On Wednesday, September 27, 2017 at 11:27:53 PM
tirsdag 26. september 2017 11.14.18 UTC+2 skrev
On Sunday, September 24, 2017 at 7:17:00 PM
On Thursday, November 24, 2016 at 5:50:05 PM
Post by bassam king karzeddinWhy it is impossible to find a single
primitive Pythagorean triplet (in positive integers)
being with all terms as powerful numbers?
Just imagine how little and how so tiny and
how unnoticeable is the world of mathematicians for
sure
A new theorem had been stated since a long
time, not a single professional historian could claim
older sources nor a single genius mathematician could
also refute it, but still, doesn't count to be
adopted by any mathematical establishment, especially
that it is published in a Usenet as sci.math
As if the word publish means only in a
Journals, (not learning any lesson from
the history)
But just imagine if this (half line theorem
without a single mathematical notation) was announced
by a top known genius mathematician or an alleged top
(Journal or University), then how the mathematical
press would immediately act with so much music and so
many analysis with especially those many so
professional talents that acquire very long tongues
and deepest throats (that are good for something
else)
So where are they hiding now from this
simplest challenge? wonder!
Don't we live in an era of supercomputers
also? wonder!
I also announced a modest prize for you genius
mathematicians
Is it your so negligible and so unnoticeable
dignity that make you pretend to be deaf and so
blind? wonder!
Or is it the inherited dishonesty that the
vast majority of the professional mathematicians
acquire? no wonder!
Aren't you so shameful of your little
self-being as real traitors to the science that
feeds, drinks, and cloths you? wonder!
Or is it that your inferiority complex that
makes you have hated a lot of real challenges for the
sake of making easy baseless maths based on
non-existing concepts as many as here (infinities,
epsilon, delta, Approximations, famous meaningless
cut, Average, endless sequences, ...etc), wonder!
So, if this is the case then you really don't
need to worry at all, because you are dancing alone
in the dark
And just imagine the football world where a
little boy only scores a goal of a win in a
competitive football match, then see how the whole
world first-page coloured photos in newspapers, in
the world press, in every TV station, ... etc
Just compare yourself and certainly, you would
find yourself facing a mirror mathematicians, but
wait and don't break the mirror...
And I was only comparing you with a class of
another little category, and there are much higher
categories for sure
But why all this is happening with a class of
people who generally think that they were born genius
and very distinct from others, but the fact is really
shocking, but why?
It is because mathematicians had been deceived
and upset-minded for so many centuries by now for the
sake of worshipping some few devils that mislead them
globally, otherwise, if true mathematicians are
sufficient number, then they would never accept to be
less than the top leaders of this mad world that are
generally governed by mad people who can't even
comprehend a simplest theorem like the Pythagorean
even you assign the best teachers for them for all
their lives, and they will destroy the world over
your heads for sure
Just look and listen carefully around, but
those helpless wouldn't change their inevitable
destiny unless they learn the biggest unforgottable
lesson for sure
BKK
And observe carefully here the complete absence
in this thread of few well-known TROLLS (at least in
sci.math – Google) as (Dan, Jan, Markus, Zelos, … and
other so strange forgotten creatures), where at the
same time they, they usually do appear very often in
my other threads in many much less talkative topics
than real challenging mathematics as number theory
where generally any mathematician can say repeatedly
anything that he learnt blindly from books
I really wonder about those incomprehensible
characters
And I know that they would run away and hide
immediately once they read the first line, and not
because they don’t understand any big issue in
mathematics, but certainly because they have no word
to add here, and they would be so glad if anyone
could prove me wrong, and they would immediately
appear in this case
But here in such area, there isn’t any hope for
anyone to turn it down (for sure)
And not because that I can’t prove it, of
course, I can and (so easily), but my real intention
is to make my Theorems (which seem only as
Conjectures for you all) as a suitable and permanent
curse and real punishment for such common typo
mathematicians in the era of free word internet
publishing, which will soon invade and throw away the
official traditional publishing as peer-reviewed
Noting that, if the well-known Euler’s (sum of
powers wrong conjecture) was only announced today
then most likely it will be refuted in the same day
mainly due to computer engineers and mathematicians
programmers, but that actually took few centuries to
be refuted
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euler%27s_sum_of_powers_
conjecture
I also challenge all those (themselves) called
world Peer-reviewed (Top Journals and Universities)
to prove me wrong in any of my PUBLISHED theorems
In fact, I want to make a great fun of them
mainly for school students and another
non-professional-mathematicians, especially for
footballers and in the best area they feel so proud
(for sure)
Regards
Bassam King Karzeddin
Sep. 26, 2017
The answer is so easy that non here has thought you
were serious. It is not solved. If you have a
solution; give it.
KON
So, it is unsolved problem, and I don't know truly
y why one shouldn't be serious here
And if it isn't a truly unsolvable problem, then why
y the mathematical establishments announce it so as
an unsolvable problem in number theory? wonder!
Or is it that they consider sci.math as a SH*T
T source or a reference for mathematical problems?
wonder!
Then, they should have to get ready for a stage
e where a reference or a source may be also
considered from any SH*TY reference or any rubbish
source as here for example as long as it contains
challenging problems (with documented dates that no
one on earth could solve it yet)
Or maybe they would think about it once they
y deliberately conclude it from any future fabricated
old references from an alleged reputable source, as
usual, especially if they truly could solve it,
wonder!
Isn't so strange that people came to know about so
o many others who wrote only notes for themselves in
much older centuries, whereas something PUBLISHED
REPEATEDLY to the whole WOLRD and so freely nowadays
goes unnoticeable? wonder!
Also, I wouldn't be stingy with you mathematicians
s by not showing you the solution, but I would prefer
giving a big hint to it from my PUBLISHED and well
documented and also irrefutable formula (certified by
others) for the real number (r), for (x^r + y^r =
z^r), where (x, y, z) are distinct positive integers,
And don't pretend that you didn't see my formula
a that was announced repeatedly and in other sites
too
However, the formula was done (in 1990) by the
e formal mathematical analysis that mathematicians
usually are familiar
BKK