably lasted no more than a generation or two, its legacy has persisted for thousands of years. For Jews, Finkelstein told me, David “represents territorial sovereignty, the legend of the empire.” For Christians, he is “directly related to Jesus and the birth of Christianity.” For Muslims, he is a righteous prophet who preceded Muhammad. The story of David, Finkelstein added, “is the most central thing in the Bible, and in our culture.”

The Bible depicts David as a brilliant but flawed figure, capable of unspeakable violence but also of remorse and tenderness—perhaps humanity’s first antihero. He is anointed by God to replace Saul, the first king of Israel, whose short rule was marked by bouts of rebellion. David is a handsome shepherd; he has a way with the lyre and a way with women; he slings a fatal stone at a giant. So far, these are the familiar tropes of the ancient hero. But David is also said to have impregnated Bathsheba—a married woman—and sent her husband off to die in battle.

Nadav Na’aman, an authority on Jewish history and a colleague of Finkelstein’s at Tel Aviv University, describes David’s story as “extraordinary fiction.” But he believes that it contains kernels of truth, preserved as the tale was passed down by oral tradition. The story, for instance, frequently mentions the Philistine city of Gath, which was destroyed in the late ninth century B.C.—a clue to its origins.

In the long war over how to reconcile the Bible with historical fact, the story of David stands at ground zero. There is no archeological record of Abraham, or Isaac, or Jacob. There is no Noah’s Ark, nothing from Moses. Joshua did not bring down the walls of Jericho: they collapsed centuries earlier, perhaps in an earthquake. But, in 1993, an Israeli archeologist working near the Syrian border found a fragment of basalt from the ninth century B.C., with an Aramaic inscription that mentioned the “House of David”—the first known reference to one of the Bible’s foundational figures. So David is not just a central ancestor in the Old Testament. He may also be the only one that we can prove existed. Yet to prove it definitively would be exceptionally difficult; Jerusalem of the tenth century B.C. is an archeological void. “I can take a shoebox and put inside everything we have from that period,” Yuval Gadot, an archeologist from Tel Aviv University, said.

Finkelstein has pushed Israeli research to the forefront of science, employing precision radiocarbon dating, DNA analysis, and image processing that can examine a three-thousand-year-old potsherd and determine how many ancient scribes were involved in its making. An archeology lab run by Tel Aviv University and the Weizmann Institute of Science has employed the chief forensic investigator of the Israel Police. Despite their advanced technology, these researchers are still engaged in questions that have persisted for more than a century. From where did the early Israelites emerge? When do we first see signs of a centralized cult with a single deity? More prosaically, but no less crucially, who was David? Was he the all-powerful king described in the Bible? Or was he, as some archeologists believe, no more than a small-time Bedouin sheikh?
--- end quoting THE NEW YORKER-- In Search of King David's Lost Empire ---

The article mentions Israel was in Syria but not as far north as Turkey.

It said "He rules over a neglected chiefdom of pastoralists and outlaws. His name is David."

"King David-- the vagabond, the racketeer--"

"The Israelites, he claimed, were "of local stock"-- that is, Bedouin nomads."

" The Bible, of course, tells it differently."

"stretching as far north as the Euphrates River and as far south as the Negev Desert."

"There is no archeological record of Abraham, or Isaac, or Jacob. There is no Noah's Ark, nothing from Moses. Joshua did not bring down the walls of Jericho: they collapsed centuries earlier, perhaps in an earthquake."

"But, in 1993, an Israeli archeologist working near the Syrian border found a fragment of basalt from the 9th century B.C. with an Aramic inscription that mentioned the "House of David"-- the first known reference to one of the Bible's foundational figures."

"He may also be the only one that we can prove existed."

AP, looking up where the Euphrates River is-- is it in Southern Turkey?????

Yes, yes indeed the Euphrates River is in southern Turkey.

Bibi, after you annex Rafah, and Gaza strip, will you turn your attention of illegal settlements along the Euphrates River????

AP, worried that rogue Israel at the rate it is going will spark nuclear ww3 because of its constant, nonstop stealing of land to regain Ancient King David's land.

Russia is fast steal of Ukraine with genocide. Israel is slow steal of land with genocide.

AP

[Archimedes Plutonium]

AP proudly announces his 277th published book of science-- Clarity to concepts of Biology of what is DNA, Chromosome, Genes, Genome, RNA and how they relate to one another// biophysics by Archimedes Plutonium

My 277th published book of science.

Clarity to concepts of Biology of what is DNA, Chromosome, Genes, Genome, RNA and how they relate to one another// biophysics
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) (Amazon's Kindle)

Preface: It is my opinion that few professors of biology or students of biology can list, well-defined and finally relate the units of biology heredity-- logically. That they all make mistakes of relating the units, genome, DNA, chromosome, genes. And to help with well-defining and relating I use physics units as a model. Finally, in doing this exercise of logically straightening-out the units of biology heredity, I find a formula that relates those units of genome, DNA, chromosome, genes. That formula comes from electricity magnetism of physics and is M_animals L^2T^-3 = M_plants L^2T^-2.

In addition, in this book I discovered the functional purpose of chromosomes as being a Faraday law enacted upon two identical molecules of DNA to activate the two molecules of DNA, for one molecule is the bar magnet in Faraday law and the second molecule is the coil in Faraday law, both together producing electricity and reading the DNA molecules.

Cover Picture: My photograph of "An Introduction to Genetic Analysis" by Griffiths, Miller, Suzuki, Lewontin, Gelbart, 6th edition, 1996, page 2 where they make it exquisitely clear to students that the Chromosome definition is "Each chromosome is one long DNA molecule and genes are functional regions of this DNA." For AP never really had an accurate understanding of what is the difference between DNA and chromosome, until reading that. Almost every biology book in the world does an obfuscation of "what is a chromosome" and where they should be doing a clarity check instead.

Product details
• ASIN ‏ : ‎ B0CVRMNJ7W
• Publication date ‏ : ‎ February 15, 2024
• Language ‏ : ‎ English
• File size ‏ : ‎ 540 KB
• Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
• Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Sticky notes ‏ : ‎ On Kindle Scribe
• Print length ‏ : ‎ 64 pages

AP proudly announces his 277th published book of science-- Clarity to concepts of Biology of what is DNA, Chromosome, Genes, Genome, RNA and how they relate to one another// biophysics by Archimedes Plutonium

#4-6, My 67th published book of science

Evolution of Animals and Organs from Plants //biophysics series, book 5 (biology series) Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Last revision was November 2022. And this is AP's 67th published book of science.

Preface: Strange how a little exploration for me in 10 Oct 2019 would end up landing me with a whole theory of how animals evolved from plants, and the order in which animal organs evolved, all in the space of a few days in October 2019. Below in this text is a history of that discovery, then I slowly fill in the details of animal organ evolution. Mind you, all from the central idea that living entities are capacitors of physics. In this world of ours, all that there is, is atoms, and all that atoms are, are electricity and magnetism. So in doing science, eventually you come down to talking about electricity and magnetism.

A massive revision of this book occurred in November 2022 taking into account that fungus are the First-Animals and they evolved along with plants in a Complamentary Mechanism of quantum mechanics physics. This is discussed in my 215th book of science: "Biology Evolution of motion in animals; science of legs// biology evolution." Ongoing research often calls for massive revisions, as the nature of science is a ever changing enterprise.

Cover: The cover is my camera photo of my computer of a Google search for "blue-green algae anatomy". We can see quite clearly how blue-green algae is a capacitor of physics!

Product details
ASIN ‏ : ‎ B07ZBNKBPY
Publication date ‏ : ‎ October 18, 2019
Language ‏ : ‎ English
File size ‏ : ‎ 1039 KB
Simultaneous device usage ‏ : ‎ Unlimited
Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
Print length ‏ : ‎ 40 pages
Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #487,284 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
#15649 in Biological Sciences (Books)
#4070 in Evolution (Books)
#494 in Evolution (Kindle Store)


#4-6, My 9th published book.

Biology's Meiosis unclarity, DNA-Capacitor// biophysics series, book 6
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) (Amazon's Kindle)

Last revision was September 2023. And this is AP's 9th published book of science.

Preface: Fixing the huge obfuscation of Biology--Meiosis going from 46 chromosomes to 92 to get to 23.

This is a history-story of my research into making Meiosis clear. And even I make mistakes in the process of this research. I have given date-time groups to many entries. And this research is not over with even in September of 2023, for meiosis is a difficult subject to eye-witness, for the cells are tiny and the time periods of meiosis takes 74 hours or more if we include interphase. No single researcher can stay awake for 74 hours watching.

This book aims to clarify the Biology process of Meiosis. Biologists are all over the map on meiosis, with duplication mistakes, with unclarity of when pairs are formed, or separated chromatids. And this book demands and forces biologists to make meiosis clear.

In the below treatise story of research, we see where Miami Univ finally and directly and clearly comes out and states it does not go from 46 to 92. But then, Miami Univ still does not make the whole process clear. Then in September 2023, on world wide web a Youtube film by Amoeba Sisters clarifies the issue somewhat but so complex is meiosis, that it needs further clarity.

And finally, mathematics, a mathematician has to enter this fray, this struggle for clarity, for which Old Biology was never able to make clear, with no obfuscation what goes on in both Mitosis and in Meiosis. The source of the obfuscation and mistakes in meiosis stem from a misuse of a mathematical concept of Units. If one tries to do mathematics without 1 being the Unit in mathematics, then the result is a mathematics that is unteachable, for people just are confused right and left, left and right with little understanding going on. Likewise in biology for meiosis and mitosis, the unit is chromatid, not chromosomes and we have to follow chromatids throughout the process of meiosis and mitosis.

Cover Picture: my own personal drawing rendering of a phase of meiosis. Many times in biology class in High School we had to do drawings of biology objects. So I had some practice in rendering a biology drawing, before this one.

Product details
ASIN ‏ : ‎ B07PRXPHS3
Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 13, 2019
Language ‏ : ‎ English
File size ‏ : ‎ 1077 KB
Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
Sticky notes ‏ : ‎ On Kindle Scribe
Print length ‏ : ‎ 186 pages
Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #300,029 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
#111 in Cell Biology (Books)
#30 in Cell Biology (Kindle Store)
◦ #302 in Biophysics (Kindle Store)
◦ #809 in Molecular Biology (Kindle Store)
◦ #1,226 in Biophysics (Books)

#4-7, 77th published book

First Life on Earth was from Coral Reefs-Theory due to salt; how DNA came into existence //biophysics series, book 7
by Archimedes Plutonium (Amazon's Kindle)

This theory explains how First DNA evolved and then First Living Organism evolved on Earth. Sodium in salt played a crucial role, for without it, our planet Earth would be as barren as Mars. Fortunately, recently NASA and others have detected salt oceans on Europa.

In Science, all of science can be boiled down to one key idea-- All is Atom, and atoms are nothing but, electricity and magnetism. So to find how first DNA evolved, it was not a chemical progression, no, it was a instantaneous precipitation-out of a nonliving capacitor filled with photon and electricity energy, much like salt precipitates out of evaporating salt water.

This is a theory not a hypothesis, because of the agreement with numbers of capacitor energy and with the energy of a DNA molecule. But more importantly, a logical proof that DNA comes from photons and monopoles, a perfect physics structure that is photons and monopoles, is that DNA is reversible. Not much in physics is reversible, say a fried egg is not able to be turned back into a original egg. But DNA is reversible, meaning, if you had DNA and no photosynthesis organelles, the DNA has instructions to make it reverse engineer the photosynthesis organelles from more photons of pure energy. DNA is a reversible machine and thus not born of biology evolution.

Cover Picture: is a picture of water with salt.
Length: 16 pages

Product details
File Size: 920 KB
Print Length: 16 pages
Publication Date: December 28, 2019
Sold by: Amazon Digital Services LLC
Language: English
ASIN: B08387M8M1
Text-to-Speech: Enabled 
X-Ray: 
Not Enabled  

Word Wise: Not Enabled
Lending: Enabled
Screen Reader: Supported 
Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled 


#4-8, My 91st published book of science.

The AP- Linnaeus Classification of Biology-- Using Physics instead of wishy-washy characteristics// Biophysics series, book 8
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) (Amazon's Kindle)

Last revision was 17Jan2022. And this is AP's 91st published book of science.
Preface:
There is nothing in the world better to focus a mind on viruses than living through a pandemic of the corona-virus of 2020. For the mind stays completely focused on biology. This focus is going to be at least three books on biology:
1) Revised Linnaeus Classification
2) Function and Purpose of Viruses
3) Biology Equilibrium Principle
And there maybe more to come. But first things first, and the old 1735 Linnaeus Classification is badly outdated and in need of revision, using modern up to date physics and chemistry. Such a revision should encompass what First Life itself was, that would later cascade into so many different species.
Cover Picture: Is my iphone photograph of a Google Search for "capacitor".


Product details
• ASIN ‏ : ‎ B085NHRL17
• Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 8, 2020
• Language ‏ : ‎ English
• File size ‏ : ‎ 1156 KB
• Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
• Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Print length ‏ : ‎ 24 pages
• Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Best Sellers Rank: #280,925 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
◦ #8 in 30-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
◦ #6,898 in Science & Math (Kindle Store)
◦ #8,566 in Biological Sciences (Books)




#4-9, 92nd published book

FUNCTION AND PURPOSE OF VIRUSES// Biophysics series, book 9 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Last revision was 18May2021. This is AP's 92nd published science books.

Preface: So far I am fortunate to live through a viral pandemic. I may not be able to say that once all the action and reaction is over with. The 1918 Pandemic of flu virus lasted just 2 years and disappeared as fast as it arrived. I and everyone else is still unclear as to why it disappeared so fast. But since I have this front row seat, the mind works in overtime on the subject, wanting answers. And the answers to me come in three books so far. There maybe more to come.

Now I first started this book with a recap of what I had thought before in the past, that viruses were deadly killers, and just parasites, causing death and cancer. These are notions most everyone has of viruses. But I have known from experience that something as widespread as viruses in _life_, that they must serve some beneficial purpose. And to make any accurate guess of the function and purpose of viruses, I had to read some literature first. And on March 3, 2020, I read 4 separate passages in Wikipedia on viruses. All 4 passages gave some strong indication that the virus being mostly just a coat and sack that the purpose of virus had to do with it being just a coat and sack. That gave my logical mind something to work with. If viruses were just coats and sacks, could it be that the function of viruses was to build the coat and sacks and linings and other structure of plants and animals? Could that be the purpose? Well that idea formed a hypothesis, and all I needed thereafter was find strong supporting evidence. That evidence came on March 4, 2020, with a research report long ago in 1963. With that strong evidence, my hypothesis instantly becomes a theory of viruses. Here is that report.

--- quoting Biochemistry ---
Biochemistry 1963
Metal Content of Tobacco Mosaic Virus and Tobacco Mosaic Virus RNA
Wacker, Gordon, Huff
The data demonstrate that tobacco mosaic virus itself and its component RNA consistently contain magnesium, calcium, strontium, barium, aluminum, chromium, manganese, iron, nickel, zinc, and copper. Metal ions, especially those of the first transition period of the periodic system, are very firmly bound, resisting removal by exhaustive dialysis against metal-free water or chelating agents.
--- end quote ---

Cover Picture: Is my iphone photograph of several pictures of viruses in all shapes and sizes from a Google search of "viruses".

Length: 77 pages



Product details
File Size: 876 KB
Print Length: 77 pages
Publication Date: March 9, 2020
Sold by: Amazon.com Services LLC
Language: English
ASIN: B085Q2PZF5
Text-to-Speech: Enabled 
X-Ray: 
Not Enabled  

Word Wise: Enabled
Lending: Enabled
Screen Reader: Supported 
Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled 
Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #442,597 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
#594 in Biology (Kindle Store)
#145 in Two-Hour Science & Math Short Reads
#81 in Virology




#4-10, 93rd published book

BIOLOGY EQUILIBRIUM THEORY// Biophysics series, book 10 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

I started this book in late February 2020 on the eve of the pandemic corona virus. There is nothing better in the world to focus upon viruses than in the midst of a pandemic. I wrote two books already in March 2020, first on a correcting of the Linnaeus Classification of Life, in particular the viruses, bacteria, and fungi. For it was long overdue that a Classification of Life be based on modern day physics and chemistry knowledge. And a second book on the function and purpose of viruses. Parts of both books need the Physics concepts of Superdeterminism in an Atom Totality. And that shortfall of superdeterminism in an Atom Totality in those two books of Classification of Life and Function and Purpose of Viruses, that shortfall is to be made-up for in this book. Now I called it the Biology Equilibrium theory but I could have just well called it the thermodynamics of biology. I used the precipitation concept of chemistry which involves an equilibrium of solids in aqueous solution.

Cover Picture: My iphone photograph of Feynman, page 3-3, Lectures on Physics, Vol 1, 1963. A photograph of the citric-acid-cycle which is part of the thermodynamics of biology. The thermodynamics involves enzymes, discussed on page 3-4.
Length: 46 pages

Product details
ASIN ‏ : ‎ B085RL3ZBD
Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 10, 2020
Language ‏ : ‎ English
File size ‏ : ‎ 647 KB
Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
Print length ‏ : ‎ 46 pages
Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
Best Sellers Rank: #210,951 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
◦ #17 in 90-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
◦ #224 in Biology (Kindle Store)
◦ #366 in Physics (Kindle Store)



#4-11, 120th published book

AP's Research Notebook on New Biology's replacement of Vaccinations with MRI and CT scans//Biophysics series, book 11 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

This is a research notebook not a textbook, for until the first patient is cured of virus in a MRI or CT scan with resonant frequency that kills a pocket of the virus inside the body, and that killing or deactivation of the virus allows the human immune system to accelerate in recognition of the viral invader by the white blood cells killing and removing all the remainder viruses inside the body. Once the first patient is cured by this new technique, will make the old way of medical science vaccinations rather as second rate handling of viral diseases. Once the first patient is cured, then this book will become a textbook, no longer a research notebook.

Cover Picture: My iphone photograph of a Google image search of MRI machines, photo taken of my computer search.

Table of Contents
------------------------

1) Research Notes starting 16 May 2020

Length: 25 pages

Product details
File Size: 925 KB
Print Length: 25 pages
Publication Date: May 29, 2020
Sold by: Amazon.com Services LLC
Language: English
ASIN: B089FMMZHN
Text-to-Speech: Enabled 
X-Ray: 
Not Enabled  

Word Wise: Enabled
Lending: Enabled
Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled 



#4-12, My 224th published book.

Research on how the heart & diaphragm work by electricity// Biophysics
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) (Amazon's Kindle)

Preface: I needed a book to research on how the heart as a pump and the diaphragm as a pump work, from simply, and only from electricity and magnetism. I have to explain this in terms of the primal axiom over all of physics-- hence, over all the sciences. Primal-Axiom-- All is Atom and Atoms are nothing but electricity and magnetism. In a world where all is atom and atoms are nothing but electricity and magnetism, in such a world, the question of "how do things work?" often does not have an explanation that is pure electricity and magnetism. And yet the explanation needs that pure electricity and magnetism answer. So in the case of the heart or diaphragm or muscles in physical exercise, or how tall trees get water moved up, or how the mouth swallows food and drink, or how we hold in urine or poop, all these questions need answers from purely electricity and magnetism. And how the heart and diaphragm work purely from electricity and magnetism is the major main topic of this book.

The central theme of this research book is to explain phenomenon by purely electricity and magnetism. This is not an easy chore or task, but an extremely difficult one.

This book is a research book, for many questions go unanswered, but some progress is made in finding those answers.

Cover Picture: My iphone photograph of a Google search of long muscle cells.


Product details
• ASIN ‏ : ‎ B0BTBRB29V
• Publication date ‏ : ‎ January 28, 2023
• Language ‏ : ‎ English
• File size ‏ : ‎ 458 KB
• Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
• Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Sticky notes ‏ : ‎ On Kindle Scribe
• Print length ‏ : ‎ 72 pages



#4-13, My 246th published book.


Connecting up Physics Right-Hand Rule with Jellyfish able to live forever// Biophysics research

by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) (Amazon's Kindle)


Preface: One of Earth's greatest science marvels is the fact that the Jellyfish can live forever, theoretically live forever, for a adult jellyfish under stress, can fall to the ocean floor and reprogram its own genetics to be reborn again as a baby jellyfish.

Since all of science falls under the primal axiom principle of physics-- All is Atom, and Atoms are nothing but electricity and magnetism, then this marvelous feature of jellyfish life span, theoretically live forever must be clearly explained by physics electricity and magnetism for everything is physics.

This book is a first attempt at a clear explanation of what is going on in Jellyfish physiology and anatomy that can turn an adult back into a baby and start life over again.


Cover Picture: My iphone photograph of a Google Search of jellyfish and jellyfish life cycle.


Product details
• ASIN ‏ : ‎ B0CB56MLBQ
• Publication date ‏ : ‎ July 4, 2023
• Language ‏ : ‎ English
• File size ‏ : ‎ 581 KB
• Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
• Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Sticky notes ‏ : ‎ On Kindle Scribe
• Print length ‏ : ‎ 33 pages


#4-14, My 249th published book.

The Thylacine + Woolly Mammoth + The Electrolysis Plant or Animal to Europa// biophysics

by Archimedes Plutonium


Preface: I was excited in reading that Australia will attempt to bring back to life the extinct Thylacine animal, a marsupial wolf-like predator. Excited and urging them to go forward at full speed ahead, and even bring back the Woolly Mammoth. Excited because I know we need all of that biotechnology going forward in the next 1,000 years, save we do not have a nuclear war, but rather instead, focused on a permanent colony on Europa. We need all the biotech engineering knowledge to pull off that feat of a permanent living colony on Europa. Why Europa and 1,000 years hence? Because stars and Sun shine not from fusion physics, but from Faraday law going on inside each and every proton that exists in the Sun and stars. That means the Sun has already started its Red Giant Initiation Phase. And if we do not get a permanent colony on Europa in the next 1,000 years, consider all of life on Earth going extinct and into Oblivion.

Cover Picture: Sadly, I should have made the cover picture a picture of thylacines, instead, I decided to make the cover picture the electrolysis of water, for on Europa we have to biotech engineer plants and animals to thrive on Europa.


Product details
• ASIN ‏ : ‎ B0CBXQKSKZ
• Publication date ‏ : ‎ July 14, 2023
• Language ‏ : ‎ English
• File size ‏ : ‎ 576 KB
• Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
• Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Sticky notes ‏ : ‎ On Kindle Scribe
• Print length ‏ : ‎ 28 pages


#4.1-1, 157th published book

In Biology, keystone-species is a poor name for it is a "doping" concept of Physics and doping-species is its best name// Biology Science Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Preface: I was watching a PBS NATURE program on "keystone species" for the second time and said to myself, what a ugly term for a concept of science. And I instinctively knew there had to be a physics term that would comprise the poetry or literary term of "keystone". And in a few days I realized that the true term was "doping" from physics and chemistry. Thus, was born this book, where the theme lesson is that all concepts of hard science should link-up to its physics primal concept.

Cover Picture: is my iphone photograph of a Google search for "doping semiconductor".

Product details
• ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09LXW76F9
• Publication date ‏ : ‎ November 14, 2021
• Language ‏ : ‎ English
• File size ‏ : ‎ 951 KB
• Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
• Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Print length ‏ : ‎ 23 pages
• Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled


#4.1-2, 158th published book

Solving Darwin's Mystery-- how flowering plants evolved explosively in Cretaceous// Biology Science
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) (Amazon's Kindle)


Preface: In January of 2021, I was reading a article in BBC about Darwin's Mystery of Flowering Plants. I had never heard of this before. And since I had completed two astronomy geology books on when the Moon was the satellite of Earth and when the 2nd rock bolide companion of the Moon struck Earth and carved out the Mediterranean Sea, I instantly could see that I had solved Darwin's Mystery of Flowering Plants. But since I had other books to complete, I put this book to the side to wait for the moment I was free to write this book.

Cover Picture: Is my iphone photograph of the picture by BBC of Darwin's Mystery of Flowering Plants.

Product details
• ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09M9KVSTB
• Publication date ‏ : ‎ November 19, 2021
• Language ‏ : ‎ English
• File size ‏ : ‎ 1138 KB
• Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
• Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Print length ‏ : ‎ 45 pages
• Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled


#4.1-3, 162nd published book
First Multicellular Organism on Earth was a cancer of a single cell in mitosis/ Cancer is primarily a problem of detachment// Biology Science Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Preface: In late November early December 2021, I had realized the First Multicellular organism evolved not from a collection of individual single cells in a colony, but rather evolved all at once from a single cell during mitosis that the parent cell could not split-off from its daughter cell, but remain attached. And this attachment would become the skin covering that evolved for the cells that are now a multicellular organism. As I discovered that, I realized this was cancer, for to try to shake free of the attachment of parent cell with daughter cell, to shake free, the two cells stuck together and signaling for another mitosis division in hopes of freeing themselves. Unfortunately the uncontrolled replication does not free them but only adds on more cells into the multicellular organism.
Cover Picture: Is my iphone camera taking a picture of a animation and diagram of cells in mitosis. I tried to capture the animation just as it was splitting off the two cells from mitosis.

Product details
• ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09N2DSQFF
• Publication date ‏ : ‎ December 4, 2021
• Language ‏ : ‎ English
• File size ‏ : ‎ 1336 KB
• Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
• Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Print length ‏ : ‎ 46 pages
• Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Best Sellers Rank: #3,918,804 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
◦ #1,632 in 90-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
◦ #6,851 in Biology (Kindle Store)
◦ #43,832 in Biology (Books)

#4.1-4, 164th published book

Race Horses are the fastest land animals, not the cheetah// lessons on speed versus acceleration// biology science
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) Format Kindle Edition

Preface: 164th book of science by AP// The Debate on whether the racehorse is the fastest land animal or the cheetah. Rather strange that a predator animal would be faster than its prey, which would mean it is successful on every hunt. But we certainly know that is not the case for the cheetah. So why did biology get this wrong, that the racehorse is the fastest land animal in terms of speed or velocity over a large distance such as 2.4kilometers. While the cheetah is the world's fastest accelerator land animal over a small distance of about 100 meters. Is it that biologists are poor on mathematics and physics of speed versus acceleration? This book explores these questions and much more.
Cover Picture: iphone photograph of one of my most loved horses, Secretariat, (others being Pharlap and Seabiscuit). And many would say Secretariat was the fastest racehorse in history. And this book will argue that Secretariat as a individual, was the fastest land animal, that we know of, --fastest land animal to have lived.

Product details
• ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09P84M3DS
• Publication date ‏ : ‎ December 26, 2021
• Language ‏ : ‎ English
• File size ‏ : ‎ 1051 KB
• Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
• Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Print length ‏ : ‎ 31 pages
• Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled



#4.1-5, 165th published book


Evolution of Eye, Mitosis & Meiosis/ biophysics science Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)


Preface: This is AP's 165th book of science. It started out as a examination of the first-eye evolution, but in the course of researching the data and facts of first-eye evolution, I could see links and connections to how first-mitosis and more complex, how first-meiosis evolved on our planet Earth. Meiosis, or sexual reproduction is a very complex dynamic and very difficult to see how it evolved in terms of Darwin evolution. So I was ecstatic when doing first-eye evolution to come across how first- meiosis had evolved. And how it evolved is new science for all of biology.
Cover Picture: Is my iphone photograph of a Google search for meiosis phases. Try to notice the Spindle structure, and then look at light waves as semicircle waves.


Product details
• ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09PJ25HGP
• Publication date ‏ : ‎ December 30, 2021
• Language ‏ : ‎ English
• File size ‏ : ‎ 787 KB
• Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
• Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Print length ‏ : ‎ 38 pages
• Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled


#4.1-6, 167th published book


Biophysics of why mammals in Ocean surpass fishes/ the lungs are 2.5X better than gills// Biology science
By Archimedes Plutonium

Last revision was July 2023. And this is AP's 167th published book on science.

Preface: Back in High School in the 1960s, I had learned many animals on land in past geological time, returned to the ocean, seas with their lungs, instead of having gills. And surprising to me, they seemed to be more successful in their new home than many of the animals of the sea with their gills. This question has vexed me for decades, and finally in 2021, I decided to find out more about this question of lungs versus gills in ocean water. Which is the superior breathing apparatus is explored.

Cover Picture: Is a iphone picture of a Google Search for Orcas versus Great White Sharks. The Orcas are lung breathers while the shark is a gill breather.

Product details
• ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09PRB4MQQ
• Publication date ‏ : ‎ January 4, 2022
• Language ‏ : ‎ English
• File size ‏ : ‎ 898 KB
• Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
• Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Sticky notes ‏ : ‎ On Kindle Scribe
• Print length ‏ : ‎ 23 pages


#4.1-7, My 168th published book of science.

Evolution of First-Heart concurrent with First-Gill, First-Lung // Biology science Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Preface: AP loves unravelling the evolution history of life, far far better than any crime mystery story, and far more rewarding. It takes logical thought backed up with physical science understanding to unravel First Heart with First Gill/Lung. Logic and physics should be able to unravel most "Firsts' of Biology" even with a scant fossil record. We should be able to penetrate the Firsts of Biology from the living species of today, a scant fossil record but good-logic and good-physics knowledge. In this manner, this book uses logic and physics to determine the First Heart concurrent First-Gill/Lung.
Cover Picture: A picture of octopus from my iphone camera of a Google search of octopus, for it is the octopus animal evolved from fungus Mold some 600 million years ago that First Heart synchronized with First Gill/Lungs was evolved.


Product details
• ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09QLQWQTR
• Publication date ‏ : ‎ January 17, 2022
• Language ‏ : ‎ English
• File size ‏ : ‎ 1006 KB
• Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
• Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Print length ‏ : ‎ 24 pages
• Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled


#4.1-8, My 268th published book of science.

Rewriting Nature: "Canada: Surviving the Wild North" / biology
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) (Amazon's Kindle)

Preface: I recently wrote 6 books on the poor science methodology of NOVA's 5 episode series "Ancient Earth". Where they used the atmosphere gas carbon dioxide CO2 to be the cause for catastrophes of past geological times. This is not science but science-fiction with what is propaganda of hidden agenda. A section of NATURE: "Canada: Surviving the Wild North" where they evaluate sea wolf behavior in eating Pacific salmon is another example of bad science explanation. The poor methodology of sea wolf behavior in eating salmon, needs correction for we want never to have science be a propaganda platform.

Actually, there is only one offending segment of this NATURE program and that is the segment on sea wolves eating Pacific salmon. So I rewrite only the segment on the sea wolves.

Cover Picture: Is my iphone photograph of a Google search of NATURE: "Canada: Surviving the Wild North".

Product details
• ASIN ‏ : ‎ B0CQVDDQFX
• Publication date ‏ : ‎ December 22, 2023
• Language ‏ : ‎ English
• File size ‏ : ‎ 492 KB
• Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
• Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Sticky notes ‏ : ‎ On Kindle Scribe
• Print length ‏ : ‎ 29 pages




#4.1-9, My 275th published book of science.

Corrections & Rewrite of NATURE's TV show: Serengeti Rules // biology
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) (Amazon's Kindle)


Preface: Usually NATURE science TV-shows are of high quality, but sometimes a NATURE show is poor to failing containing errors of science. The Serengeti Rules is more anti-science than actual science, and at best is a show of "statement of the obvious" if you remove predators from an ecosystem the herbivores increase in numbers and the plant life declines. This is so elementary that this show can be used in Junior High School for the students in High School biology would know these ideas before the TV-show is even played. But the bad side of this show is to introduce a concept of "keystone" which is crackpot science, and then introduce the idea that a herbivore the Wildebeest can save an ecosystem is a contradiction to this show's main-theme that removing predators increases herbivores and decreasing plant life. So the mistakes made in this show are so big and glaring that NATURE needs to scrap this show and make a new one, perhaps keeping the film scenes but altering the discussion and transcript.

In fact, this show of NATURE: Serengeti Rules should be scrapped because of the early scenes where a biologist haphazardly tosses starfish in the direction of the Ocean, not careful enough or prudent enough to simply put them in a plastic bucket and walking them to the shoreline and then gently releasing them back to the ocean and ensuring they are not smashed to death on rocks. No, Bob Paine does not even have the sensibility of making sure the wildlife is not killed in his experiment. And teaching young students-- not to care about wildlife.

♪♪♪ ♪♪♪ Here, Paine conducts one of the simplest experiments in the history of biology.

♪♪♪ He removes starfish from one tide pool, while leaving them in another.

This is where Paine is showed as tossing starfish haphazardly that could be smashed on rocks. My vote is to completely scrap this NATURE show and then remove narration and title the show as being "How an ecosystem is altered when removal of a species". For Bob Paine needs to go back to school and learn Logic, how to think logically, not think to self promotion for claiming the discovery of "the obvious". Even a High School student knows that if you remove predators, the herbivores increase and the plants decrease. But Bob Paine thinks that is a monumental discovery and he should get the Nobel prize in "discovery of the Obvious".

Cover Picture: Is my iphone photograph of NATURE's Serengeti Rules showing the Wildebeest herd.

Product details
• ASIN ‏ : ‎ B0CTYQXKW1
• Publication date ‏ : ‎ February 3, 2024
• Language ‏ : ‎ English
• File size ‏ : ‎ 930 KB
• Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
• Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Sticky notes ‏ : ‎ On Kindle Scribe
• Print length ‏ : ‎ 72 pages


#4.1-10, My 276th published book of science.


Whales and hippopotamus evolved from sauropods and or pterosaurs, not some ancient deer or wolf like species-- genetic evolution of huge size favors sauropods as ancestors// biology

by Archimedes Plutonium

Preface: There is ample DNA evidence that Whales and Hippopotamus are closely related. The main theme of this 276th book of science for AP, that main theme is the idea that size of animal is a parameter or unit that is actually evolved. What I mean is that you cannot directly go from small size or medium size and evolve into large size. You cannot evolve the whale or hippopotamus from a deer or wolf size. You need an animal that is already large or huge to evolve into a whale or hippopotamus, and more so the whale. The hugest dinosaurs were sauropods and they were aquatic animals to buoy up that weight, for if they wandered onto land they would collapse. What this book theme is about is showing that the Whale evolved directly from sauropods. And perhaps some of the whale species and hippos came from pterosaurs. What we need most of all is ability to get ancient fossil DNA of sauropod and pterosaur.


Cover Picture: Is my iphone photograph of a Google search on "sauropoda pterosaur". Of course AP believes the Sauropod was a sea and ocean going animal and never terrestrial. And the pterosaur never flew in the air but was a sea and ocean going animal that used its appendages as sails and rowing oars.

Product details
• ASIN ‏ : ‎ B0CVFTBWR7
• Publication date ‏ : ‎ February 10, 2024
• Language ‏ : ‎ English
• File size ‏ : ‎ 906 KB
• Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
• Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Sticky notes ‏ : ‎ On Kindle Scribe
• Print length ‏ : ‎ 82 pages




y z
| /
| /
|/______ x

Read my recent posts in peace and quiet.
https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe
Archimedes Plutonium

AP kindly asks Google to let AP run all three, sci.math, sci.physics, PAU as he runs PAU, now--- all pure science, no spam and no govt b.s. Why, did you know that because of the "cloud" every picture I take on my camera-- whether private personal picture-- is also viewed by the governments around the world, whether I like it or not, and that is because of the "cloud" for the cloud is open to governments. I now no longer have my Apple payed and bought for music, as a govt. bureaucrat felt like disabling AP's music, ever since AP rewrote "Chariots of Fire" as a praise hymnal "How Great Thou Art". And it is no wonder govt. wants Google newsgroups to collapse and fold, for the govt. hates it when they are not in "overwhelming force in control of what they think science education should be and what is taught as science". For the govt. reCAPTcha has now -- disallowed AP from making a new thread in sci.math and sci.physics, and that AP has to post in any old thread not AP's own, in order to get out a single post at all. Govt. bureaucrats love it when they can fully strangle its citizens, especially scientists.

PAU newsgroup is this.
https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe
Archimedes Plutonium


Very crude dot picture of 5f6 magnetosphere of 231Pu Atom Totality.

A torus shape doing the Faraday Law inside of each and every atom. The Cosmos of Astronomy looks like this.
____
.-' `-.
.' ::\ ::|:: /:: `.
/ ::\::|::/:: \
; _ _ ;
| ___( O )___ |
; - - ;
\ ::/::|::\:: /
`. ::/ ::|:: \:: .'
`- _____ .-'

One of those dots in the magnetosphere is the Milky Way galaxy. And
each dot represents another galaxy. The O is the Cosmic nucleus and
certainly not as dense as what Old Physics thought because in New Physics
the interior of atoms has the Faraday law with the donut hole occupied by neutrons as storage capacitors.

I re-opened the old newsgroup PAU of 1990s and there one can read my recent posts without the hassle of spammers, govt-police drag net spam,off-topic-misfits, front-page-hogs, stalking mockers, suppression-bullies, and demonizers.

[Archimedes Plutonium]

I thought I do a series of books of famous science (some infamous) experiments. If for no other purpose than to prod those in science to redo the experiment with keener mind and eye. Because of the horrid lack of logic in water electrolysis-- for water is really H40 and not H2O that the experiment was stopped short of completion-- stopped by looking at volume when it naturally needs to stop only after the mass of hydrogen versus oxygen are weighed and proving AP correct-- water is really H4O since all atoms need at least one capacitor-- one neutron. So the Hydrogen atom is truly H2 and not H, for H has no capacitor. And where H2 is not a molecule but actually a Atom.

It is appalling logic in most old experiments of science that nearly all of them need a second check up and a logically trained mind to see what was done and to see what was interpreted. The Rutherford-Geiger-Marsden experiment on gold foil scattering from alpha particles comes up with an absurd interpretation-- Atoms have nuclei when in truth, in reality-- Atomic interiors are proton toruses with a muon circumnavigating inside the proton torus producing electricity in the Faraday law.

So these books are vital and essential into puting logical reasoning and order into long past done experiments who have stupid conclusions and have anti-science conclusions.


AP's 278th book of science// Correcting & Chronicling the most famous Science Experiments// Experiments-physics-chemistry
by Archimedes Plutonium

Jan Deiman- Adrian van Troostwijk, 1778 water electrolysis.

Cavendish Gravity Constant experiment 1798.

Michelson-Morley experiment 1887.

JJ Thomson experiment of electron 1897.

Millikan-Fletcher 1909 electric monopole oil drop.

Rutherford, Geiger, Marsden gold leaf scattering experiment 1908-1913.

Harvard's Hau slow light experiment 1999-2001 slow light experiments.

CERN's higgs boson of Standard Model farce 2011-2013.

AP's 278-285th books of science on correcting and chronicling famous experiments of science. I find it appalling of the many mistakes made in famous science experiments and am here to do something about it-- correction and redo the experiment over

zzzzzzzzzzzz


Very crude dot picture of 5f6 magnetosphere of 231Pu Atom Totality.

A torus shape doing the Faraday Law inside of each and every atom. The Cosmos of Astronomy looks like this.
____
.-' `-.
.' ::\ ::|:: /:: `.
/ ::\::|::/:: \
; _ _ ;
| ___( O )___ |
; - - ;
\ ::/::|::\:: /
`. ::/ ::|:: \:: .'
`- _____ .-'

One of those dots in the magnetosphere is the Milky Way galaxy. And
each dot represents another galaxy. The O is the Cosmic nucleus and
certainly not as dense as what Old Physics thought because in New Physics
the interior of atoms has the Faraday law with the donut hole occupied by neutrons as storage capacitors.

I re-opened the old newsgroup PAU of 1990s and there one can read my recent posts without the hassle of spammers, govt-police drag net spam,off-topic-misfits, front-page-hogs, stalking mockers, suppression-bullies, and demonizers.


AP kindly asks Google to let AP run all three, sci.math, sci.physics, PAU as he runs PAU, now--- all pure science, no spam and no govt b.s.

PAU newsgroup is this.
https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe
Archimedes Plutonium

[Archimedes Plutonium]

AP's 278th book of science starts a series on Experiments of Science that need a Logic- OverView of mistakes, grave errors and simple stupidity of reasoning starting with Magnetism.
13 views
Skip to first unread message
Subscribe

Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium<***@gmail.com>
Feb 17, 2024, 6:03:00 PM (9 hours ago)



to Plutonium Atom Universe
AP's 278-289th books of science on correcting and chronicling famous experiments of science. I find it appalling of the many mistakes made in famous science experiments and am here to do something about it-- correction and redo the experiment over
4 views
Subscribe

Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium<***@gmail.com>
3:38 PM (2 hours ago)



to Plutonium Atom Universe
AP's 278-289th books of science on correcting and chronicling famous experiments of science. I find it appalling of the many mistakes made in famous science experiments and am here to do something about it-- correction and redo the experiment over

I thought I do a series of books of famous science (some infamous) experiments. If for no other purpose than to prod those in science to redo the experiment with keener mind and eye. Because of the horrid lack of logic in water electrolysis-- for water is really H40 and not H2O that the experiment was stopped short of completion-- stopped by looking at volume when it naturally needs to stop only after the mass of hydrogen versus oxygen are weighed and proving AP correct-- water is really H4O since all atoms need at least one capacitor-- one neutron. So the Hydrogen atom is truly H2 and not H, for H has no capacitor. And where H2 is not a molecule but actually a Atom.

It is appalling logic in most old experiments of science that nearly all of them need a second check up and a logically trained mind to see what was done and to see what was interpreted. The Rutherford-Geiger-Marsden experiment on gold foil scattering from alpha particles comes up with an absurd interpretation-- Atoms have nuclei when in truth, in reality-- Atomic interiors are proton toruses with a muon circumnavigating inside the proton torus producing electricity in the Faraday law.

So these books are vital and essential into puting logical reasoning and order into long past done experiments who have stupid conclusions and have anti-science conclusions.


AP's 278th book of science// Correcting & Chronicling the most famous Science Experiments// Experiments-physics-chemistry
by Archimedes Plutonium

Ancient Greek magnetism-- Lodestone. And also considering a new form of magnetism in recent news.

Ben Franklin kite flying in lightning storm 1700s

Jan Deiman- Adrian van Troostwijk, 1778 water electrolysis.

Cavendish Gravity Constant experiment 1798.

Double Slit Experiment 1801 with Thomas Young.

Ohm's law 1827.

Michelson-Morley experiment 1887.

JJ Thomson experiment of electron 1897.

Millikan-Fletcher 1909 electric monopole oil drop.

Rutherford, Geiger, Marsden gold leaf scattering experiment 1908-1913.

Harvard's Hau slow light experiment 1999-2001 slow light experiments.

CERN's higgs boson of Standard Model farce 2011-2013.

AP's 278-289th books of science on correcting and chronicling famous experiments of science. I find it appalling of the many mistakes made in famous science experiments and am here to do something about it-- correction and redo the experiment over

zzzzzzzzzzzz


Very crude dot picture of 5f6 magnetosphere of 231Pu Atom Totality.

A torus shape doing the Faraday Law inside of each and every atom. The Cosmos of Astronomy looks like this.
____
.-' `-.
.' ::\ ::|:: /:: `.
/ ::\::|::/:: \
; _ _ ;
| ___( O )___ |
; - - ;
\ ::/::|::\:: /
`. ::/ ::|:: \:: .'
`- _____ .-'

One of those dots in the magnetosphere is the Milky Way galaxy. And
each dot represents another galaxy. The O is the Cosmic nucleus and
certainly not as dense as what Old Physics thought because in New Physics
the interior of atoms has the Faraday law with the donut hole occupied by neutrons as storage capacitors.

I re-opened the old newsgroup PAU of 1990s and there one can read my recent posts without the hassle of spammers, govt-police drag net spam,off-topic-misfits, front-page-hogs, stalking mockers, suppression-bullies, and demonizers.

AP kindly asks Google to let AP run all three, sci.math, sci.physics, PAU as he runs PAU, now--- all pure science, no spam and no govt b.s.

PAU newsgroup is this.
https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe
Archimedes Plutonium
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium<***@gmail.com>
4:20 PM (2 hours ago)



to Plutonium Atom Universe
--- quoting Google hits of "new form of magnetism" ---

Altermagnets
A new kind of magnetism has been measured for the first time. Altermagnets, which contain a blend of properties from different classes of existing magnets, could be used to make high capacity and fast memory devices or new kinds of magnetic computers.3 days ago

The existence of a new kind of magnetism has been confirmed

New Scientist
https://www.newscientist.com › article › 2417255-the-exi...


Researchers discover new kind of magnetism

Science | AAAS
https://www.science.org › content › article › researchers...

Feb 6, 2024 — Physicists now know that magnetic materials glean their power from the behavior of the atoms inside them. But magnetism still holds secrets.

Scientists Just Discovered a New Type of Magnetism

WIRED
https://www.wired.com › Science › Quanta Magazine

Jan 28, 2024 — In 2020, researchers created Nagaoka ferromagnetism in a tiny system containing just three electrons, one of the smallest possible systems in ...

Scientists discover strange new form of magnetism

New Atlas
https://newatlas.com › physics › magnetism-strange-n...

Nov 19, 2023 — Scientists at ETH Zurich have discovered a new type of magnetism. Experiments show that an artificially produced material becomes magnetic ...

A New Form Of Magnetism Could Make For More Powerful ...

IFLScience
https://www.iflscience.com › a-suspected-alternative-...

Scientists discover new type of magnetism never seen before

Interesting Engineering
https://interestingengineering.com › Science

3 days ago — Called altermagnetism, this type of magnetism was confirmed through work conducted in collaboration with the Czech Academy of Sciences (CAS).

Altermagnetism: A new type of magnetism, with broad ...

Phys.org
https://phys.org › Physics › Condensed Matter

3 days ago — Altermagnetism: A new type of magnetism, with broad implications for technology and research ... There is now a new addition to the magnetic ...

Scientists have found a new kind of magnetic material

The Economist
https://www.economist.com › 2024/01/24 › scientists...

Jan 24, 2024 — A new type of magnetic material may, it seems, have been hiding under their noses. Most people are familiar with ferromagnets. These have a ...

New type of magnetism splits from convention

Nature
https://www.nature.com › news & views

by C Autieri · 2024 — Magnetic materials with zero net magnetization fall into two classes: conventional antiferromagnets and altermagnets.

A new kind of magnetism | ETH Zurich

ETH Zürich
https://ethz.ch › eth-news › news › 2023/11 › a-new-ki...

Nov 16, 2023 — ETH Zurich researchers have detected a new type of magnetism in an artificially produced material. The material becomes ferromagnetic through ...

Scientists Have Discovered a New Type of Magnetism

SciTechDaily
https://scitechdaily.com › unraveling-quantum-mysteri...

ETH Zurich scientists have identified a novel ferromagnetism in a custom-engineered moiré material, challenging traditional magnetic theories. This magnetism, ...

The existence of a new kind of magnet has been confirmed

Scientists Discovered a New Type of Magnetism

atlas.edu.tr
https://www.atlas.edu.tr › Atlas Blog

In 1966, Japanese physicist Yosuke Nagaoka envisioned a type of magnetism produced by the seemingly unnatural dance of electrons within a hypothetical material.
Missing: form ‎| Show results with: form

Scientists find new form of magnetism in engineered material

Interesting Engineering
https://interestingengineering.com › Science

Nov 20, 2023 — In a groundbreaking exploration of materials science, researchers from ETH Zurich have unveiled a revolutionary form of ferromagnetism within an ...

Experimental Evidence for a New Type of Magnetism

American Physical Society
https://physics.aps.org › articles

by R Wilkinson · 2024 — Spectroscopic data suggest that thin films of a certain semiconducting material can exhibit altermagnetism, a new and fundamental form of ...

New type of magnetism unveiled in an iconic material

ScienceDaily
https://www.sciencedaily.com › releases › 2021/10

Oct 5, 2021 — Scientists have made a path-breaking discovery in strontium ruthenate -- with potential for new applications in quantum electronics.

'Magnetic graphene' forms a new kind of magnetism

University of Cambridge
https://www.cam.ac.uk › research › news › magnetic-g...

Feb 8, 2021 — 'Magnetic graphene' forms a new kind of magnetism · Researchers have identified a new form of magnetism in so-called magnetic graphene, which ...

--- end quoting some Google hits on this new form of magnetism ---

AP writes:: But is it really "new" or is it from the fact that Old Physics never understood magnetism logically in the first place. That there is __no repulsion__ in magnetism but only Attraction. That magnetism does ___not allow same space occupancy___. For which dullards of logic get confused with their dumb repell force???

So what AP is saying is that if Magnetism has only a Attraction force, never a repelling force. And that when we put north pole to north pole-- that is not repel at all. That is ___no same space occupancy___.

And now, in modern times February 2024 with news of Altermagnetism, is the fleet of dumb physicists just starting to catch up logically that their altermagnetism is not new, but a side show of the fact that magnets are Attract Only and have __no same space occupancy__.

I suspect this is the case-- the dumb Old Physics physicists are now catching up with Logic that you have no repel force in magnetism, and these dumb physicists are beginning to understand that Altermagnets is a form of ___no same space occupancy___. That the dumb physicists of OId Physics are starting to realize the truth of magnetism and are not finding a "new magnetism" but rather, finding their stupid errors of the past.

AP
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium<***@gmail.com>
Feb 17, 2024, 6:17:45 PM (9 hours ago)



to Plutonium Atom Universe
I was fed up with the Old Physics, Old Chemistry community of do-nothing error filled professors who simply cannot even review and re-do experiments, simple experiments to see if what they are teaching in colleges and universities is true science or merely memorized fake science. The question most on my mind was water, whether it is H4O or H2O and seeing no physics or chemistry professor so to speak "shake a leg" and find out the truth, I decided to write this series of science experiment books. I write from the perspective of LOGIC as the judge of whether scientists have a good experiment with truthful answers or whether scientists have a experiment with false conclusions. I start with magnetism because in the news recently of February 2024 is news of a new form of magnetism.

Is it truly new form of magnetism, or, as AP asks, is it just part of the misunderstanding of magnetism that there never is a repel force in magnetism, only an attraction force in magnetism. But that magnetism obeys the Pauli Exclusion Principle that of ___no same space occupancy___ which is the Pauli Exclusion Principle. But most people are weak in logic and when they see a sort of push back when drawing a north pole near a north pole, they think--- repel repel repel.

Not logical enough in mind to consider that you have repel but you have a phenomenon that is Not Repel but looks like repel in the phenomenon of ____ no same space occupancy___.

You see, a person with a Logical Mind can recognize these are two different phenomenon-- repel is one, but no same space occupancy is different and is not repel. So one can immediately recognize that for 3,000 years we have known about magnetism, that we have confused and mixed up these two distinct ideas--- repel and different is ___ no same space occupancy___.

And so horribly mixed up and confused is the modern day physicist over this distinction, that when the modern day physicist finds this new material called Altermagnetism, he/she has not yet even straightened out in their mind that there is no repel in magnetism, and confusing that with Altermagnetism.

AP, King of Science
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium<***@gmail.com>
Feb 17, 2024, 7:37:58 PM (7 hours ago)



to Plutonium Atom Universe
The Chronicling list keeps going and hopefully I will not forget any important experiment in the next few months as I publish each one of these. I hate to forget someone.
AP's 278th book of science// Correcting & Chronicling the most famous Science Experiments// Experiments-physics-chemistry
by Archimedes Plutonium

Ancient Greek magnetism-- Lodestone. And also considering a new form of magnetism in recent news.

Ben Franklin kite flying in lightning storm 1700s

Jan Deiman- Adrian van Troostwijk, 1778 water electrolysis. Here I should include the history that two of the most famous scientists did water electrolysis-- Davy and Faraday, but both can be excused because a weighing scale of the accuracy needed was never available in the early 1800s to weigh the masses of hydrogen to oxygen. It is after precision scales were made that chemists and physicists became fools and derelict of duty.


Cavendish Gravity Constant experiment 1798.

Double Slit Experiment 1801 with Thomas Young.

Ohm's law 1827.

Michelson-Morley experiment 1887.

JJ Thomson experiment of electron 1897.

Millikan-Fletcher 1909 electric monopole oil drop.

Rutherford, Geiger, Marsden gold leaf scattering experiment 1908-1913.

How stars make their energy-- Harkins, 1921 Eddington, Atkinson-Houtermans, Blackett, Oliphant, Bethe all making claims the the Sun and Stars energy comes from fusion of light elements into heavier elements. But AP sees a huge flaw of logic in this reasoning for fusion is dependent on rare probabilities, yet Sun and Stars are so reliable and so constant in outpouring of energy which apparently increases over time (not decrease) as evidenced in Red Giant stars, that AP says the main bulk of star energy is the Faraday law perhaps as high as 90-99% of star energy. For the Faraday law is a constant energy source.

Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium<***@gmail.com>
Feb 17, 2024, 8:09:07 PM (7 hours ago)



to Plutonium Atom Universe

The list keeps growing.


1927 Lemaitre and Big Bang, when a tiny bit of Logic was needed to form the Atom Totality theory. But the chemical elements of plutonium had never be yet discovered by 1927. Still, Lemaitre could have researched the literature going back to the Ancient Greeks with their Democritus Cosmic Atom. And if Lemaitre had used a bit of Logical Reasoning could have figured out AP's Atomic Theory Syllogism-- all things are made up of atoms-- the universe is a thing -- hence the Universe must be a single Cosmic Atom in order to preserve the Atomic Theory to its furthest theoretical reach. The greatest theory of science cannot be restricted to a smaller domain, but must be universal.

1954, Yang-Mills, Chien-Shiung, Glashow, Weinberg-Salam-Higgs in the Standard Model of physics, a thoroughly disgusting and fake theory of physics, when all that was required for a true theory is notice the proton and neutron were within sigma error of 9 times the mass of muon.

1965, Penzias & Wilson, Smoot & Mather on Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation. A tiny bit of a logical mind would have helped here, enormously. For if the observations are coming in as Quantum Mechanics, means the Universe itself is Quantum Mechanics as the interior inside of one big Cosmic Atom. I do not know if the Bible has any good quotes of how some people search the world over for answers, when the answer is there in front of their face all along. The Universe is not a stupid silly Big Bang. The Universe is a single atom for all all matter is made up-- one of the atoms in the Periodic Table of Chemical Elements.


Harvard's Hau slow light experiment 1999-2001 slow light experiments.

CERN's higgs boson of Standard Model farce 2011-2013.

AP, King of Science, especially physics and logic
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium<***@gmail.com>
Feb 17, 2024, 9:21:31 PM (6 hours ago)



to Plutonium Atom Universe
List keeps growing, but nothing is more important to science than Experiment, experiment and more experiment. I failed to include biology so far, and here so, I include biology.





AP's 278th book of science// Correcting & Chronicling the most famous Science Experiments// Experiments-physics-chemistry
by Archimedes Plutonium

Ancient Greek magnetism-- Lodestone. And also considering a new form of magnetism in recent news.

Ben Franklin kite flying in lightning storm 1700s

Jan Deiman- Adrian van Troostwijk, 1778 water electrolysis. Here I should include the history that two of the most famous scientists did water electrolysis-- Davy and Faraday, but both can be excused because a weighing scale of the accuracy needed was never available in the early 1800s to weigh the masses of hydrogen to oxygen. It is after precision scales were made that chemists and physicists became fools and derelict of duty.


Cavendish Gravity Constant experiment 1798.

Double Slit Experiment 1801 with Thomas Young.

Ohm's law 1827.

Michelson-Morley experiment 1887.

JJ Thomson experiment of electron 1897.

Millikan-Fletcher 1909 electric monopole oil drop.

Rutherford, Geiger, Marsden gold leaf scattering experiment 1908-1913.

How stars make their energy-- Harkins, 1921 Eddington, Atkinson-Houtermans, Blackett, Oliphant, Bethe all making claims the the Sun and Stars energy comes from fusion of light elements into heavier elements. But AP sees a huge flaw of logic in this reasoning for fusion is dependent on rare probabilities, yet Sun and Stars are so reliable and so constant in outpouring of energy which apparently increases over time (not decrease) as evidenced in Red Giant stars, that AP says the main bulk of star energy is the Faraday law perhaps as high as 90-99% of star energy. For the Faraday law is a constant energy source.

The list keeps growing.


1927 Lemaitre and Big Bang, when a tiny bit of Logic was needed to form the Atom Totality theory. But the chemical elements of plutonium had never be yet discovered by 1927. Still, Lemaitre could have researched the literature going back to the Ancient Greeks with their Democritus Cosmic Atom. And if Lemaitre had used a bit of Logical Reasoning could have figured out AP's Atomic Theory Syllogism-- all things are made up of atoms-- the universe is a thing -- hence the Universe must be a single Cosmic Atom in order to preserve the Atomic Theory to its furthest theoretical reach. The greatest theory of science cannot be restricted to a smaller domain, but must be universal.


1953 is a culmination of discovery via experiments and research observations of DNA, the genetic coding of life. The list of contributors is extremely long, and a shame all of them should have been awarded the Nobel prize, not just three of them. The logic shortfall in the discovery of DNA and its time period after 1953, is that no-one in biology or the other sciences realized that the geometry of DNA resembles the geometry of pure Light Waves in Physics, and that Light waves of physics is "Perfect DNA". And that light waves in the environment communicates with DNA in plants and animals.






1954, Yang-Mills, Chien-Shiung, Glashow, Weinberg-Salam-Higgs in the Standard Model of physics, a thoroughly disgusting and fake theory of physics, when all that was required for a true theory is notice the proton and neutron were within sigma error of 9 times the mass of muon.


1964 with the John Bell Inequality in Quantum Mechanics gives rise to quantum entanglement and often referred to as Superdeterminism for the sake of biology. Experiments carried out by Aspect et al circa 1982 proved true the Bell Inequality of entanglement. How this relates to biology is it makes Darwin Evolution be a rule, not a theory of science. It makes biology be quantum mechanics and thus, biology, physics are parts of the Atom Totality theory. The logic mistakes here are simply the denial of acceptance. The many scientists who agree everything is correct and clear, but who cannot admit Superdeterminism replaces Darwin Evolution, nor admit that Light Waves are perfect DNA. Denial by scientists is often, a disease that is incurable in science. Much like mathematicians who deny slant cut of cone is oval, not ellipse.

Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium<***@gmail.com>
Feb 17, 2024, 10:30:54 PM (5 hours ago)



to Plutonium Atom Universe
On Saturday, February 17, 2024 at 9:21:31 PM UTC-6 Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
List keeps growing, but nothing is more important to science than Experiment, experiment and more experiment. I failed to include biology so far, and here so, I include biology.

Alright, almost ready to write this series of books on science experiments and to point out the gaps and holes in Logic in each, the blaring mistakes.

But I need to include superconductivity, for recently I made a major discovery in superconductivity which highlights the errors of missing elements.

And I probably will combine some of these listed experiments as they are pretty much similar such as DNA and superdeterminism of Bell Inequality. Probably combine Cavendish and Millikan experiments. Probably combine Double Slit experiment with the Harvard's Dr. Hau slow light for the fundamental flaw in both are looking at light as straightline arrows with a front tip and and tail end, when in truth they are closed loop circuits of pencil ellipse.

Once I finish this series, I should write a series on how Psychology Frame of Mind holds back so many math professors and mathematicians from doing "good honest true mathematics" and how a twisted mind of psychological makes them losers of mathematics. A fate far worse than in physics where we have lapses of logical judgement.

Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium<***@gmail.com>
Feb 17, 2024, 11:00:02 PM (4 hours ago)



to Plutonium Atom Universe

Chronology


Ancient Greek magnetism-- Lodestone. And also considering a new form of magnetism in recent news.

Ben Franklin kite flying in lightning storm 1700s

Jan Deiman- Adrian van Troostwijk, 1778 water electrolysis. Here I should include the history that two of the most famous scientists did water electrolysis-- Davy and Faraday, but both can be excused because a weighing scale of the accuracy needed was never available in the early 1800s to weigh the masses of hydrogen to oxygen. It is after precision scales were made that chemists and physicists became fools and derelict of duty.


Cavendish Gravity Constant experiment 1798.

Double Slit Experiment 1801 with Thomas Young.

Ohm's law 1827.

Michelson-Morley experiment 1887.

JJ Thomson experiment of electron 1897.

Millikan-Fletcher 1909 electric monopole oil drop.

Rutherford, Geiger, Marsden gold leaf scattering experiment 1908-1913.

1911 and later 1986 experiments in Superconductivity, starting with Onnes where he discoveries conductivity with no resistance when in cold temperature. Then in 1986 Bednorz & Muller with high temperature superconductors. My 270th book of science--
2nd Law of Thermodynamics is connected to Superconductivity-- Explained as New Ohm's Law// Physics research
by Archimedes Plutonium


1921, and how stars make their energy-- Harkins, 1921 Eddington, Atkinson-Houtermans, Blackett, Oliphant, Bethe all making claims the the Sun and Stars energy comes from fusion of light elements into heavier elements. But AP sees a huge flaw of logic in this reasoning for fusion is dependent on rare probabilities, yet Sun and Stars are so reliable and so constant in outpouring of energy which apparently increases over time (not decrease) as evidenced in Red Giant stars, that AP says the main bulk of star energy is the Faraday law perhaps as high as 90-99% of star energy. For the Faraday law is a constant energy source.

Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium<***@gmail.com>
unread,
3:03 AM (now)



to Plutonium Atom Universe
The list keeps growing bigger. I need my new insights into what superconductivity actually is, and it comes directly out of the Faraday law of Maxwell Equations which Feynman talked about the conundrum of 2 phenomenon. Where I get the sine of an angle of thrust. If the sine is that of 90 degrees I have the full current with no resistance as superconductivity. In other words, the pencil ellipse becomes straightline perpendicularity allowing for superconductivity. This is really really exciting for it also is the most beautiful explanation of the 4 seasons, why we have winter cold and summer hot and in between. All due to sine of angle that the Sun rays hit Earth. We can demonstrate this easily in front of a heater. If I hold me hand perpendicular, the most heat is felt. If I hold my hand at an angle only a fraction of the heat is felt. If I hold my hand on edge to the heater almost no heat is felt.

In this series of books I need to outline what Fallacy of Logic the mistakes that were made. For instance the fallacy of logic for the mistakes on the Faraday law is that the Maxwell Equations should all come from New Ohm's law, all four laws coming out of New Ohm's law and not each made up helter skelter. See AP's Teaching True Physics.


On Saturday, February 17, 2024 at 11:00:02 PM UTC-6 Archimedes Plutonium wrote:

Chronology

Ancient Greek magnetism-- Lodestone. And also considering a new form of magnetism in recent news.

Ben Franklin kite flying in lightning storm 1700s

Jan Deiman- Adrian van Troostwijk, 1778 water electrolysis. Here I should include the history that two of the most famous scientists did water electrolysis-- Davy and Faraday, but both can be excused because a weighing scale of the accuracy needed was never available in the early 1800s to weigh the masses of hydrogen to oxygen. It is after precision scales were made that chemists and physicists became fools and derelict of duty.


Cavendish Gravity Constant experiment 1798.

Double Slit Experiment 1801 with Thomas Young.

Ohm's law 1827.



1845-1860s Neumann- Maxwell the formal math laws of Faraday magnetic induction to produce electricity from thrusting magnetic field.

Two phenomena
Faraday's law is a single equation describing two different phenomena: the motional emf generated by a magnetic force on a moving wire (see the Lorentz force), and the transformer emf generated by an electric force due to a changing magnetic field (described by the Maxwell–Faraday equation).
James Clerk Maxwell drew attention to this fact in his 1861 paper On Physical Lines of Force. In the latter half of Part II of that paper, Maxwell gives a separate physical explanation for each of the two phenomena.
A reference to these two aspects of electromagnetic induction is made in some modern textbooks. As Richard Feynman states:
So the "flux rule" that the emf in a circuit is equal to the rate of change of the magnetic flux through the circuit applies whether the flux changes because the field changes or because the circuit moves (or both) ...
Yet in our explanation of the rule we have used two completely distinct laws for the two cases – v × B for "circuit moves" and ∇ × E = −∂tB for "field changes".
We know of no other place in physics where such a simple and accurate general principle requires for its real understanding an analysis in terms of two different phenomena.
— Richard P. Feynman, The Feynman Lectures on Physics

AP

AP kindly asks Google to let AP run all three, sci.math, sci.physics, PAU as he runs PAU, now--- all pure science, no spam and no govt b.s.

PAU newsgroup is this.
https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe        
Archimedes Plutonium

[Archimedes Plutonium]

AP's 278th book of science starts a series on Experiments of Science that need a Logic- OverView of mistakes, grave errors and simple stupidity of reasoning starting with Magnetism.
24m views
Subscribe

Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium<***@gmail.com>
Feb 17, 2024, 6:03:00 PM (2 days ago)



to Plutonium Atom Universe
AP's 278-289th books of science on correcting and chronicling famous experiments of science. I find it appalling of the many mistakes made in famous science experiments and am here to do something about it-- correction and redo the experiment over
4 views
Subscribe

Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium<***@gmail.com>
3:38 PM (2 hours ago)



to Plutonium Atom Universe
AP's 278-289th books of science on correcting and chronicling famous experiments of science. I find it appalling of the many mistakes made in famous science experiments and am here to do something about it-- correction and redo the experiment over

I thought I do a series of books of famous science (some infamous) experiments. If for no other purpose than to prod those in science to redo the experiment with keener mind and eye. Because of the horrid lack of logic in water electrolysis-- for water is really H40 and not H2O that the experiment was stopped short of completion-- stopped by looking at volume when it naturally needs to stop only after the mass of hydrogen versus oxygen are weighed and proving AP correct-- water is really H4O since all atoms need at least one capacitor-- one neutron. So the Hydrogen atom is truly H2 and not H, for H has no capacitor. And where H2 is not a molecule but actually a Atom.

It is appalling logic in most old experiments of science that nearly all of them need a second check up and a logically trained mind to see what was done and to see what was interpreted. The Rutherford-Geiger-Marsden experiment on gold foil scattering from alpha particles comes up with an absurd interpretation-- Atoms have nuclei when in truth, in reality-- Atomic interiors are proton toruses with a muon circumnavigating inside the proton torus producing electricity in the Faraday law.

So these books are vital and essential into puting logical reasoning and order into long past done experiments who have stupid conclusions and have anti-science conclusions.


AP's 278th book of science// Correcting & Chronicling the most famous Science Experiments// Experiments-physics-chemistry
by Archimedes Plutonium

Ancient Greek magnetism-- Lodestone. And also considering a new form of magnetism in recent news.

Ben Franklin kite flying in lightning storm 1700s

Jan Deiman- Adrian van Troostwijk, 1778 water electrolysis.

Cavendish Gravity Constant experiment 1798.

Double Slit Experiment 1801 with Thomas Young.

Ohm's law 1827.

Michelson-Morley experiment 1887.

JJ Thomson experiment of electron 1897.

Millikan-Fletcher 1909 electric monopole oil drop.

Rutherford, Geiger, Marsden gold leaf scattering experiment 1908-1913.

Harvard's Hau slow light experiment 1999-2001 slow light experiments.

CERN's higgs boson of Standard Model farce 2011-2013.

AP's 278-289th books of science on correcting and chronicling famous experiments of science. I find it appalling of the many mistakes made in famous science experiments and am here to do something about it-- correction and redo the experiment over

zzzzzzzzzzzz


Very crude dot picture of 5f6 magnetosphere of 231Pu Atom Totality.

A torus shape doing the Faraday Law inside of each and every atom. The Cosmos of Astronomy looks like this.
____
.-' `-.
.' ::\ ::|:: /:: `.
/ ::\::|::/:: \
; _ _ ;
| ___( O )___ |
; - - ;
\ ::/::|::\:: /
`. ::/ ::|:: \:: .'
`- _____ .-'

One of those dots in the magnetosphere is the Milky Way galaxy. And
each dot represents another galaxy. The O is the Cosmic nucleus and
certainly not as dense as what Old Physics thought because in New Physics
the interior of atoms has the Faraday law with the donut hole occupied by neutrons as storage capacitors.

I re-opened the old newsgroup PAU of 1990s and there one can read my recent posts without the hassle of spammers, govt-police drag net spam,off-topic-misfits, front-page-hogs, stalking mockers, suppression-bullies, and demonizers.

AP kindly asks Google to let AP run all three, sci.math, sci.physics, PAU as he runs PAU, now--- all pure science, no spam and no govt b.s.

PAU newsgroup is this.
https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe
Archimedes Plutonium
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium<***@gmail.com>
4:20 PM (2 hours ago)



to Plutonium Atom Universe
--- quoting Google hits of "new form of magnetism" ---

Altermagnets
A new kind of magnetism has been measured for the first time. Altermagnets, which contain a blend of properties from different classes of existing magnets, could be used to make high capacity and fast memory devices or new kinds of magnetic computers.3 days ago

The existence of a new kind of magnetism has been confirmed

New Scientist
https://www.newscientist.com › article › 2417255-the-exi...


Researchers discover new kind of magnetism

Science | AAAS
https://www.science.org › content › article › researchers...

Feb 6, 2024 — Physicists now know that magnetic materials glean their power from the behavior of the atoms inside them. But magnetism still holds secrets.

Scientists Just Discovered a New Type of Magnetism

WIRED
https://www.wired.com › Science › Quanta Magazine

Jan 28, 2024 — In 2020, researchers created Nagaoka ferromagnetism in a tiny system containing just three electrons, one of the smallest possible systems in ...

Scientists discover strange new form of magnetism

New Atlas
https://newatlas.com › physics › magnetism-strange-n...

Nov 19, 2023 — Scientists at ETH Zurich have discovered a new type of magnetism. Experiments show that an artificially produced material becomes magnetic ...

A New Form Of Magnetism Could Make For More Powerful ...

IFLScience
https://www.iflscience.com › a-suspected-alternative-...

Scientists discover new type of magnetism never seen before

Interesting Engineering
https://interestingengineering.com › Science

3 days ago — Called altermagnetism, this type of magnetism was confirmed through work conducted in collaboration with the Czech Academy of Sciences (CAS).

Altermagnetism: A new type of magnetism, with broad ...

Phys.org
https://phys.org › Physics › Condensed Matter

3 days ago — Altermagnetism: A new type of magnetism, with broad implications for technology and research ... There is now a new addition to the magnetic ...

Scientists have found a new kind of magnetic material

The Economist
https://www.economist.com › 2024/01/24 › scientists...

Jan 24, 2024 — A new type of magnetic material may, it seems, have been hiding under their noses. Most people are familiar with ferromagnets. These have a ...

New type of magnetism splits from convention

Nature
https://www.nature.com › news & views

by C Autieri · 2024 — Magnetic materials with zero net magnetization fall into two classes: conventional antiferromagnets and altermagnets.

A new kind of magnetism | ETH Zurich

ETH Zürich
https://ethz.ch › eth-news › news › 2023/11 › a-new-ki...

Nov 16, 2023 — ETH Zurich researchers have detected a new type of magnetism in an artificially produced material. The material becomes ferromagnetic through ...

Scientists Have Discovered a New Type of Magnetism

SciTechDaily
https://scitechdaily.com › unraveling-quantum-mysteri...

ETH Zurich scientists have identified a novel ferromagnetism in a custom-engineered moiré material, challenging traditional magnetic theories. This magnetism, ...

The existence of a new kind of magnet has been confirmed

Scientists Discovered a New Type of Magnetism

atlas.edu.tr
https://www.atlas.edu.tr › Atlas Blog

In 1966, Japanese physicist Yosuke Nagaoka envisioned a type of magnetism produced by the seemingly unnatural dance of electrons within a hypothetical material.
Missing: form ‎| Show results with: form

Scientists find new form of magnetism in engineered material

Interesting Engineering
https://interestingengineering.com › Science

Nov 20, 2023 — In a groundbreaking exploration of materials science, researchers from ETH Zurich have unveiled a revolutionary form of ferromagnetism within an ...

Experimental Evidence for a New Type of Magnetism

American Physical Society
https://physics.aps.org › articles

by R Wilkinson · 2024 — Spectroscopic data suggest that thin films of a certain semiconducting material can exhibit altermagnetism, a new and fundamental form of ...

New type of magnetism unveiled in an iconic material

ScienceDaily
https://www.sciencedaily.com › releases › 2021/10

Oct 5, 2021 — Scientists have made a path-breaking discovery in strontium ruthenate -- with potential for new applications in quantum electronics.

'Magnetic graphene' forms a new kind of magnetism

University of Cambridge
https://www.cam.ac.uk › research › news › magnetic-g...

Feb 8, 2021 — 'Magnetic graphene' forms a new kind of magnetism · Researchers have identified a new form of magnetism in so-called magnetic graphene, which ...

--- end quoting some Google hits on this new form of magnetism ---

AP writes:: But is it really "new" or is it from the fact that Old Physics never understood magnetism logically in the first place. That there is __no repulsion__ in magnetism but only Attraction. That magnetism does ___not allow same space occupancy___. For which dullards of logic get confused with their dumb repell force???

So what AP is saying is that if Magnetism has only a Attraction force, never a repelling force. And that when we put north pole to north pole-- that is not repel at all. That is ___no same space occupancy___.

And now, in modern times February 2024 with news of Altermagnetism, is the fleet of dumb physicists just starting to catch up logically that their altermagnetism is not new, but a side show of the fact that magnets are Attract Only and have __no same space occupancy__.

I suspect this is the case-- the dumb Old Physics physicists are now catching up with Logic that you have no repel force in magnetism, and these dumb physicists are beginning to understand that Altermagnets is a form of ___no same space occupancy___. That the dumb physicists of OId Physics are starting to realize the truth of magnetism and are not finding a "new magnetism" but rather, finding their stupid errors of the past.

AP
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium
Feb 17, 2024, 6:17:45 PM (2 days ago)

I was fed up with the Old Physics, Old Chemistry community of do-nothing error filled professors who
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium
Feb 17, 2024, 7:37:58 PM (2 days ago)

The Chronicling list keeps going and hopefully I will not forget any important experiment in the next
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium
Feb 17, 2024, 8:09:07 PM (2 days ago)

On Saturday, February 17, 2024 at 7:37:58 PM UTC-6 Archimedes Plutonium wrote: The Chronicling list
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium
Feb 17, 2024, 9:21:31 PM (2 days ago)

List keeps growing, but nothing is more important to science than Experiment, experiment and more
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium
Feb 17, 2024, 10:30:54 PM (2 days ago)

On Saturday, February 17, 2024 at 9:21:31 PM UTC-6 Archimedes Plutonium wrote: List keeps growing,
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium<***@gmail.com>
Feb 17, 2024, 11:00:02 PM (2 days ago)



to Plutonium Atom Universe

Chronology


Ancient Greek magnetism-- Lodestone. And also considering a new form of magnetism in recent news.

Ben Franklin kite flying in lightning storm 1700s

Jan Deiman- Adrian van Troostwijk, 1778 water electrolysis. Here I should include the history that two of the most famous scientists did water electrolysis-- Davy and Faraday, but both can be excused because a weighing scale of the accuracy needed was never available in the early 1800s to weigh the masses of hydrogen to oxygen. It is after precision scales were made that chemists and physicists became fools and derelict of duty.


Cavendish Gravity Constant experiment 1798.

Double Slit Experiment 1801 with Thomas Young.

Ohm's law 1827.

Michelson-Morley experiment 1887.

JJ Thomson experiment of electron 1897.

Millikan-Fletcher 1909 electric monopole oil drop.

Rutherford, Geiger, Marsden gold leaf scattering experiment 1908-1913.

1911 and later 1986 experiments in Superconductivity, starting with Onnes where he discoveries conductivity with no resistance when in cold temperature. Then in 1986 Bednorz & Muller with high temperature superconductors. My 270th book of science--
2nd Law of Thermodynamics is connected to Superconductivity-- Explained as New Ohm's Law// Physics research
by Archimedes Plutonium


1921, and how stars make their energy-- Harkins, 1921 Eddington, Atkinson-Houtermans, Blackett, Oliphant, Bethe all making claims the the Sun and Stars energy comes from fusion of light elements into heavier elements. But AP sees a huge flaw of logic in this reasoning for fusion is dependent on rare probabilities, yet Sun and Stars are so reliable and so constant in outpouring of energy which apparently increases over time (not decrease) as evidenced in Red Giant stars, that AP says the main bulk of star energy is the Faraday law perhaps as high as 90-99% of star energy. For the Faraday law is a constant energy source.

Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium<***@gmail.com>
Feb 18, 2024, 3:03:38 AM (yesterday)



to Plutonium Atom Universe
The list keeps growing bigger. I need my new insights into what superconductivity actually is, and it comes directly out of the Faraday law of Maxwell Equations which Feynman talked about the conundrum of 2 phenomenon. Where I get the sine of an angle of thrust. If the sine is that of 90 degrees I have the full current with no resistance as superconductivity. In other words, the pencil ellipse becomes straightline perpendicularity allowing for superconductivity. This is really really exciting for it also is the most beautiful explanation of the 4 seasons, why we have winter cold and summer hot and in between. All due to sine of angle that the Sun rays hit Earth. We can demonstrate this easily in front of a heater. If I hold me hand perpendicular, the most heat is felt. If I hold my hand at an angle only a fraction of the heat is felt. If I hold my hand on edge to the heater almost no heat is felt.

In this series of books I need to outline what Fallacy of Logic the mistakes that were made. For instance the fallacy of logic for the mistakes on the Faraday law is that the Maxwell Equations should all come from New Ohm's law, all four laws coming out of New Ohm's law and not each made up helter skelter. See AP's Teaching True Physics.


On Saturday, February 17, 2024 at 11:00:02 PM UTC-6 Archimedes Plutonium wrote:

Chronology

Ancient Greek magnetism-- Lodestone. And also considering a new form of magnetism in recent news.

Ben Franklin kite flying in lightning storm 1700s

Jan Deiman- Adrian van Troostwijk, 1778 water electrolysis. Here I should include the history that two of the most famous scientists did water electrolysis-- Davy and Faraday, but both can be excused because a weighing scale of the accuracy needed was never available in the early 1800s to weigh the masses of hydrogen to oxygen. It is after precision scales were made that chemists and physicists became fools and derelict of duty.


Cavendish Gravity Constant experiment 1798.

Double Slit Experiment 1801 with Thomas Young.

Ohm's law 1827.



1845-1860s Neumann- Maxwell the formal math laws of Faraday magnetic induction to produce electricity from thrusting magnetic field.

Two phenomena
Faraday's law is a single equation describing two different phenomena: the motional emf generated by a magnetic force on a moving wire (see the Lorentz force), and the transformer emf generated by an electric force due to a changing magnetic field (described by the Maxwell–Faraday equation).
James Clerk Maxwell drew attention to this fact in his 1861 paper On Physical Lines of Force. In the latter half of Part II of that paper, Maxwell gives a separate physical explanation for each of the two phenomena.
A reference to these two aspects of electromagnetic induction is made in some modern textbooks. As Richard Feynman states:
So the "flux rule" that the emf in a circuit is equal to the rate of change of the magnetic flux through the circuit applies whether the flux changes because the field changes or because the circuit moves (or both) ...
Yet in our explanation of the rule we have used two completely distinct laws for the two cases – v × B for "circuit moves" and ∇ × E = −∂tB for "field changes".
We know of no other place in physics where such a simple and accurate general principle requires for its real understanding an analysis in terms of two different phenomena.
— Richard P. Feynman, The Feynman Lectures on Physics

Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium<***@gmail.com>
Feb 18, 2024, 5:18:31 PM (yesterday)



to Plutonium Atom Universe

Alright, I need to make a Experiment myself, a world class experiment probably far more important than any on those long list below. The experiment involves heat and Light Waves and electricity and magnetism and why we have winter and summer. We are taught this lesson in Junior High School science but taught sloppily, never well enough that we can remember the cause of winter. For the complexity of the science involved makes teaching this subject difficult.

And it is this complexity of science that has evaded our understanding of Superconductivity. For if we analyzed how Sun Light Waves heat Earth, we can understand how superconductivity happens and why it exists. But first--- the full explanation of Winter.

We know from Junior High School that the tilt on axis of Earth is the cause of the 4 seasons, but we rarely are taught the particular details of how this occurs. So I want to make a Experimental Model.

And several Models.

The first model is on a cold wintry day, you have a space heater-- a warm electric heater with grill fins in between and you put your hands between the fins to instantly warm them. Now you have your hand and fingers perpendicular to the grill fins to get the most heat. But now you tilt your fingers and hands and you feel less and less heat.

Now we shift to the AP Model Experiment of the entire Globe of Earth and we use a package of new pencils, of 4 by 4 or 16 pencils in all in a plastic package. We pretend each pencil is a Light Wave from the Sun as heat. Now if those 16 pencils hits directly overhead on Earth would maximize density of 16 and that spot on Earth would be the hottest that day. But now those same 16 heading for a northern latitude on Earth in Winter has to contend with the curvature of Earth itself, but also has to contend with a axis tilt of Earth by 23 degrees. So we have a multitude of variables that we cannot use a simple math of a trigonometry function.

So on the Equator, all 16 pencil tips would hit the Equator with maximum density and all impacts would impart their total energy in the form of heat, and the Equator is really hot in this direct hit. But the polar region in winter, of those 16 pencils as Sun heat Light Waves, how many impact directly? How many impact at an angle?

Hard to believe, but the explanation of why summer and winter is this analysis but also; how Superconductivity works.

Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium<***@gmail.com>
Feb 18, 2024, 10:11:33 PM (22 hours ago)



to Plutonium Atom Universe
AP's Model of why Earth has Winters and Summers, due to Earth as sphere and tilt of axis 23 degrees.

So I get out the box of 16 pencils and pretend they are Sun Light Waves each. When they strike land in the tropics they come in packed maximum density 4 by 4 for a surface area of 16. Now when those same 16 Light Waves strike the Polar Region because the surface of Earth is curved, the curvature of Earth, plus the tilt in axis in winter of 23 degrees we have a different situation where the 16 light waves are spread out and hit Earth in a area of 16 by 16 = 256.

Now let us do this Model in Celsius. A typical tropical temperature would be 25 Celcius. So we have a ratio of this.

256 25Celsius
------- ---------------
16 XCelsius

Solving the ratio we have 256X = 400 Celsius
X the polar temperature is thus 400/256 = 1.5 Celsius, just shy of water freezing.

A similar model relates to the Faraday law as we thrust a bar magnet through a coil. But what if the bar magnet is at a slant to the coil perpendicular? Then we have to factor a fractional electric current production.

Now how does this relate to superconductivity? We see in a capacitor or battery as holding static electric current because the plates are perpendicular to the current held. If we short circuit the battery, all the current rushes out with superconduction, and no loss of electricity. If the capacitor or battery are not perfectly perpendicular then the current inside gradually wear away as internal heat. The cold temperatures needed to create superconductivity is to make all the plates perpendicular. For as the electricity is moving around inside the capacitor or battery it needs to keep hitting the walls perpendicular. Back to the Model, by perpendicular hitting of the walls or bouncing off the walls, all 16 of the Light Waves or electric current monopoles hit the walls as a maximum density of 16, none are thinned out into 256. (Sort of reminds me of Snell's law that the bent light means resistance and loss of electric current.)

More later.....

AP, King of Science
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium<***@gmail.com>
1:33 AM (18 hours ago)



to Plutonium Atom Universe
Superconductivity is much like Snell's law of optics, only with angle of incidence equals angle of reflection of a 90 degree angle in, and 90 degree angle out. Like a mirror reflection where none of the electric waves get absorbed while inside the capacitor or battery. Where roundness is turning into straightline geometry of rectangles. As the waves of electric current keep reflecting off the walls at 90 degrees.

In fact the Snell's law of Old Physics is rather a waste of time to study for although we can see the rays moving in and out of a block of glass to air and vice versa, where Snell's law is really important is Sun Light Waves striking Earth and how much of those waves warm Earth, and how magnetic lines of force in bar magnet thrust through coil in Faraday law goes to making electric current, or how much a battery can store electric current by having the electricity strike the parallel plates at 90 degrees where they are reflected back with no resistance.

So superconductivity is the most important phenomenon of Light Waves striking at 90 degrees in Snell's law. Much like the image in a mirror is 90 degree reflections, energy in equals energy out.

My 270th book of science talks of superconductivity and its prevalence in biology. However I never made a mathematical formula in that book, and hope to by discussing this topic now.

--- quoting my 270th book of science ---


2nd Law of Thermodynamics is connected to Superconductivity-- Explained as New Ohm's Law// Physics research

by Archimedes Plutonium


Preface: When I went to college 1968-72 and studied physics and math, I learned thermodynamics as a major branch of physics. It was only recently in 2023-24 that I began to see a different picture of thermodynamics. That every major band width of the Electromagnetic Spectrum, radio, microwave, infrared, visible light, ultraviolet, soft x-rays, hard x-rays, gamma rays, did the realization come to me that thermodynamics is merely a detailed study of one of those band widths-- infrared band of the EM Spectrum. Up until now, I had thought thermodynamics was a physics study that stood out from other branches of physics. But no, thermodynamics is a minor part of the EM Spectrum. And as much as thermodynamics enjoys its status as a major branch of physics, we must realize, that radio wave band is another branch just as important as thermodynamics infrared band. And the other bands -- microwave, visible, ultraviolet, soft and hard x-rays, gamma rays all should have a branch of physics study as does thermodynamics infrared band.

Cover picture: Is my iphone photograph of a Google search for "Right-Hand-Rule" which very much defines the New Ohm's Law and 2nd law of thermodynamics and expresses the meaning of vector dot product and vector cross product.


Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium<***@gmail.com>
4:36 PM (3 hours ago)



to Plutonium Atom Universe
The mathematical law governing superconductivity is a extremely simple law, one of the most simple in all of physics, perhaps the rock-bottom most simple law of physics-- Snell's law, the law of reflection.

angle theta_1 equals angle theta_2 Law of Reflection

index_1* sine angle theta_1 = index_2* sine angle theta_2 Law of Refraction

When I learned Snell's law in High School Physics, my reaction in my mind was that of "what is all the fuss about"?

When I went to University a year or two later and seeing Snell's law again, my reaction was again-- "And this is a law of physics, seems like it has no meat on its bones, unlike gravity or Coulomb law."

And now I understand why Snell's law is impoverished of meaning, impoverished of depth and meaning. For it is not the full law until you recognize it is missing Superconductivity.

Superconductivity is inside of Snell's laws of Optics, where the sine angle is 90 degrees or its inverse 0 degrees for cosine angle and both come to a value of 1. All the electricity inside a battery or capacitor is released and no electricity is lost to resistance when you multiply by 1.

--- quoting excerpts from a recent book I wrote, my 271st book of science ---
Recalibrating physics units to one another, Calculus derivative, velocity, New Ohm's law // physics-math

by Archimedes Plutonium

Preface: A mystery paradox exists between math calculus and physics, in that math has just 3 dimensions for its maximum geometry description-- which is volume, yet physics maximum description of energy as in kinetic energy has just 2 dimensions of mass times meters^2/seconds^2. This is a paradox if left unresolved. This book aims to solve the mystery so that both physics energy and math volume are both 3rd dimension. And what results in this mystery solving is a recalibration of all the units of physics.


Cover Picture: My photograph of several important Physics units of Linear momentum and its derivative with respect to time is Force, while Angular momentum derivative with respect to time is Energy. Notice especially in this photograph of a computer screen at an angle. For I am able to get what looks like a graphing of what a graph paper looks like. So is this natural in physics optics to be able to retrieve a Graphing Grid System?

Here we are asking what is (B*E) to equal kg*meter^2 /sec^2. Since vector dot product is the same as vector cross product, only difference is where we take the angle, whether cosine or sine of a triangle to get area of two equal triangles that forms a parallelogram.

The direction AP is headed for is to make equal the ultimate units of 3D in geometry is volume making the ultimate units of volts in physics also be 3D.

That unification of volume to voltage requires Volts = current*(B*E) as similar to Volume = Length * Width * Depth.

The way I do that in this book is consider volume as a length of area, the area is width* depth and multiplied by length is volume. For physics, B*E is similar to width*depth and when multiplied the B*E is a parallelogram whose area is two triangles that compose the parallelogram. The area of one of these two triangles follows the formula Area = A cross B (sine angle) while the other complimentary triangle follows Area = A dot B (cosine of compliment angle of sine). So if the sine angle is 30 degrees the compliment angle is 60 degrees for cosine.

What I am heading for is the final units formula of Voltage is Volt = A*(magnetic field * electric field) written as A ((1/A)(meters/sec) * (A)(meters/sec). Which leaves me with Voltage = A(meters^2/seconds^2) a final configuration of energy.

In Geometry, volume is 3D and is the final configuration. In physics we need to end at 3D and be energy, and Voltage = A(meters^2/seconds^2 does just that.

But in New Physics, I need to recalibrate Ampere A and Coulomb C so that this final configuration makes sense.
--- end quoting from my 271st book of science ---

AP, King of Science

Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium<***@gmail.com>
7:44 PM (now)



to Plutonium Atom Universe
Alright I am able to start writing this book the first of a long series of books on Science Experiments and their failures of Logical interpretation and Logical Correctness. I was momentarily stalled because of the issue of a Math Formula for Superconductivity emerged early on. But now I start writing the first of this series.

I am fortunate to find the Math formula that involves Superconductivity while doing this series. And I am sure many new ideas will also pop up in writing this series which may be ten or more books long.

And in doing Superconductivity I found a way of explaining to the young student the difference between electric current and electric field. I know when I was a young student in late 1960s I kept wrestling with what was electric field and electric current. And I was not the only one for my classmates also had this difficulty. By doing various experiments in this series, I can point out to the young reader what that difference is quite clearly and save him/her the agony and turmoil of not knowing.

This series is about the impact and intersection of the science of Logic with the physical sciences-- mostly physics. And it harps back to a long problem that AP has voiced over the Internet sci.math, sci.physics and his own newsgroup of plutonium-atom-universe and in many of AP's published books of science. The obvious under-education of scientists who never took a single formal course in Logic in University. AP recommends a Introduction to Logic and then a full year of Symbolic Logic; thus 2 full years of training by all scientists in logic-- how to think straight and think clearly.

I truly believe if this had happened in physics education starting from Newton and Gilbert onwards-- that they studied Logic-- how to think straight and think clearly, that AP would not have to write a long series of books on how and why physicists- chemists, biologists failed so badly in their experiments and interpretation of their experiments and observations. For example, the 1908-1913 Rutherford-Geiger-Marsden gold leaf foil experiment with the conclusion of a "Atom has a dense small nucleus" would likely never occurred if the three had taken 2 years of logic in University. For all three Rutherford, Geiger, Marsden would have remembered that when cars hit head on with a truck and the cars fly backwards at twice the speed they struck the truck, would have made Rutherford, Geiger, Marsden declare the opposite--- Atoms have no nucleus, and that the incoming alpha particle rammed into a Muon, or muon cluster moving at nearly the speed of light in a opposite direction of incoming alpha particle. Much like the Newton cradle of balls swinging.

And this raises the question of Logic itself, is logic the subject of Clarity. We can call mathematics the subject of precision, but is Logic the subject of clarity?? Both Logic and Mathematics are languages needed by physics. Is clarity the same as precision? So many questions to tackle and wrestle with. So let me start writing the first of this series. My 278th book of science.

AP, King of Science

AP kindly asks Google to let AP run all three, sci.math, sci.physics, PAU as he runs PAU, now--- all pure science, no spam and no govt b.s.

PAU newsgroup is this.
https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe        
Archimedes Plutonium

[Earle]

Post by Archimedes Plutonium
The psychology problem is scientists are so jeolose of AP's acumen, that they refuse to complete their experiment, for their jeolosy wants to deny AP his victory in science, that water is really H4O and not H2O. And Harvard's Dr.Hau would rather deny the AP victory that Light Waves are closed loop circuits, so when Dr. Hau turns out the light source in slow light experiments, all the light goes out--even the slow light simultaneously and proving AP's claim-- light is not a straightline arrow with head and tail, but a closed loop circuit, a pencil ellipse, with source in the circuit.
Psychological analysis of why physicists and chemists cannot finish their experiments -- Water Electrolysis --- Caltech Dr. Goodstein H4O and Harvard Dr. Hau slow light experiment.
Can
Dr.David Goodstein,Dr.Thomas Phillips,
Dr.John Schwarz, Dr.Barry Simon, Dr.Kip Thorne, Dr.Petr Vogel,
Dr.Rochus Vogt, Dr.Ward Whaling, Dr.Michael E. Brown, Dr.Felix Boehm, Dr.Steven Frautschi, can they ever, ever simply weigh the mass of hydrogen and oxygen in water electrolysis, instead of looking at volume, or remain as Earle Jones wrote recently-- rectums of physics???
Dr.Konstantin Batygin, Dr.Frances Arnold (chem), Dr.Barry Barish, Dr.Rudolph Marcus (chem), Dr.Hugh Politzer
the hydrogen and oxygen in Water Electrolysis, for it is unusual that Caltech physics is so shoddy in logical thought as to think of stopping Water Electrolysis by observation of Volume and not weighing the masses.
Volney (CIA) selling CalTech because they cannot do Water Electrolysis properly-- forgetting to actually weigh the mass of hydrogen compared to oxygen, and stop at observing volume. Caltech science is so shoddy of logical reasoning.
Volney Physics failures..CalTech_Dr.David Goodstein,Dr.Frances Arnold (chem), Dr.Barry Barish, Dr.Rudolph Marcus (chem), Dr.Hugh Politzer NSF Dr.Panchanathan,Alejandro Adem, Purdue Univ_France Cordova,
Physics failures..Rensselaer,Dr.Esther A. Wertz,Dr.Heidi Jo Newberg,Dr.Glenn Ciolek,Dr.Charles Martin,Dr.Joseph Darryl Michael,NSF Dr.Panchanathan,Alejandro Adem,Purdue Univ_France Cordova,..
Why Volney?? Because they are so sloppy and slipshod in Physics experiment of Water Electrolysis, stopping and ceasing the experiment before weighing the mass of the hydrogen compared to mass of oxygen. Is it that they are stupid silly thinking volume and mass are the same. For AP needs to prove decisively, if Water is really H4O or H2O. And of course, this experiment would destroy the Standard Model-- that post-diction theory of physics that never gave a single prediction in all of its tenure.
And they even know that a weighing balance of Quartz Crystal MicroBalance has been around since the 1960s, what are they waiting for???
Or is it because they cannot admit the truth of math geometry that slant cut of cone is oval, not ellipse for you need the symmetry of slant cut of cylinder to yield a ellipse.
Re: 2-Looking for a concordance of Dr. Richard Feynmann talking about AP-- on suffering of fools
by Volney 3:57PM, 17Oct2023
This is Volney-Kibo Parry Moroney spam (CIA connected drag net spam b.s.), and no matter how much you report it to Google Abuse-- they cannot kick the miscreant out-- I suggest reporting this spam to your Congress-person. Not only do they stalk you for 30 years but destroy the newsgroup they pollute. Just look at sci.chem which is a destroyed newsgroup. The Google Abuse report only hides the miscreant, but the next day-- new fresh b.s.spam is there.
Kibo Parry Moron-Volney blowing his cover with the CIA in 1997
Re: Archimedes Vanadium, America's most beloved poster
Re: Dan is the Kibo Parry Moroney Volney CIA equivalent for Canada-- using Usenet but destroying newsgroups of science in the process
Volney
3
Dan Christensen using TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS at Univ Western Ontario instead of the fake Old Math calculus with its thousands of rules and memorization of trig functions. New Math has 1 rule-- Power Rule
9:03PM

,
Volney
3
WM using AP's TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS to teach 13-14 year olds CALCULUS, those heading for Gottingen & Uni Berlin for AP reduced Calculus to its most simple form-- add or subtract 1 from exponent.
9:01PM

182b-Volney uses TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS to teach 13-14 year olds CALCULUS, those heading for Berkeley,Caltech, Stanford, for AP reduced Calculus to its most simple form-- add or subtract 1 from exponent.
8:52PM

,
Volney
2
Volney uses TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS to teach 13-14 year olds CALCULUS, those heading for Berkeley,Caltech, Stanford, for AP reduced Calculus to its most simple form-- add or subtract 1 from exponent.
8:45PM

Dan Christensen's profile photo
Dan Christensen
,
Volney
14
unread,
Re: Dr.Terence Tao along with Dr. Gene D.Block fired from UCLA for teaching propaganda -- truth is slant cut of cone is Oval, never the ellipse, yet UCLA continues their propaganda of ellipse as slant cut.
8:43PM

Caltech Physics Dept
Felix Boehm, Steven Frautschi
Murray Gell-Mann, David Goodstein, Thomas Phillips,
John Schwarz, Barry Simon, Kip Thorne, Petr Vogel,
Rochus Vogt, Ward Whaling, Michael E. Brown,
Konstantin Batygin, Dr.Frances Arnold (chem), Dr.Barry Barish, Dr.Rudolph Marcus (chem), Dr.Hugh Politzer
Apparently Kibo realized he was a science failure when he could not even do a proper percentage. But then one has to wonder how much he paid to bribe Rensselaer to graduate from the school in engineering unable to do a percentage properly???? For I certainly would not hire a engineer who cannot even do proper percentage.

Silly boy, that's off by more than 12.6 MeV, or 12% of the mass of a muon.
Hardly "exactly" 9 muons.
Or, 938.2720813/105.6583745 = 8.88024338572. A proton is about the mass
of 8.88 muons, not 9. About 12% short.

Why Volney?? Because they stop short of completing the Water Electrolysis Experiment by only looking at volume, when they are meant to weigh the mass of hydrogen versus oxygen?? Such shoddy minds in experimental physics and chemistry.
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Physics dept Dr.Martin Schmidt (ee), Dr.Ivar Giaever
Vincent Meunier, Ethan Brown, Glenn Ciolek, Julian S. Georg, Joel T. Giedt, Yong Sung Kim, Gyorgy Korniss, Toh-Ming Lu, Charles Martin, Joseph Darryl Michael, Heidi Jo Newberg, Moussa N'Gom, Peter Persans, John Schroeder, Michael Shur, Shawn-Yu Lin, Humberto Terrones, Gwo Ching Wang, Morris A Washington, Esther A. Wertz, Christian M. Wetzel, Ingrid Wilke, Shengbai Zhang
Rensselaer math department
Donald Schwendeman, Jeffrey Banks, Kristin Bennett, Mohamed Boudjelkha, Joseph Ecker, William Henshaw, Isom Herron, Mark H Holmes, David Isaacson, Elizabeth Kam, Ashwani Kapila, Maya Kiehl, Gregor Kovacic, Peter Kramer, Gina Kucinski, Rongjie Lai, Fengyan Li, Chjan Lim, Yuri V Lvov, Harry McLaughlin, John E. Mitchell, Bruce Piper, David A Schmidt, Daniel Stevenson, Yangyang Xu, Bulent Yener, Donald Drew, William Siegmann

Physics minnow

What warning is that Kibo Parry failure of science-- warning that insane persons like Kibo Parry Moroney Volney spends their entire life in a hate-mill, never doing anything in science itself. And paid to stalk hate spew
Kibo Parry Moroney-Volney blowing his cover with the CIA in 1997

Re: Archimedes Vanadium, America's most beloved poster

---quoting Wikipedia ---

Controversy
Many government and university installations blocked, threatened to block, or attempted to shut-down The World's Internet connection until Software Tool & Die was eventually granted permission by the National Science Foundation to provide public Internet access on "an experimental basis."

--- end quote ---

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
Dr. Panchanathan , present day
NSF Dr. Panchanathan, F. Fleming Crim, Dorothy E Aronson, Brian Stone, James S Ulvestad (math), Rebecca Lynn Keiser, Vernon D. Ross, Lloyd Whitman, John J. Veysey (physics), Scott Stanley
France Anne Cordova
Subra Suresh (bioengineer)
Arden Lee Bement Jr. (nuclear engineering)
Rita R. Colwell (microbiology)
Neal Francis Lane
John Howard Gibbons 1993
Barry Shein, kibo parry std world
Jim Frost, Joe "Spike" Ilacqua
Canada-- NSERC , Alejandro Adem (math) , Navdeep Bains, Francois-Philippe Champagne

News starting to come in that AP's Water Electrolysis Experiment proves the true formula of Water is H4O, not H2O is starting to come in.

Aug 30, 2023, 10:19:20PM
to Plutonium Atom Universe
News starting to come in that AP's Water Electrolysis Experiment proves the true formula of Water is H4O, not H2O is starting to come in.
I received a letter today of Experiment results on Water Electrolysis of weighing the hydrogen test tube versus oxygen test tube and the result is 1/4 atomic mass units of Hydrogen compared to Oxygen.
The researcher weighing 1600 micrograms of hydrogen, using a Eisco-Brownlee-Water-Electrolysis Apparatus.
Using sulfuric acid as electrolyte on ultra pure water. Using low voltage DC of 1.5 volts, 1 amp.
I am not surprised that news of the true formula of Water is H4O comes so quickly. For not much in science is more important than knowing the truth of Water. And this means the start of the complete downfall and throwing out the sick Standard Model of Physics, for it is such an insane theory that it cannot get passed the idea of its subatomic particles as stick and ball, with no job, no function, no task. The Standard Model of Physics, is crazy insane physics for it is all postdiction, never prediction. The idea that the hydrogen atom is H2 not H, is because of the prediction of Atom Totality Theory where a atom is a proton torus with muon inside doing the Faraday law and all atoms require at least 1 capacitor. That means the one proton in H2 serves as a neutron to the other proton, storaging the electricity produced by the other proton.
The true Hydrogen Atom is H2 for all atoms need at least one capacitor, and one of the protons in H2 serves as a neutron.
Sad that chemistry and physics throughout the 20th century were too stupid to actually weigh the mass of hydrogen and oxygen in electrolysis, no, the ignorant fools stopped at looking when they saw the volume of hydrogen was twice that of oxygen. A real scientist is not that shoddy and slipshod ignorant, the real scientist then proceeds with -- let us weigh the hydrogen test tube mass versus the oxygen test tube mass.
Thanks for the news!!!!!
AP
News starting to come in that AP's Water Electrolysis Experiment proves the true formula of Water is H4O, not H2O is starting to come in.
There is another experiment that achieves the same result that Water is truly H4O and not H2O, but I suspect this second method is hugely fraught with difficulty.
The prediction of H4O comes from the Physics idea that a Atom is composed, all atoms mind you, is composed of a proton torus with muon/s inside going round and round thrusting through the torus in the Faraday law and producing electricity. So that when you have Hydrogen without a neutron, there is no way to collect the electricity produced by the Faraday law. Think of it as a automobile engine, you cannot have a engine if there is no crank shaft to collect the energy from the thrusting piston inside the crankcase.
Same thing with an Atom, it needs 3 parts-- muon as bar magnet, proton as torus of coils, and a capacitor to storage the produced electricity. If one of those parts is missing, the entity is a Subatomic particle and not a atom.
So, when we have Hydrogen as a proton with muon inside, it is not a Atom, until it has a neutron, or, has another proton of hydrogen H2, then it is a Atom.
So that H2 is not a molecule but a Atom. H alone is a subatomic particle.
Much harder than Water Electrolysis.
We need to get two identical containers.
We need to be able to make pure heavy-water with deuterium. Deuterium is proton + neutron as hydrogen. Proton + proton is H2 as hydrogen.
So we have two identical containers and we fill one with pure heavy water, deuterium water.
We have the second container and we fill it with pure (light) water.
We now weigh both of them.
If AP is correct, that water is really H4O and not H2O, then both containers should weigh almost the same. Only a tiny fraction difference because the neutron is known to be 940MeV versus proton in Old Physics as 938MeV a tiny difference of 2MeV, but we realize we have a huge number of water molecules in the two identical containers.
If water is truly H4O, the weights should be almost the same. If water is H2O, then there is a **large difference** in weights.
But the Water Electrolysis experiment is much easier to conduct and get results.
And, there is the biological processes that apparently cannot distinguish between heavy water and that of regular normal water.
Deuterium Water is the same in biology as is normal regular water. This means that water must be H4O, due to biology as proof.
Deuterium Water in atomic mass units is 16 for the oxygen and 4 for the deuterium.
Regular normal Water in atomic mass units is 16 for the oxygen and 4 for the 4 protons in H4O.
Old Physics and Old Chemistry had regular water as H2O in atomic mass units of 16 oxygen and 2 hydrogen for 2 protons.
If biology functions whether heavy water or normal water all the same, then water itself must be H4O.
Now, there maybe some animal or plant that can separate out heavy water from H4O water???
Searching the literature today for where biology needs as essential deuterium water. And not too surprised that it is a essential requirement in metabolism. In fact one web site listed the need for deuterium more than the need of many minerals and vitamins.
Now tonight I came up with two new exciting experiments to verify that Water is truly H4O and not H2O.
H4O is 4 protons with muons inside the 840MeV proton toruses.
Deuterium water is DOD. And the difference between D2O and H4O is merely the difference of 4MeV for as last reported, neutron = 940MeV and proton (with muon inside) is 938MeV, a difference of 2MeV but for water is 2+2 = 4MeV.
So these two new experiments take advantage of the fact that what we think is normal regular water is actually very close to heavy water of D2O, with only a 4MeV difference.
EXPERIMENT #3 Water layers in still pond of D2O mixed with H4O (what we thought was H2O.
So in this experiment we get a clear glass container and mix H4O with D2O. If Old Physics is correct, the heavy water should sink rapidly in the container while the light water floats to the top rapidly. And we have some sort of beam of photons that can distinguish D2O from H4O (thought of as H2O. We obtain pure D2O and pure H4O each filling 1/2 of the container. We stir and mix them. And then we observe with the EM beam for separation. If the light water is truly H4O, it takes a long time for the D2O to be on bottom and H4O on top. We measure the time of a settled container and determine this time from the theoretical 4MeV difference should take a long time, whereas if Old Physics is correct, the separation would be almost instantly and quick time.
EXPERIMENT #4 also plays on this minor difference of 4MeV. We devise a sort of squirt gun for D2O and a identical squirt gun for H4O (what we call H2O). We put pure D2O in one squirt gun and the H40 or light water in the other squirt gun. Both guns forcing the water a certain distance.
If AP is correct that light water is really H4O and not H2O as we squirt both guns, where the water lands should be almost the same distance considering H4O is only 4MeV apart from D2O.
If Old Physics and Old Chemistry is correct, then D2O water is 940 + 940 = 1880MeV apart from light water of H2O, and H4O is only 4MeV apart.
So where the squirt gun lands the D2O is a very much shorter distance than a H2O land, but a H4 land distance is nearly the same as the D2O land.
These two experiments are very exciting and would be a very nice confirming evidence to Water Electrolysis actual weighing the mass in atomic mass units.

Searching the literature today for where biology needs as essential deuterium water. And not too surprised that it is a essential requirement in metabolism. In fact one web site listed the need for deuterium more than the need of many minerals and vitamins.
Now tonight I came up with two new exciting experiments to verify that Water is truly H4O and not H2O.
H4O is 4 protons with muons inside the 840MeV proton toruses.
Deuterium water is DOD. And the difference between D2O and H4O is merely the difference of 4MeV for as last reported, neutron = 940MeV and proton (with muon inside) is 938MeV, a difference of 2MeV but for water is 2+2 = 4MeV.
So these two new experiments take advantage of the fact that what we think is normal regular water is actually very close to heavy water of D2O, with only a 4MeV difference.
EXPERIMENT #3 Water layers in still pond of D2O mixed with H4O (what we thought was H2O.
So in this experiment we get a clear glass container and mix H4O with D2O. If Old Physics is correct, the heavy water should sink rapidly in the container while the light water floats to the top rapidly. And we have some sort of beam of photons that can distinguish D2O from H4O (thought of as H2O. We obtain pure D2O and pure H4O each filling 1/2 of the container. We stir and mix them. And then we observe with the EM beam for separation. If the light water is truly H4O, it takes a long time for the D2O to be on bottom and H4O on top. We measure the time of a settled container and determine this time from the theoretical 4MeV difference should take a long time, whereas if Old Physics is correct, the separation would be almost instantly and quick time.

Apparently this Experiment is already done and called for-- There is Uniform Distribution of heavy water Deuterium Water in the Oceans, Lakes, Ponds, Streams and Rivers. Heavy Water is not layered in the oceans or lakes or ponds or streams or rivers. Uniformity means that the difference between D2O and H4O is so slight of a difference (only 4MeV, compared to 1880MeV for H2O, that Brownian motion keeps the D2O and H4O in a Uniform Distribution in all bodies of water. I was going through the research literature today and find that scientists discover Uniformity of Distribution of deuterium water. This thus closes the case on Water, for uniformity of distribution of D2O implies that Water is itself H4O and not H2O.

My 250th published book.

TEACHING TRUE CHEMISTRY; H2 is the hydrogen Atom and water is H4O, not H2O// Chemistry
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) (Amazon's Kindle)
Prologue: This textbook is 1/2 research history and 1/2 factual textbook combined as one textbook. For many of the experiments described here-in have not yet been performed, such as water is really H4O not H2O. Written in a style of history research with date-time markers, and fact telling. And there are no problem sets. This book is intended for 1st year college. Until I include problem sets and exercises, I leave it to the professor and instructor to provide such. And also, chemistry is hugely a laboratory science, even more so than physics, so a first year college student in the lab to test whether Water is really H4O and not H2O is mighty educational.
Preface: This is my 250th book of science, and the first of my textbooks on Teaching True Chemistry. I have completed the Teaching True Physics and the Teaching True Mathematics textbook series. But had not yet started on a Teaching True Chemistry textbook series. What got me started on this project is the fact that no chemistry textbook had the correct formula for water which is actually H4O and not H2O. Leaving the true formula for hydroxyl groups as H2O and not OH. But none of this is possible in Old Chemistry, Old Physics where they had do-nothing subatomic particles that sit around and do nothing or go whizzing around the outside of balls in a nucleus, in a mindless circling. Once every subatomic particle has a job, task, function, then water cannot be H2O but rather H4O. And a hydrogen atom cannot be H alone but is actually H2. H2 is not a molecule of hydrogen but a full fledged Atom, a single atom of hydrogen.
Cover Picture: Sorry for the crude sketch work but chemistry and physics students are going to have to learn to make such sketches in a minute or less. Just as they make Lewis diagrams or ball & stick diagrams. My 4-5 minute sketch-work of the Water molecule H4O plus the subatomic particle H, and the hydrogen atom H2. Showing how one H is a proton torus with muon inside (blue color) doing the Faraday law. Protons are toruses with many windings. Protons are the coils in Faraday law while muons are the bar magnets. Neutrons are the capacitors as parallel plates, the outer skin cover of atoms.
Product details
ASIN : B0CCLPTBDG
Publication date : July 21, 2023
Language : English
File size : 788 KB
Text-to-Speech : Enabled
Screen Reader : Supported
Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
X-Ray : Not Enabled
Word Wise : Enabled
Sticky notes : On Kindle Scribe
Print length : 168 pages

Caltech & Rensselaer Polytech do only slipshod physics-chemistry experiments of Water Electrolysis, too dumb to weigh the hydrogen & oxygen to see if H4O or H2O

AP kindly asks Google to let AP run all three, sci.math, sci.physics, PAU as he runs PAU, now--- all pure science, no spam and no govt b.s.
PAU newsgroup is this.
https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe
Archimedes Plutonium